Occupational noise-induced hearing loss in South African large-scale mines: exploring hearing conservation programmes as complex interventions embedded in a realist approach

References

• Mine Health and Safety Act (No. 29 of 1996). Government Gazette. 1996;372(17242).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards AL, Kritzinger D. Noise-induced hearing loss milestones: past and future. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2012;112:865–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC). The road to zero harm – new milestones. In: Proceedings of the 10th Anniversary of the 2003 Occupational Health and Safety; 2014 Nov 19–20; Midrand, South Africa. Woodmead: MHSC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Booyens Y. Noise induced hearing loss worrying – CoM. Creamer Media: Mining Weekly [Internet]. 2013, May 17 [cited 2016 Apr 29]. Available from: http://www.miningweekly.com/article/noise-induced-hearing-loss-worrying-com-2013-05-20.
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, Hutchinson A, et al. Realist synthesis: illustrating the method for implementation research. Implement Sci. 2012;7(33):1–10. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-33
   Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, McCormack B, DeCorby K, et al. Realist synthesis: method and examples. In: Gerrish K and Lacey A, editors. The research process in nursing. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2010. p. 1--10.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist review – a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005;10(1):21–34. doi: 10.1258/1355819054308530
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawson R. Evidence-based policy. A realist perspective. London (UK): SAGE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper C, Lhussier M, Shucksmith J, et al. Protocol for a realist review of complex interventions to prevent adolescents from engaging in multiple risk behaviours. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015477. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher A, Jamal F, Moore G, et al. Realist complex intervention science: applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Evaluation (Lond). 2016;22(3):286–303. doi: 10.1177/1356389016652743
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willis CD, Riley BL, Stockton L, et al. Scaling up complex interventions: insights from a realist synthesis. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(88):1–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg RC, Nanavati J. Realist review: current practice and future prospects. J Res Pract. 2016;12(1):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirst M, O’Campo P. Realist review methods for complex health problems. In: O’Campo P, Dunn J, editors. Rethinking social epidemiology. Cham: Springer; 2012. p. 231–245.
   Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council (MRC). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London (UK): MRC; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Datta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(568):1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shendell DG, Barnett C, Boese S. Science-based recommendations to prevent or reduce potential exposure to biological, chemical, and physical agents in schools. J Sch Health. 2004;74(10):390–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb06603.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delecrode CR, et al. Prevalence of tinnitus in workers exposed to noise and organophosphates. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(3):328–334.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omer Ahmed H. Noise exposure, awareness, practice and noise annoyance among steel workers in United Arab Emirates. Open Public Health J. 2012;5:28–35. doi: 10.2174/1874944501205010028
   Google Scholar
• Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325–1332. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiell A, Hawe P, Gold L. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ. 2008;336(7656):1281–1283. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39569.510521.AD
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colorafi KJ, Evans B. Qualitative descriptive methods in health science research. Health Environ Res Des J. 2016;9(4):16–25. doi: 10.1177/1937586715614171
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health. 2010;33:77–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. Am J Theor Appl Stat. 2016;5(1):1–4. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Stanton DW. Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Safety and Health in the Mining Industry. South Afr OHS Comm. 2003;1(1):1–192.
   Google Scholar
• Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC). South African mining industry journey to zero harm 2003–2013. Woodmead: Mine Health and Safety Council; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• South African Society of Occupational Medicine (SASOM). Audiometry in the work place. Pretoria: SASOM; 2011. (SASOM guideline; 29).
   Google Scholar
• Occupational health and safety act, 1993. Noise induced hearing loss regulations. Government Gazette. 2003;(24967):318–327.
   Google Scholar
• Mine Health and Safety Inspectorate. Guideline for the compilation of a mandatory code of practice for an occupational health programme (occupational hygiene and medical surveillance) for noise. Pretoria: Department of Minerals and Energy; 2003. ( DME 16/3/2/4-A3).
   Google Scholar
• de W Oosthuizen S. Guidelines for hearing conservation programmes. Bloemfontein: Provincial Occupational Health Unit; 2006. p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC). Every mine worker returning from work unharmed every day: striving for zero harm. In: Proceedings of the 10th anniversary of the 2003 Occupational Health and Safety milestones; 2014 Nov 19–20; Midrand, South Africa. Woodmead: MHSC; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards AL, Milanzi LA, Khoza NN, et al. Evaluation of the current practices of noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) awareness training in the South African mining industry. Occup Health South Afr. 2015;21(1):11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gumede H, Blomerus K, Coutts D, et al. Strategy towards a mining industry-wide buy-and-maintain quiet initiative to reduce noise induced hearing loss. J South Afr Inst Min Metallurgy. 2014;114:923–928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntlhakana L, Kanji A, Khoza-Shangase K. The use of hearing protection devices in South Africa: exploring the current status in a gold and a non-ferrous mine. Occup Health South Afr. 2015;21(2):10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp RJ. A personal approach to hearing conservation: the key to effective second-level noise control. South Afr J Ind Eng. 2008;19(1):215–229.
   Google Scholar
• Amedofu GK. Effectiveness of hearing conservation program at a large surface gold mining company in Ghana. Afr J Health Sci. 2007;14:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mutara G, Mutanana N. An analysis of a hearing conservation programme (HCP) at a mining company in Zimbabwe. J Biol Agric Healthcare. 2015;5(12);51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp RJ. A six sigma-based management model to eliminate the noise-induced hearing loss pandemic in South African mines. South Afr Bus Rev. 2007;11:104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Rashaad Hansia M, Dickinson D. Hearing protection device usage at a South African gold mine. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60(1):72–74. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger NDL, von Wielligh AJ, de Wet PR, et al. Design and development of a low noise rockdrill. J South Afr Inst Min Metall. 2004;104(7):403–410.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson M. How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open. 2016;2:8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labuschagne A. Qualitative research: airy fairy or fundamental? Qual Rep. 2003;8(1):100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown I, Bradley A, Ng CJ, et al. Investigating active ingredients in a complex intervention: a nested study within the Patient and Decision Aids (PANDAs) randomised controlled trial for people with type 2 diabetes. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:347. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawe P. Lessons from complex interventions to improve health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2015;36(1):307–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031912-114421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine Health and Safety Council (MHSC). The health and safety summit: the road to zero harm – new milestones. Johannesburg: MHSC; 2014. p. 1–92.
   Google Scholar
• Holmboe ES. Competency-based medical education and the ghost of Kuhn: reflections on the messy and meaningful work of transformation. Acad Med. 2018;93(3):350–353. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvam R. Meaningful stakeholder consultation. Washington (DC): Inter-American Development Bank (IDB); 2017. (IDB monograph; 545)
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran SS, Ahmad MS, Mostafa S, et al. Cross-fertilization of ideas in collective intelligence model (CIM). In: 2nd International Symposium on Agent, Multi-Agent Systems and Robotics (ISAMSR); 2016 Aug 23–24; Bangi, Malaysia. Piscataway (NJ): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2017. p. 27–33.
   Google Scholar