Exploring the land use changes in Eastern Poland: statistics-based modeling

References

• Adhikari S, Fik T, and Dwivedi P. 2017. Proximate causes of land-use and land-cover change in Bannerghatta National Park: a spatial statistical model. Forests 8(9):342. doi:10.3390/f8090342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE T Automat Contr. 19:716–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacior S. 2016. Investigations of variability of the motorway on agricultural land as an example A1 motorway section. Acta Sci Pol Formatio Circumiectus. 15:29–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacior S and Prus B. 2018. Infrastructure development and its influence on agricultural land and regional sustainable development. Ecol Informatics 44:82–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacior S, Przegon W, and Gniadek J. 2017. Modelowanie oddziaływania autostrady na grunty rolne na przykładzie odcinka autostrady A4 Borek Mały – Boreczek. Acta Sci Pol Formatio Circumiectus 16:127–38. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/ASP.FC/2017.16.4.127
   Google Scholar
• Bakker MM, Govers G, Kosmas C, et al. 2005. Soil erosion as a driver of land-use change. Agric Ecosystems Environ. 105:467–81. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2004.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banski J. 2017. The future of rural poland: the main trends and possible scenarios. Eastern Eur Country. 23:71–102. doi:10.1515/eec-2017-0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bański J and Flaga M 2013. The areas of unfavourable demographic processes in Eastern Poland — selected aspects. Barometr Regionalny. 11:17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bański J, Pantylej W, Janicki W, et al. 2014. The impact of socio-economic transformation on population potential in the Eastern Poland. Rural Stud. 36:155
   Google Scholar
• Baran-Zglobicka B and Zglobicki W. 2012. Mosaic landscapes of SE Poland: Should we preserve them? Agroforest Syst. 85:351–65. doi:10.1007/s10457-011-9436-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayley GV and Hammersley JM. 1946. The effective number of independent observations in an autocorrelated time series. J Royal Stat Soc Ser B Stat Method. 8:184–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicik I, Jelecek L, and Stepanek V. 2001. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18:65–73. doi:10.1016/s0264-8377(00)00047-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowski J, Boratynski J, Czerniak A, et al. 2011. The long-term effect of EURO 2012 on Poland's economy. Ekonomista. 4:493–525.
   Google Scholar
• Box GEP, and Jenkins GM. 1976. Time Series Analysis, Forecasting and Control. Holden Day, San Francisco
   Google Scholar
• Bozek P, Janus J, Taszakowski J, et al. 2017. The use of Lidar data and Cadastral databases in the identification of land abandonment. 17th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2017. Bulgaria, pp. 705–12.
   Google Scholar
• Briassoulis H. 2000. Analysis of Land Use Change: Theoretical and Modeling Approaches. The web Book of Regional Science. West Virginia University, Virginia
   Google Scholar
• Busko M and Szafranska B. 2018. Analysis of changes in land use patterns pursuant to the conversion of agricultural land to non-agricultural use in the context of the sustainable development of the Malopolska region. Sustainability 10(1):136. doi:10.3390/su10010136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegielska K, Kudas D, Różycka-Czas R, et al. 2017. The analysis of land cover macrostructure in the suburban area of Krakow. Geomatics Landmanage Landscape. 2:47–60.
   Google Scholar
• Churski P. 2008. Structural funds of the European Union in Poland – experience of the first period of membership. Eur Plan Stud. 16:579–607. doi:10.1080/09654310801983506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churski P and Dominiak J. 2014. The impact of innovations on growth and stagnation regions in Poland. Eur Plan Stud. 22:1143–64. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.767494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1973. Statistical power analysis and research results. Am Educ Res J. 10:225–30. doi:10.3102/00028312010003225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. 1992. Statistical power analysis. Curr Direc Psycholog Sci. 1:98–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR and Stuart A. 1955. Some quick sign tests for trend in location and dispersion. Biometrika 42:80–95. doi:10.2307/2333424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSO (Central Statistical Office). 2016. Preliminary Estimates of the Gross National Product by Voivodeships in 2014. Central Statistical Office, Warsaw, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Dannenberg P and Kuemmerle T. 2010. Farm size and land use pattern changes in postsocialist Poland. Prof Geogr. 62:197–210. doi:10.1080/00330120903546312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosa M, Knudsen MT, and Hermansen JE. 2016. A comparison of land use change models: challenges and future developments. J Cleaner Prod. 113:183–93. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di XH, Wang YD, and Hou XY. 2014. Ecological risk caused by land use change in the coastal zone: a case study in the Yellow River Delta High-Efficiency Ecological Economic Zone. 35th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment (ISRSE35). Institute of Physics Publishing, Beijing, Peoples R China. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/17/1/012068
   Google Scholar
• Dykas P and Szewczyk M. 2015. Diversification of Eastern Polish Powiats’ economic development. Studia i Materiały Miscellanea Oeconomicae. 19:37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Dzun W and Musiał W. 2013. Zagospodarowanie ziemi rolniczej w Polsce w okresie przed - i po akcesyjnym w ujęciu regionalnym. Wieś i Rolnictwo. 4(161):62–78.
   Google Scholar
• Engstrom K, Rounsevell MDA, Murray-Rust D, et al. 2016. Applying Occam's razor to global agricultural land use change. Environ Model Softw. 75:212–29. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2018. GDP per capita in 276 EU regions; Eurostat: 28 Feb 2018
   Google Scholar
• Falsone G. 2018. Stochastic differential calculus for Gaussian and non-Gaussian noises: a critical review. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 56:198–216. doi:10.1016/j.cnsns.2017.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan JH, Wang Y, Zhou Z, et al. 2016. Dynamic ecological risk assessment and management of land use in the middle reaches of the Heihe River based on landscape patterns and spatial statistics. Sustainability 8:536. doi:10.3390/su8060536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feld CK, Birk S, Eme D, et al. 2016. Disentangling the effects of land use and geo-climatic factors on diversity in European freshwater ecosystems. Ecol Indicators 60:71–83. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz-Vietta NVM, Tahirindraza HS, and Stoll-Kleemann S. 2017. Local people's knowledge with regard to land use activities in southwest Madagascar – conceptual insights for sustainable land management. J Environ Manage. 199:126–38. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingrich S, Niedertscheider M, Kastner T, et al. 2015. Exploring long-term trends in land use change and aboveground human appropriation of net primary production in nine European countries. Land Use Policy 47:426–38. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldewijk KK, Dekker SC, and van Zanden JL 2017. Per-capita estimations of long-term historical land use and the consequences for global change research. J Land Use Sci. 12:313–337. doi:10.1080/1747423x.2017.1354938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grešlová Kušková P. 2013. A case study of the Czech agriculture since 1918 in a socio-metabolic perspective – from land reform through nationalisation to privatisation. Land Use Policy 30:592–603. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gąsiorowski J and Poławski Z. 2014. Land use structure as the basis for indicators determining spatial development of the environment. Polish J Environ Stud. 23:955–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajduga P. 2014. Strategic directions of social and economic development of Eastern Poland until 2020 in the context of programming cohesion policy for the period 2014–2020. Barometr Regionalny. 12:65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Halecki W, Kruk E, and Ryczek M. 2018. Loss of topsoil and soil erosion by water in agricultural areas: A multi-criteria approach for various land use scenarios in the Western Carpathians using a SWAT model. Land Use Policy 73:363–72. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek G, Beelen R, and Brunekreef B. 2011. Methodological issues and statistical analysis in land use regression modeling. Epidemiology 22:S101. doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000391977.49575.1f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoshino S. 1996. Statistical Analysis of Land-use Change and Driving Forces in the Kansai District, Japan. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
   Google Scholar
• Indrová M and Kupková L. 2015. Land use changes in Prague suburban area according to different prediction modelling approaches. Geografie 120:422–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus J and Taszakowski J. 2018. Spatial differentiation of indicators presenting selected barriers in the productivity of agricultural areas: a regional approach to setting land consolidation priorities. Ecol Indicators 93:718–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janus J, Mika M, Leń P, et al. 2018. A new approach to calculate the land fragmentation indicators taking into account the adjacent plots. Survey Rev. 50:1–7. doi:10.1080/00396265.2016.1210362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanianska R, Kizeková M, Nováček J, et al. 2014. Land-use and land-cover changes in rural areas during different political systems: A case study of Slovakia from 1782 to 2006. Land Use Policy 36:554–66. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan JO, Krumhardt KM, Ellis EC, et al. 2011. Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene 21:775–91. doi:10.1177/0959683610386983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi M, Mesgari MS, Sharifi MA, et al. 2017. Developing a methodology for modelling land use change in space and time. J Spatial Sci. 62:261–80. doi:10.1080/14498596.2017.1283253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall MG. 1938. A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrika 30:81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijowska-Strugala M, and Demczuk P. 2015. Impact of land use changes on soil erosion and deposition in a small Polish Carpathians catchment in last 40 years. Carpathian J Earth Environ Sci. 10:261–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JJ, Goodwin CW, and Kim S. 2017. Communication turns green construction planning into reality. J Green Build. 12:168–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh EH, Lee SH, Kaown D, et al. 2017. Impacts of land use change and groundwater management on long-term nitrate-nitrogen and chloride trends in groundwater of Jeju Island, Korea. Environ Earth Sci. 76:176. doi:10.1007/s12665-017-6466-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolecka N, Kozak J, Kaim D, et al. 2017. Understanding farmland abandonment in the Polish Carpathians. Appl Geogr. 88:62–72. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozak J, Gimmi U, Houet T, et al. 2017. Current practices and challenges for modelling past and future land use and land cover changes in mountainous regions. Regional Environ Change 17:2187–91. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1217-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski D, Phillips P, Schmidt P, et al. 1992. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. J Econometr. 54:159–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin EF, Rounsevell MDA, and Geist HJ. 2000. Are agricultural land-use models able to predict changes in land-use intensity? Agric Ecosyst Environ. 82:321–31. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00235-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasanta T, Arnaez J, Pascual N, et al. 2017. Space-time process and drivers of land abandonment in Europe. Catena 149:810–23. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latocha A, Szymanowski M, Jeziorska J, et al. 2016. Effects of land abandonment and climate change on soil erosion: an example from depopulated agricultural lands in the Sudetes Mts., SW Poland. Catena 145:128–41. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2016.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowska A, Stopa M, and Humenny G. 2015. The European Union structural funds and regional development. The perspective of small and medium enterprises in Eastern Poland. Eur Plan Stud. 23:785–97. doi:10.1080/09654313.2014.970132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R and Wong TC. 2018. Urban village redevelopment in Beijing: the state-dominated formalization of informal housing. Cities 72:160–72. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljung GM and Box GEP. 1978. On a measure of a lack of fit in time series models. Biometrika 65:297–303. doi:10.1093/biomet/65.2.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Łowicki D. 2008. Land use changes in Poland during transformation: case study of Wielkopolska region. Landscape Urban Plan. 87:279–88. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma LG, Ma FL, Ji Z, et al. 2015. Urban land use classification using LiDAR geometric, spatial autocorrelation and lacunarity features combined with postclassification processing method. Can J Remote Sens. 41:334–45. doi:10.1080/07038992.2015.1102630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann HB. 1945. Nonparametric test against trend. Econometrica 13:245–59. doi:10.2307/1907187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsaglia G. 1995. Diehard Battery of Tests of Randomness, the Marsaglia Random Number CDROM. Department of Statistics, Florida State University, Florida
   Google Scholar
• Matchavariani L, Metreveli G, Lagidze L, et al. 2017. Positive aspects of studying the sedimentations in reservoirs through the natural experiments. J Environ Biol. 38:1155–9. doi:10.22438/jeb/38/5(S1)/GM-36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michetti M and Zampieri M. 2014. Climate–human–land interactions: a review of major modelling approaches. Land 3:793–833. doi:10.3390/land3030793
   Google Scholar
• MID (Ministry of Infrastructure and Development). 2015a. Evaluation Plan for Operational Programme Eastern Poland. Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Warsaw, Poland
   Google Scholar
• MID (Ministry of Infrastructure and Development). 2015b. Operational Programme Eastern Poland 2014–2020. Ministry of Infrastructure and Development, Warsaw, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Milczarek-Andrzejewska D, Zawalińska K, and Czarnecki A. 2018. Land-use conflicts and the Common Agricultural Policy: evidence from Poland. Land Use Policy 73:423–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minetos D and Polyzos S. 2009. Multivariate statistical methodologies for testing hypothesis of land-use change at the regional level. A review and evaluation. J Environ Protect Ecol. 10:834–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirkatouli J, Hosseini A, and Neshat A. 2015. Analysis of land use and land cover spatial pattern based on Markov chains modelling. City, Territory Architect. 2:4
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JL, Gergel SE, and Coops NC. 2010. Aerial photography: a rapidly evolving tool for ecological management. Bioscience 60:47–59. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.1.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MRD (Ministry of Regional Development). 2013. Strategy for Socioeconomic Development of Eastern Poland until 2020. Ministry of Regional Development, Warsaw, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Muchova Z and Tarnikova M. 2018. Land cover change and its influence on the assessment of the ecological stability. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 16(3):2169–82. doi:10.15666/aeer/1603_21692182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy KR, Myors B, and Wolach A. 2014. Statistical Power Analysis: A Simple and General Model for Traditional and Modern Hypothesis Tests. Routledge Academic, New York, NY
   Google Scholar
• Narany TS, Aris AZ, Sefie A, et al. 2017. Detecting and predicting the impact of land use changes on groundwater quality, a case study in Northern Kelantan, Malaysia. Sci Total Environ. 599:844–53. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newland CP, Maier HR, Zecchin AC, et al. 2018. Multi-objective optimisation framework for calibration of Cellular Automata land-use models. Environ Model Softw. 100:175–200. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noszczyk T. 2018a. A review of approaches to land use changes modeling. Human Ecol Risk Assess. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1468994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noszczyk T. 2018b. Is the obligation to monitor land use change in Poland complied with? Acta Sci Pol Formatio Circumiectus 17(1):11–19. doi:10.15576/ASP.FC/2018.17.1.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noszczyk T, Rutkowska A, and Hernik J. 2017. Determining changes in land use structure in Małopolska using statistical methods. Polish J Environ Stud. 26(1):211–20. doi:10.15244/pjoes/64913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostapowicz K. 2012. Modelowanie przestrzenne zmian pokrycia terenu. In: Zastosowania metod statystycznych w badaniach naukowych IV. pp 175–82. StatSoft Polska, Kraków. Available at: https://www.statsoft.pl/Ksiazki/Zastosowania-metod-statystycznych-w-badaniach-naukowych-IV/
   Google Scholar
• Pawlewicz A, Cieslak I, Pawlewicz K, et al. 2015. Natura 2000 sites and socio-economic development of rural communes in Eastern Poland. International Conference ‘Economic Science for Rural Development’. Jelgava, Latvia, April 23-24, 2015. pp 14–23
   Google Scholar
• Piekarski W, Stoma M, Dudziak A, et al. 2016. How location shapes environmental awareness among inhabitants of Eastern Poland – an empirical study. Polish J Environ Stud. 25:733–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poławski Z. 2009. Zmiany użytkowania ziemi w Polsce w ostatnich dwóch stuleciach. Teledetekcja Środowiska 42:69–82.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
   Google Scholar
• Rennings K and Wiggering H. 1997. Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: linking economic and ecological concepts. Ecol Econ. 20:25–36. doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(96)00108-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero R, Guijarro JA, Ramis C, et al. 1998. A 30-year (1964-1993) daily rainfall data base for the Spanish Mediterranean regions: first exploratory study. Int J Climatol. 18:541–60. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0088(199804)18:5<541::AID-JOC270>3.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowska A. 2015. Properties of the Cox-Stuart test for trend in application to hydrological series: the simulation study. Commun Stat Simul Comput. 44:565–79. doi:10.1080/03610918.2013.784988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutkowska A and Ptak M. 2012. On certain stationarity tests for hydrologic series. Studia Geotechnica Mechanica XXXIV:51–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK and Niedzielski T. 2010. Statistical characteristics of riverflow variability in the Odra River Basin, Southwestern Poland. Polish J Environ Stud. 19:387–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senetra A, Szczepanska A, and Wasilewicz-Pszczolkowska M. 2014. Analysis of changes in the land use structure of developed and urban areas in Eastern Poland. Bull Geogr Socio-economic Ser. 24:219–30. doi:10.2478/bog-2014-0024
   Google Scholar
• Setyorini A, Khare D, and Pingale SM. 2017. Simulating the impact of land use/land cover change and climate variability on watershed hydrology in the Upper Brantas basin, Indonesia. Appl Geomatics 9:191–204. doi:10.1007/s12518-017-0193-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobolewska-Mikulska K. 2015. Environmental issues related to construction of motorways in Poland and in Croatia. In Proceedings of the 4th International Scientific Symposium on Economy of Eastern Croatia – Vision and Growth, Osijek, Croatia, 21–23 May 2015; Tonkovic, A.M., Ed.; FAC Economics Osijek: Osijek, Croatia, 2015; pp 660–9.
   Google Scholar
• Song J, Ye J, Zhu E, et al. 2016. Analyzing the impact of highways associated with farmland loss under rapid urbanization. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inform. 5(6):94. doi:10.3390/ijgi5060094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sroka W, Mikolajczyk J, Wojewodzic T, et al. 2018. Agricultural land vs. urbanisation in chosen Polish Metropolitan areas: a spatial analysis based on regression trees. Sustainability 10:837. doi:10.3390/su10030837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strek Z. 2018. Differences in spatial structure of agricultural areas in Ksiezpol commune with regard to productivity of cropland and grassland. In Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development, Jelgava, Latvia, 23–25 May 2018; pp 592–598.
   Google Scholar
• Sulewski P. 2016. Tests’ power for independence in the two-way contingency table. Wiadomości Statystyczne 8:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Szewrański S, Kazak J, Sylla M, et al. 2017a. Spatial data analysis with the use of ArcGIS and Tableau systems. In: Ivan I, Singleton A, Horák J, Inspektor T (eds), The Rise of Big Spatial Data, pp 337–49. Springer, Berlin, Germany
   Google Scholar
• Szewranski S, Kazak J, Zmuda R, et al. 2017b. Indicator-based assessment for soil resource management in the Wroclaw Larger Urban Zone of Poland. Polish J Environ Stud. 26:2239–48. doi:10.15244/pjoes/70178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Molen P and Mitchell D. 2016. Climate change, land use and land surveyors. Survey Rev. 48:148–55. doi:10.1179/1752270615y.0000000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vliet J, de Groot HLF, Rietveld P, et al. 2015. Manifestations and underlying drivers of agricultural land use change in Europe. Landscape Urban Plan. 133:24–36. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varamesh S, Hosseini SM, and Rahimzadegan M. 2017. Detection of land use changes in Northeastern Iran by Landsat satellite data. Appl Ecol Environ Res. 15:1443–54. doi:10.15666/aeer/1503_14431454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp A and Lambin EF. 2001. Predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85:1–6. doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00199-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verburg PH, Schot PP, Dijst MJ, et al. 2004. Land use change modelling: current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal 61:309–24. doi:10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y
   Google Scholar
• Walenia A. 2009. Selected issues in agricultural development in the areas of Eastern Poland. Scientific J Warsaw Univ Life Sci SGGW - Probl World Agric. 9(24):176–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wiejaczka L, Oledzki JR, Bucala-Hrabia A, et al. 2017. A spatial and temporal analysis of land use changes in two mountain valleys: with and without dam reservoir (Polish Carpathians). Quaestiones Geographicae 36:129–37. doi:10.1515/quageo-2017-0010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie HL. 2017. Towards sustainable land use in China: a collection of empirical studies. Sustainability 9(11):2129. doi:10.3390/su9112129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie HL, Wang P, and Huang HS. 2013. Ecological risk assessment of land use change in the Poyang Lake eco-economic zone, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 10:328–46. doi:10.3390/ijerph10010328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu LL, Li BL, Yuan YC, et al. 2016. Detecting different types of directional land cover changes using MODIS NDVI time series dataset. Remote Sensing 8(6):495. doi:10.3390/rs8060495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue S, Pilon P, and Cavadias G. 2002a. Power of the Mann-Kendall and Spearman's rho tests for detecting monotonic trends in hydrological series. J Hydrol. 259:254–71. doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(01)00594-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue S, Pilon P, Phinney B, et al. 2002b. The influence of autocorrelation on the ability to detect trend in hydrological series. Hydrologic Process. 16:1807–29. doi:10.1002/hyp.1095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zglobicki W, Gawrysiak L, Baran-Zglobicka B, et al. 2016. Long-term forest cover changes, within an agricultural region, in relation to environmental variables, Lubelskie province, Eastern Poland. Environ Earth Sci. 75:1373. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-6195-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Yushanjiang A, and Wang DF. 2018. Ecological risk assessment due to land use/cover changes (LUCC) in Jinghe County, Xinjiang, China from 1990 to 2014 based on landscape patterns and spatial statistics. Environ Earth Sci. 77:491. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7676-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Cabilio P, and Nadeem K. 2016. Improved seasonal Mann-Kendall tests for trend analysis in water resources time series. In: Li WK, Stanford DA, Yu H (eds), Advances in Time Series Methods and Applications: The a Ian Mcleod Festschrift, Vol. 78, pp 215–29. Springer: New York, NY. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-6568-7_10
   Google Scholar
• Zhu JM. 2017. Making urbanisation compact and equal: Integrating rural villages into urban communities in Kunshan, China. Urban Stud. 54:2268–84. doi:10.1177/0042098016643455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zia A. 2012. Land use adaptation to climate change: economic damages from land-falling hurricanes in the Atlantic and Gulf States of the USA, 1900-2005. Sustainability 4:917–32. doi:10.3390/su4050917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Źróbek-Różańska A, Źróbek S, and Źróbek R. 2014. Urban sprawl and the problems of changes of land use on the fringe areas of towns. 9th International Conference Environmental Engineering (9th ICEE), Vilnius, Lithuania, MAY 22-23, 2014. - Selected Papers. doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.140
   Google Scholar