Earmuff efficacy in the workplace using F-MIRE – a case report

References

• Neves EB, Soalheiro M. A proteção auditiva utilizada pelos militares do Exército Brasileiro: há efetividade? [Hearing protection used by the military of the Brazilian Army: is it effective?]. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2010;15(3):889–898. Portuguese. doi: 10.1590/S1413-81232010000300032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). American national standard methods for the measuring the real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. Washington (DC): ANSI; 1997. Standard No. ANSI S12.6:1997 (B).
   Google Scholar
• Gerges SNY. Ruído, fundamentos e controle [Noise, fundamentals and control]. 2nd ed. Florianópolis (SC): Federal University of Santa Catarina; 2000. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Berger EH. Introducing F-MIRE testing: background and concepts. Indianapolis (IN): EAR/Aearo Technologies, EARCAL Laboratory; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Nélisse H, Le Cocq C, Boutin J, et al. Systematic evaluation of the relationship between physical and psychoacoustical measurements of hearing protectors’ attenuation. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2015;12(12):829–844. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1053893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization (ISO). Acoustics – hearing protectors. Geneva: ISO; 1994. Standard No. ISO 4869-2:1994.
   Google Scholar
• Donoghue AM, Frisch N, Dixon-Ernst C, et al. Hearing conservation in the primary aluminium industry. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66:208–214. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casali JG, Park MY. Laboratory versus field attenuation of selected hearing protectors. J Sound Vib. 1991;25:28–38.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization (ISO). Acoustics – determination of sound immissions from sound sources placed closed to the ears – part 1: technique using microphones in real ears (MIRE-technique). Geneva: ISO; 2000. Standard No. ISO 11904-1:2000.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electroacoustics – specifications for personal sound exposure meters. Geneva: IEC; 1993. Standard No. IEC 61252:1993.
   Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Electroacoustics sound level meters. Geneva: IEC; 2002. Standard No. IEC 61672:2002.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specification for personal noise dosimeters. Washington (DC): ANSI; 1991. Standard No. ANSI S1.25:1991.
   Google Scholar
• Santos I, Colella-Santos MF, Couto CM. Pressão sonora gerada por equipamentos sonoros portáteis individuais [Sound pressure level generated by individual portable sound equipment]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80(1):41–47. Portuguese. doi: 10.5935/1808-8694.20140010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer S, Doutres O, Sgard F, et al. Objective assessment of the sound paths through earmuff components. Appl Acoust. 2014;83:76–85. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel JA, Broughton K. Assessment of the noise exposure of call centre operators. Ann Occup Hyg. 2002;46(8):653–661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casali JG, Grenell JF. An exploratory study of moderate physical activity and selected design attribute effects on earmuff attenuation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1989;50(9):480–485. doi: 10.1080/15298668991375029
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pääkkönen R. Effects of cup, cushion, band force, foam lining and various design parameters on the attenuation of earmuffs. Noise Control Eng J. 1992;38(2):59–65. doi: 10.3397/1.2827806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson WA, Wierner FW. In search of the missing 6 dB. J Acoust Soc Am. 1952;24:498–501. doi: 10.1121/1.1906927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson CMB, Whittle LS. Physiological noise and the missing 6 dB. Acustica. 1971;24:261–272.
   Google Scholar
• Berger EH, Kerivan JE. Influence of physiological noise and the occlusion effect on the measurement of real-ear attenuation at threshold. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;74:81–94. doi: 10.1121/1.389621
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida-Agurto D, Gerges SNY, Arenas JP. MIRE-IL methodology applied to measuring the noise attenuation of earmuff hearing protectors. Appl Acoust. 2011;72:451–457. doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy WJ, Byrne DC, Gauger D, et al. Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health – U.S. Environmental Protection Agency interlaboratory comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 methods A and B. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009;125:3262–3277. doi: 10.1121/1.3095803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger EH, Franks JR, Lindgren F. International review of field studies of hearing protector attenuation. In: Axelsson A, Borchgrevink HM, Hamernik RP, editors. Scientific basis of noise-induced hearing loss. New York (NY): Thieme Medical; 1996. p. 361–377.
   Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. In search of the bone-conduction threshold in a free sound field. J Acoust Soc Am. 1957;29:795–804. doi: 10.1121/1.1909058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger EH. Methods of measuring the attenuation of hearing protection devices. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986;79:1655–1687. doi: 10.1121/1.393228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyrba P, Dantscher S, Fritsch T, et al. Comparison of different measurement systems for the assessment of the individual noise attenuation of earplugs. Lärmbekämpfung Bd. 2014;9(6):255–265.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH Compendium Calculation [Internet]. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [cited 2017 May 1]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/noise/hpdcomp/pdfs/calculation.pdf
   Google Scholar