Methods for Communicating the Complexity and Uncertainty of Oil Spill Response Actions and Tradeoffs

REFERENCES

• Adam MB and Reyna VF. 2005. Coherence and correspondence criteria for rationality: Experts’ estimation of risks of sexually transmitted infections. J Behav Decis Making 18:169–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancker JS, Senathirajah Y, Kukafka R, et al. 2006. Design features of graphs in health risk communication: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assn 13:608–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett FC. 1932. A theory of remembering. In: Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, pp 197–214. Cambridge University Press, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Beach LR. 2009. Narrative Thinking and Decision Making: How the Stories We Tell Ourselves Shape our Decisions, and Vice Versa. Available at www.LeeRoyBeach.com (accessed July 20, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Beegle-Krause J. 2001. General NOAA oil modeling environment (GNOME): A new spill trajectory model. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International Oil Spill Conference, pp 865–71. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-2001-2-865. Tampa, FL, USA. . March 26–29
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne DE. 1966. Curiosity and exploration. Science, New Series 153:25–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth Sweeney L and Sterman J. 2000. Bathtub dynamics: Initial results of a systems thinking inventory. Syst Dynam Rev 16:249–94
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth Sweeney L and Sterman J. 2007. Thinking about systems: Students’ and their teachers’ conceptions of natural and social systems. Syst Dynam Rev 23:285–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom A. 2008. Lead is like mercury: Risk comparisons, analogies and mental models. J Risk Res 11:99–117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A, Walker AH, Scott T, et al. 2015. Oil spill response risk judgments, decisions and mental models: Findings from surveying U.S. stakeholders and coastal residents. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:581–604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad K, Leiserowitz T, Weinkle J, et al. 2007. Misinterpretations of the “cone of uncertainty” in Florida during the 2004 hurricane season. B Am Meteorol Soc 88:651–67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budescu D, Broomell S, and Por HH. 2009. Improving communication of uncertainty in the reports of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Psychol Sci 20:299–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camerer C and Weber M. 1992. Recent developments in modeling preferences—Uncertainty and ambiguity. J Risk Uncertainty 5:325–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, and Rees E. 1982. Expertise in problem solving. In: Sternberg R (ed), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, pp 17–76. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA
   Google Scholar
• Chi MTH, Glaser R, and Farr M. (eds). 1988. The Nature of Expertise. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, USA
   Google Scholar
• Chua HF, Yates JF, and Shah P. 2006. Risk avoidance: Graphs versus numbers. Mem Cognition 34:399–410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik KJW. 1943. The Nature of Explanation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• CRRC (Coastal Response Research Center). 2012. North Slope Borough Oil Spill Workshop: Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) & Environmental Response Management Application (ERMA®), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Response Research Center and Center for Spills in the Environment, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA. November 8–9, 2012. Available at http://www.crrc.unh.edu/sites/crrc.unh.edu/files/media/docs/Workshops/nsb_12/NorthSlopeBorough_workshop_report_FINAL_appendix.pdf (accessed January 3, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Cuite CL, Weinstein ND, Emmons K, et al. 2008. A test of numeric formats for communicating risk probabilities. Med Decis Making 28:377–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes RM. 1979. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Am Psychol 34:571–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demski C, Spence A, and Pidgeon N. 2013. Summary findings of a survey conducted in August 2012– Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability. Working Paper. UKERC, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Eiser JR, Bostrom A, Burton I, et al. 2012. Risk interpretation and action: A conceptual framework for responses to natural hazards. Internat J Disaster Risk Reduction 1:5–16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epley N and Gilovich T. 2006. The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic: Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psych Sci 17:311–18
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson KA and Lehmann AC. 1996. Expert and Exceptional Performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annu Rev Psychol 47:273–305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlin A and Peters E. 2011. Quantitative Information. In: Fischhoff B, Brewer NT, and Downs JS (eds), Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide, Ch. 7. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B. 2012. Judgment and Decision Making. Earthscan, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B. 2013. The sciences of science communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA110(Supplement 3):14033–39
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Brewer NT, and Downs JS (eds). 2011. Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence-Based User's Guide. US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/UCM268069.pdf (accessed July 10, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Freudenberg WR, Gramling R, and Davidson DJ. 2008. Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): Science and the politics of doubt. Sociol Inq 78:2–38
   Google Scholar
• Gentner D and Smith L. 2012. Analogical reasoning. In: Ramachandran VS (ed), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd edit, pp 130–6. Elsevier, Oxford, UK
   Google Scholar
• Gentner D and Stevens AL (eds). 1983. Mental Models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, USA
   Google Scholar
• Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, and Kokinov BN (eds). 2001. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Gibson JM, Rowe A, Stone ER, et al. 2013. Communicating quantitative information about unexploded ordnance risks to the public. Environ Sci Technol 47:4004–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart PS. 2013. The role of numeracy in moderating the influence of statistics in climate change messages. Public Underst Sci 22:785–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty M, Canham MS, and Fabrikant SI. 2010. Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. J Exp Psychol Learn 36:37–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar S. 1990. Framing responsibility for political issues: The case of poverty. Polit Behav 12 Cognition and Political Action:19–40
   Google Scholar
• Johnson BB. 2003. Are some risk comparisons more effective under conflict?: A replication and extension of Roth et al. Risk Anal 23:767–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB and Slovic P. 1995. Presenting uncertainty in health risk assessment: Initial studies of its effects on risk perception and trust. Risk Anal 15:485–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB and Slovic P. 1998. Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment. J Risk Res 1:261–79
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird PN. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
   Google Scholar
• Joslyn S and LeClerc J. 2012. Uncertainty forecasts improve weather related decisions and attenuate the effects of forecast error. J Exp. Psychol-Appl 18:126–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslyn S, Nadav-Greenberg L, Taing MU, et al. 2009. The effects of wording on the understanding and use of uncertainty information in a threshold forecasting decision. Appl Cognitive Psych 23:55–72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joslyn S, Nemec L, and Savelli S. 2013. The benefits and challenges of predictive interval forecasts and verification graphics for end users. Weather, Climate, and Society 5:133–47
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D and Frederick S. 2002. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In: Gilovich T, Griffin D, and Kahneman D (eds), Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, pp 49–81. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D and Tversky A. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47:263–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatchadourian R. 2011. A reporter at large: The Gulf War—Were there any heros in the BP oil disaster? The New Yorker, March 14, 2011. Available at http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/03/14/110314fa_fact_khatchadourian (accessed July 10, 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Kleber J, Dickert S, Peters E, et al. 2013. Same numbers, different meanings: How numeracy influences the importance of numbers for pro-social behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol 49:699–705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschine T, Pavia R, Walker AH, et al. 2015. What-if scenario modeling to support oil spill preparedness and response decision making. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:646–66
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin IP, Schneider SL, and Gaeth GJ. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organ Behav Hum Dec 76:149–88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz E. 1963. Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J Atmos Sci 20:130–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlis GE and McNutt MK. 2011. Ocean policy: Black swans, wicked problems, and science during crises. Oceanography 24:318–20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March JG. 1994. A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. The Free Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Miles EL. 2009. On the increasing vulnerability of the world ocean to multiple stresses. Annu Rev Env Resour 24:17–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan MG and Henrion M. 1992. Uncertainty: A Guide To Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Bostrom A, et al. 2002. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Moser SC, Jeffress Williams S, and Boesch DF. 2012. Wicked challenges at land's end: Managing coastal vulnerability under climate change. Annu Rev Env Resour 37:51–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moxnes E and Saysel AK. 2009. Misperceptions of global climate change: Information policies. Climatic Change 93:15–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• OMB (Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget). 2013. Memorandum M-13-17 to Heads of Departments and Agencies from Sylvia M. Burwell, Cecilia Muñoz, John Holder and Alan Krueger on next steps in the evidence and innovation agenda. Washington, DC, USA. Dated July 26, 2013. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-17.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oullier O. 2013. Behavioural insights are vital to policy-making. Nature 501:463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker AM and Fischhoff B. 2005. Decision making competence: External validation through an individual-differences approach. J Behav Decis Making 18:1–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JW. 1976. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organ Behav Hum Perf 16:366–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, and Johnson EJ. 1988. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. J Exp Psychol Learn 14:534–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Bettman JR, Coupey E, et al. 1992. A constructive process view of decision making: Multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychol 80:107–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne JW, Samper A, Bettman JR, et al. 2008. Boundary conditions on unconscious thought in complex decision making. Psychol Sc 19:1118–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters E and Levin IP. 2008. Dissecting the risky-choice framing effect: Numeracy as an individual-difference factor in weighting risky and riskless options. Judgm Decis Mak 3:435–48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters E, Västfjäll D, Slovic P, et al. 2006. Numeracy and decision making. Psychol Sci 17:407–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds B and Seeger M. 2012. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communications. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Roth E, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, et al. 1990. What do we know about making risk comparisons? Risk Anal 10:375–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo JE, Medvec VH, and Meloy MG. 1996. The distortion of information during decisions. Organ Behav Hum Dec 66:102–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelli S and Joslyn S. 2013. The advantages of predictive interval forecasts for non-expert users and the impact of visualizations. Appl Cognitive Psych 27:527–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P and Freedman EG. 2011. Bar and line graph comprehension: An interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes. Top Cogn Sci 3:560–78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah P, Freedman EG, and Vekiri I. 2005. The comprehension of quantitative information in graphical displays. In: Shah P and Miyake A (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp 426–76. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Simon HA. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 59:99–118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon HA. 1956. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychol Rev 63:129–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon HA. 1959. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Econ Rev 49:253–283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1972. Oregon Research Institute from Shakespeare to Simon: Speculations—and some evidence—about man's ability to process information. Research Bulletin 12(2). Available at http://www.decisionresearch.org/pdf/dr36.pdf (accessed January 2, 2014)
   Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Kraus N, and Covello VT. 1990. What should we know about making risk comparisons? Risk Anal 10:389–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson M. 1989. Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms. Springer Verlag, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Smithson M. 2008. The many faces and masks of uncertainty. In: Bammer G and Smithson M (eds), Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, pp 13–25. Earthscan, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Spotts P. 2010. In finding BP oil spill flow rate, lab science meets real world. Christian Science Monitor, June 11
   Google Scholar
• Starbird K, Dailey D, Walker AH, et al. 2015. Social media, public participation and the 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:605–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman J. 2010. Does formal system dynamics training improve people's understanding of accumulation? Syst Dynam Rev 26:316–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterman J. 2011. Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Climatic Change 108:811–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone ER, Yates JF, and Parker AM. 1997. Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. J Exp Psychol-Appl 3:243–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler RH and Sunstein CR. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA
   Google Scholar
• Tversky A and Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky A and Kahneman D. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211:453–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of the Interior. 1963. Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Policy on the Use of Chemicals to Treat Floating Oils. July 5. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1994. 40 CFR Parts 9 ad 300. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Final Rule. September 15. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Van Schie ECM and van der Pligt J. 1995. Influencing risk preference in decision making: The effects of framing and salience. Organ Behav Hum Dec 63:264–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi WK, Magat WA, and Huber J. 1991. Communication of ambiguous risk information. Theor Decis 31:159–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker AH, Pavia R, Bostrom A, et al. 2015. Communication practices for oil spills: Stakeholder engagement during preparedness and response. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21:667–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS and Budescu DV. 1995. A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence. The Knowledge Engineering Rev 10:43–62
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Budescu DV, and Zwick R. 1993a. Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgments. Manage Sci 39:176–90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Budescu DV, Zwick R, et al. 1993b. Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms. Bull Psychonomic Soc 31:135–8
   Google Scholar
• Weber EU and Johnson EJ. 2009. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 60:53–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webler T, Tuler S, and Dietz T. 2011. Modellers’ and outreach professionals’ views on the role of models in watershed management. Environ Policy Gov 21:472–86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood MM, Mileti DS, Kano M, et al. 2012. Communicating actionable risk for terrorism and other hazards. Risk Anal 32:601–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar