Leading indicators of mental representation in construction hazard recognition

References

• Melo RRSD, Costa DB, Álvares JS, et al. Applicability of unmanned aerial system (UAS) for safety inspection on construction sites. Safety Science. 2017;98:174–185. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurin TA. Safety inspections in construction sites: a systems thinking perspective. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2016;93:240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahn S. Workplace hazard identification and management: the case of an underground mining operation. Safety Science. 2013;57:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandit B, Albert A, Patil Y, et al. Impact of safety climate on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. Safety Science. 2019;113:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiter BM, Bellanca JL, Helfrich W, et al. Recognizing mine site hazards: identifying differences in hazard recognition ability for experienced and new mineworkers. In: Cassenti D, editor. Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors and Simulation and Digital Human Modeling and Applied Optimization; 2017 Jul 17–21; Los Angeles (CA). Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 104–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Dao B, Esmaeili B, et al. Measuring the impact of working memory load on the safety performance of construction workers. In: Lin K-Y, El-Gohary N, Tang P, editors. Proceedings of the ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering 2017; 2017 Jun 25–27; Seattle (WA). Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017. p. 158–166.
   Google Scholar
• Namian M, Albert A, Feng J. Effect of distraction on hazard recognition and safety risk perception. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018;144(4):04018008. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski-Trakofler KM, Barrett EA. The concept of degraded images applied to hazard recognition training in mining for reduction of lost-time injuries. Journal of Safety Research. 2003;34(5):515–525. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2003.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao P-C, Sun X, Liu M, et al. Influence of visual clutter on the effect of navigated safety inspection: a case study on elevator installation. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2019;25(4):495–509. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1389464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham D, Jeffery R. Location, location, location: eye-tracking evidence that consumers preferentially view prominently positioned nutrition information. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2011;111:1704–1711. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeelani I, Albert A, Han K, et al. Are visual search patterns predictive of hazard recognition performance? Empirical investigation using eye-tracking technology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2019;145(1):04018115. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert A, Hallowell MR, Kleiner BM. Enhancing construction hazard recognition and communication with energy-based cognitive mnemonics and safety meeting maturity model: multiple baseline study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2014;140(2):04013042. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000790
   Google Scholar
• Asadi S, Karan E, Mohammadpour A. Advancing safety by in-depth assessment of workers attention and perception. International Journal of Safety Science. 2017;01(3):46–60. doi: 10.24900/ijss/01034660.2017.1201
   Google Scholar
• Bhoir S, Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, et al. Measuring construction workers’ attention using eye-tracking technology. In: Froese TM, Newton L, Sadeghpour F, et al. editors. Proceedings of the 5th International/11th Construction Specialty Conference; 2015 Jun 8–10; Vancouver. Montreal (QC): Canadian Society for Civil Engineering; 2015. p. 222-001-010.
   Google Scholar
• Hasanzadeh S, Esmaeili B, Dodd M. Examining the relationship between construction workers’ visual attention and situation awareness under fall and tripping hazard conditions: using mobile eye tracking. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2018;144(7):04018060. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Q, Chong H-Y, Liao P-C. Exploring eye-tracking searching strategies for construction hazard recognition in a laboratory scene. Safety Science. 2019;120:824–832. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzman CD, Fusi S. Emotion, cognition, and mental state representation in amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2010;33:173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank C, Land WM, Schack T. Mental representation and learning: the influence of practice on the development of mental representation structure in complex action. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2013;14(3):353–361. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Liao P-C. Re-assessing hazard recognition ability in occupational environment with microvascular function in the brain. Safety Science. 2019;120:67–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.06.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonetti LV, Hassan SA, Lau S-TL, et al. Oxyhemoglobin changes in the prefrontal cortex in response to cognitive tasks: a systematic review. International Journal of Neuroscience. 2019;129(2):194–202. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2018.1518906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 2001;24(1):167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li RYM, Chau KW, Lu W, et al. A research agenda for neuroactivities in construction safety knowledge sharing, hazard identification and decision making. In: Ayaz H, editor. Proceedings of the Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering; 2019 Jul 24–28; Washington D.C.. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 383–389.
   Google Scholar
• Starkweather CK, Gershman SJ, Uchida N. The medial prefrontal cortex shapes dopamine reward prediction errors under state uncertainty. Neuron. 2018;98(3):616–629.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.03.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshino K, Oka N, Yamamoto K, et al. Functional brain imaging using near-infrared spectroscopy during actual driving on an expressway. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013;7(882):1–16. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00882
   Google Scholar
• Anderson E, Mannan S, Husain M, et al. Involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual search. Experimental Brain Research. 2007;180(2):289–302. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-0860-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschman TJ, Miller EK. Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science. 2007;315(5820):1860–1862. doi: 10.1126/science.1138071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalla R, Muggleton NG, Cowey A, et al. Human dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is involved in visual search for conjunctions but not features: a theta TMS study. Cortex. 2009;45(9):1085–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causse M, Peysakhovich V, Mandrick K. Eliciting sustained mental effort using the Toulouse N-back task: prefrontal cortex and pupillary responses. In: Hale KS, Stanney KM, editors. Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering; 2016 Jul 27–31; Walt Disney World (FL). Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 185–193.
   Google Scholar
• Heeger DJ, Ress D. What does fMRI tell us about neuronal activity? Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 2002;3(2):142–151. doi: 10.1038/nrn730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf M, Wolf U, Toronov V, et al. Different time evolution of oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin concentration changes in the visual and motor cortices during functional stimulation: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroimage. 2002;16(3, Part A):704–712. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leff DR, Orihuela-Espina F, Elwell CE, et al. Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: a systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2922–2936. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaresima V, Ferrari M, Torricelli A, et al. Bilateral prefrontal cortex oxygenation responses to a verbal fluency task: a multichannel time-resolved near-infrared topography study. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2005;10(1):011012. doi: 10.1117/1.1851512
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholkmann F, Kleiser S, Metz AJ, et al. A review on continuous wave functional near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging instrumentation and methodology. Neuroimage. 2014;85:6–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zou PXW, Li PP. Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers’ safety risk tolerances. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2016;93:267–279. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Boukamp F, Teizer J. Ontology-based semantic modeling of construction safety knowledge: towards automated safety planning for job hazard analysis (JHA). Automation in Construction. 2015;52:29–41. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Yu G, Li Y, et al. Perceived colleagues’ safety knowledge/behavior and safety performance: safety climate as a moderator in a multilevel study. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(5):1468–1476. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinodkumar MN, Bhasi M. Safety management practices and safety behaviour: assessing the mediating role of safety knowledge and motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2010;42(6):2082–2093. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter DR. Risk perception and risk tolerance in aircraft pilots. Washington (DC): Federal Aviation Administration; 2002. (No. DOT/FAA/AM-2/17).
   Google Scholar
• Oliva A, Torralba A. The role of context in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2007;11(12):520–527. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huestegge L, Radach R. Visual and memory search in complex environments: determinants of eye movements and search performance. Ergonomics. 2012;55(9):1009–1027. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.689372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng A, Chan A. Mental models of construction workers for safety-sign representation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2017;143:04016091. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallman R, Becker B, Roese N. Preferences for expressing preferences: people prefer finer evaluative distinctions for liked than disliked objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;52; 25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young AI, Ratner KG, Fazio RH. Political attitudes bias the mental representation of a presidential candidate’s face. Psychological science. 2014;25(2):503–510. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali A, Kamaruzzaman S, Sing G. A study on causes of accident and prevention in Malaysian construction industry. Journal Design + Built. 2010;3:95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Golovina O, Teizer J, Pradhananga N. Heat map generation for predictive safety planning: preventing struck-by and near miss interactions between workers-on-foot and construction equipment. Automation in Construction. 2016;71:99–115. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam RA, Hide SA, Gibb AG, et al. Contributing factors in construction accidents. Applied Ergonomics. 2005;36(4):401–415. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaskutas V, Dale AM, Lipscomb H, et al. Fall prevention and safety communication training for foremen: report of a pilot project designed to improve residential construction safety. Journal of Safety Research. 2013;44:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2012.08.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Zhang D, Liao P-C, et al. Investigation of interaction among factors underlying construction hazard identification. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2021;48:838–847. doi: 10.1139/cjce-2020-0170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang H-J, Lim J-H, Kim D-W, et al. Evaluation of various mental task combinations for near-infrared spectroscopy-based brain–computer interfaces. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 2014;19(7):077005. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.7.077005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Piazza EA, Simony E, et al. Measuring speaker–listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy. Scientific Reports. 2017;7:43293. doi: 10.1038/srep43293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Kwon J, Choi J, et al. Performance enhancement of a brain–computer interface using high-density multi-distance NIRS. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):16545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16639-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petrocelli JV. Hierarchical multiple regression in counseling research: common problems and possible remedies. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2003;36(1):9–22. doi: 10.1080/07481756.2003.12069076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammed SH, Habtewold TD, Tegegne BS, et al. Dietary and non-dietary determinants of linear growth status of infants and young children in Ethiopia: hierarchical regression analysis. PloS One. 2019;14(1):e0209220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radmacher SA, Martin DJ. Identifying significant predictors of student evaluations of faculty through hierarchical regression analysis. The Journal of Psychology. 2001;135(3):259–268. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter T. What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models. Discourse Processes. 2006;41(3):221–250. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4103_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q-W, Liao P-CL. Influence of critical variables on prefrontal cortex activity in hazard search. In: Asmar ME, Grau D, Tang P, editors. Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress 2020; 2020 Mar 8–10; Tempe (AZ). Reston (VA): American Society of Civil Engineers; 2020. p. 250–257.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenholtz R, Li Y, Nakano L. Measuring visual clutter. Journal of Vision. 2007;7(2):17. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santella A, DeCarlo D. Robust clustering of eye movement recordings for quantification of visual interest. In: Duchowski AT, Vertegaal R, editors. Proceedings of the Eye Tracking Research and Applications 2004; 2004 Mar 22–24; San Antonio (TX. New York): Association for Computing Machinery; 2004. p. 27–34.
   Google Scholar
• Suthar V, Tarmizi RA, Midi H, et al. Students’ beliefs on mathematics and achievement of university students: logistics regression analysis. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010;8:525–531. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.072
   Google Scholar
• Foy HJ, Runham P, Chapman P. Prefrontal cortex activation and young driver behaviour: a fNIRS study. PloS One. 2016;11(5):e0156512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossion B, Schiltz C, Robaye L, et al. How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 2001;13(7):1019–1034. doi: 10.1162/089892901753165917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vannasing P, Florea O, González-Frankenberger B, et al. Distinct hemispheric specializations for native and non-native languages in one-day-old newborns identified by fNIRS. Neuropsychologia. 2016;84:63–69. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston RA, Edmonds AJ. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory. 2009;17(5):577–596. doi: 10.1080/09658210902976969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zelinsky GJ. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research. 2006;46(24):4118–4133. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mruczek RE, Sheinberg DL. Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics. 2005;67(6):1016–1031. doi: 10.3758/BF03193628
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasegawa I, Fukushima T, Ihara T, et al. Callosal window between prefrontal cortices: cognitive interaction to retrieve long-term memory. Science. 1998;281(5378):814–818. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5378.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita H, Ohbayashi M, Nakahara K, et al. Top-down signal from prefrontal cortex in executive control of memory retrieval. Nature. 1999;401(6754):699–703. doi: 10.1038/44372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyns PG, Rodet L. Categorization creates functional features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 1997;23(3):681–696. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.23.3.681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haluik A. Risk perception and decision making in hazard analysis: improving safety for the next generation of electrical workers. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE IAS Electrical Safety Workshop (ESW); 2016 Mar 6–11; Jacksonville (FL). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2016. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli D, Taheri H, Saberi Kakhki A. Random versus blocked practice to enhance mental representation in golf putting. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 2017;124(3):674–688. doi:10.1177/0031512517704106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar