Development and evaluation of context-based assessment system for visualization-enhanced construction safety education

References

• Horta IM, Camanho AS, Johnes J, et al. Performance trends in the construction industry worldwide: an overview of the turn of the century. J Prod Anal. 2013;39(1):89–99. doi: 10.1007/s11123-012-0276-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le QT, Lee DY, Park CS. A social network system for sharing construction safety and health knowledge. Automat Constr. 2014;46:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedro A, Le QT, Park CS. Framework for integrating safety into construction methods education through interactive virtual reality. J Prof Iss Eng Ed Pr. 2016;142(2):04015011. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Chan G, Skitmore M. Visualizing safety assessment by integrating the use of game technology. Automat Constr. 2012;22:498–505. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams P. Assessing context-based learning: not only rigorous but also relevant. Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33(4):395–408. doi: 10.1080/02602930701562890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikela E. Developing criteria for knowing and learning at work: towards context-based assessment. J Workplace Learn. 2004;16(5): 267–274. doi: 10.1108/13665620410545543
   Google Scholar
• Seddon J. Vets and videos: student learning from context-based assessment in a pre-clinical science course. Assess Eval High Educ. 2008;33(5): 559–566. doi: 10.1080/02602930701699023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le QT, Park CS. Construction safety education model based on second life. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering; 2012 Aug 20–23; Hong Kong. New York (NY): IEEE; 2012. p. H2C-1–H2C-5.
   Google Scholar
• Le QT, Pedro A, Park CS. A social virtual reality based construction safety education system for experiential learning. J Intell Robot Syst. 2015;79(3–4):487–506. doi: 10.1007/s10846-014-0112-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Jeong WS, Rojas EM. A pilot study of a 3D game environment for construction safety education. J Inform Technol Constr. 2011;6(5):69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks R, Perlman A, Barak R. Construction safety training using immersive virtual reality. Constr Manag Econ. 2013;31(9):1005–1017. doi: 10.1080/01446193.2013.828844
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers C, McCarron B, Bolan P, et al. ‘I like the sound of that’ – an evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning environment for summative assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 2015;40(3):352–370. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2014.917145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung ACK, Hashemi Pour B, Reynolds D, et al. New assessment process in an introductory undergraduate physics laboratory: an exploration on collaborative learning. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42(2):169–181. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1089977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal S, Lucey AD, Lindsay ED, et al. An alternative approach to student assessment for engineering–laboratory learning. Aust J Eng Educ. 2018;22(2):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Wood L, Teras H, Reiners T, et al. The role of gamification and game-based learning in authentic assessment within virtual environments. Proceedings of 36th HERDSA Annual International Conference; 2013 Jul 1–4; Auckland. Auckland: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia; 2013. p. 514–523.
   Google Scholar
• Strydom F. Higher education learning outcomes assessment: international perspectives. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42(3):492–494 doi: 10.1080/02602938.2016.1139097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Lauro F, Johinke R. Employing Wikipedia for good not evil: innovative approaches to collaborative writing assessment. Assess Eval High Educ. 2017;42(3):478–491. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1127322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Construction risk evaluation model. Seoul: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Butt AL. Exploring the usability of game-based virtual reality for development of procedural skills in undergraduate nursing students [dissertation]. Boise (ID): Boise State University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong T. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought. Instr Sci. 2010;38(2):105–134. doi: 10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema H, Leenknecht M, Segers M. Assessing assessment quality: criteria for quality assurance in design of (peer) assessment for learning – a review of research studies. Stud Educ Eval. 2011:37(1):25–34. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond L, Herman J, Pellegrino J, et al. Criteria for high-quality assessment. Stanford (CA): Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, Stanford University; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wengrowicz N, Dori YJ, Dori D. Meta-assessment in a project-based systems engineering course. Assess Eval High Educ. 2016;42(4):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrington J, Reeves TC, Oliver R. A guide to authentic e-learning. New York (NY): Routledge; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Williams P. Squaring the circle: a new alternative to alternative-assessment. Teach High Educ. 2014;19(5):565–577. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2014.882894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avargil S, Herscovitz O, Dori YJ. Teaching thinking skills in context-based learning: teachers’ challenges and assessment knowledge. J Sci Educ Technol. 2012;21(2):207–225. doi: 10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookhart SM. How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Virginia (VA): ASCD; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(4):212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs HC, Dingsdag DP, Sheahan VL, et al. Utilising a safety culture management approach in the Australian construction industry. In: Proceedings of QUT Research Week; 2005 Jul 4–8; Brisbane, QLD. Brisbane (QLD); QUT ePrints; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler DR. Three in-course assessment reforms to improve higher education learning outcomes. Assess Eval High Educ. 2015;41(7):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozenfeld O, Sacks R, Rosenfeld Y, et al. Construction job safety analysis. Saf Sci. 2010;48(4):491–498. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988;52:139–183. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
   Google Scholar
• Frey BB, Schmitt VL, Allen JP. Defining authentic classroom assessment. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2012;17(2):1–18. Available at http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=17&n=2
   Google Scholar
• Baartman L. Assessing the assessment: development and use of quality criteria for competence assessment programmes [dissertation]. Utrecht: Netherlands Utrecht University; 2008.
   Google Scholar