Development of an intelligent knowledge base for identification of accident causes based on Fu et al.’s model

References

• Fu G, Fan Y, Tong R, et al. A universal method for the causation analysis of accidents (version 4.0). J Accid Prev. 事故预防学报. 2017;3:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hadipriono FC. Expert system for construction safety. II: knowledge base. J Perform Constr Facil. 1992;6:246–260. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(1992)6:4(246)
   Google Scholar
• Lilić N, Obradović I, Cvjetić A. An intelligent hybrid system for surface coal mine safety analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2010;23:453–462. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2010.01.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed HK, Zulquernain M. Expert system to predict effects of noise pollution on operators of power plant using neuro-fuzzy approach. Noise Health. 2009;11:206–216. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.56214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meciarova J. Annals of DAAAM for 2011 & Proceedings of the 22nd International DAAAM Symposium ‘Intelligent Manufacturing & Automation: Power of Knowledge and Creativity’ [& 5th European DAAAM International Young Researchers’ and Scientists’ Conference]: 2011 Nov 23–26; Vienna. Katalinić B, Danube Adria Association for Automation & Manufacturing, editors. Vienna: DAAAM International; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Freivalds A. Development of an intelligent knowledge base for heat stress evaluation. Int J Ind Ergon. 1987;2:27–35. doi: 10.1016/0169-8141(87)90005-9
   Google Scholar
• Talat Birgonul M, Dikmen I, Budayan C, et al. An expert system for the quantification of fault rates in construction fall accidents. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):20–31. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1123516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic-Veselinovic S, Hedge A, Veselinovic M. An ergonomic expert system for risk assessment of work-related musculo-skeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016;53:130–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2015.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos Nicolau A, da SC Algusto JP, do NA Pereira CM, et al. A real time expert system for decision support in nuclear power plants. Int J Nucl Quantum Eng. 2017;11(9):627–633.
   Google Scholar
• Fu G, Zhou L, Wang J, et al. Analysis of an explosion accident at Dangyang Power Plant in Hubei, China: causes and lessons learned. Saf Sci. 2018;102:134–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang W, Xu P, et al. Applicability of accident analysis methods to Chinese construction accidents. J Safety Res. 2019;68:187–196. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2018.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He A, Xu S, Fu G. Study on the basic problems of safety culture. Procedia Eng. 2012;43:245–249. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.08.042
   Google Scholar
• Fu G, Cao J-L, Zhou L, et al. Comparative study of HFACS and the 24Model accident causation models. Pet Sci. 2017;14:570–578. doi: 10.1007/s12182-017-0171-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo X, Fu G, Wang C, et al. An application of 24Model to analyse capsizing of the Eastern Star ferry. Pol Marit Res. 2017;24:116–122. doi: 10.1515/pomr-2017-0113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Fu G, Xue Y. Human and organizational factors in Chinese hazardous chemical accidents: a case study of the ‘8.12’ Tianjin Port fire and explosion using the HFACS-HC. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2018;24(3):329–340. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1372943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothblum AM, Wheal D, Withington S, et al. Human factors in incident investigation and analysis. Groton (CT): Coast Guard Research and Development Center; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Altabbakh H, Murray S, Grantham K, et al. Variations in risk management models: a comparative study of the Space Shuttle Challenger disasters. Eng Manag J. 2013;25:13–24. doi: 10.1080/10429247.2013.11431971
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang M, Hong L, Yu M-H, et al. STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: taking the China–Jiaoji railway accident for example. Saf Sci. 2010;48:544–555. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey JJP. A system theoretic safety analysis of US Coast Guard aviation mishap involving CG-6505 [dissertation]. Cambrisge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Altabbakh H, AlKazimi MA, Murray S, et al. STAMP – holistic system safety approach or just another risk model? J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2014;32:109–119. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2014.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh JH, Haga RA, Favarò FM, et al. Texas City refinery accident: case study in breakdown of defense-in-depth and violation of the safety–diagnosability principle in design. Eng Fail Anal. 2014;36:121–133. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakolas E, Saleh JH. Augmenting defense-in-depth with the concepts of observability and diagnosability from control theory and discrete event systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2011;96:184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar