Study of between-subject and within-subject variability of electromyography data and its intrinsic determinants for clip fitting tasks

References

• Ciccarelli M, Straker L, Mathiassen S, et al. Variation in muscle activity among office workers when using different information technologies at work and away from work. Hum Factors. 2013;55(5):911–923. doi: 10.1177/0018720813485788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Nardo F, Maranesi E, Mengarelli A, et al. Assessment of the variability of vastii myoelectric activity in young healthy females during walking: a statistical gait analysis. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(5):800–807. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeleine P. On functional motor adaptations: from the quantification of motor strategies to the prevention of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck–shoulder region. Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2010;199:1–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.2010.02145.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens J, Daly D, Deschamps K, et al. Inter-individual variability and pattern recognition of surface electromyography in front crawl swimming. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016;31(C):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.08.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mathiassen SE, Paquet V. The ability of limited exposure sampling to detect effects of interventions that reduce the occurrence of pronounced trunk inclination. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(2):295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan D, Mathiassen SE. Motor variability – an important issue in occupational life. Work. 2012;41Suppl 1:2527–2534.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srinivasan D, Rudolfsson T, Mathiassen SE. Between- and within-subject variance of motor variability metrics in females performing repetitive upper-extremity precision work. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(1):121–129. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström J, Mathiassen S, Liv P, et al. Upper arm postures and movements in female hairdressers across four full working days. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010;54(5):584–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthoz A. Le sens du mouvement [Sense of movement]. Paris: Odile Jacob Sciences; 2013; French.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudez C, Gilles MA, Savin J. Intrinsic movement variability at work. How long is the path from motor control to design engineering? Appl Ergon. 2016;53(A):71–78. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2015.08.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glazier PS, Wheat JS, Pease DL, et al. Dynamic system theory and the functional role of movement variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K, editors. Movement system variability. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2006. p. 49–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse K, Jones M, Healy A, et al. The role of attention in motor control. J Exp Psychol General. 2014;143(2):930–948. doi: 10.1037/a0032817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrier P, Schutz Y. Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;90(5–6):554–561. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0906-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luger T, Mathiassen SE, Srinivasan D, et al. Influence of work pace on upper extremity kinematics and muscle activity in a short-cycle repetitive pick-and-place task. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;61(3):356–368.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen JH, Madeleine P. Amount and structure of force variability during short, ramp and sustained contractions in males and females. Hum Mov Sci. 2010;29(1):35–47. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeleine P, Voigt M, Mathiassen SE. The size of cycle-to-cycle variability in biomechanical exposure among butchers performing a standardised cutting task. Ergonomics. 2008;51(7):1078–1095. doi: 10.1080/00140130801958659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedighi A, Nussbaum MA. Temporal changes in motor variability during prolonged lifting/lowering and the influence of work experience. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2017;37:61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch T, Mathiassen SE, Visser B, et al. The effect of work pace on workload, motor variability and fatigue during simulated light assembly work. Ergonomics. 2011;54(2):154–168. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2010.538723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farina D, Leclerc F, Arendt-Nielsen L, et al. The change in spatial distribution of upper trapezius muscle activity is correlated to contraction duration. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(1):16–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeleine P, Mathiassen SE, Arendt-Nielsen L. Changes in the degree of motor variability associated with experimental and chronic neck–shoulder pain during a standardised repetitive arm movement. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185(4):689–698. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1199-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiassen S. Diversity and variation in biomechanical exposure: what is it, and why would we like to know? Appl Ergon. 2006;37(4):419–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dieën JH, Westebring-van der Putten EP, Kingma I, et al. Low-level activity of the trunk extensor muscles causes electromyographic manifestations of fatigue in absence of decreased oxygenation. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(3):398–406. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmerud G, Sporrong H, Herberts P, et al. Consequences of trapezius relaxation on the distribution of shoulder muscle forces: an electromyographic study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 1998;8(3):185–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1050-6411(97)00033-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbom Å. Repetitive work of the upper extremity: part II – the scientific basis (knowledge base) for the guide. Int J Ind Ergon. 1994;14(1–2):59–86. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(94)90006-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiassen ES, Aminoff T. Motor control and cardiovascular responses during isoelectric contractions of the upper trapezius muscle: evidence for individual adaptation strategies. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1997;76(5):434–444. doi: 10.1007/s004210050273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu H, Emery K, Côté JN. Effects of additional external weight on posture and movement adaptations to fatigue induced by a repetitive pointing task. Hum Mov Sci. 2014;35:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2014.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller JR, Fung J, Côté JN. Posture-movement responses to stance perturbations and upper limb fatigue during a repetitive pointing task. Hum Mov Sci. 2013;32(4):618–632. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber ZR, Srinivasan D, Côté JN. Sex-specific links in motor and sensory adaptations to repetitive motion-induced fatigue. Motor Control. 2017;22(2):146–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chassaing K. Vers une compréhension de la construction des gestuelles avec l’expérience: le cas des «tôliers» d’une entreprise automobile [Towards an understanding of the construction of gestures with experience: the case of sheet metal workers in an automobile assembly plant]. Pistes. 2004;6(1):1–25. French. doi:10.4000/pistes.3280. https://journals.openedition.org/pistes/3280
   Google Scholar
• Gold JE, Punnett L, Cherniack M, et al. Digital vibration threshold testing and ergonomic stressors in automobile manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional assessment. Ergonomics. 2005;48(1):66–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130412331311408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann P. Inventory of tools for ergonomic evaluation. Stockholm: Arbetslivsinstitutet; 2006. (Arbetslivsrapport; 2006: 21). Available from: https://www.ryerson.ca/pneumann/research/documents/tool_inventory.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sluiter JK, Rest KM, Frings-Dresen MHW. Criteria document for evaluating the work-relatedness of upper-extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2001;27(1):1–102. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare M, Sagot JC, Roquelaure Y. Within and between individual variability of exposure to work-related musculoskeletal disorder risk factors. Inter J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):1003. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15051003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Safety of machinery – general principles for design – risk assessment and risk reduction. Geneva: ISO; 2010. ( Standard No. ISO 12100:2010).
   Google Scholar
• Gaudez C, Wild P, Aublet-Cuvelier A. A better way of fitting clips? A comparative study with respect to physical workload. Appl Ergon. 2015;51:236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Safety of machinery – anthropometric requirements for the design of workstations at machinery. Geneva: ISO; 2002. ( Standard No. ISO 14738:2002).
   Google Scholar
• De Magistris G, Micaelli A, Evrard P, et al. Dynamic control of DHM for ergonomic assessments. Int J Ind Ergon. 2013;43(2):170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2013.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipp P. Recommendations for the standardization of lead positions in surface electromyography. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1982;50:41–54. doi: 10.1007/BF00952243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsson B. Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of muscular load during work. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl. 1978;6:69–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costello AB, Osborne JW. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2005;10(7):1–9. Available from: https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=10&n=7
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):141–151. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westgaard RH. Measurement and evaluation of postural load in occupational work situations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1988;57(3):291–304. doi: 10.1007/BF00635987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc D, Farre P, Hamel O. Variability of musculoskeletal strain on dentists: an electromyographic and goniometric study. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(2):295–307. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2014.11077044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Côté JN. A critical review on physical factors and functional characteristics that may explain a sex/gender difference in work-related neck/shoulder disorders. Ergonomics. 2012;55(2):173–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2011.586061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zare M, Biau S, Brunet R, et al. A comparison of neck bending and flexion measurement methods for assessment of ergonomic risk. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):330–335. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson HJ, Collins D, Richards J. Intra-individual movement variability during skill transitions: a useful marker? Eur J Sport Sci. 2014;14(4):327–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2013.814714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai R, Rees G. The structural basis of inter-individual differences in human behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(4):231–242. doi: 10.1038/nrn3000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandlund J, Srinivasan D, Heiden M, et al. Differences in motor variability among individuals performing a standardized short-cycle manual task. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;51:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz A, Wijnants ML, Torre K, et al. Contemporary theories of 1/f noise in motor control. Hum Mov Sci. 2011;30(5):889–905. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, et al. Structure of motor variability in marginally redundant multifinger force production tasks. Exp Brain Res. 2001;141(2):153–165. doi: 10.1007/s002210100861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sicre A, Leclercq S, Gaudez C, et al. Modelling gait processes as a combination of sensory-motor and cognitive controls in an attempt to describe accidents on the level in occupational situations. Ind Health. 2008;46(1):3–14. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.46.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arevalo Pinilla N. Préparer le lys des incas en qualité et en sécurité une intervention pluridisciplinaire dans le secteur de la floriculture colombienne [Prepare the lily of the Incas in quality and safety: a multidisciplinary intervention in the Colombian floriculture sector.] Paper presented at: Échanges et pratiques sur la prévention [Dialogues and practices on prevention]. 3rd Francophone Congress on Musculoskeletal Disorders; 2011 May 26–27; Grenoble, France. French.
   Google Scholar
• Latash ML, Shim JK, Shinohara M, et al. Changes in finger coordination and hand function with advanced age. In: Latash ML, Lestienne F, editors. Motor control and learning. New York (NY): Springer; 2006. p. 141–159.
   Google Scholar
• Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, et al. Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2003;13(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00084-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilles MA, Wing AM. Age-related changes in grip force and dynamics of hand movement. J Mot Behav. 2003;35(1):79–85. doi: 10.1080/00222890309602123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh TT, Cinelli ME, Lyons JL, et al. Age-related changes in postural control to the demands of a precision task. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;44:134–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.08.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Baweja HS, Christou EA. Ankle variability is amplified in older adults due to lower EMG power from 30–60 Hz. Hum Mov Sci. 2012;31(6):1366–1378. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudart C. Conditions for maintaining ageing operators at work – a case study conducted at an automobile manufacturing plant. Appl Ergon. 2000;31(5):453–462. doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00024-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao LP, Cho CY. The effect of aging on muscle activation and postural control pattern for young and older computer users. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(5):926–932. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Lin JH, Buchholz B, et al. Shoulder muscle fatigue development in young and older female adults during a repetitive manual task. Ergonomics. 2014;57(8):1201–1212. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.914576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casamento-Moran A, Hunter SK, Chen YT, et al. Sex differences in spatial accuracy relate to the neural activation of antagonistic muscles in young adults. Exp Brain Res. 2017;235(8):2425–2436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-4968-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan D, Sinden KE, Mathiassen SE, et al. Gender differences in fatigability and muscle activity responses to a short-cycle repetitive task. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016;116(11–12):2357–2365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3487-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyland J, Heilskov-Hansen T, Alkjær T, et al. Sex differences in muscular load among house painters performing identical work tasks. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2014;114(9):1901–1911. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2918-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordander C, Ohlsson K, Balogh I, et al. Gender differences in workers with identical repetitive industrial tasks: exposure and musculoskeletal disorders. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2008;81(8):939–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-007-0286-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen HC, Chang CM, Liu YP, et al. Ergonomic risk factors for the wrists of hairdressers. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(1):98–105. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2009.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won EJ, Johnson PW, Punnett L, et al. Upper extremity biomechanics in computer tasks differ by gender. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(3):428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlström J, Svensson J, Hagberg M, et al. Differences between work methods and gender in computer mouse use. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000;26(5):390–397. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health and Safety Executive (HSE). Work related musculoskeletal disorders statistics (WRMSDs) in Great Britain, 2018. Bootle: HSE; 2018. Available from: http://www.hse.gov.uk/statistics/causdis/msd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Caisse nationale de l'assurance maladie des travailleurs salariés (CNAMTS) [National Fund for the Prevention of Occupational Accidents and Diseases]. Rapport de gestion 2014 [2014 Management Report] [Internet]. Paris: CNAMTS; 2014 [cited 2018 Dec 21]. French. Available from: http://www.risquesprofessionnels.ameli.fr/fileadmin/user_upload/document_PDF_a_telecharger/brochures/Rapport%20de%20Gestion_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guignon N. Risques professionnels : les femmes sont-elles à l'abriRegards sur la parité [Occupational risks: are women sheltered? A look at the parity] [Internet]. Paris: DARES (direction de l'animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques) [Directorate for Research, Studies and Statistics]; 2008 [cited 2018 Dec 21]. French. Available from: http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/docs_ffc/ref/fhparit08d.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Direction de l'animation de la recherche, des études et des statistiques (DARES). L’exposition des salariés aux maladies professionnelles en 2007 [Exposure of employees to occupational diseases in 2007]. Dares Analyses. 2005;(56):1–11. French. Available from: http://travail-emploi.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/2010-056-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lovell GA, Blanch PD, Barnes CJ. EMG of the hip adductor muscles in six clinical examination tests. Phys Ther Sport. 2012;13(3):134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordander C, Hansson GA, Rylander L, et al. Muscular rest and gap frequency as EMG measures of physical exposure: the impact of work tasks and individual related factors. Ergonomics. 2000;43(11):1904–1919. doi: 10.1080/00140130050174536
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kankaanpää M, Laaksonen D, Taimela S, et al. Age, sex, and body mass index as determinants of back and hip extensor fatigue in the isometric Sørensen back endurance test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(9):1069–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90173-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudez C. Hypo recovery and hyper exertion muscular: the factors of musculoskeletal disorders in dynamic activities: insert's fitting case. Arch Mal Prof. 2008;69(2):252.
   Google Scholar
• Moriguchi CS, Carnaz L, Júnior LCM, et al. Are posture data from simulated tasks representative of field conditions? Case study for overhead electric utility workers. Ergonomics. 2012;55(11):1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.708439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntze G, von Tscharner V, Hutchison C, et al. Alterations in lower limb multimuscle activation patterns during stair climbing in female total knee arthroplasty patients. J Neurophysiol. 2015;114(5):2718–2725. doi: 10.1152/jn.00370.2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva L, Vaz JR, Castro MA, et al. Recurrence quantification analysis and support vector machines for golf handicap and low back pain EMG classification. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015;25(4):637–647. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang G, Zhu X, Ju Z, et al. Dynamical characteristics of surface EMG signals of hand grasps via recurrence plot. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014;18(1):257–265. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2013.2261311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashaback JGA, Cluff T, Potvin JR. Muscle fatigue and contraction intensity modulates the complexity of surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(1):78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju Z, Ouyang G, Wilamowska-Korsak M, et al. Surface EMG based hand manipulation identification via nonlinear feature extraction and classification. IEEE Sens J. 2013;13(9):3302–3311. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2013.2259051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathleff MS, Samani A, Olesen JL, et al. Neuromuscular activity and knee kinematics in adolescents with patellofemoral pain. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(9):1730–1739. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318292be30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madeleine P, Sogaard K, Holtermann A, et al. Level of self-reported neck/shoulder pain and biomechanical workload in cleaners. Work. 2012;41(1):447–452.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svendsen JH, Samani A, Mayntzhusen K, et al. Muscle coordination and force variability during static and dynamic tracking tasks. Hum Mov Sci. 2011;30(6):1039–1051. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri DF, Srinivasan D, Mathiassen SE, et al. The ability of non-computer tasks to increase biomechanical exposure variability in computer-intensive office work. Ergonomics. 2015;58(1):50–64. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2014.965753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar