A model to predict and optimize machine guarding operator compliance activities in a bottling process plant: a developing country experience

References

• Uzor C, Oke S, Okolie S. Sensitivity analysis on a variant machine guard compliance productivity model (VMGPEM) for a bottling plant using the OFAT technique. International Conference on Engineering for a Sustainable World (ICESW 2018); IOP Conf Series: Mat Sci Eng. 2018;413:1–5. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/413/1/012074
   Google Scholar
• Booth RT, Thompson D. Anthropometry and machinery guarding: an investigation into forced reach over barriers and through opening: part I. Reach over barriers. J Occup Accid. 1980;3(1):45–56. doi: 10.1016/0376-6349(80)90015-2
   Google Scholar
• Parker DL, Brosseau LM, Samant Y, et al. A randomized, controlled intervention of machine guarding and related safety programs in small metal-fabrication businesses. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:90–100. doi: 10.1177/00333549091244S111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DL, Yamin SC, Brosseau LM, et al. National Machine Guarding Program: part 1. Machine safeguarding practices in small metal fabrication businesses. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58:1174–1183. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DL, Yamin SC, Brosseau LM, et al. National Machine Guarding Program: part 2. Safety management in small metal fabrication enterprises. Am J Ind Med. 2015;58:1184–1193. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzor C, Oke S, Okolie S. An alternate productivity evaluation practice to depict machine guarding performance in a process plant. International Conference on Engineering for a Sustainable World (ICESW 2018); IOP conf Series: Mat Sci Eng. 2018;413:1–5. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/413/1/012075
   Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardization (DIN). Safety design of technical equipment, safety devices, definitions, safety distances for adults and children. Berlin: DIN; 1976. Standard No. DIN 31 001:1976.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). Machinery and machine guarding: general requirements for all machines. Washington (DC): OSHA; 1973. Standard No. OSHA 1910.212:1973.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Safety requirements for injection molding machines. Washington (DC): ANSI; 2017. Standard No. ANSI B151.1:2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt B. Machine guard improvements. Concr Prod. 2001;104(9):29.
   Google Scholar
• Soranno C. Five serious machine guarding problems. Prof Saf. 2012;57(2):64–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinger J, Hamilton J. Machine guard guidelines. Wood Wood Prod. 2013;118(2):18.
   Google Scholar
• Cordier PJ. Machine guarding remains a safety concern. Pulp Pap. 2006;80(3):27.
   Google Scholar
• Berke L. Safe but slow: how long till operators remove the guard? Mach Des. 2008;80(20):40.
   Google Scholar
• Peabody J. The do’s and don’ts of fixed and moveable machine guards. Today. 2012;5(1):39.
   Google Scholar
• Mewes D, Mewes O, Herbst P. Impact resistance of guards on grinding machines. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2011;17(4):411–421. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2011.11076904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyes MA, King GW, Miller GG. Wireless machine guard monitoring system. In: 2012 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting: 47th IAS Annual Meeting, Oct 7–11, Las Vegas, NV. Piscataway (NJ): Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2012. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Munshi KI, Parker D, Samant Y, et al. Machine safety evaluation in small metal working facilities: an evaluation of inter-rater reliability in the quantification of machine-related hazards. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(5):381–388. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gańczak MI. Bezpieczny sprzęt w zapobieganiu zakłuciom wśród personelu medycznego [Safe equipment to prevent injuries in medical staff]. Med Pr. 2007;58(1):13–17. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Martin KJ. Machine safety: proper safeguarding techniques. AAOHN J. 1992;40(6):279–283.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruff TI, Coleman P, Martini L. Machine-related injuries in the US mining industry and priorities for safety research. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2011;18(1):11–20. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2010.487154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mewes DI, Trapp R-P. Impact resistance of materials for guards on cutting machine tools – requirements in future European safety standards. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2000;6(4):507–520. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2000.11076469
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jiang BC, Lio AYH, Suresh N, et al. An evaluation of machine guarding techniques for robot guarding. Rob Auton Syst. 1991;7(4):299–308. doi: 10.1016/0921-8890(91)90061-O
   Google Scholar
• Vaillancourt DR, Snook SH. A review of machine-guarding recommendations. Appl Ergon. 1995;26(2):141–145. doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(95)00011-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin S, Parker D, Brosseau L, et al. National Machine Guarding Program: design of a machine safety intervention. Saf Sci Mon. 2014;18(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Backström T, Döös M. Problems with machine safeguards in automated installations. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(6):573–585. doi: 10.1016/S0169-8141(99)00044-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westkämper E. Towards the re-industrialization of Europe: a concept for manufacturing for 2030. Berlin: Springer; 2014. Chapter 3, Manufacturing the backbone of the European economy; p. 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Herman E. The importance of the manufacturing sector in the Romanian economy. Procedia Tech. 2016;22:976–983. doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.121
   Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Identifying the human factors associated with the defeating of interlocks on Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machines. Buxton: HSE; 2013. (Research report; RR974).
   Google Scholar
• Dźwiarek M. Basic principles for protective equipment application. In: Koradecka D, editor. Handbook of occupational safety and health. Boca Raton (FL): CRC; 2010. p. 579–592.
   Google Scholar
• Dźwiarek M, Latała A. Analysis of occupational accidents: prevention through the use of additional technical safety measures for machinery. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(2):186–192. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1129154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüken K, Pardon H, Windemuth D. Bypassing and defeating protective devices of machines – a multidimensional problem. INRS – Ind Hyg Saf. 2006;4:55–58.
   Google Scholar
• German Social Accident Insurance (IFA). Effects of vibration at workplaces – characteristics values of hand-arm and whole-body vibration. Sankt Augustin: IFA; 2010. (IFA report; 6/2006e). Available from: https://www.dguv.de/medien/ifa/en/pub/rep/pdf/rep05/biar0606/6_2006e.pdfhttps://www.dguv.de/medien/ifa/en/pub/rep/pdf/rep05/biar0606/6_2006e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ayomoh MKO, Oke SA. A framework for measuring safety level for production environments. Saf Sci. 2006;44:221–239. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyegiri IE, Oke SA. An analytical hierarchical approach to building airline safety management systems. Erzincan Univ J Sci Technol. 2016;9(3):147–163.
   Google Scholar
• Onyegiri IE, Oke SA. Applying decision trial and evaluation laboratory as a decision tool for effective safety management system in aviation transport. KKU Eng J. 2016;43(4):166–171.
   Google Scholar
• Onyegiri IE, Oke SA. A grey relational analytical approach to safety performance assessment in an aviation industry in the developing country. Eng Appl Sci Res. 2017;44(1):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Radhika N, Subramanian R, Prasat SV. Tribological behaviour of aluminium/alumina/graphite hybrid metal matrix composite using Taguchi’s techniques. J Miner Mater Charact Eng. 2011;10(5):427–443.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton JM. Galton, Pearson and the peas: a brief history of linear regression for statistics instructors. J Stats Ed. 2001;9(3):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2001.11910537
   Google Scholar
• Schneider K, Nurre SG. A multi-criteria vehicle routing approach to improve compliance audit schedule for food banks. Omega. 2018;000:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.05.002
   Google Scholar