Contributions of safety critical success factors and safety program elements to overall project success

References

• Williams J, Fugar F, Adinyira E. Assessment of health and safety culture maturity in the construction industry in developing economies. J Eng Des Technol, Vol. 18, Issue 4. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Buniya MK, Othman I, Sunindijo RY, et al. Barriers to safety program implementation in the construction industry. Ain Shams Eng J, Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2021, Pages 65-72. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mekhlafi A-BA, Isha ASN, Chileshe N, et al. Impact of safety culture implementation on driving performance among oil and gas tanker drivers: a partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mekhlafi A-BA, Isha ASN, Chileshe N, et al. Modelling the relationship between the nature of work factors and driving performance mediating by role of fatigue. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(13):6752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Othman I, Kamil M, Sunindijo RY, et al. Critical success factors influencing construction safety program implementation in developing countries. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1529(4):042079.
   Google Scholar
• Al Haadir S, Panuwatwanich K. Critical success factors for safety program implementation among construction companies in Saudi Arabia. Procedia Eng. 2011;14:148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson S. Construction safety management systems. Routledge, London; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Priyadarshani K, Karunasena G, Jayasuriya S. Construction safety assessment framework for developing countries: a case study of Sri Lanka. J Constr Developing Countries. 2013;18(1):33–51.
   Google Scholar
• Abed A. Barriers to risk management process adoption: a qualitative study of project-based construction companies in Iraq. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Bank W. The World Bank Atlas method – detailed methodology. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Hatem W. Evaluation of safety systems in Iraqi construction projects. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2017;12(21):11714–11726.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoud AH. Evaluating the effectiveness of occupational health and safety management system of construction companies in Iraq (Al-Rasheed state contracting construction company as a case study). J Eng Sustainable Development. 2009;13(2):182–197.
   Google Scholar
• Rockart JF. Chief executives define their own data needs. Harvard Business Rev. 1979;57(2):81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaselskis EJ, Anderson SD, Russell JS. Strategies for achieving excellence in construction safety performance. J Construction Eng Manage. 1996;122(1):61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam C, Fung IV IW. Effectiveness of safety management strategies on safety performance in Hong Kong. Construction Manage Econ. 1998;16(1):49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tsao M-L, Hsieh C-J, Chen LY. The role of management commitment and employee involvement in safety management. Int J Organizational Innovation, VOLUME 10 NUMBER 2 Page 52, October. 2017;10(2).
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell MR, Gambatese JA. Construction safety risk mitigation. J Construction Eng Manage. 2009;135(12):1316–1323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recommended practices for safety and health programs: worker participation [Internet]. US Department of Labor OSHA; 2017. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/shpguidelines/workerparticipation.html
   Google Scholar
• Findley M, Smith S, Kress T, et al. Safety program elements in construction. Prof Saf. 2004;49(2):14.
   Google Scholar
• Carter G, Smith SD. Safety hazard identification on construction projects. J ConstrEng Manage. 2006;132(2):197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Gambatese J. Factors that influence safety performance of specialty contractors. J Constr Eng Manage. 2003;129(2):159–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council B-BSS. NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures, FEMA P-2082-1 | Volume I: Part 1 Provisions, Part 2 Commentary.  FEMA. 2001;302.
   Google Scholar
• Trehan E, Mehta A, Kin PM. MTR train data analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Hinze J. Analysis of construction worker fall accidents. J Constr Eng Manage. 2003;129(3):262–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksorn T, Hadikusumo BH. Critical success factors influencing safety program performance in Thai construction projects. Saf Sci. 2008;46(4):709–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins JR. Construction workers’ perceptions of health and safety training programmes. Constr Manage Econ. 2011;29(10):1017–1026.
   Google Scholar
• Choudhry RM, Fang D. Why operatives engage in unsafe work behavior: investigating factors on construction sites. Saf Sci. 2008;46(4):566–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill D. Construction safety management planning. Des Plaines: American Society of Safety Engineers; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Devenport JN, Giang G. Analysis of construction worker injuries that do not result in lost time. J Constr Eng Manage. 2006;132(3):321–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buniya MK, Othman I, Durdyev S, et al. Safety program elements in the construction industry: the case of Iraq. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(2):411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osha US Department of Labor. Hazards associated with shipbreaking. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Hallowell M, Baud K. Construction-safety best practices and relationships to safety performance. J Constr Eng Manage. 2013;139(10):04013006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeckelaert L, et al. Review of workplace innovation and its relation with occupational safety and health. Bilbao: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks TK, Abudayyeh O, Choi SD, et al. Occupational injuries and fatalities in the roofing contracting industry. J Constr Eng Manage. 2005;131(11):1233–1240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. U.S. Department of Labor Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health. Washington, D.C. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlinson SM. Hong Kong construction: safety management and the law. Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia Causeway Bay; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J. Safety plus: making zero accidents a reality. Construction Industry Institute. 2002: vol. 160–11.
   Google Scholar
• Darabont DC, Antonov AE, Bejinariu C. Key elements on implementing an occupational health and safety management system using ISO 45001 standard. MATEC Web of Conferences; Sibiu, Romania; 2017, vol. 121: EDP Sciences, p. 11007.
   Google Scholar
• Darabont DC, Bejinariu C, Ionita I, et al. Considerations on improving occupational health and safety performance in companies using ISO 45001 standard. Environ Eng Manage J. 2018;Vol.17; page (11).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam C, Fung IV IW, Chan AP. Study of attitude changes in people after the implementation of a new safety management system: the supervision plan. Constr Manage Econ. 2001;19(4):393–403.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran S, Gambatese JA. Development and initial validation of sustainable construction safety and health rating system. J Constr Eng Manage. 2009;135(10):1067–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang D, Chen Y, Wong L. Safety climate in construction industry: a case study in Hong Kong. J Constr Eng Manage. 2006;132(6):573–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stranks JW. The handbook of health and safety practice. Financial Times Management; UK. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Neal A, Griffin MA. Safety climate and safety behaviour. Aust J Manage. 2002;27(1_Suppl):67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson SE. Behavioral safety theory. Prof Saf. 2003;48(10):39.
   Google Scholar
• Ariss SS. Employee involvement to improve safety in the workplace: an ethical imperative. Am J Business. Volume 18 Issue 2 ; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Smith S. The top 10 ways to improve safety management. Occup Hazards. 2003;65(12):33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ng ST, Cheng KP, Skitmore RM. A framework for evaluating the safety performance of construction contractors. Building Environ. 2005;40(10):1347–1355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa BCR, Adams SG. Attitude toward teamwork and effective teaming. Team Perform Manage Int J; Vol. 10 No. 7/8, pp. 145-151. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Blake M. Safety management – whose responsibility is it? Rural Telecommun. 1997;16:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Peyton RX, Rubio TC. Construction safety practices and principles. Van Nostrand Reinhold; UK; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Harper RS, Koehn E. Managing industrial construction safety in southeast Texas. J Constr Eng Manage. 1998;124(6):452–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad S, Al-Smadi BM, Hyari KH, et al. Safety management in the Jordanian construction industry. Jordan J Civil Eng. 2010;4(1):47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce FD. Total quality for safety and health professionals. ABS Consulting; USA. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Michaud PA. Accident prevention and OSHA compliance. CRC Press; USA; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Fang D, Xie F, Huang X, et al. Factor analysis-based studies on construction workplace safety management in China. Int J Project Manage. 2004;22(1):43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tam C, Zeng S, Deng Z. Identifying elements of poor construction safety management in China. Saf Sci. 2004;42(7):569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper M, Cotton D. Safety training – a special case? J Eur Indus Training; Vol. 24 No. 9, pp. 481-490. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Toole TM, Gambatese JA. Primer on federal occupational safety and health administration standards. Pract Periodical Struct Des Constr. 2002;7(2):56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed S. Safety climate in construction site environments. J Constr Eng Manage. 2002;128(5):375–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell MR, Hinze JW, Baud KC, et al. Proactive construction safety control: measuring, monitoring, and responding to safety leading indicators. J Constr Eng Manage. 2013;139(10):04013010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung P. Institutional arrangements and construction safety in China: an empirical examination. Constr Manage Econ. 2009;27(5):439–450.
   Google Scholar
• Teo EAL, Ling FYY, Chong AFW. Framework for project managers to manage construction safety. Int J Project Manage. 2005;23(4):329–341.
   Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh O, Fredericks TK, Butt SE, et al. An investigation of management’s commitment to construction safety. Int J Project Manage. 2006;24(2):167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Anton TJ. Occupational safety and health management; OSHA; USA;1989.
   Google Scholar
• Vredenburgh AG. Organizational safety: which management practices are most effective in reducing employee injury rates? J Saf Res. 2002;33(2):259–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson JA. The relationship between corporate culture & safety performance. Prof Saf. 1997;42(5):29.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoudi S, Ghasemi F, Mohammadfam I, et al. Framework for continuous assessment and improvement of occupational health and safety issues in construction companies. Saf Health Work. 2014;5(3):125–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinze J, Godfrey R. An evaluation of safety performance measures for construction projects. J Constr Res. 2003;4(01):5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Byars LL, Byars LL, Rue LW. Supervision: key link to productivity. Irwin Professional; LA; USA; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Rollenhagen C, Kahlbom U. Towards a model for the assessment of safety activities and their associated organization context. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Human Error, Safety and System Development; Linköping, Sweden; 2001, p. 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Rechenthin D. Project safety as a sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Safety Research. 2004;35(3):297–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero S, Saldana M, Campo M, et al. A model for the improvement of occupational safety management. J Saf Health Environ Res. 2006;3(3):1–21.
   Google Scholar
• McGowan DE, Norton WW. Safety – a health service team approach. Prof Saf. 1989;34(1):21.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce FD. Setting effective goals and objectives in safety and health programs. Occupational Hazards. 1995;57(10):169–173.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks JW. The behavior-based safety process: managing involvement for an injury-free culture. Prof Saf. 1998;43(1):46.
   Google Scholar
• Hinze J, Thurman S, Wehle A. Leading indicators of construction safety performance. Saf Sci. 2013;51(1):23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou PX. Fostering a strong construction safety culture. Leadership Manage Eng. 2011;11(1):11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo RA. Relationship-based safety: moving beyond culture & behavior. Prof Saf. 2012;57(12):35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Smallman C, John G. British directors perspectives on the impact of health and safety on corporate performance. Saf Sci. 2001;38(3):227–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesarini G, Hall G, Kupiec M. Building a proactive safety culture in the construction industry. 12 steps to a safer job site. Ace Constr. April, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shields PM, Tajalli H. Intermediate theory: the missing link in successful student scholarship. J Public Affairs Educ. 2006;12(3):313–334.
   Google Scholar
• Kineber AF, Othman I, Oke AE, et al. Impact of value management on building projects success: structural equation modeling approach. J Constr Eng Manage. 2021;147(4):04021011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olanrewaju OI, Kineber AF, Chileshe N, et al. Modelling the relationship between building information modelling (BIM) implementation barriers, usage and awareness on building project lifecycle. Building Environment. Volume 207, Part B, January 2022: 108556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen CM. The ongoing process of building a theory of disruption. J Prod Innov Manage. 2006;23(1):39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kineber AF, Othman IB, Oke AE, et al. Modelling the relationship between value management’s activities and critical success factors for sustainable buildings. J Eng Design Technol; Volume 20 Issue 2. 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Othman I, Kineber A, Oke A, et al. Drivers of value management implementation in building projects in developing countries. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1529(4):042083.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Othman I, Kineber A, Oke A, et al. Barriers of value management implementation for building projects in Egyptian construction industry. Ain Shams Eng J; Volume 12, Issue 1, March 2021, Pages 21-30. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis (no. 3). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tanko BL. Roadmap for implementing value management in the Nigerian construction industry [PhD thesis]. Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying Universiti Technologi Malaysia; JB; Malaysia;2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kineber AF, Othman I, Oke AE, et al. Critical value management activities in building projects: a case of Egypt. Buildings. 2020;10(12):239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Kineber AF, Albukhari I, et al. Assessment of cloud computing success factors for sustainable construction industry: the case of Nigeria. Buildings. 2021;11(2):36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olanrewaju OI, Kineber AF, Chileshe N, et al. Modelling the impact of building information modelling (BIM) implementation drivers and awareness on project lifecycle. Sustainability. 2021;13(16):8887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashwani G, Nielsen Y. Evaluation of safety engineering system in oil and gas construction projects in UAE. Int J GEOMATE. 2017;12(29):178–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanoff P, Mamelund SE, Robinson M, et al. Tracking parental attitudes on vaccination across European countries: the Vaccine Safety, Attitudes, Training and Communication Project (VACSATC). Vaccine. 2010;28(35):5731–5737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia A, Boix P, Canosa C. Why do workers behave unsafely at work? Determinants of safe work practices in industrial workers. Occup Environ Med. 2004;61(3):239–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelo O, Braakmann D, Benetka G. Quantitative and qualitative research: beyond the debate. Integr Psychological Behav Sci. 2009;43(4):406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamad Ramly Z, Shen GQ, Yu AT. Critical success factors for value management workshops in Malaysia. J Manage Eng. 2015;31(2):05014015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma G. Pros and cons of different sampling techniques. Int J Appl Res. 2017;3(7):749–752.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxha D, Capelleras JL. Fast-growing firms in a transitional and extreme environment: are they different? J Small Business Enterprise Develop; Volume 17 Issue 3 . 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari CR. Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Age Int. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Wahyuni D. The research design maze: understanding paradigms, cases, methods and methodologies. J Appl Manage Account Res. 2012;10(1):69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Oke AE, Kineber AF, Albukhari I, et al. Modeling the robotics implementation barriers for construction projects in developing countries. Int J Building Pathol Adaptation. 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaratunga D, Kulatunga U, Liyanage C, et al. Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector. Facilities;  Vol. 28 No. 5/6, pp. 306-320. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Çakıt E, Olak AJ, Karwowski W, et al. Assessing safety at work using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach aided by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Int J Indus Ergon. 2020;76:102925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Vol. 6. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; NY; USA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Vol. 6. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory Practice. 2011;19(2):139–152.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen D, Straub D, Boudreau M-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practice. Commun Assoc Inform Syst. 2000;4(1):7.
   Google Scholar
• Hair Jr JF, Matthews LM, Matthews RL, et al. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. Int J Multivariate Data Anal. 2017;1(2):107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Hair Jr JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, et al. Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage; LA; USA; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sinkovics RR. The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In: New challenges to international marketing. Emerald Group; UK; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res. 2003;14(2):189–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J Acad Market Sci. 2015;43(1):115–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning. 2013;46(1–2):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y-S. Review of second-order models for adsorption systems. J Hazardous Mater. 2006;136(3):681–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranthi A, Ahmed KA. Determinants of smartwatch adoption among IT professionals – an extended UTAUT2 model for smartwatch enterprise. Int J Enterp Network Manage. 2018;9(3–4):294–316.
   Google Scholar
• Razzak MR, Jassem S. Socioemotional wealth and performance in private family firms. J Fam Business Manage. 2019;9(4):468–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen A, Alhuraish I, Robledo C, et al. A statistical analysis of critical quality tools and companies’ performance. J Cleaner Prod. 2020;255:120221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Slater MD, Snyder LB. The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research. Sage; LA; USA; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Raykov T. On measures of explained variance in nonrecursive structural equation models. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(1):125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioural sciences. Hilsdale (NY): Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Geisser S. A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika. 1974;61(1):101–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedifew MT, Muluneh GS. Measuring and modelling the adaptive capacity of universities: a composite indicators methodology. Public Administration Research. 2019;8(2).
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, et al. PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;48(1):159–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper MD. Exploratory analyses of the effects of managerial support and feedback consequences on behavioral safety maintenance. J Organizational Behav Manage. 2006;26(3):1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais M. Good management practice as a means of preventing back disorders in the construction sector. Safety Science. 2003;41(1):77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar