Determining optimum seat depth using comfort and discomfort assessments

References

• Therisa K, Sony M. Enhancing impact of ergonomics in educational institutions: theoretical foundations and practical viewpoints. Int J Proc Manage Benchmarking. 2016;6(2):133–146.
   Google Scholar
• Todd AI, Bennett AI, Christie CJ. Physical implications of prolonged sitting in a confined posture – a literature review. Ergon SA J Ergon Soc SA. 2007;19(2):7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Knight G, Noyes J. Children’s behaviour and the design of school furniture. Ergonomics. 1999;42(5):747–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcells C, Stommel M, Hubbard RP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: empirical findings and health implications. J Adolesc Health. 1999;24(4):265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Karimi MA, Hashemi AA, et al. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Appl Ergon. 2013;44(1):101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baharampour S, Nazari J, Dianat I, et al. Student’s body dimensions in relation to classroom furniture. Health Promot Perspect. 2013;3(2):165–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goonetilleke RS, Feizhou S. A methodology to determine the optimum seat depth. Int J Ind Ergon. 2001;27(4):207–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers-Carnahan R, Carnahan T, Tallis-Crump R, et al. User perspectives on seat design. J Commer Veh. 1995;104(2):805–810.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta C, Tewari V. Seating discomfort for tractor operators – a critical review. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;25(6):661–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moes N. Analysis of sitting discomfort, a review. Contemp Ergon. 2005;2005:200–204.
   Google Scholar
• van Dieën JH, Kingma I, Van der Bug J. Evidence for a role of antagonistic cocontraction in controlling trunk stiffness during lifting. J Biomech. 2003;36(12):1829–1836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaderi E, Maleki A, Dianat I. Design of combine harvester seat based on anthropometric data of Iranian operators. Int J Ind Ergon. 2014;44(6):810–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Molenbroek J, Castellucci HI. A review of the methodology and applications of anthropometry in ergonomics and product design. Ergonomics. 2018:[25 p.]. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2018.1502817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolich M, White P. Reliability and validity of a long term survey for automobile seat comfort. Int J Veh Design. 2004;34(2):158–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenesteijn L, Vink P, de Looze M, et al. Effects of differences in office chair controls, seat and backrest angle design in relation to tasks. Appl Ergon. 2009;40(3):362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziefle M. Sitting posture, postural discomfort, and visual performance: a critical view on the interdependence of cognitive and anthropometric factors in the VDU workplace. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2003;9(4):503–514. doi:10.1080/10803548.2003.11076586
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Helander MG, Drury CG. Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Hum Factors. 1996;38(3):377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Looze MP, Kuijt-Evers LF, Van Dieen J. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics. 2003;46(10):985–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemp R, Taylor WR, Lorenzetti S. Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review. Appl Ergon. 2015;48:273–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helander MG, Zhang L. Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics. 1997;40(9):895–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overbeeke K, Djadjadiningrat T, Hummels C, et al. Beauty in usability: forget about ease of use. In: Green WS, Jordan PW, editors. Pleasure with products: beyond usability. London: Taylor & Francis; 2002. p. 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Kyung G, Nussbaum MA. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. Int J Ind Ergon. 2008;38(5):526–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamberg-van Reenen HH, van der Beek AJ, Blatter BM, et al. Does musculoskeletal discomfort at work predict future musculoskeletal pain? Ergonomics. 2008;51(5):637–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller GF, Hassenzahl M. Sitting comfort of ergonomic office chairs – developed versus intuitive evaluation. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2010;16(3):369–374. doi:10.1080/10803548.2010.11076853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosario H, Porcar R, López-Tores M, et al. Has backrest height any effect on user back mobility and comfort. In: Pikaar RN, Koningsveld EAP, Settels PJM, editors. Proceedings of the 16th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, Maastricht, The Netherlands [CD-ROM]. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006. art0431.
   Google Scholar
• Hernandez L, Alhemood A, Genaidy AM, et al. Evaluation of different scales for measurement of perceived physical strain during performance of manual tasks. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2002;8(4):413–432. doi:10.1080/10803548.2002.11076545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zenk R, Franz M, Bubb H, et al. Technical note: spine loading in automotive seating. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellegast RP, Kraft K, Groenesteijn L, et al. Comparison of four specific dynamic office chairs with a conventional office chair: impact upon muscle activation, physical activity and posture. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):296–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamp I. The influence of car-seat design on its character experience. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):329–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenesteijn L, Hiemstra-van Mastrigt S, Gallais C, et al. Activities, postures and comfort perception of train passengers as input for train seat design. Ergonomics. 2014;57(8):1154–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijt-Evers L, Bosch T, Huysmans M, et al. Association between objective and subjective measurements of comfort and discomfort in hand tools. Appl Ergon. 2007;38(5):643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DR, Andrews DM, Wawrow PT. Development and evaluation of the automotive seating discomfort questionnaire (ASDQ). Int J Ind Ergon. 2006;36(2):141–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheasant S. Ergonomics, work and health. London: Macmillan; 1991.
   Google Scholar