Analysis of Determining Factors of the Public's Risk Acceptance Level in China

REFERENCES

• Chaiken , S and Maheswaran , D . 1994 . Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment . J Person Soci Psych , 66 : 460 – 73 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken , S , Liberman , A and Early , A H . 1989 . “ Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context ” . Edited by: Uleman , J S and Bargh , J A . New York, NY, , USA Unintended Thought
   Google Scholar
• Eiser , J R , Hannover , B Mann , L . 1990 . Nuclear attitudes after Chernobyl: A cross-national study . J Environ Psych , 10 : 101 – 10 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn , J , Slovic , P Lichtenstein , S . 1994 . Gender, race and environmental health risks . Risk Anal , 14 : 1101 – 8 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothmann , T and Reusswig , F . 2006 . People at risk of flooding: Why some residents take precautionary action while others do not . Natural Hazards , 38 : 101 – 20 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho , M C , Shaw , D Lin , S . 2008 . How do disaster characteristics influence risk perception? . Risk Anal , 28 ( 3 ) : 635 – 43 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji , B C , Hong , K K and Sam , K R . 2008 . Analysis of local acceptance of a radioactive waste disposal facility . Risk Anal , 28 ( 4 ) : 1021 – 32 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karpowicz-Lazerg , C and Mullet , E . 1993 . Societal risk as seen by the French public . Risk Anal , 13 : 253 – 8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinhesselink , R and Rosa , E . 1991 . Cognitive representations of risk perceptions: A comparison of Japan and the United States . J Cross-Cultural Psych , 22 ( 1 ) : 11 – 28 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunreuther , H , Eastering , D Desvousges , W . 1990 . Public attitudes toward siting a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada . Risk Anal , 10 ( 4 ) : 469 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima , M L , Barnett , J and Vala , J . 2005 . Risk perception and technological development at a societal level . Risk Anal , 25 ( 5 ) : 1229 – 37 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell , MK. 2000 . Household adjustment to earthquake hazard: A review of research . Environ Behavior , 32 : 461 – 501 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lior , N. 2008 . Energy resources and use: The present situation and possible paths to the future . Energy , 33 ( 6 ) : 842 – 57 .
   Google Scholar
• Lowrance , W. 1976 . “ Acceptable Risk: Science and the Determination of Safety ” . Los Altos, CA, , USA : W. Kaufman .
   Google Scholar
• Macri , D and Mullet , E . 2007 . Cross-cultural differences in societal risk perception: Atypological approach . Hum Ecol Risk Assess , 13 : 1352 – 8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayachi , K. 1998 . How do people evaluate risk reduction when they are told zero risk is impossible? . Risk Anal , 18 ( 3 ) : 235 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Nicolas , C B and Luis , A C . 2003 . Risk perception in a developing country: The case of Chile . Risk Anal , 23 ( 6 ) : 1271 – 85 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyland , LG. 1993 . “ Risk perception in Brazil and Sweden ” . Stockholm, , Sweden : Center for Risk Research, Stockholm School of Economics . RHIZIKON: Risk Research Report No. 15
   Google Scholar
• Petty , R E and Cacioppo , J T . 1986 . The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion . Advan in Experi Soci Psych , 19 : 123 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Poumadere , M , Mays , C Slovic , P . 1995 . “ What lies behind public acceptance? Comparison of US and French perceptions of the nuclear power option ” . 393 – 405 . Vienna, , Austria Proceedings of an International Conference on the Nuclear Power Option
   Google Scholar
• Ramadan , A A and Etienne , M . 2008 . Societal risk perception in Arab countries: The Case of Kuwait . Hum Ecol Risk Assess , 14 : 1291 – 305 .
   Google Scholar
• Renn , O. 1998 . Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges . J Risk Res , 1 ( 1 ) : 49 – 71 .
   Google Scholar
• Rogers , GO. 1985 . “ On determining public acceptability of risk ” . Edited by: Whipple , C and Covello , V . 483 – 504 . New York, NY, , USA Risk Analysis in the Private Sector
   Google Scholar
• Rohrmann , B. 1994 . Risk perception of different societal groups: Australian findings and cross-national comparison . Australian J Psych , 46 : 150 – 63 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist , M. 2000 . The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology . Risk Anal , 20 ( 2 ) : 195 – 203 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg , L. 2001 . Limits of knowledge and the limited importance of trust . Risk Anal , 21 ( 1 ) : 189 – 98 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg , L. 2004 . Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repository . Risk Anal , 24 ( 3 ) : 737 – 49 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöberg , L. 2006 . “ Nuclear waste risk perceptions and attitudes in siting a final repository for spent nuclear fuel ” . Edited by: Andersson , K . 452 – 60 . Stockholm, , Sweden VALDOR Proceedings
   Google Scholar
• Slovic , P. 1987 . Perception of risk . Science , 236 : 280 – 5 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic , P. 1997 . “ Trust, emotion, sex, politics and science: Surveying the risk-assessment battlefield ” . Edited by: Bazerman , M , Messick , D and Tenbrunsel , A . 277 – 313 . San Francisco, CA, , USA Environment, Ethics and Behavior
   Google Scholar
• Slovic , P. 2000 . “ The perception of risk ” . Sterling, VA, , USA : Earthscan Publications Ltd . Risk, Society and Policy Series
   Google Scholar
• Slovic , P , Fischhoff , B and Lichtenstein , S . 1980 . “ Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk ” . Edited by: Schwing , R C and Albers , W A Jr. 181 – 216 . New York, NY, , USA Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?
   Google Scholar
• Slovic , P , Finucane , M L Peters , E . 2004 . Risk analysis risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality . Risk Anal , 24 ( 2 ) : 311 – 22 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith , VK. 2008 . Risk perceptions, optimism, and natural hazards . Risk Anal , 28 ( 6 ) : 1763 – 7 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teigen , K H , Brun , W and Slovic , P . 1988 . Societal risks as seen by the Norwegian public . J Behavioural Decision Making , 1 : 111 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Tsunoda , K. 2002 . Difference in the formation of attitude toward nuclear power . Politic Psych , 23 ( 1 ) : 191 – 20 .
   Google Scholar