REFERENCES
- Ågerstrand M. 2012. From Science to Policy. Improving Environmental Risk Assessment and Management of Chemicals. Thesis in Risk and Safety from the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. . ISBN 978-91-7501-507-1
- Ågerstrand M, Breitholtz M, and Rudén C. 2011a. Comparison of four different methods for reliability evaluation of ecotoxicity data: A case study of non-standard test data used in environmental risk assessments of pharmaceutical substances. Environ Sci Eur 23(1):17
- Ågerstrand M, Küster A, Bachmann J, et al. 2011b. Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Environ Pollut 159(10):2487–92
- Ågerstrand M, Edvardsson L, and Rudén C. 2013. Bad reporting or bad Science? Systematic data evaluation as a means to improve the use of peer-reviewed studies in risk assessments of chemicals. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. doi:10.1080/10807039.2013.854139
- Beronius A, Rudén C, Håkansson H, et al. 2010. Risk to all or none? A comparative analysis of controversies in the health risk assessment of Bisphenol A. Reprod Toxicol 29:132–46
- Beronius A, Johansson N, Rudén C, et al. 2013. The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing. Toxicol 311(1–2):13–26
- Beronius A, Molander L, Rudén C, et al. 2014. Facilitating the Use of Non-Standard In Vivo Studies in Health Risk Assessment—A Proposal to Improve Evaluation Criteria and Reporting. doi:10.1002/jat.2991
- Durda JL and Preziosi DV. 2000. Data quality evaluation of toxicological studies used to derive ecotoxicological benchmarks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6(5):747–65
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2011a. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Part B: Hazard Assessment. Helsinki, Finland. . Available at http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/information_requirements_part_b_en.pdf (accessed August 27, 2014)
- ECHA. 2011b. Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information. Helsinki, Finland. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13643/information_requirements_r4_en.pdf (accessed August 27, 2014)
- ECHA. 2013. Evaluation under REACH, Progress Report 2012. Helsinki, Finland. ECHA-13-A-01-EN, ISBN: 978-92-9217-819-2, ISSN: 1831-6506. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/evaluation_report_2012_en.pdf (accessed August 27, 2014)
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2010. European Food Safety Authority Guidance: Application of Systematic Review Methodology to Food and Feed Safety Assessments to Support Decision Making. EFSA Journal 8(6). Available at www.efsa.europa.eu (accessed August 27, 2014)
- Hobbs DA, Warne MS, and Markich SJ. 2005. Evaluation of criteria used to assess the quality of aquatic toxicity data. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(3):174–80
- Klimisch HJ, Andreae M, and Tillmann U. 1997. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul Toxicol Pharm 25(1):1–5
- Küster A, Bachmann J, Brandt U, et al. 2009. Regulatory demands on data quality for the environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals. Regul Toxicol Pharm 55(3):276–80
- Lavelle KS, Schnatter AR, Travis KZ, et al. 2012. Framework for integrating human and animal data in chemical risk assessment. Regul Toxicol Pharm 62(2):302–12
- Maxim L and van der Sluijs JP. 2014. Qualichem In Vivo: A tool for assessing the quality of in vivo studies and its application for bisphenol A. PLOS One 9(1):e87738
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). 2005. Manual for the Assessment of Chemicals. Chapter 3: Data Evaluation. Available at http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/risk-assessment/chapter3dataevaluation.htm (accessed August 27, 2014)
- Schneider K, Schwarz M, Burkholder I, et al. 2009. “ToxRTool,” a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. Toxicol Lett 189(2):138–44
- USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1999. Determining the Adequacy of Existing Data. Available at www.usepa.gov (accessed August 27, 2014)
- Wandall B. 2004. Values in science and risk assessment. Toxicol Lett 152(3):265–72
- Weed DL. 2005. Weight of evidence: A review of concept and methods. Risk Anal 25(6):1545–57