Bioaccessibility and other key parameters in assessing oral exposure to PAH-contaminated soils and dust: A critical review

References

• Allan IJ, Semple KT, Hare R, et al. 2007. Cyclodextrin enhanced biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols in contaminated soil slurries. Environ Sci Technol 41:5498–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1995. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA, USA
   Google Scholar
• Bacigalupo C and Hale B. 2012. Human health risks of Pb and As exposure via consumption of home garden vegetables and incidental soil and dust ingestion: A probabilistic screening tool. Sci Total Environ 423:27–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta NT, Rodriguez RR, and Casteel SW. 2001. Bioavailability and risk of arsenic exposure by the soil ingestion pathway. In Frankenberger WT (ed), Environmental Chemistry of Arsenic. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA
   Google Scholar
• Beriro DJ, Cave MR, Wragg J, et al. 2016. A review of the current state of the art of physiologically based tests for measuring human dermal in vitro bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in soil. J Hazard Mater 305:240–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordelon NR, Donnelly KC, King LC, et al. 2000. Bioavailability of the genotoxic components in coal tar contaminated soils in Fischer 344 Rats. Toxicol Sci 56:37–48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cachada A, Pato P, Rocha-Santos T, et al. 2012. Levels, sources and potential human health risks of organic pollutants in urban soils. Sci Total Environ 430:184–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ, Stanek EJ, Pekow P, et al. 1997. Soil ingestion estimates for children residing on a superfund site. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 36:258–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cave MR, Wragg J, Denys S, et al. 2011. Dealing with Contaminated Sites, Chapter 7 – Oral Bioavailability. Springer Science + Business Media B.V., Bilthoven, The Netherlands
   Google Scholar
• Cave MR, Wragg J, Harrison I, et al. 2010. Comparison of batch mode and dynamic physiologically based bioaccessibility tests for PAHs in soil samples. Environ Sci Technol 44:2654–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CD, Craggs M, Garcia-Alcega S, et al. 2015. Towards a unified approach for the determination of the bioaccessibility of organic pollutants. Environ Int 78:24–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins CD, Mosquera-Vazquez M, Gomez-Eyles JL, et al. 2013. Is there sufficient ‘sink’ in current bioaccessibility determinations of organic pollutants in soils? Environ Pollut 181:128–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins JF, Brown JP, Alexeeff GV, et al. 1998. Potency equivalency factors for some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon derivatives. Regul Toxicol Pharm 28:45–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean JR and Ma R. 2007. Approaches to assess the oral bioaccessibility of persistent organic pollutants: A critical review. Chemosphere 68:1399–407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN (Deutsches Institut fur Normung). 2000. Soil Quality - Absorption Availability of Organic and Inorganic Pollutants from Contaminated Soil Material: DIN E 19738, DIN, Berlin, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Doyle JR, Blais JM, Holmes RD, et al. 2012. A soil ingestion pilot study of a population following a traditional lifestyle typical of rural or wilderness areas. Sci Total Environ 424:110–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouliarmou V, Collins CD, Christiansen E, et al. 2013. Sorptive physiologically based extraction of contaminated solid matrices: Incorporating silicone rod as absorption sink for hydrophobic organic contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 47:941–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouliarmou V and Mayer P. 2012. Sorptive bioaccessibility extraction (SBE) of soils: Combining a mobilization medium with an absorption sink. Environ Sci Technol 46:10682–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gron C, Oomen A, Weyand E, et al. 2007. Bioaccessibility of PAH from Danish soils. J Environ Sci Health 42:1233–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guney M, Welfringer B, de Repentigny C, et al. 2013. Exposure assessment and risk characterization for children's exposure to Hg-contaminated soils. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65:345–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guney M, Zagury GJ, Dogan N, et al. 2010. Exposure assessment and risk characterization from trace elements following soil ingestion by children exposed to playgrounds, parks and picnic areas. J Hazard Mater 182:656–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hack A and Selenka F. 1996. Mobilization of PAH and PCB from contaminated soil using a digestive tract model. Toxicol Lett 88:199–210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris KL, Banks LD, Mantey JA, et al. 2013. Bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Relevance to toxicity and carcinogenesis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 9:1465–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Canada. 2010. Guidance on Human Health Preliminary Quantitative Risk Assessment (PQRA) v 2.0. Contaminated Sites Division, Ontario, ON, Canada
   Google Scholar
• INERIS (Institut National de l'Environnement et des Risques). 2012. Quantités de terre et poussières ingérées par un enfant de moins de 6 ans et bioaccessibilité des polluants: État des connaissances et propositions. InVS-INERIS, Verneuil-en Halatte, France
   Google Scholar
• Irvine G, Doyle JR, White PA, et al. 2014. SIR Determination in a rural population of Alberta, Canada practicing a wilderness lifestyle. Sci Total Environ 470–471:138–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K, Farrell RE, and Siciliano SD. 2012. Comparison of human exposure pathways in an urban brownfield: Reduced risk from paving roads. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2423–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James K, Peters RE, Laird BD, et al. 2011. Human exposure assessment: A case study of 8 PAH contaminated soils using in vitro digestors and the juvenile swine model. Environ Sci Technol 45:4586–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz AL, Weber J, Stevenson G, et al. 2014. In vivo measurement, in vitro estimation and fugacity prediction of PAH bioavailability in post-remediated creosote-contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ 473–474:147–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox RC, Sabatini DA, and Canter LW. 1993. Subsurface Transport and Fate Processes. Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton, FL, USA
   Google Scholar
• Latawiec AE, Simmons P, and Reid BJ. 2010. Decision-makers' perspectives on the use of bioaccessibility for risk-based regulation of contaminated land. Environ Int 36:383–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerda D. 2010. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) Factsheet, 3rd ed. JRC-IRMM of European Commission, JRC 60146-2010, Geel, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• Liao C, Chia C, Chen W, et al. 2011. Lung cancer risk in relation to traffic-related nano/ultrafine particle-bound PAHs exposure: A preliminary probabilistic assessment. J Hazard Mater 190:150–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung K, Oomen A, Duits M, et al. 2007. Bioaccessibility of metals in urban playground soils. J Environ Sci Health 42:1241–50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi D, Entwisthe J, Cave M, et al. 2012. The application of an in vitro gastrointestinal extraction to assess the oral bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils from a former industrial site. Anal Chim Acta 735:54–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu M, Yuan D, Lin Q, et al. 2010. Assessment of the bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in topsoils from different urban functional areas using an in vitro gastrointestinal test. Environ Monit Assess 166:29–39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Man YB, Kang Y, Wang HS, et al. 2013. Cancer risk assessments of Hong Kong soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Hazard Mater 261:770–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzie CA, Potocki BB, and Santodonato J. 1992. Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 26:1278–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molly K, Van de Woestyne M, and Verstraete W. 1993. Development of a 5-step multi-chamber reactor as a simulation of the human intestinal microbial ecosystem. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 39:254–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 2003. Bioavailability of Contaminants in Soil and Sediment: Processes, Tools and Applications, National Academic Press, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• Oomen AG, Sips AJAM, Groten JP, et al. 2000. Mobilization of PCBs and Lindan from soil during in vitro digestion and their distribution among bile salt micelles and proteins of human digestive fluid and the soil. Environ Sci Technol 34:297–303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paustenbach DJ. 2000. The practice of exposure assessment: A state of the art review. J Toxicol Environ Health 3:179–291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumlee GS, Durant JT, Morman SA, et al. 2013. Linking geological and health sciences to assess childhood lead poisoning from artisanal gold mining in Nigeria. Environ Health Perspec 121:744–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumlee GS and Morman SA. 2011. Mine wastes and human health. Elements Magazine 7:399–404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouschat P and Zagury GJ. 2006. In vitro gastrointestinal bioavailability of arsenic in soils collected near CCA-treated utility poles. Environ Sci Technol 40:4317–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu X, Lee LS, Galinsky RE, et al. 2004. Evaluation of a rat model versus a physiologically based extraction test for assessing phenanthrene bioavailability from soils. Toxicol Sci 79:10–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puls C, Limbeck A, and Hann S. 2012. Bioaccessibility of palladium and platinum in urban aerosol particulates. Atmos Environ 55:213–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RECORD (REseau COopératif de Recherche sur les Déchets). 2012. Biodisponibilité et bioaccessiblité des polluants dans le cas des sols pollués : État des connaissances et pistes de recherche, RECORD, n°10-0671/1A, Villeurbanne, France
   Google Scholar
• Reeves WR, Mcdonald TJ, Bordelon NR, et al. 2001. Impacts of aging on in vivo and in vitro measurements of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon availability. Environ Sci Technol 35:1637–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riding MJ, Doick KJ, Martin FL, et al. 2013. Chemical measures of bioavailability/bioaccessibility of PAHs in soil: Fundamentals to application. J Hazard Mater 261:687–700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez RR, Basta NT, Casteel SW, et al. 1999. An in-vitro gastro-intestinal method to assess bioavailable arsenic in contaminated soils and solid media. Environ Sci Technol 33:642–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostami I and Juhasz AL. 2011. Assessment of persistent organic pollutant (POP) bioavailability and bioaccessibility for human health exposure assessment: A critical review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:623–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotard W, Christmann W, Knoth W, et al. 1995. Determination of absorption availability of PCDD/PCDF from “Kieselrot” (Red Slag) in the digestive tract-Simulation of the digestion of technogenic soil. UWSF-Z Umweltchem Okotox 7:3–9
   Google Scholar
• Ruby MV, Davis A, Schoof R, et al. 1996. Estimation of lead and arsenic bioavailability using a physiologically based extraction test. Environ Sci Technol 30:422–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby MV and Lowney YW. 2012. Selective soil particle adherence to hands: Implications for understanding oral exposure to soil contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 46:12759–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby MV, Lowney YW, Bunge AL, et al. 2016. Oral bioavailability, bioaccessibility, and dermal absorption of PAHs from soil - State of the science. Environ Sci Technol 50:2151–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby MV, Schoof R, Brattin W, et al. 1999. Advances in evaluating the oral bioavailability of inorganics in soil for use in human health risk assessment. Environ Sci Technol 33:3697–705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siciliano SD, Laird BD, and Lemieux CL. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons are enriched but bioaccessibility reduced in brownfield soils adhered to human hands. Chemosphere 80:1101–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srogi K. 2007. Monitoring of environmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A review. Environ Chem Lett 5:169–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanek EJ, Calabrese EJ, and Zorn M. Soil ingestion distributions for Monte Carlo risk assessment in children. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:357–68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang X, Tang L, Zhu Y, et al. 2006. Assessment of the bioaccessibility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soils from Beijing using an in vitro test. Environ Pollut 140:279–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilston EL, Gibson GR, and Collins CD. Colon extended physiologically based extraction test (CE-PBET) increases bioaccessibility of soil-bound PAH. Environ Sci Technol 45:5301–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji JS, Benson R, Schoof RA, et al. 2004. Health effect levels for risk assessment of childhood exposure to arsenic. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 39:99–110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulve NS, Suggs JC, McCurdy T, et al. 2002. Frequency of Mouthing Behavior in Young Children. J. Expo. Anal Environ Epidemiol 12:259–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• U.K.EA (United Kingdom Environment Agency). 2002. In-vitro Methods for the Measurement of the Oral Bioaccessibility of Selected Metals and Metalloids in Soils: A Critical Review, P5-062/TR/01, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK
   Google Scholar
• U.K.EA. 2009. Updated Technical Background to the CLEA Model, SC050021/SR3, Environment Agency, Bristol, UK
   Google Scholar
• U.K.EA. 2015. Environmental management – guidance: Contaminated land exposure assessment (CLEA) tool. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/contaminated-land-exposure-assessment-clea-tool
   Google Scholar
• U.S.EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1994. Integrated Risk Information System. Benzo(a)pyrene – CASRN 50-32-8. Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris2/chemicalLanding.cfm?substance_nmbr=136
   Google Scholar
• U.S.EPA. 2008. Child-Specific exposure factors handbook. EPA/600/R-06/096F. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• U.S.EPA. 2011a. Exposure factors handbook: 2011 edition. EPA/600/R-090/052F. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
   Google Scholar
• U.S.EPA. 2011b. Attachment E - Selection of Soil Ingestion Rates. Washington, DC, USA. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/region1/ge/thesite/restofriver/reports/final_hhra/comments/generalelectric/AttachE.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S.EPA. 2016. Soil Bioavailability at Superfund Sites: Guidance. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/soil-bioavailability-superfund-sites-guidance
   Google Scholar
• von Lindern I, Spalinger S, Stifelman ML, et al. 2016. Estimating children's soil/dust ingestion rates through retrospective analyses of blood lead biomonitoring from the Bunker Hill superfund site in Idaho. Environ Health Perspec, article in press, DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1510144
   Google Scholar
• Wang L, Lu X, Ren C, et al. 2014. Contamination assessment and health risk of heavy metals in dust from Changqing industrial park of Baoji, NW China. Environ Earth Sci 71:2095–104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Huang M, Wu F, et al. 2013. Risk assessment of bioaccessible organochlorine pesticides exposure via indoor and outdoor dust. Atmos Environ 77:525–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson R, Jones-Otazo H, Petrovic S, et al. 2013. Revisiting dust and soil ingestion rates based on hand-to-mouth ransfer. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 19:158–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittsiepe J, Schrey P, Hack A, et al. 2001. Comparison of different digestive tract models for estimating bioaccessibility of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) from red slag ‘Kieselrot’. Int J Hyg Environ Health 203:263–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Zartarian V, Moya J, et al. 2007. A Meta-analysis of children's and-to-mouth frequency data for estimating nondietary ingestion exposure. Risk Anal 27:411–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahran S, Laidlaw MAS, McElmurry SP, et al. 2013. Linking source and effect: Resuspended soil lead, air lead, and children's blood lead levels in Detroit, Michigan. Environ Sci Technol 47:2839–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yang J, Wang R, et al. 2013. Effects of pollution sources and soil properties on distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 463–464:1–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Pignatello JJ, Tao S, et al. 2015a. Bioaccessibility of PAHs in fuel soot assessed by an in vitro digestive model with absorptive sink: Effect of food ingestion. Environ Sci Technol 49:14641–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Pignatello JJ, Tao S, et al. 2015b. Bioaccessibility of PAHs in fuel soot assessed by an in vitro digestive model: Effect of including an absorptive sink. Environ Sci Technol 49:3905–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Yang X, Yuan Q, et al. 2014. Airborne particulate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) Pollution in a background site in the North China Plain: Concentration, size distribution, toxicity and sources. Sci Total Environ 466–467:357–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar