The influence of team workload on team performance in the light of task complexity: a study of nuclear fire brigades

References

• Salas E, Dickinson TL, Converse SA, et al. Toward an understanding of team performance and training. In: Swezey RW, Salas E, editors. Teams: their training and performance. Norwood (NJ): Ablex; 1992. p. 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Colquitt JA, Lepine JA, Zapata CP, et al. Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(5):999–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouanne E, Charron C, Chauvin C, et al. Correlates of team effectiveness: an exploratory study of firefighter’s operations during emergency situations. Appl. Ergon. 2017;61:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis J, Gallagher S. Physiological demand on firefighters crawling during a search exercise. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014;44(6):821–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neitzel R, Hong O, Quinlan P, et al. Pilot task-based assessment of noise levels among firefighters. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2013;43(6):479–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisbett B, Wolkow A, Sprajcer M, et al. ‘Awake, smoky, and hot’: providing an evidence-base for managing the risks associated with occupational stressors encountered by wildland firefighters. Appl. Ergon. 2012;43(5):916–925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell T, Salas E, Driskell JE. Teams in extreme environments: alterations in team development and teamwork. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2018;28(4):434–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller MJ, Gupta N, Giambatista RC. Effects of adaptive behaviors and shared mental models on control crew performance. Manage Sci. 2004;50(11):1534–1544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jee MH, Moon CK, Kim HT. Performance-based firefighting strategies for confined fire zones in nuclear power plants. Prog. Nucl. Energy. 2013;62:16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopher D, Donchin E. Workload: an examination of the concept. In: Boff KR, Kaufman L, Thomas JP, editors. Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. II, Cognitive Processes and Performance. New York (NY): Wiley; 1986. p. 41–49.
   Google Scholar
• Tsang PS, Vidulich MA. Mental workload and situation awareness. In: Salvendy G, editor. Handbook of human factors and ergonomics. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2006. p. 243–274.
   Google Scholar
• Funke GJ, Knott BA, Salas E, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of team workload: a critical need. Hum. Factors. 2012;54(1):36–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers CA, Jentsch F. Team workload. In: Stanton N, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick H, editors. Handbook of human factors and ergonomic methods. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2005. p. 571–573.
   Google Scholar
• Gawron VJ. Human performance, workload, and situational awareness measures handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Antalovits M, Izsó L. Assessment of crew performance and measurement of mental task effort in cognitively demanding task environment. In: Hockey GRJ, Gaillard AWK, Burov O, editors. Operator functional state. Amsterdam: IOS Press and Kluwer Academic; 2003. p. 284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Casali JG, Wierwille WW. A comparison of rating scale, secondary task, physiological, and primary-task workload estimation techniques in a simulated flight task emphasizing communications load. Hum. Factors. 1983;25:623–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn GP, Kesler RM, Motl RW, et al. Physiological responses to simulated firefighter exercise protocols in varying environments. Ergonomics. 2015;58:1012–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murai K, Okazaki K, Hayashi Y. Measurement for mental workload of bridge team on leaving/entering port. Paper presented at: 2004 IEEE Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium; 2004 Apr; Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock PA, Meshkati N, editors. Human mental workload. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1986. p. 139–183.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio S, Díaz E, Martin J, et al. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: a comparison of SWAT, NASA-TLX, and workload profile methods. Appl. Psychol. 2004;53(1):61–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funke GJ, Galster SM. The effects of cognitive processing load and collaboration technology on team performance in a simulated command and control environment. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009;39(3):541–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand GA, Pharmer JA, Weaver MD. Performance and usability evaluation of an automated task management concept prototype design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2003;47:1913–1917.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz D. Exploring team dynamics: the evolution of coordination in a complex command and control environment [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dayton (OH): Wright State University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Sebok A. Team performance in process control: influences of interface design and staffing levels. Ergonomics. 2000;43:1210–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driskell JE, Salas E, Johnston J. Does stress lead to a loss of team perspective? Group Dyn-Theor Res. 1999;3(4):291–302.
   Google Scholar
• Grote G, Zala-Mező E. The effects of different forms of coordination in coping with workload: cockpit versus operating theatre. Report on the psychological part of the project. GIHRE-Kolleg (group interaction in high risk environments) of the Daimler-Benz foundation. Zurich: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Liao H, Hildebrandt M. Empirical insights on operators’ procedure following behavior in nuclear power plants. In: Harris D, editor. 10th International Conference, EPCE 2013; 2013 Jul 21–26; Las Vegas, NV. p. 242–251. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brüggen A. An empirical investigation of the relationship between workload and performance. Manag. Decis. 2015;53(10):2377–2389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico R, Gibson CB, Sánchez-Manzanares M, et al. Building team effectiveness through adaptation: team knowledge and implicit and explicit coordination. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2019;9(2-3):71–98.
   Google Scholar
• Grote G, Kolbe M, Waller MJ. The dual nature of adaptive coordination in teams. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2018;8(2–3):125–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson EAI, Wilson GF. Psychological and psychophysiological models of pilot performance for systems development and mission evaluation. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 2002;12(1):95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häusler R, Klämpfer R, Amacher A, et al. Behavioral markers in analyzing team performance of cockpit crews. In: Dietrich R, Childress TM, editors. Group interaction in high risk environments. Burlington: Ashgate; 2004. p. 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Huey BM, Wickens CD. Workload transition: implications for individual and team performance. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar