Probabilistic estimation of annual lost economic production due to premature deaths because of earthquakes

References

• AIS (Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica). 2010. Estudio General de la Amenaza Sísmica de Colombia. Comité AIS-300. Bogota DC, Colombia
   Google Scholar
• Algermissen ST, Dewey J, and Rinehart W. 1972. A study of earthquake losses in the San Francisco Bay area; data and analysis. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, USA
   Google Scholar
• Brookings Institution. 2015. 2014 Global Metro Monitor Map. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/research/reports2/2015/01/22-global-metro-monitor
   Google Scholar
• Cardona OD, Ordaz M, Reinoso E, et al. 2010. Comprehensive Approach to Probabilistic Risk Assessment (CAPRA): International Initiative for Disaster Risk Management Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ohrid, Macedonia
   Google Scholar
• Cardona OD, Ordaz M, Reinoso E, et al. 2012. CAPRA-Comprehensive Approach to Probabilistic Risk Assessment: International Initiative for Risk Management Effectiveness. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Lisbon, Portugal
   Google Scholar
• Coburn A and Spence R. 2002. Earthquake Protection, 2nd edit. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK
   Google Scholar
• DANE (Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística) and Alcaldía de Medellín. 2010. Proyecciones de Población Municipio de Medellín por edad, sexo, comunas y corregimientos. Available at https://www.medellin.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/wpccontent/Sites/Subportal%20del%20Ciudadano/Planeaci%C3%B3n%20Municipal/Secciones/Indicadores%20y%20Estad%C3%ADsticas/Documentos/Proyecciones%20de%20poblaci%C3%B3n%202005%20-%202015/08%20Proyec-ciones%20Poblaci%C3%B3n%20Medell%C3%ADn%202005-2015%20por%20comuna_correg%20y%20Grupos%20de%20Edad.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Enarson E, Fothergill A, and Peek L. 2007. Gender and disaster: foundations and directions. In: Rodríguez H, Quarantelli E, and Dynes R (eds), Handbook of Disaster Research, pp 130–146. Springer, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• ERN-AL (Evaluación de Riesgos Naturales América Latina). 2011. CAPRA-GIS v2.0. Program for probabilistic risk assessment. Available at http://www.ecapra.org
   Google Scholar
• FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2003. Multi-Hazard Loss Estimation Methodology. Earthquake Model. HAZUS-HM MR4. Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira MA, Oliveira CS, and Mota de Sá F. 2011. Estimating human losses in earthquake models: A discussion. In: Spence R, So E, and Scawthorn C (eds), Human Casualties in Earthquakes, pp 255–266. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Grossi P. 2004. Sources, nature and impact of uncertainties on catastrophe modeling. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Vancouver, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Guha-Sapir D, Below R, and Hoyois Ph. 2015. EM-DAT: International Disaster Database. Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Jaimes MA, Reinoso E, and Esteva L. 2015. Risk analysis for structures exposed to several multi-hazard sources. J Earthquake Eng 19:297–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal K and Wald D. 2010. An empirical model for global earthquake fatality estimation. Earthquake Spectra 26(4):1017–37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal KS, Wald DJ, Eartle PS, et al. 2011. Earthquake casualty models within the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) system. In: Spence R, So E, and Scawthorn C (eds), Human Casualties in Earthquakes, pp 83–94. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy K, Harichandrakumar KT, Krishna-Kumari A, et al. 2005. Years of life lost and productivity loss due to tsunami in India. Curr Sci 89(5):739–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liel AB and Deierlein GC. 2012. Using collapse risk assessments to inform seismic safety policy for older concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra 28(4):1495–521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luco N and Cornell CA. 2007. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 23(2):357–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marulanda MC. 2013. Modelación probabilista de pérdidas económicas por sismo para la estimación de la vulnerabilidad fiscal del Estado y la gestión financiera del riesgo soberano. PhD Thesis. Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
   Google Scholar
• Marulanda MC, Carreño ML, Cardona OD, et al. 2013. Probabilistic earthquake risk assessment using CAPRA: Application to the city of Barcelona, Spain. Nat Haz 69:59–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure FE, Degenkolb HJ, Steinbrugge KV, et al. 1979. Evaluating the Seismic Hazard of State Owned Buildings. California Seismic Safety Commission, Sacramento, CA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Murphy C, Gardoni P, and Harris CE Jr. 2011. Classification and moral evaluation of uncertainties in engineering modeling. Sci Eng Ethics 17:553–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy I. 2014. A non-monetary global measure of the direct impact of natural disasters. Background paper of the 2015 Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• Noy I. 2015. Comparing the direct human impact of natural disasters for two cases in 2011: The Christchurch earthquake and Bangkok flood. Int J of Disaster Risk Reduct 13:61–5
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2014. OECD Employment Outlook 2015. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/empl_outlook-2014-en
   Google Scholar
• Olson DL and Wu DD. 2010. Earthquakes and risk management in China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16(3):478–93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordaz M. 2000. Metodología para la evaluación del riesgo sísmico enfocada a la gerencia de seguros por terremoto. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico
   Google Scholar
• Ordaz M. 2015. A simple probabilistic model to combine losses arising from the simultaneous occurrence of several hazards. Nat Haz 76:389–96
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordaz M, Martinelli F, D'Amico V, et al. 2013. CRISIS2008: A flexible tool to perform probabilistic seismic hazard assessments. Seismol Res Lett 84(3):495–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitherman R. 1982. Computer-Aided Earthquake Analysis and Planning for Business and Organizations. National Science Foundation, USA
   Google Scholar
• RMS (Risk Management Solutions) 2015. RMS Commends Tokyo's. 50 Percent Initiative2 for setting targets to reduce disaster casualties. Press release. Available at http://www.rms.com/about/newsroom/press-releases/press-detail/2015-04-07/rms-commends-tokyos-50-percent-initiative-for-setting-targets-to-reduce-disaster-casualties
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblueth E. 1976. Towards optimum design through building codes. J Struct Div American Society of Civil Engineers ST3:591–607
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Gálvez MA, Bernal GA, Yamin LE, et al. 2010. Evaluación de la amenaza sísmica de Colombia. Actualización y uso en las nuevas normas colombianas de diseño sismo resistente NSR-10. Rev. de Ing. Universidad de Los Andes 32:28–37
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Gálvez MA, Zuloaga-Romero D, Bernal GA, et al. 2014. Fully probabilistic seismic risk assessment considering local site effects for the portfolio of buildings in Medellín, Colombia. Bull Earthquark Eng 12:671–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado-Gálvez MA, Zuloaga D, Velásquez CA, et al. 2015a. Urban Seismic Risk Index for Medellín, Colombia, based on probabilistic loss and casualties estimations. Nat Haz. doi: 10.1007/s11069-015-2056-4. In press
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Gálvez MA, Carreño ML, Barbat AH, et al. 2015b. Evaluación probabilista del riesgo sísmico en Lorca mediante simulaciones de escenarios. Rev. Intern. de método. numér. para calc. y diseño en ing. doi:10.1016/j.rimni.2014.12.001. In press
   Google Scholar
• Salgado-Gálvez MA, Bernal GA, and Cardona OD. 2015c. Evaluación probabilista de la amenaza sísmica de Colombia con fines de actualización de la Norma Colombiana de Diseño de Puentes CCP-14. Rev. Intern. de método. numér. para calc. y diseño en ing. doi:10.1016/j.rimni.2015.07.001. In press
   Google Scholar
• Scawthorn C. 2011. Disaster casualties—Accounting for economic impacts and diurnal variation. In: Spence R, So E, and Scawthorn C (eds), Human Casualties in Earthquakes, pp 51–63. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Spence R and So E. 2009. Estimating Shaking-Induced Casualties and Building Damage for Global Earthquake Events. NEHRP Grant number 08HQGR0102. Final Technical Report
   Google Scholar
• UNISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction). 2015. Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• Velásquez CA, Cardona OD, Mora MG, et al. 2014. Hybrid loss exceedance curve (HLEC) for disaster risk assessment. Nat Haz 72:455–79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Li YH, Chi GB, et al. 2008. Injury-related fatalities in China: An under-recognized public-health problem. Lancet 372:1765–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO (World Health Organization). 2004. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 2013. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000–2011. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
   Google Scholar