0
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The burdens and benefits of managing and engaging: a diary study approach to person-centred risk assessment of top executives and works council members

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Sonnentag S, Tay L, Nesher Shoshan H. A review on health and well-being at work: more than stressors and strains. Pers Psychol. 2023;76:473–510. doi:10.1111/peps.12572
  • Theorell T, Hammarström A, Aronsson G, et al. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:738. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1954-4
  • Potter R, Jamieson S, Jain A, et al. Evaluation of national work-related psychosocial risk management policies: an international review of the literature. Saf Sci. 2022;154:105854. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105854
  • Leka S, Jain A, Iavicoli S, et al. An evaluation of the policy context on psychosocial risks and mental health in the workplace in the European Union: achievements, challenges, and the future. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:213089.
  • Leka S, Jain A, Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: an overview. [place unknown]: World Health Organization; 2010.
  • Metzler YA, Neuhaus CA, Taibi Y, et al. Redesigning workplaces by bridging the gap between analysis and action. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O. 2022;66:184–197. doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000393
  • Borgschulte M, Guenzel M, Liu C, et al. CEO stress, aging, and death. Cambridge, MA: US National Bureau of Economic Research; 2021.
  • Hambrick DC, Finkelstein S, Mooney AC. Executive job demands: new insights for explaining strategic decisions and leader behaviors. Acad Manag Rev [Internet]. 2005;30:472–491. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159139. doi:10.5465/amr.2005.17293355
  • Porter ME, Nohria N. How CEOs manage time [Internet]; [cited 2023 Jul 25]. Available from: https://hbr.org/2018/07/how-ceos-manage-time
  • Rabe M, Giacomuzzi S, Nübling M. Psychosocial workload and stress in the workers’ representative. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:909. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-909
  • Wills J. Great expectations: three years in the life of a European works council. Eur J Ind Relat. 2000;6:85–107. doi:10.1177/095968010061005
  • Gruber H, Kittelmann M, Barth C. Leitfaden für die Gefährdungsbeurteilung. 16th ed. Bochum: DC Verlag e. K; 2018. German.
  • Barling J, Cloutier A. Leaders’ mental health at work: empirical, methodological, and policy directions. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017;22:394–406. doi:10.1037/ocp0000055
  • Muraven M, Tice DM, Baumeister RF. Self-control as a limited resource: regulatory depletion patterns. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:774–789. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.774
  • Skagert K, Dellve L, Eklöf M, et al. Leaders’ strategies for dealing with own and their subordinates’ stress in public human service organisations. Appl Ergon. 2008;39:803–811. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.006
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. From ego depletion to vitality: theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2008;2:702–717. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x
  • International Labour Organization. Convention C155 – occupational safety and health convention, 1981 (No. 155) [Internet]; 1981 [cited 2023 Jul 25]. Available from: https://www.ilo.org/dyn/normlex/en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::p12100_instrument_id:312300
  • Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. The work design questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91:1321–1339. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
  • Lincke H-J, Vomstein M, Lindner A, et al. COPSOQ III in Germany: validation of a standard instrument to measure psychosocial factors at work. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2021;16:50. doi:10.1186/s12995-021-00331-1
  • Inceoglu I, Thomas G, Chu C, et al. Leadership behavior and employee well-being: an integrated review and a future research agenda. Leadersh Q. 2018;29:179–202. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.006
  • Wegge J, Shemla M, Haslam SA. Leader behavior as a determinant of health at work: specification and evidence of five key pathways. German J Human Res Manag. 2014;28:6–23.
  • Blake AB, Luu VH, Petrenko OV, et al. Let’s agree about nice leaders: a literature review and meta-analysis of agreeableness and its relationship with leadership outcomes. Leadersh Q. 2022;33:101593. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101593
  • Harari MB, Williams EA, Castro SL, et al. Self-leadership: a meta-analysis of over two decades of research. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2021;94:890–923. doi:10.1111/joop.12365
  • Anderson MH, Sun PYT. Reviewing leadership styles: overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory. Int J Manag Rev. 2017;19:76–96. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12082
  • Nielsen K, Daniels K, Nayani R, et al. Out of mind, out of sight? Leading distributed workers to ensure health and safety. Work Stress. 2019;33:173–191. doi:10.1080/02678373.2018.1509402
  • Garzaro G, Gatti P, Caputo A, et al. Job demands and perceived distance in leader–follower relationships: a study on emotional exhaustion among nurses. Appl Nurs Res. 2021;61:151455. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151455
  • Stempel CR, Dettmers J, Rigotti T. The domino effect: how leader job characteristics as antecedents of transformational leadership facilitate follower job characteristics. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2023;32:1–10.
  • Nielsen K, Taris TW. Leading well: challenges to researching leadership in occupational health psychology – and some ways forward. Work Stress. 2019;33:107–118. doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1592263
  • Bernerth JB, Hirschfeld RR. The subjective well-being of group leaders as explained by the quality of leader–member exchange. Leadersh Q. 2016;27:697–710. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.04.003
  • Taris TW, Nielsen K. Leadership in occupational health psychology. Work Stress. 2019;33:105–106. doi:10.1080/02678373.2019.1592262
  • Lundqvist D. Psychosocial work environment and health when entering or leaving a managerial position. Work (Reading. Mass.). 2022;73:505–515.
  • Skakon J, Kristensen TS, Christensen KB, et al. Do managers experience more stress than employees? results from the Intervention Project on Absence and Well-being (IPAW) study among Danish managers and their employees. Work (Reading. Mass.). 2011;38:103–109.
  • Dalgaard VL, Gayed A, Hansen AKL, et al. A study protocol outlining the development and evaluation of a training program for frontline managers on leading well-being and the psychosocial work environment in Danish hospital settings – a cluster randomized waitlist controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2023;23:848. doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15728-2
  • Degen L, Göbel J, Minder K, et al. Leadership program with skills training for general practitioners was highly accepted without improving job satisfaction: the cluster randomized IMPROVEjob study. Sci Rep. 2022;12:17869. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22357-z
  • Gayed A, Bryan BT, Petrie K, et al. A protocol for the HeadCoach trial: the development and evaluation of an online mental health training program for workplace managers. BMC Psychiatry. 2018;18:25. doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1603-4
  • Milligan-Saville JS, Tan L, Gayed A, et al. Workplace mental health training for managers and its effect on sick leave in employees: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:850–858. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30372-3
  • Stansfeld SA, Kerry S, Chandola T, et al. Pilot study of a cluster randomised trial of a guided e-learning health promotion intervention for managers based on management standards for the improvement of employee well-being and reduction of sickness absence: GEM study. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007981. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007981
  • Schaufeli WB. Applying the job demands–resources model. Organ Dyn. 2017;46:120–132. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
  • Balint EM, Angerer P, Guendel H, et al. Stress management intervention for leaders increases nighttime SDANN: results from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:1–12. doi:10.3390/ijerph19073841
  • Tummers LG, Bakker AB. Leadership and job demands–resources theory: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2021;12:722080. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722080
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept. In Bakker AB, Leiter MP, editors. Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. London: Psychology Press; 2010. p. 10–24.
  • Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-Romá V, et al. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3:71–92. doi:10.1023/A:1015630930326
  • Fritz C, Yankelevich M, Zarubin A, et al. Happy, healthy, and productive: the role of detachment from work during nonwork time. J Appl Psychol. 2010;95:977–983. doi:10.1037/a0019462
  • Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87:268–279. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268
  • Khusanova R, Kang S-W, Choi SB. Work engagement among public employees: antecedents and consequences. Front Psychol. 2021;12:684495. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684495
  • Xanthopoulou D, Bakker AB, Demerouti E, et al. Work engagement and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2009;82:183–200. doi:10.1348/096317908X285633
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, van Rhenen W. How changes in job demands and resources predict burnout, work engagement, and sickness absenteeism. J Organiz Behav. 2009;30:893–917. doi:10.1002/job.595
  • Breaugh J. Too stressed to be engaged? The role of basic needs satisfaction in understanding work stress and public sector engagement. Public Pers Manage. 2021;50:84–108. doi:10.1177/0091026020912516
  • Fong TC, Ng S. Measuring engagement at work: validation of the Chinese version of the Utrecht work engagement scale. Int J Behav Med. 2012;19:391–397. doi:10.1007/s12529-011-9173-6
  • Miranda AR, Rivadero L, Bruera JÁ, et al. Examining the relationship between engagement and perceived stress-related cognitive complaints in the Argentinian working population. Eur J Psychol. 2020;16:12–31. doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i1.1832
  • Padula RS, Chiavegato LD, Cabral CMN, et al. Is occupational stress associated with work engagement? Work (Reading, Mass.) [Internet]. 2012;41(Suppl 1):2963–2965. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22317170/
  • Wolter C, Santa Maria A, Georg S, et al. Relationships between effort–reward imbalance and work engagement in police officers: taking a salutogenic perspective. J Public Health (Berl.). 2021;29:177–186. doi:10.1007/s10389-019-01112-1
  • Knight C, Patterson M, Dawson J. Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2019;28:348–372. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887
  • Bakker AB, editor. Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. Hove: Psychology Press; 2010.
  • Bakker AB, Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career Develop Int. 2008;13:209–223. doi:10.1108/13620430810870476
  • Calcagni CC, Salanova M, Llorens S, et al. Differential effects of mindfulness-based intervention programs at work on psychological wellbeing and work engagement. Front Psychol. 2021;12:715146. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715146
  • Kauffeld S, Müller A, Schulte E-M. Betriebliches Gesundheitsmanagement. In: Michel A, Hoppe A, editors. Handbuch Gesundheitsförderung bei. der Arbeit. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien; 2020. p. 1–18.
  • Siegrist J. Effort–reward imbalance model. In: Fink G., editor. Stress: concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2016. p. 81–86.
  • Bellingrath S, Kudielka BM. Effort–reward-imbalance and overcommitment are associated with hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis responses to acute psychosocial stress in healthy working schoolteachers. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2008;33:1335–1343. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.07.008
  • Siegrist J. Contributions of sociology to the prediction of heart disease and their implications for public health. Eur J Public Health. 1991;1:10–21. doi:10.1093/eurpub/1.1.10
  • Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:27–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27
  • Aboa-Éboulé C, Brisson C, Maunsell E, et al. Effort–reward imbalance at work and recurrent coronary heart disease events. Psychosom Med. 2011;73:436–447. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e318222b2d8
  • van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, et al. Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1117–1131. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043
  • Harvanek ZM, Fogelman N, Xu K, et al. Psychological and biological resilience modulates the effects of stress on epigenetic aging. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11:601. doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01735-7
  • Brett JM, Stroh LK. Working 61 plus hours a week: why do managers do it? J Appl Psychol. 2003;88:67–78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.67
  • McCarthy JM, Erdogan B, Bauer TN. An interpersonal perspective of perceived stress: examining the prosocial coping response patterns of stressed managers. J Organiz Behav. 2019;40:1027–1044. doi:10.1002/job.2406
  • Bellingrath S, Kudielka BM. Psychobiological pathways from work stress to reduced health: naturalistic and experimental studies on the ERI model. In: Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M, editors. Work stress and health in a globalized economy. London: Springer Nature; 2016. p. 145–170.
  • Stalder T, Kirschbaum C, Kudielka BM, et al. Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: expert consensus guidelines. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016;63:414–432. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.010
  • Gartland N, O’Connor DB, Lawton R, et al. Exploring day-to-day dynamics of daily stressor appraisals, physical symptoms and the cortisol awakening response. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;50:130–138. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.08.006
  • Ohly S, Gochmann V. Diary studies in leadership. In: Schyns B, Hall RJ, Neves P, editors. Handbook of methods in leadership research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2017. p. 296–316.
  • Haar JM, Roche M, ten Brummelhuis L. A daily diary study of work–life balance in managers: utilizing a daily process model. Int J Human Res Manag. 2018;29:2659–2681. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1314311
  • Morf M, Bakker AB. Ups and downs in transformational leadership: a weekly diary study. Eur Manag J. 2022. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2022.12.007
  • Poetz L, Volmer J. A diary study on the moderating role of leader–member exchange on the relationship between job characteristics, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Front Psychol. 2022;13:812103. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.812103
  • Sayre GM, Grandey AA, Almeida DM. Does sleep help or harm managers’ perceived productivity? Trade-offs between affect and time as resources. J Occup Health Psychol. 2021;26:127–141. doi:10.1037/ocp0000192
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66:701–716. doi:10.1177/0013164405282471
  • Schaufeli WB, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organiz Behav. 2004;25:293–315. doi:10.1002/job.248
  • Siegrist J, Wege N, Pühlhofer F, et al. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82:1005–1013. doi:10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3
  • Johnston D, Bell C, Jones M, et al. Stressors, appraisal of stressors, experienced stress and cardiac response: a real-time, real-life investigation of work stress in nurses. Ann Behav Med. 2016;50:187–197. doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9746-8
  • Siegrist J, Li J, Montano D. Psychometric properties of the Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire. Department of Medical Sociology FoM, Duesseldorf University. 2014. Available from https://www.uniklinik-duesseldorf.de/fileadmin/Fuer-Patienten-und-Besucher/Kliniken-Zentren-Institute/Institute/Institut_fuer_Medizinische_Soziologie/Forschung/PsychometricProperties.pdf
  • Cohen S. Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States; 1988.
  • Reis D, Lehr D, Heber E, et al. The German version of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10): evaluation of dimensionality, validity, and measurement invariance with exploratory and confirmatory bifactor modeling. Assessment. 2019;26:1246–1259. doi:10.1177/1073191117715731
  • Adam EK, Kumari M. Assessing salivary cortisol in large-scale, epidemiological research. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2009;34:1423–1436. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.06.011
  • Fries E, Dettenborn L, Kirschbaum C. The cortisol awakening response (CAR): facts and future directions. Int J Psychophysiol. 2009;72:67–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.03.014
  • Roelfsema F, van Heemst D, Iranmanesh A, et al. Impact of age, sex and body mass index on cortisol secretion in 143 healthy adults. Endocr Connect. 2017;6:500–509. doi:10.1530/EC-17-0160
  • Limm H, Gündel H, Heinmüller M, et al. Stress management interventions in the workplace improve stress reactivity: a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:126–133. doi:10.1136/oem.2009.054148
  • Hulls PM, Richmond RC, Martin RM, et al. Workplace interventions that aim to improve employee health and well-being in male-dominated industries: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2022;79:77–87. doi:10.1136/oemed-2020-107314
  • Feldt T, Huhtala M, Kinnunen U, et al. Long-term patterns of effort–reward imbalance and over-commitment: investigating occupational well-being and recovery experiences as outcomes. Work Stress. 2013;27:64–87. doi:10.1080/02678373.2013.765670
  • Munafò M, Patron E, Palomba D. Improving managers’ psychophysical well-being: effectiveness of respiratory sinus arrhythmia biofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2016;41:129–139. doi:10.1007/s10484-015-9320-y
  • Chida Y, Steptoe A. Cortisol awakening response and psychosocial factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Psychol. 2009;80:265–278. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.10.004
  • Eddy P, Wertheim EH, Hale MW, et al. A systematic review and revised meta-analysis of the effort–reward imbalance model of workplace stress and hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis measures of stress. Psychosom Med. 2023;85:450–460. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000001155
  • Vrshek-Schallhorn S, Doane LD, Mineka S, et al. The cortisol awakening response predicts major depression: predictive stability over a 4-year follow-up and effect of depression history. Psychol Med. 2013;43:483–493. doi:10.1017/S0033291712001213

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.