Experimental evaluation of impact-resistant gloves using surrogate hands

References

• Alessa FM, Nimbarte A, Sosa EM. Incidences and severity of wrist,: hand, and finger injuries in the U.S. mining industry. Saf Sci. 2020;29(104792):1–11. doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104792.
   Google Scholar
• Dolez P, Soulati K, Gauvin C, et al. Studies and research projects, Technical Guide RG-738, information document for selecting gloves for protection against mechanical hazards. Montréal (QC): Institut de recherché Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST); 2012. p. 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dianat I, Haslegrave CM, Stedmon AW. Methodology for evaluating gloves in relation to the effects on hand performance capabilities: a literature review. Ergonomics. 2012;55(11):1429–1451. doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.708058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods S, Sosa EM, Kurowski-Burt A, et al. Effects of wearing metacarpal gloves on hand dexterity, function, and perceived comfort: a pilot study. Appl Ergon. 2021;97(103538):1–8. doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103538.
   Google Scholar
• Chadli S, Ababou N, Ababou A, et al. Quantification of boxing gloves damping: method and apparatus. Measurement. 2018;129:504–517. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan O, Foster L, Senior T, et al. A comparison of novel and conventional fabrication methods for auxetic foams for sports safety applications. Procedia Eng. 2016;147:384–389. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.323
   Google Scholar
• Irzmańska E, Stefko A. Comparative evaluation of test methods for cut resistance of protective gloves according to polish standards. Fibres Textiles Eastern Europe. 2012;20,5(94):107–111.
   Google Scholar
• Ertekin M, Erhan Kirtay H. Cut resistance of hybrid para-aramid fabrics for protective gloves. J Textile Inst. 2016;107(10):1276–1283. doi:10.1080/00405000.2015.1100820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar M, Shaker K, Umair M, et al. Optimizing the performance of woven protective gloves using grey relational analysis. J Textile Inst. 2017;108(10):1715–1719. doi:10.1080/00405000.2017.1281709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpanen D, Kedgley AE, Shah DS, et al. Injury risk of interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints under impact loading. J Mech Behav Bio Mat. 2019;97:306–311. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loshek PD. Classification of adequate impact protection for hands [master’s thesis]. Madison (WI): University of Wisconsin-Madison; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa EM, Alessa FM. Experimental evaluation of protected and unprotected hands under impact loading. J Biomechanics. 2021;118(110326):1–9. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110326.
   Google Scholar
• Schuurman AH, Kauer JMG. Impact load on the triangular fibrocartilage of the wrist: a cadaver study. J Surgical Res. 2002;103(2):129–133. doi:10.1006/jsre.2001.6344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoganandan N, Chirvi S, Pintar FA, et al. Foot–ankle fractures and injury probability curves from post-mortem human surrogate tests. Bio Eng. 2016;44(10):2937–2947. doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1598-2
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). European Standard EN 388:2016. Protective gloves against mechanical risks. Brussels: CEN; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN). European Standard EN 13594:2015. Protective gloves for motorcycle riders. Brussels: CEN; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 23388:2018. Protective gloves against mechanical risks. Geneva: ISO; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). International Safety Equipment Association (ISEA). ANSI/ISEA 138-2019, 2019. American national standard for performance and classification for impact-resistant gloves. Arlington (VA): ISEA ; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes K, Abramczyk J, Berliner J, et al. ES-2 dummy biomechanical responses. Stapp Car Crash J. 2002;46:353–396.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonin SJ, Luck JF, Bass CR, et al. Dynamic response and residual helmet liner crush using cadaver heads and standard headforms. Bio Eng. 2017;45(3):656–667. doi:10.1007/s10439-016-1712-5
   Google Scholar
• Trotta A, Ní-Annaidh A, Burek RO, et al. Evaluation of the head–helmet sliding properties in an impact test. J Biomechanics. 2018;75:28–34. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummel A, Barker R, Lyons K, et al. Development of instrumented manikin hands for characterizing the thermal protective performance of gloves in flash fire exposures. Fire Technol. 2011;47(3):615–629. doi:10.1007/s10694-010-0190-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KHA, Loo ZY, Goldie SJ, et al. Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(3):213–221. doi:10.1002/ase.1573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YY, Rajaraman M, Lee B, et al. A patient-specific flexible 3D printed orthopedic model for training and teaching of clubfoot correction surgery. 3D Printing Add Manuf. 2016;3(2):99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra A, Srivastava V. Biomaterials and 3D printing techniques used in the medical field. J Med Eng Technol. 2021;45(4):290–302. doi:10.1080/03091902.2021.1893845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu YY, Rajaraman M, Guth J, et al. A high-fidelity tactile hand simulator as a training tool to develop competency in percutaneous pinning in residents. Global Res Rev. 2018;2(7):e028.
   Google Scholar
• Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodontics. 2012;21(8):641–644. doi:10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00888.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ackland D, Robinson D, Lee PV, et al. Design and clinical outcome of a novel 3D-printed prosthetic joint replacement for the human temporomandibular joint. Clinical Biomechanics. 2018;56:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardini AL, Larosa MA, Filho RM, et al. Cranial reconstruction: 3D bio model and custom-built implant created using additive manufacturing. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;42(8):1877–1884. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett JW. The adult human hand: some anthropometric and biomechanical considerations. Human Fact. 1971;13(2):117–131. doi:10.1177/001872087101300204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner TM. Hand anthropometry of U.S. army personnel. Natick (MA): US Army Natick, Research, Development & Engineering Center; 1992. (Technical Report TR-92/011).
   Google Scholar
• Harrison CR, Robinette KM. CAESAR: Summary statistics for the adult population (age 18–65) of the United States of America. Wright-Patterson AFB (OH): Human Effectiveness Directorate, Crew Systems Interface Division; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• White TD, Folkens PA. The human bone manual. Burlington, MA: Elsevier; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Öchsner A, Ahmed W, Fish J, etal Biomechanics of hard tissues. Singapore: Weinheim-Wiley; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The mechanical properties of cortical bone. J Bone Joint Surgery. 1974;56(5):1001–1022. doi:10.2106/00004623-197456050-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanikella NG, Wittbrodt B, Pearce JM. Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing. Additive Manuf. 2017;15:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanzotti A, Grasso M, Staiano G, et al. The impact of process parameters on mechanical properties of parts fabricated in PLA with an open-source 3-D printer. Rapid Prototyping J. 2015;21(5):604–617. doi:10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Vicente M, Calle W, Ferrandiz S, et al. Effect of infill parameters on tensile mechanical behavior in desktop 3D printing. 3D Printing Add Manuf. 2016;3(3):183–192. doi:10.1089/3dp.2015.0036
   Google Scholar
• Alessa FM. A study of impact protection of metacarpal gloves [dissertation]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Humimic Medical, Medical Gels. Fort Smith (AR); 2021. Available from: Humimic Medical, https://humimic.com/product-category/medical-gels/medical-gels-medical-gels/
   Google Scholar
• Risler Z, Magee MA, Mazza JM, et al. A three-dimensional printed low-cost anterior shoulder dislocation model for ultrasound-guided injection training. Cureus. 2018;10(11):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Headman ZC, Matson MC, Schneider RP, et al. Developing neuraxial and regional pain procedural skills through innovative 3-dimensional printing technology. J Am Osteopathic Assoc. 2020;120(4):273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang G, Futter C, Pincus J, et al. Development and testing of a low-cost simulation manikin for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) using 3-dimensional printing. Resuscitation. 2020;149:24–29. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). ASTM Standard D2240, 2021: standard test method for rubber property – durometer hardness. ASTM (West Conshohocken, PA).
   Google Scholar
• Brison TA, Sosa EM. Development of surrogate hand for impact tests. Mountaineer Undergraduate Res Rev. 2020;5:9–15. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/murr/vol5/iss1/5/.
   Google Scholar
• Haron A, Ismail KA. Coefficient of restitution of sports balls: a normal drop test. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2012;36(1):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Aryaei A, Hashemnia K, Jafarpur K. Experimental and numerical study of ball size effect on restitution coefficient in low velocity impacts. Int J Impact Eng. 2010;37(10):1037–1044. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandeep CS, Senetakis K, Cheung DKH, et al. Experimental study on the coefficient of restitution of grain against block interfaces for natural and engineered materials. Canadian Geotechnical J. 2020;58:35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonner AA. Effect of metacarpal gloves on pinch and grip strength [master's thesis]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sah S. Can Fitts’ throughput be a predictor of muscle fatigue? – A study based on metacarpal gloves [master's thesis]. Morgantown (WV): West Virginia University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz B, Armstrong TJ, Goldstein SA. Anthropometric data for describing the kinematics of the human hand. Ergonomics. 1992;35(3):261–273. doi:10.1080/00140139208967812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas R, Silva C, Costa L, et al. Male ageing and bone mineral density in a sample of Portuguese men. A Reumatologica Portuguesa. 2008;33:306–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar