Risk Assessment of Human Activities on Protected Areas: A Case Study

REFERENCES

• Alijani B, Ghohroudi M, and Amirahmadi A. 2007. Zonation landslide in the northern slopes of Shah Jahan (Case study: Watershed Estarkhi Shirvan). Geogr Res 22:117–32
   Google Scholar
• Amiri MP. 2010. Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonie S and Durate S. 1997. Stochastic judgments in the AHP: The measurement of rank reversal. Decision Sci 28:655–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragones P, Aznar J, Ferries J, et al. 2006. Valuation of urban industrial land: An analytical network process approach. Eur J Oper Res 185:322–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A and Mohammad Fam I. 2009. Integrated MHSEE management systems for industry: A case study in gas refinery. J Chin Inst Eng 32:235–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black D. 1976. Partial justification of the Borda count. Public Choice 28:1–15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catherine P. 2002. The Delphi technique: Myths and realities. J Adv Nurs 41:376–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demidova O and Cherp A. 2005. Risk assessment for improved treatment of health consideration in EIA. Environ Impact Assess 25:411–29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman JR. 2006. IDRISI Andes, Guide to GIS and Image Processing. Clark Labs, Clark University, Worchester, MA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, et al. 2006. Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience 56:121–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulez S. 1992. Environmental auditing a method for evaluating areas for national park status. Environ Manage 16:811–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrald R, Tanali I, Shaw G, et al. 2006. Review of Risk Based Priorization/Decision Making Methodologies for Dams. George Washington University Institute for Crisis Disaster and Risk Management, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Heller S. 2006. Managing industrial risk-having a test and proven system to prevent and assess risk. J Hazard Mater 130:58–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iran Department of Environment (DoE). 2004. Studies of Management Plan for Helleh Protected Area, Tehran, Iran
   Google Scholar
• Jozi SA and Malmir M. 2014. Environmental risk assessment of dams by using multi-criteria decision-making methods: A case study of the Polrood Dam, Guilan Province, Iran. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 20:69–85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozi SA, Shafiee M, MoradiMajd N, et al. 2011. An integrated Shannon's Entropy–TOPSIS methodology for environmental risk assessment of Helleh protected area in Iran. Environ Monit Assess. doi: doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2468-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozi SA, Tabib Shoshtary M, and Khayat Zadeh AR. 2015. Environmental risk assessment of dams in construction phase using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 21(1doi: doi:10.1080/10807039.2013.821905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas J and Stachowski A. 2009. Middle category endorsement in odd-numbered Likert response scales: Associated item characteristics, cognitive demands, and preferred meanings. J Res Pers 43:489–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahr J and Kooistra L. 2009. Environmental risk mapping of pollutants: State of the art and communication aspects. Sci Total Environ 408:3899–907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig L and Starr S. 2005. Library as place: Results of a Delphi study. J Med Libr Assoc 93:315–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCrimmon KR. 1968. Decision Making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Memorandum, RM-4823-ARPA. Advanced Research Projects Agency, Santa Monica, CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Malekmohammadi B and Rahimi Blouchi L. 2014. Ecological risk assessment of wetland ecosystems using multi criteria decision making and geographic information system. Ecol Indic 41:133–44
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masser I and Foley P. 1987. Delphi revisited: Expert opinion in urban analysis. Urban Stud 24:217–25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinecke E. 1928. A Report on the Effects of Excessive Tourist Travel on the California Redwood Parks. California State Printing Office, Sacramento, CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Iran. 2007. Development Capacity and Social Economic Changes in Bushehr Province. Management and Planning Organization of Iran, Tehran, Iran
   Google Scholar
• Motahari A, Malmasi S, and Jafarzaeh Haghighi Fard N. 2014. Application of a multi-criteria decision-making approach for ranking environmental risks caused by petrochemical industries: A case study of a sodium carbonate production unit. Hum Ecol Risk Assess doi: 10.1080/10807039.2014.916548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhlbauer WK. 2004. Pipeline Management Manual, Golf Professional Publishing, 2nd edit. Houston, TX, USA
   Google Scholar
• Onut S and Selin S. 2008. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manage 28:1552–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robu B, Căliman F, Beţianu C, et al. 2007. Methods and procedures for environmental risk assessment. Environ Eng Manage J6:573–92
   Google Scholar
• Saari DG. 1994. Geometry of Voting. Volume 3 of Studies in Economic Theory. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Saari DG and Merlin V. 1996. The Copeland method I: Relationships and the dictionary. Econ Theor 8:51–76
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1980. Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq R and Tesfamariam S. 2007. Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch Env Res Risk A 23:75–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith VK. 1993. Nonmarket valuation of environmental resources: An Interpretive appraisal. Land Econ 69:1–26
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh J and Steve H. 2005. Management Objectives and Economic Value of National Parks: Preservation, Conservation and Development. Discussion Paper No. 337. School of Economics, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia
   Google Scholar
• Sun Chia C. 2010. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:7745–54
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam S and Rehan S. 2006. Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(F-AHP). Stoch Env Res Risk A 21(1):35–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdell C. 2005. Linking policies for biodiversity conservation with advances in behavioral economics. Singapore Econ Rev 50:449–62
   Google Scholar
• Treweek J. 1999. Ecological Impact Assessment. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK
   Google Scholar
• Tsaur S and Wang C. 2007. The evaluation of sustainable tourism development by analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy set theory: An empirical study on the Green Island in Taiwan. Asia Pac J Tourism Res 12:127–45
   Google Scholar
• Velasquez M and Hester P. 2013. An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Internat J Oper Res 10:56–66
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Jing Y, Zhang C, et al. 2009. Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13:2263–78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). 1987. Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2005. Islamic Republic of Iran, Cost Assessment of Environmental Degradation. Report No.32043-IR. Tehran, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Xingju S, Su C, and Li W. 2008. Jiuzhaigou ecotourism areal system: Temporal evolution of entropic change. Wuhan Univ J Natur Sci 13:303–8
   Google Scholar
• Zayed T, Amer M, and Pan J. 2008. Assessing risk and inherent in Chinese highway projects using AHP. Internat J Proj Manage 26:408–19
   Google Scholar
• Zhijun T, Jiquan Z, and Xingpeng L. 2009. GIS-based risk assessment of grassland fire disaster in western Jilin province, China. Stoch Env Res Risk A 23:463–71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar