The effect of positive reinforcement of behavioral-based safety on safety participation in Philippine coal-fired power plant workers: a partial least squares structural equation modeling approach

References

• Geller ES. Behavior-based safety and occupational risk management. Behav modification. 2005;29(3):539–561. doi:10.1177/0145445504273287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail F, Hashim AE, Zuriea W, et al. Behaviour based approach for quality and safety environment improvement: Malaysian experience in the oil and gas industry. Procedia-Social and Behav Sci. 2012;35:586–594. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.125
   Google Scholar
• Roberts M. Understanding organisational and personal behaviours to sustain high productivity and safety. Conference: 6. Australasian coal operators' conference: Coal2005, Brisbane, Qld. (Australia), 26–28 Apr 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wu T-C, Lin C-H, Shiau S-Y. Predicting safety culture: the roles of employer, operations manager and safety professional. J Saf Res. 2010;41(5):423–431. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2010.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaila H. Behaviour based safety in organizations. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2006;10(3):102. doi:10.4103/0019-5278.29568
   Google Scholar
• Neal A, Gri M, Neal HP. The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1–3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0925-7535(00)00008-4
   Google Scholar
• Ocon R, McFarlane O. eds. Reducing employee injuries through behavior based safety. Fifth LACCEI International Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology (LACCEI'2007) “Developing Entrepreneurial Engineers for the Sustainable Growth of Latin America and the Caribbean: Education, Innovation, Technology and Practice” 29 May – 1 June 2007, Tampico, México.
   Google Scholar
• Kim W, Burgherr P, Spada M, et al. Energy-related severe accident database (ENSAD): cloud-based geospatial platform. Big Earth Data. 2018;2(4):368–394. doi:10.1080/20964471.2019.1586276
   Google Scholar
• Hirschberg S, Burgherr P, Hunt A. eds. Accident risks in the energy sector: comparison of damage indicators and external costs. In: Spitzer C, Schmocker U, Dang VN, editors. Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management; 2004: London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Fogarty GJ, Shaw A. Safety climate and the theory of planned behavior: towards the prediction of unsafe behavior. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(5):1455–1459. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mihai MP, Sorin BM. Behavioral based safety management in electric power industry – complementary safety of workers. Advances in automatic control. Model Simul. 2010: 303–307.
   Google Scholar
• Rahmani A, Khadem M, Madreseh E, et al. Descriptive study of occupational accidents and their causes among electricity distribution company workers at an eight-year period in Iran. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(3):160–165. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2013.07.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behera RK, Hassan MI. Regulatory interventions and industrial accidents: a case from India for ‘Vision Zero’ goals. Saf Sci. 2019;113:415–424. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo BH, Goh YM, Wong KLX. A system dynamics view of a behavior-based safety program in the construction industry. Saf Sci. 2018;104:202–215. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell J, Healey N. The causes of major hazard incidents and how to improve risk control and health and safety management: a review of the existing literature. Harpur Hill, Buxton: CiteSeer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Burgherr P, Hirschberg S. Severe accident risks in fossil energy chains: a comparative analysis. Energy. 2008;33(4):538–553. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2007.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippine Statistics Authority. 2017 Annual Survey of Philippine Business and Industry (ASPBI) – electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply sector with total employment of 20 and over: preliminary results [Internet]; [cited December 1st, 2020] 2019. Available from: https://psa.gov.ph/content/2017-annual-survey-philippine-business-and-industry-aspbi-electricity-gas-steam-and-air
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Fan Y, Wang J, et al. The mediating role of safety management practices in process safety culture in the Chinese oil industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2019;57:223–230. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal H, Waheed B, Haider H, et al. Mapping safety culture attributes with integrity management program to achieve assessment goals: a framework for oil and gas pipelines industry. J Saf Res. 2019;68:59–69. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2018.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saedi A, Majid AA, Isa Z. Relationships between safety climate and safety participation in the petroleum industry: a structural equation modeling approach. Saf Sci. 2020;121:240–248. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.08.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz S, Park D. The effect of safety communication network characteristics on safety awareness and behavior in an LNG terminal. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;27(1):1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T-C, Chang S-H, Shu C-M, et al. Safety leadership and safety performance in petrochemical industries: the mediating role of safety climate. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2011;24(6):716–721. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2011.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin D-P, Gwak H-S, Lee D-E. Modeling the predictors of safety behavior in construction workers. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):298–311. doi:10.1080/10803548.2015.1085164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmoujaddidi F, Bachir A. Perceived risk, safety climate and safety behavior on Moroccan construction sites. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019;26(1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia FJ, Tomas I, Martinez-Corcoles M, et al. Empowering leadership,: mindful organizing and safety performance in a nuclear power plant: a multilevel structural equation model. Saf Sci. 2020;123:104542. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.104542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Córcoles M, Gracia F, Tomás I, et al. Leadership and employees’ perceived safety behaviours in a nuclear power plant: a structural equation model. Saf Sci. 2011;49(8–9):1118–1129. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Córcoles M, Schöbel M, Gracia FJ, et al. Linking empowering leadership to safety participation in nuclear power plants: a structural equation model. J Saf Res. 2012;43(3):215–221. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2012.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maples JL, Guan L, Carter NT, et al. A test of the international personality item pool representation of the revised NEO personality inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological assessment. 2014;26(4):1070. doi:10.1037/pas0000004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiu NS, Chan DW, Shan M, et al. Implementation of safety management system in managing construction projects: benefits and obstacles. Saf Sci. 2019;117:23–32. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-C, Mufidah I, Persada SF. Safety-culture exploration in Taiwan’s metal industries: identifying the workers’ background influence on safety climate. Sustainability. 2017;9(11):1965. doi:10.3390/su9111965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DF, DeCotiis TA. Organizational determinants of job stress. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1983;32(2):160–177. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90145-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro BL, Gracia FJ, Tomás I, et al. The safety culture enactment questionnaire (SCEQ): theoretical model and empirical validation. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;103:44–55. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suprapto VH, Pujawan N, Dewi RS. A framework to strengthen learning culture and safeguards. Safety. 2021;7(4):78. doi:10.3390/safety7040078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suprapto VH, Pujawan IN, Dewi RS. Effects of human performance improvement and operational learning on organizational safety culture and occupational safety and health management performance. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021: 1–13. doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.2002571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell-Carlson D. Rewarding safe behavior: strategies for change. Aaohn Journal. 2004;52(12):521–529. doi:10.1177/216507990405201206
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim NK, Rahim NFA, Iranmanesh M, et al. The role of the safety climate in the successful implementation of safety management systems. Saf Sci. 2019;118:48–56. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer DJ, Benet-Martinez V. Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:401–421. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei Q, Wang Q, Liu S, et al. Effects of organizational safety on employees’ proactivity safety behaviors and occupational health and safety management systems in Chinese high-risk small-scale enterprises. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020;26(1):101–111. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1470287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Yang X, Mei Q. The effect of perceived organizational support for safety and organizational commitment on employee safety behavior: a meta-analysis. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;27(4):1154–1165. doi:10.1080/10803548.2019.1694778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith TD, Mullins-Jaime C, Dyal M-A, et al. Stress, burnout and diminished safety behaviors: an argument for Total Worker Health® approaches in the fire service. J Saf Res. 2020;75:189–195. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2020.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silla I, Navajas J, Koves GK. Organizational culture and a safety-conscious work environment: the mediating role of employee communication satisfaction. J Saf Res. 2017;61:121–127. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerin RJ, Toland MD. An application of a modified theory of planned behavior model to investigate adolescents’ job safety knowledge, norms, attitude and intention to enact workplace safety and health skills. J Saf Res. 2020;72:189–198. doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olak AJ, Hejduk I, Karwowski W, et al. The relationships between the use of smart mobile technology, safety knowledge and propensity to follow safe practices at work. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;27(3):911–920. doi:10.1080/10803548.2019.1658398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martyka J, Lebecki K. Safety culture in high-risk industries. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(4):561–572. doi:10.1080/10803548.2014.11077076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalteh HO, Mortazavi SB, Mohammadi E, et al. The relationship between safety culture and safety climate and safety performance: a systematic review. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021;27(1):206–216. doi:10.1080/10803548.2018.1556976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, et al. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Çakıt E, Olak AJ, Karwowski W, et al. Assessing safety at work using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) approach aided by partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Int J Ind Ergon. 2020;76:102925. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izogo EE, Reza A, Ogba I-E, et al. Determinants of relationship quality and customer loyalty in retail banking: evidence from Nigeria. African J Econ Manage Stud. 2017;8(2):186–204.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res. 2020;109:101–110. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ab Hamid M, Sami W, Sidek MM. Discriminant validity assessment: use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. J Phys Conf. Ser. 2017;890 012163. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10 .1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
   Google Scholar
• Kushary D. Bootstrap methods and their application. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986;1(1):54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, et al. Handbook of partial least squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus M, Vinzi VE, Chatelin Y-M, et al. PLS path modeling. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;48(1):159–205. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Soc Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah R, Goldstein SM. Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. J Oper Manage. 2006;24(2):148–169. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y-H, Sinclair RR, Lee J, et al. Does talking the talk matter? Effects of supervisor safety communication and safety climate on long-haul truckers’ safety performance. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;117:357–367. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl Ø. Safety compliance in a highly regulated environment: a case study of workers’ knowledge of rules and procedures within the petroleum industry. Saf Sci. 2013;60:185–195. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.07.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jong-Hyun L, Soo-Hyun S, Seung-Nam M, et al. The effects of personality types on self-reported safety behavior: focused on plant workers in Korea. Accid Anal Prev. 2018;121:20–27. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman DA. Design rules based on analyses of human error. Commun ACM. 1983;26(4):254–258. doi:10.1145/2163.358092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orzáez F, Domingo R, Marín M. Considerations for the development of a human reliability analysis (HRA) model oriented to the maintenance work safety. Procedia Manuf. 2019;41:185–192. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.07.045
   Google Scholar
• Philippine Statistics Authority. 2017 Annual Survey of Philippine Business and Industry (ASPBI) – electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply sector: final results [Internet]; [cited January 20th, 2021] 2019. Available from: https://psa.gov.ph/content/2017-annual-survey-philippine-business-and-industry-aspbi-electricity-gas-steam-and-air-0
   Google Scholar
• German JD, Redi AA, Prasetyo YT, et al. Choosing a package carrier during COVID-19 pandemic: an integration of pro-environmental planned behavior (PEPB) theory and service quality (SERVQUAL).J Cleaner Prod. 2022;346:131123. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong AK, Prasetyo YT, Salazar JM, et al. Investigating the acceptance of the reopening Bataan nuclear power plant: integrating protection motivation theory and extended theory of planned behavior. Nucl Eng Technol. 2022;54:1115–1125. doi:10.1016/j.net.2021.08.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sario MC, Prasetyo YT. Classification scheme of work-related accidents in a ready-mixed concrete company. In: 2021 IEEE 8th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), 23–26 April 2021, Chengdu, China. 2021. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9436720
   Google Scholar