Phytoremediation for lightly toxic sites: Hazard perception and acceptance of remediation alternatives

References

• Bell D, Gray T, and Haggett C. 2005. The “social gap” in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses. Environ Politics 14(4):460–77
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodine SP. 2008. Statement of Assistant Administrator, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. USEPA, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• City of Roanoke, Virginia. 2013. Brownfield Rail Corridor Revitalization Plan. Available at: http://www.roanokeva.gov/DocumentCenter/View/1303
   Google Scholar
• Cummings CL, Berube DM, and Lavelle ME. 2013. Influences of individual-level characteristics on risk perceptions to various categories of environmental health and safety risks. J Risk Res 16(10):1277–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiser JR, Podpadec TJ, Reicher SD, et al. 1998. Muddy waters and heavy metal: Time and attitudes guide judgements of pollution. J Environ Psychol 18(2):199–208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson P. 2014. NIMBYism–A re-examination of the phenomenon. Social Science Research 48:185–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, et al. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences 9(2):127–52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn J, Slovic P, and Mertz CK. 1994. Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks. Risk Analys 14(6):1101–08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghazali FM, Syafalni S, and Noor SM. 2014. Public perception on the current solid waste management system in Malaysia: A comparative study of Matang landfill and Bukit Tagar sanitary landfill (BTSL). World Appl Sci J 32(5):872–83
   Google Scholar
• Hagedorn SA. 1994. The national biological impact assessment program and the public perception of biotechnology. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 14(1):24–7
   Google Scholar
• Hansson SO. 1989. Dimensions of risk. Risk Analy 9(1):107–12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry HF, Burken JG, Maier RM, et al. 2013. Phytotechnologies–preventing exposures, improving public health. Int J Phytoremediation 15(9):889–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, et al. 1988. The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analys 8(2):177–87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennen K and Kirkwood N. 2015b. Phyto: Principles and Resources for Site Remediation and Landscape Design. Routledge, London, UK
   Google Scholar
• Kim EJ and Miller P. 2015a. Collaborative planning model for brownfield regeneration. J Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(3):92–100
   Google Scholar
• Kim EJ and Miller P. 2015b. Periodic characteristics and implications of programs and policies for brownfield management in the U.S.A. J Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(1):96–107
   Google Scholar
• LaGrega MD, Buckingham PL, and Evans JC. 2010. Hazardous Waste Management. Waveland Press, Long Grove, IL, USA
   Google Scholar
• Lee TR. 1986. Public attitudes towards chemical hazards. Sci Total Environ 51:125–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power S. 1993. Risking it all—personal and policy decisions about environmental risks. J Environ Psychol 13(1):85–9
   Google Scholar
• Prasad MNV, Freitas H, Fraenzle S, et al. 2010. Knowledge explosion in phytotechnologies for environmental solutions. Environ Pollut 158(1):18–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Health Hazard Categories. 2015, Jul 15. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry (ATSDR). Available at: http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/com/hazcat.html
   Google Scholar
• Signorino G. 2012. Proximity and risk perception. Comparing risk perception “profiles” in two petrochemical areas of Sicily (Augusta and Milazzo). J Risk Res 15(10):1223–43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slimak MW and Dietz T. 2006. Personal values, beliefs, and ecological risk perception. Risk Analys 26(6):1689–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science 236(4799):280–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Analys 13(6):675–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1997. Public perception of risk. J Environ Health 59(9):22–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, and Lichtenstein S. 1979. Rating the risks. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 21(3):14–39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Fischhoff B, and Lichtenstein S. 1980. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In: Schwing RC et al. (eds), Societal Risk Assessment, pp 181–216. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y. 1998. Psychological dimensions of risk assessment: Risk perception and risk communication. Prog Nucl Energy 32(3):243–53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urban D and Hoban TJ. 1997. Cognitive determinants of risk perceptions associated with biotechnology. Scientometrics 40(2):299–331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, et al. 2013. The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analys 33(6):1049–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng YC, Fujiwara T, Houng HJ, et al. 2015. Management of landfill reclamation with regard to biodiversity preservation, global warming mitigation and landfill mining: Experiences from the Asia–Pacific region. J Clean Prod 104:364–73
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigglesworth V. 2013. Frisco, environmental group disagree on clean-up at Exide plant. The Dallas Morning News. Available at: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/community-news/frisco/headlines/20131029-frisco-environmental-group-disagree-on-clean-up-at-exide-plant.ece
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe AK and Bjornstad DJ. 2002. Why would anyone object? An exploration of social aspects of phytoremediation acceptability. Crit Rev Plant Sc 21(5):429–38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe AK, Bjornstad DJ, Russell M, et al. 2002. A framework for analyzing dialogues over the acceptability of controversial technologies. Sci Technol Human Values 27(1):134–59
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar