295
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating ecosystem-based natural disaster management

Pages 1896-1906 | Received 11 Feb 2019, Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 23 May 2019

References

  • Adekola O, and Mitchell G. 2011. The Niger Delta wetlands: Threats to ecosystem services, their importance to dependent communities and possible management measures. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage 7:50–68
  • Al-Damkhi AM, Khuraibet AM, Al-Attar FA, et al. 2008. Integrating environmental impact assessment within Kuwait master plans as a tool for human and ecological risk control. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14:1070–85
  • Barbier EB. 2006. Natural disasters to natural disasters: replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front Ecol Environ 4:124–41
  • Beer T. 2006. Ecological risk assessment and quantitative consequence analysis. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12:51–65
  • Bozza A. 2016. Ecosystems and Engineering: A Working Synergy towards City Resilience to Natural Disasters, pp. 21–87. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Structures for Engineering and Architecture, University of Naples Federico II, Italy.
  • Browne M, Pagad D, and De Poorter M. 2009. The crucial role of information exchange and research for effective responses to biological invasions. Weed Res 49:6–18
  • Carabine E, Venton CC, Tanner T, et al. 2015. The Contribution of Ecosystem Services to Human Resilience: A Rapid Review, pp. 3–16. Overseas Development Institute, London.
  • Duane TP. 1997. Community participation in ecosystem management. Ecol Law Q 24:771–98
  • Ertekin T, and Yuksel C. 2014. The role of ecological literacy education with academic support in raising environmental awareness for high school students: “Enka ecological literacy summer camp project case study. Procedia – Social Behav Sci 120:124–32
  • Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2013. Fundamentals of Emergency Management. Emergency Management Institute, Emmitsburg, MD.
  • Gandage AS, and Ranadive MS. 2009. Ecosystem based disaster management. J Environ Res Dev 4:643–50
  • Gemmill B, and Bamidele-Izu A. 2002. The role of NGOs and civil society in global environmental governance. In: Esty DC and Ivanova MH (eds), Global Environmental Governance: Options & Opportunities, pp. 77–100. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.
  • Government of Canada. 2018. A guide to business continuity planning. Public Safety Canada. Available at https://www.publicsafety.gc.ca/cnt/rsrcs/pblctns/bsnss-cntnt-plnnng/index-en.aspx
  • Heged Z. 2018. Low awareness of ‘smart cities’ threatens innovation and adoption, research says. Iotnow. Available at https://www.iot-now.com/2018/07/10/85535-low-awareness-smart-cities-threatens-innovation-adoption-research-says/
  • Hermansson H. 2019. Challenges to decentralization of disaster management in Turkey: The role of political-administrative context. Int J Public Admin 42:417–31
  • Hudson PF. 2018. Towards integrated flood management along the lower Rhine and Mississippi Rivers and the international legacy of the 2005 New Orleans Hurricanes Katrina-Rita flood disaster. Int J River Basin Manage 16:273–85
  • Iftekhar MS. 2006. Conservation and management of the Bangladesh coastal ecosystem: Overview of an integrated approach. Nat Resour Forum 30:177–249
  • Kaya HO, and Koitsiwe M. 2016. African indigenous knowledge systems and natural disaster management in North West Province, South Africa. J Hum Ecol 35:101–6
  • Kouadio IK, Aljunid S, Kamigaki T, et al. 2012. Infectious diseases following natural disasters: Prevention and control measures. Expert Re. Anti-infective Ther 10:95–104
  • Lombard E. 2009. Ecology and administration: ecosystem management in the Great Lakes and the U.S.-Mexico border region. Michigan Acad XXIX:177–204
  • Maskrey A. 2011. Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environ Hazards 10:42–52
  • Mastebroek M. 2017. Joint Efforts and Shared Responsibilities. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands.
  • Mata-Lima H, Alvino-Borba A, Pinheiro A, et al. 2013. Impacts of natural disasters on environmental and socio-economic systems: What makes the difference? Ambient Soc xvi:45–64
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, pp. 1–24. Island Press, Washington, DC.
  • Moos C, Bebi P, Schwarz M, et al. 2018. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction in mountains. Earth Sci Rev 177:497–513
  • Naoya F. 2017. Ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: A review of recent progress and remaining gaps. In: Nishida H, Yokoyama J, Wagstaff SJ, and Callomon P (eds), Disaster and Biodiversity, pp. 154–163. International Union of Biological Sciences, Tokyo
  • National Governors’ Association. 1979. Comprehensive Emergency Management: A Governor’s Guide, pp. 11–26. Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, Washington, DC
  • Nehren U, Sudmeier-Rieux K, Sandholz S, et al. (eds). 2014. The Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction: Case Study and Exercise Source Book, pp. 3–7. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Center for Natural Resources and Development (CNRD), Köln, Germany.
  • Olson DL, and Wu DD. 2010. Earthquakes and risk management in China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 16:478–93
  • Potyraj J. 2016. Climate change action and the critical role of NGOs. Interaction: A United Voice for Global Change. Available at https://www.interaction.org/newsroom/blog/climate-change-action-and-critical-role-ngos
  • Preston J, Chadderton C, Kitagawa K, et al. 2015. Community response in disasters: An ecological learning framework. Int J Lifelong Educ 34:727–53
  • Rathi A. 2017. Global disasters in 2017 cost $306 billion-nearly double the cost of 2016. Quartz. Available at https://qz.com/1162791/2017-natural-disasters-and-climate-change-effects-cost-the-world-306-billion/
  • Renaud FG, Sudmeier-Rieux K, and Estrella M. 2013. The relevance of ecosystems for disaster risk reduction. In: Renaud FG, Sudmeier-Rieux K, and Estrella M (eds), The Role of Ecosystems in Disaster Risk Reduction, pp. 3–25. United Nations University Press, Tokyo
  • RICS (ed.). 2009. The Built Environment Professions in DRR and Response: A Guide for Humanitarian Agencies, pp. 8–36. MLC Press, University of Westminster, London.
  • Seneviratne K, Baldry D, and Pathirage C. 2010. Disaster knowledge factors in managing disasters successfully. Int J Strategic Property Manage 14:376–90
  • Setten G, and Brown KM. 2018. Ecosystem services as an integrative framework: What is the potential?. Land Use Policy 75:549–56
  • Smarter Scotland. 2016. National Improvement Framework for Scottish Education. Scottish Government, Edinburgh 6–7
  • Spialek ML, and Houston B. 2019. The influence of citizen disaster communication on perceptions of neighborhood belonging and community resilience. J Appl Commun Res 47:1–23
  • Sudmeier-Rieux K, Rizvi HMA, and Rietbergen S (eds.). 2006. Ecosystems, Livelihoods and Disasters: An Integrated Approach to Disaster Risk Management, pp. 8–18. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland.
  • Triyanti A, and Chu E. 2017. A survey of governance approaches to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction: Current gaps and future directions. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 32:11–21 Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.11.005
  • United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR). 2008. Environment and Disaster Risk: Emerging Perspectives, pp. 1–34. United Nations Environment Programme, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • UNISDR. 2019. Official Website of UNISDR. Available at https://www.unisdr.org/
  • Waage S and Kester C. 2014. Private Sector Engagement with Ecosystem Services, pp. 10–11. BSR, New York.
  • Winggvist GO, Drakenberg O, Slunge D, et al. 2012. The Role of Governance for Improved Environmental Outcomes: Perspectives for Developing Countries and Countries in Transition, pp. 22–27. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm.
  • Yu M, Yang C, and Li Y. 2018. Big data in natural disaster management: A review. Geosci 8:1–26
  • Zolch T, Wamsler C, and Pauleit S. 2018. Integrating the ecosystem-based approach into municipal climate adaptation strategies: The case of Germany. J Clean Prod 170:966–77

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.