Human reliability analysis in deep excavation projects using a fuzzy Bayesian HEART-5M integrated method: case of a residential tower in north Tehran

References

• McDonald MA, Lipscomb HJ, Bondy J, et al. ‘Safety is everyone’s job’: the key to safety on a large university construction site. J Saf Res. 2009;40(1):53–61. Doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2008.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kines P, Andersen LP, Spangenberg S, et al. Improving construction site safety through leader-based verbal safety communication. J Safety Res. 2010;41(5):399–406. Doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2010.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Tang Q, Zhang J. Dynamic risk assessment for excavation engineering based on human factors. First Int Conf Informat Sci Eng. 2009:4270–4274. Doi:10.1109/ICISE.2009.523
   Google Scholar
• Ejraee MH. Principles and safety of excavation. Tehran: Ministry of Labour Cooperation and Social Welfare; 2013. Persian.
   Google Scholar
• Ghousi R, Khanzadi M, Atshgah M. A flexible method of building construction safety risk assessment and investigation financial aspects of safety program. Int J Optim Civil Eng. 2018;8(3):433–452.
   Google Scholar
• Valipour A, Yahaya Y, Md Noor N, et al. Hybrid SWARA–COPRAS method for risk assessment in deep foundation excavation project: an Iranian case study. J Civil Eng Manag. 2017;23(4):524–532. Doi:10.3846/13923730.2017.1281842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero M, Peila D. The use of the analytic hierarchy process for the comparison between microtunnelling and trench excavation. Tunnel Under Space Technol. 2005;20(6):501–513. Doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai YT, Wang WC, Wang HH. AHP- and simulation-based budget determination procedure for public building construction projects. Automat Constr. 2008;17(5):623–632. Doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2007.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou HB, Zhang H. Risk assessment methodology for a deep foundation pit construction project in Shanghai, China. J Constr Eng Manag. 2011;137(12):1185–1194. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakher A. Advanced foundation engineering. Tehran: University of Tehran Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo YC, Lu ST. Using fuzzy multiple criteria decision making approach to enhance risk assessment for metropolitan construction projects. Int J Project Manag. 2013;31(4):602–614. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo L, Kaiqiang W, Mian H, et al. Research on fuzzy hierarchical risk assessment of metro deep excavation pit. Chinese J Under Space Eng. 2015;11(S1):257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Khosravizade A, Sharifipour M. Subway risks assessment in different construction stages using AHP and TOPSIS. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9(7):1–9. Doi:10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i7/87859.
   Google Scholar
• Khan N, Ali AK, Skibniewski MJ, etal. Excavation safety modeling approach using BIM and VPL. Adv Civil Eng. 2019: 1–15. Doi:10.1155/2019/1515808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Liu Z, Liu HC, et al. An improved alternative queuing method for occupational health and safety risk assessment and its application to construction excavation. Automat Constr. 2021;126:103672. Doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin SS, Shen SL, Zhou A, et al. Novel model for risk identification during karst excavation. Reliab Eng System Saf. 2021;209:1–14. Doi:10.1016/j.ress.2021.107435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertman D, Blackman H, Marble J, et al.. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 2005;230(4):35.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman HS, Byers JC. ASP/SPAR methodology. Internal EG&G report developed for the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Galvão N, Matos JC, Oliveira DV, etal Human error impact in structural safety of a reinforced concrete bridge. Struct Infrast Eng. 2021;18(6):836–850. Doi:10.1080/15732479.2021.1876105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Embrey DE. SHERPA: a systematic human error reduction and prediction approach. Proc Int Top Meet Adv Human Fact Nuclear Power Syst. 1986;18(17):184–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ghasemi M, Khoshakhlagh AH, Mahmudi S, et al. Identification and assessment of medical errors in the triage area of an educational hospital using the SHERPA technique in Iran. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):382–390. Doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1073431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan b. A guide to practical human reliability assessment. London: Taylor & Francis; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Bowo LP, Furusho M, Mutmainnah WA. New HEART-4M method for human error assessment in maritime collision accidents. Trans Navigation. 2020;5(2):39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Virdi PS, Pamnani G. Human error identification and risk prioritization in LPG unloading operations. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022:1–15. Doi:10.1080/10803548.2022.2065771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaniel Torres Y, Nadeau S, Landau K. Classification and quantification of human error in manufacturing: a case study in complex manual assembly. Appl Sci. 2021;11(2):749. Doi: 10.3390/app11020749
   Google Scholar
• Humphreys P. Human reliability assessor’s guide. Risley: Human Reliability in Factor’s Group; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Informat Control. 1965;8:338–353. Doi:10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong WM, Wang FS. Fuzzy weighted averages and implementation of the extension principle. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1987;21:183–199. Doi:10.1016/0165-0114(87)90163-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radman Kian AH, Ghousi R, Janinasab M. Risk assessment of workshops at Iran University of Science and Technology using fuzzy FMEA. Occup Hyg Health Promot. 2020;4(2):167–182.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrycz W. Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994;64:21–30. Doi:10.1016/0165-0114(94)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, Wong YD, Loh HS, et al. A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis – the case of tanker shipping. Saf Sci. 2018;105:149–157. Doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl J. Fusion, propagation, and structuring in belief networks. Artif Intel. 1986;29(3):241–288. Doi:10.1016/0004-3702(86)90072-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliabadi MM, Mohammadfam I, Salimi K. Identification and evaluation of maintenance error in catalyst replacement using the HEART technique under a fuzzy environment. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;8(2):1291–1303. Doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1890423
   Google Scholar
• Cárdenas IC, Al-Jibouri SS, Halman JI, et al. Modeling risk-related knowledge in tunneling projects. Risk Anal. 2014;34(2):323–339. Doi:10.1111/risa.12094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanzadi M, Eshtehardian E, Esfahani MM. Cash flow forecasting with risk consideration using Bayesian belief networks (BBNS). J Civil Eng Manag. 2017;23(8):1045–1059. Doi:10.3846/13923730.2017.1374303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Xing Y, Lu J. Causation analysis of hazardous material road transportation accidents by Bayesian network using genie. J Adv Trans. 2018;special issue 2018 . Doi:10.1155/2018/6248105.
   Google Scholar
• Slizyte D, Lepkova N, Mackevicius R.. Geotechnical Risk Identification: Case Study of Flexible Retaining Walls Installation. Teknik Dergi. 2020;31(4):10085–10111. Doi:10.18400/tekderg.459316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thwala DW, Mustapha Z, Aigbavbao C. Major excavation hazard in cape coast metropolis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; March 5-7. Bangkok, Thailand, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Khanzadi M, Nasirzadeh F, Dashti MS. Fuzzy cognitive map approach to analyze causes of change orders in construction projects. J Constr Eng Manag. 2018;144(2):04017111. Doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghasemi F, Ghasemi A, Kalatpour O. Prediction of human error probability during the hydrocarbon road tanker loading operation using a hybrid technique of fuzzy sets, Bayesian network and CREAM. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022;28(3):1342–1352. Doi:10.1080/10803548.2021.1889877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar