How spiritual leadership affects team safety performance: the role of team reflexivity and work interdependence

References

• Neal A, Griffin MA. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(4):946–953. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Zhang YR, Li F. A multilevel model of autonomous safety motivation and safety performance. Adv Psychol Sci. 2019;27(7):1141–1152. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.01141
   Google Scholar
• Griffin MA, Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. J Occup Health Psychol. 2000;5(3):347–358. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.3.347
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fry LW. Tow and a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadersh Q. 2003;14(6):693–727. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai AA. Creating safer workplaces: the role of ethical leadership. Saf Sci. 2015;73:92–98. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan N, Ahmad I, Ilyas M. Impact of ethical leadership on organizational safety performance: the mediating role of safety culture and safety consciousness. Ethics Behav. 2018;28(8):628–643. doi:10.1080/10508422.2018.1427097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inness M, Turner N, Barling J, et al. Transformational leadership and employee safety performance: a within-person, between-jobs design. J Occup Health Psychol. 2010;15(3):279–290. doi:10.1037/a0019380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Córcoles M, Gracia FJ, Tomás I, et al. Empowering team leadership and safety performance in nuclear power plants: a multilevel approach. Saf Science. 2013;51(1):293–301. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu CS, Yang CS. Safety leadership and safety behavior in container terminal operations. Saf Science. 2010;48(2):123–134. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali M, Aziz S, Pham NT, et al. A positive human health perspective on how spiritual leadership weaves its influence on employee safety performance: the role of harmonious safety passion. Saf Science. 2020;131:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Liu Y, Liu P, et al. The spiritual force of safety: effect of spiritual leadership on employees’ safety performance. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2022: 1–9. doi:10.1080/10803548.2022.2056379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schippers MC, Homan AC, Knippenberg DV. To reflect or not to reflect: prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. J Org Behav. 2013;34(1):6–23. doi:10.1002/job.1784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West MA, Hirst G, Richter A, et al. Twelve steps to heaven: successfully managing change through developing innovative teams. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2004;13(2):269–299. doi:10.1080/13594320444000092
   Google Scholar
• Ye X, Ren S, Chadee D, et al. The canary in the coal mine: a multi-level analysis of the role of hope in managing safety performance of underground miners. J Vocat Behav. 2020;121:(103461)1–44. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103461
   Google Scholar
• Afsar B, Badir Y, Kiani US. Linking spiritual leadership and employee pro-environmental behavior: the influence of workplace spirituality, intrinsic motivation, and environmental passion. J Environ Psychol. 2016;45(3):79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.011
   Google Scholar
• Lin CP, Liu CM, Joe SW, et al. Modelling leadership and team performance: the moderation of politics and leadership self-efficacy. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell. 2020;33(1–2):73–91. doi:10.1080/14783363.2020.1794804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox A, Li S. The medical consultation through the lenses of language and social interaction theory. Adv Health Sci Edu. 2019;25(1):241–257. doi:10.1007/s10459-018-09873-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ar A, Mgb C, Dwr D. The impact of work demands and operational tempo on safety culture, motivation and perceived performance in safety critical systems. Saf Sci. 2022;155; doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann D, Stetzer AA. A cross level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents. Pers Psychol. 1996;49(2):307–339. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01802.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52(1):1–9. doi:10.1111/1467-839x.00024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo M, Hu L, Ye L. Cognition and driving safety: how does the high-speed railway drivers’ cognitive ability affect safety performance? Transp Res F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2019;65:10–22. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajgopal T. Mental well-being at the workplace. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2011;14(3):63–65. doi:10.4103/0019-5278.75691
   Google Scholar
• Guo B, Yiu TW, González VA. Predicting safety behavior in the construction industry: development and test of an integrative model. Saf Sci. 2016;84:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchino BN. Understanding the links between social ties and health: on building stronger bridges with relationship science. J Soc Pers Relationsh. 2013;30(2SI):155–162. doi:10.1177/0265407512458659
   Google Scholar
• Fry LW, Cohen MP. Spiritual leadership as a paradigm for organizational transformation and recovery from extended work hours cultures. J Bus Ethics. 2009;84(2):265–278. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9695-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West MA, Anderson NR. Innovation in top management teams. J Appl Psychol. 1996;81(6):680–693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vashdi DR, Bamberger PA, Erez M. Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Acad Manag J. 2013;56(4):945–971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede NP, Ayranci E. Exploring the connections among spiritual leadership, altruism, and trust in family businesses. Qual Quant. 2014;48(6):3373–3400. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9962-x
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg FJ, Locander WB. Advancing workplace spiritual development: a dyadic mentoring approach. Leadership Q. 2014;25(2):391–408. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficapal-Cusà P, Enache-Zegheru M, Torrent-Sellens J. Enhancing team performance: a multilevel model. J Clean Prod. 2020;289:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vegt GSVD, Vliert EVD. Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams. J Manag. 2005;31(1):73–89. doi:10.1177/0149206304271382
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach DG, Powell BC, Bendoly E, et al. Organizational citizenship behavior and performance evaluations: exploring the impact of task interdependence. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(1):193–201. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zheng B, Liu H, et al. Three-way interaction effect of social media usage, perceived task interdependence and perceived participative leadership on employee creativity. Internet Res. 2020;31(2):457–478. doi:10.1108/INTR-02-2020-0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico R, Bachrach DG, Sánchez-Manzanares M, et al. The interactive effects of person-focused citizenship behaviour, task interdependence, and virtuality on team performance. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2011;20(5):700–726. doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.495206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beigpourian B, Ohland MW. Dynamics of mixed-gender teams in engineering education. Int J Eng Edu. 2022;38(3):774–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu J, Liden RC. Making a difference in the teamwork: linking team prosocial motivation to team processes and effectiveness. Acad Manag J. 2014;58(4):1102–1127. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.1142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke KA, Kipperberg G, Nyborg K. Social interaction in responsibility ascription: the case of household recycling. Land Econ. 2010;86(4):766–784. doi:10.3368/le.86.4.766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidyarthi PR, Anand S, Liden RC. Do emotionally perceptive leaders motivate higher employee performance? The moderating role of task interdependence and power distance. Leadership Q. 2014;25(2):232–244. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves T. Interacting for the environment: engaging Goffman in pro-environmental action. Soc Nat Resour. 2015;29(1):1–15. doi:10.10.80/08941920.2015.1054978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hon A, Chan W. Team creative performance: the roles of empowering leadership, creative-related motivation, and task interdependence. Cornell Hosp Q. 2013;54(2):199–210. doi:10.1177/1938965512455859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eric M. Attitudes toward flexibility: the role of task characteristics. Group Organ Manag. 2009;34(2):241–268. doi:10.1177/1059601108330090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu J, Chen Z, Huang Q, et al. A multilevel analysis of the relationship between shared leadership and creativity in inter-organizational teams. J Creat Behav. 2016;52(2):109–126. doi:10.1002/jocb.135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry LW, Vitucci S, Cedillo M. Spiritual leadership and army transformation: theory, measurement, and establishing a baseline. Leadership Q. 2005;16(5):835–862. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campion MA, Medsker GJ, Higgs AC. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: implications for designing effective work groups. Pers Psychol. 1993;46(4):823–850. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1993.tb01571.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Jin R, Wood H, et al. Investigation of demographic factors in construction employees’ safety perceptions. KSCE J Civ Eng. 2019;23(7):2815–2828. doi:10.1007/s12205-019-2044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliese PD, Maltarich MA, Hendricks JL. Back to basics with mixed-effects models: nine take-away points. J Bus Psychol. 2017;33(1):1–23. doi:10.1007/s10869-017-9491-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew JJ, Leong LY, Tan WH, et al. The age of mobile social commerce: an artificial neural network analysis on its resistances. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;144:311–324. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Methods. 2007;12(1):1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Meng Y, Qiu Y, et al. Why am I willing to speak up? The impact of spiritual leadership on employee voice behavior. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2718–2718. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Guo T, Ni Y, et al. The effect of spiritual leadership on employee effectiveness: an intrinsic motivation perspective. Front Psychol. 2019;9:2627–2641. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA. The structure and function of collective constructs: implications for multilevel research and theory development. Acad Manag Rev. 1999;24(2):249–265. doi:10.5465/AMR.1999.1893935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc PM, González-Romá V, Wang H. Charismatic leadership and work team innovative behavior: the role of team task interdependence and team potency. J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(2):333–346. doi:10.1007/s10869-019-09663-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar