Occurrence and transformation of mercury in formerly contaminated soils due to operation of amalgamation techniques and assessment of consequences

References

• Aller AJ, Lumbreras JM, Robles LC. 1996. Stability of bacterium-mercury complexes and speciation of soluble inorganic mercury species. Anal Chim Acta. 330:89–105. doi:10.1016/0003-2670(96)00167-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymus. 2016. Public notice No. 153/2016 about the conditions for protection of the agricultural soil quality. Legal code of The Czech Republic, pp. 2692–2699.
   Google Scholar
• Árvay J, Demková L, Hauptvogl M. 2017. Assessment of environmental and health risks in former polymetallic ore mining and smelting area, Slovakia: spatial distribution and accumulation of mercury in four different ecosystems. Ecotox Environ Safe. 144:236–244. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He B, Jiang GB. 1999. Analysis of organomercuric species in soils from orchards and wheat fields by capillary gas chromatography on-line coupled with atomic absorption spectrometry after in situ hydride generation and headspace solid phase microextraction. Fresenius J Anal Chem. 365:615–618. doi:10.1007/s002160051532
   Google Scholar
• Biester H, Müller G, Schöler HF. 2002. Binding and mobility of mercury in soils contaminated by emissions from chlor-alkali plants. Sci Total Environ. 284:191–203. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00885-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom NS, Porcella DB. 1994. Less mercury? Nature. 367:694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Lu W, Hou Z, Zhang Y, Jiang X, Wu J. 2017. Heavy metal pollution in soil associated with a large-scale cyanidation gold mining region in southeast of Jilin, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 24:3084–3096. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7968-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coufalík P, Zvěřina O, Komárek J. 2014. Determination of mercury species using thermal desorption analysis in AAS. Chem Pap. 68:427–434. doi:10.2478/s11696-013-0471-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Černá M. 2004. Opatření mezinárodních institucí a České republiky k omezování rizika znečišťování životního prostředí rtutí (Provision of international institutions and the Czech Republic to reduce the risk of environmental pollution of mercury). Chem Listy. 98:916–921. (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• Dadová J, Andráš P, Kupka J, Krnáč J, Andráš P, Hroncová E, Midula P. 2016. Mercury contamination from historical mining territory at Malachov Hg-deposit (Central Slovakia). Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 23:2914–2927. doi:10.1007/s11356-056-015-5527-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1999. Appendix E. Contaminant persistence and mobility factors. http://www.epa.gov/
   Google Scholar
• ERM® Catalogue. 2010. ERM CC-580 Estuarine sediment EC JRC. Geel, Belgium: Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements.
   Google Scholar
• Gage JC. 1975. Mechanisms for biodegradation of organic mercury-compounds – Actions of ascorbate and of soluble-proteins. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 32:225–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Sánchez M, Šípková A, Száková J, Kaplan L, Ochecová P, Tlustoš P. 2014. Applications of organic and inorganic amendments induce changes in the mobility of mercury and macro-and micronutrients of soils. Scientific World Journal. 2014:1. doi:10.1155/2014/407049
   Google Scholar
• Gil-Díaz M, Alonso J, Rodríguez-Valdés E, Gallego JR, Lobo MC. 2017. Comparing different commercial zero valent iron nanoparticles to immobilize As and Hg in brownfield soil. Sci Total Environ. 584–585:1324–1332. doi:10.1016/j.scitoten.2017.02.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golding GR, Sparling R, Kelly CA. 2008. Effect of pH on intracellular accumulation of trace concentrations of Hg(II) in Escherichia coli under anaerobic conditions, as measured using a mer-lux bioreporter. Appl Environ Microbiol. 74:667–675. doi:10.1128/AEM.00717-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grégoire DS, Poulain AJ. 2014. A Little bit of light a long way: the role of phototrophs on mercury cycling. Metallomics. 6:396–407. doi:10.1039/C3MT00312D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulley AL. 2017. Valuing environmental impacts of mercury emissions from gold mining: dollar per troy ounce for twelve open-pit, small-scale, and artisanal mining sites. Resour Policy. 52:266–272. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Kingston HM, Boylan HM, Rahman GMM, Shah S, Richter RC, Link DD, Bhandari S. 2003. Speciation of mercury in soil and sediment by selective solvent and acid extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 375:428–436. doi:10.1007/s00216-002-1701-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojdová M, Navrátil T, Rohovec J, Penížek V, Grygar T. 2009. Mercury distribution and speciation in soils affected by historic mercury mining. Water Air Soil Pollut. 200:89–99. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9895-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly CA, Rudd JWM, Holoka MH. 2003. Effect of pH on mercury uptake by an aquatic bacterium: implications for Hg cycling. Environ Sci Technol. 37:2941–2946. doi:10.1021/es0263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyono M, Pan-Hou H. 2006. Genetic engineering of bacteria for environmental remediation of mercury. J Health Sci. 52:199–204. doi:10.1248/jhs.52.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krausß P, Deyhle M, Maier KH. 1997. Field study on the mercury content of saliva. Toxicol Environ Chem. 63:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Kumar B, Manzoor S, Kulshrestha U. 2015. Status mercury of atmospheric research in South Asia: a review. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 15:1092–1109. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2014.05.0098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeland AL, Hardin RD, Neitzel RL. 2017. Mercury levels in human hair and farmed fish near artisanal and small-scale gold mining communities in the Madre de Dios river basin, Peru. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 14:302. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00885-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu YR, Zheng YM, Shen JP, Zhang L-M, He J-Z. 2010. Effects of mercury on the activity and community composition of soil ammonia oxidizers. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 17:1237–1244. doi:10.1007/s11356-010-0302-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu C, Wu YG, Hu S. 2016. Drying-wetting cycles facilitated mobilization and transport of metal-rich colloidal particles from exposed mine tailing into soil in a gold mining region along the Silk Road. Environ Earth Sci. 75:1031. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5812-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant BP, Saby NPA, Arrouays D. 2017. A survey of topsoil arsenic and mercury concentrations across France. Chemosphere. 181:635–644. doi:10.1016/j.chemsphere.2017.04.106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morávek P, Cícha J, Losertová L, Tichý A, Toms B, Tvrdý J, Večeřa J, Zemek V. 2017. Stezkami zlatonosných revírů Čech a Moravy. Zlatonosný revír Kozí Hory-Libčice 40–42, ČGS Praha. (in Czech).
   Google Scholar
• Musilova J, Árvay J, Vollmannova A, Toth T, Tomas J. 2016. Environmental contamination by heavy metals in region with previous mining activity. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 97:569–575. doi:10.1007/s00128-016-1907-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Pontevedra-Pombal X, Martínez-Cortizas A, García-Rodeja Gayoso E. 2008. Mercury accumulation in upland acid forest ecosystems nearby a coalfired power-plant in Southwest Europe (Galicia, NW Spain). Sci Total Environ. 394:303–312. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.01.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novozamsky J, Lexmond TM, Houba VJG. 1993. A single extraction procedure of soil for evaluation of uptake of some heavy metals in plants. Int J Envir Anal Chem. 51:47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordónez A, Álvarez R, Charlesworth E, De Miguel E, Loredo J. 2011. Risk assessment of soils contaminated by mercury mining, Northern Spain. J Environ Monit. 13:128–136. ISSN 1464-0325. doi:10.1039/C0EM00132E
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacyna EG, Pacyna JM, Steenhuisen F, Wilson S. 2006. Global anthropogenic mercury emission inventory for 2000. Atmos Environ. 40:4048–4063. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey SK, Kim KH, Brown R. 2011. Measurement techniques for mercury species in ambient air. Trends Anal Chem. 30:899–916. doi:10.1016/j.trac.2011.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavilonis B, Grassman J, Johnson G, Diaz Y, Caravanos J. 2017. Characterization and risk of exposure to elements from artisanal gold mining operations in the Bolivian Andes. Environ Res. 154:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirrone N, Aas W, Cinnirella S, Ebinghaus R, Hedgecock IM, Pacyna J, Sprovieri F, Sunderland EM. 2013. Toward the next generation of air quality monitoring: mercury. Atmos Environ 80:599–611. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.03.053
   Google Scholar
• Public Notice 13/1994. 1994. Czech Regulation. Specifications for protection of agricultural soils. Prague: Czech Ministry of Environment. (in Czech). https://www.federalregister.gov>documents>1994/13
   Google Scholar
• Rafaj P, Bertok I, Cofata J, Schopp V. 2013. Scenarios of global mercury emissions from anthropogenic sources. Atmos Environ. 79:472–479. doi:10.1016/j.atmoserov.2013.06.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis AT, Rodrigues SM, Davidson CM, Pereira E, Duarte AC. 2010. Extractability and mobility of mercury from agricultural soils surrounding industrial and mining contaminated areas. Chemosphere. 81:1369–1377. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risher JF, Tucker P. 2016. Alkyl mercury-induced toxicity: multiple mechanisms of action. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 240:105–149. doi:10.1007/398_2016_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumayor M, Lopez-Anton MA, Díaz-Somoano M, Maroto-Valer MM, Richard J-H, Biester H, Martínez-Tarzona MR. 2016. A comparison of devices using thermal desorption for mercury speciation in solids. Talanta. 150:272–277. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2015.12.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos de Souza E, Texeira RA, Cardoso da Costa HS, Oliveira FJ, Azevedo Melo LC, do CarmoFreitas Faial K, Rodrigues Fernandes A. 2017. Assessment of risk to human health from simultaneous exposure to multiple contaminants in an artisanal gold mine in Serra Pelada, Pará, Brazil. Sci Total Environ. 576:683–695. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez DM, Quejido AJ, Fernández H, Hernández C, Schmid T, Millán R, Gonzalez M, Aldea M, Martin R, Morante R. 2005. Mercury and trace element fraction in Almaden soils by application of different sequential extraction procedures. Anal Bioanal Chem. 381:1507–1513. doi:10.1007/s00216-005-3058-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin NE. 2009. Global biogeochemical cycling of mercury: a review. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 34:43–63. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.051308.084314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholupov S, Pogarev S, Ryzhov V, Stroganov A, Mashyanov N, Siperstein J. 2004. Multifunctional Zeeman mercury analytical system RA-915+: practical experience and future trends. Rudarsko-Metalurski Zbornik. 51:2019–2021.
   Google Scholar
• Sysalová J, Kučera J, Fikrle M, Drtinová B. 2013. Determination of the total mercury in contaminated soils by direct solid sampling atomic absorption spectrometry using an AMA-254 device and radiochemical neutron activation analysis. Microchem J. 110:691–694. doi:10.1016/j.microc.2013.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sysalová J, Kučera J, Drtinová B, Červenka R., Zvěřina O, Komárek J, Kameník J. 2017. Mercury species in formerly contaminated soils and released soil gases. Sci Total Environ. 584–585:1032–1039. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Száková J, Havlíčková J, Šípková A, Gabriel J, Švec K, Baldrian P, Sysalová J, Coufalík P, Červenka R, Zvěřina O, et al. 2016. Effects of the soil microbial community on mobile proportions and speciation of mercury (Hg) in contaminated soil. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 51:364–370. doi:10.1080/10934529.2015.1109413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Száková J, Burešová A, Praus L, García-SánsezM, Holečková Z, Gabriel J, Sysalová J, Červenka R, Komárek J, Grohová S, et al. 2016a. The response of mercury (Hg) transformation in soil to sulfur compounds and sulfur-rich biowaste application. Environ Earth Sci. 75:584. doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taube F, Pommer L, Larsson T, Shchukarev A, Nordin A. 2008. Soil remediation–mercury speciation in soil and vapour phase during thermal treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut. 193:155–163. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9679-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telmer K, Stapper D. 2012. Reducing mercury use in artisanal and small-scale gold mining: a practical guide. A UNEP Glob Mercury Partnersh Doc Conjuction Artis Gold Counc 68. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/22524
   Google Scholar
• Tomiyasu T, Kodamatani H, Hamada YK, Matsuyama A, Imura R, Taniguchi Y, Hidayati N, Rahajoe RS. 2017. Distribution of total mercury and methylmercury around the small-scale gold mining area along the Cikaniki River, Bogor, Indonesia. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 24:2643–2652. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuček M, Bencko V, Krýsl S. 2007. Zdravotní rizika rtuti ze zubních amalgámů. Chem Listy. 101:1038–1044. (in Czech).WOS:000251916900008
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich SMT, Tanton W, Abdrashitova SA. 2001. Mercury in the aquatic environment: a review of factors affecting methylation. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol. 31:241–293. doi:10.1080/20016491089226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umlaufová M, Száková J, Najmanová J, Sysalová J, Tlustoš P. 2018. The soil-plant transfer of risk elements within the area of an abandoned gold mine in Libčice, Czech Republic. J Environ Sci Heal A. 53:1267–1276. doi:10.1080/10934529.2018.1528041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNEP. 2013. Global mercury assessment: sources, Emissions, releases and environmental transport.wedocs.unep.org>handle
   Google Scholar
• USDHHS. 1999. Toxicological profile for mercury. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Valenete RJ, Shea C, Hemes KJ, Tanner RL. 2007. Atmosheric mercury in the Great Smoky Mountains compared to regional and global levels. Atmos Environ. 41:1861–1873.https://wwwatsdr.cdc.gov>toprofiles
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Váňa T, Litochleb J. 2001. Geological walk to Novy Knin and Goatish Mountains. (in Czech). Exkurze ČG Společnosti. 8:l7–l8. ČGÚ Praha
   Google Scholar
• Vaselli O, Higueras P, Nisi B, Esbrí JM, Cabassi J, Martínez-Coronado A, Tassi F, Rappuoli D. 2013. Distribution of gaseous Hg in the Mercury mining district of Mt. Amiata (Central Italy): a geochemical survey prior the reclamation project . Environ Res. 125:179–187. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2012.12.00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga MM, Angeloci G, Niquen W, Seccatore J. 2015. Reducing mercury pollution by training Peruvian artisanal gold miners. J Clean Prod. 94:268–277. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickre JB, Karagas MR, Folt CL, Sturup S. 2004. Environmental exposure and fingernail analysis of arsenic and mercury in children and adults in a Nicaraguan gold mining community. Arch Environ Health. 400–409: doi:10.3200/AEOH.59.8.400-409
   Google Scholar
• Yasutake A, Cheng JP, Kiyono M, Uragichi S, Liu X, Muira K. 2011. Rapid monitoring of mercury in air from an organic chemical factory in China using a portable mercury analyzer. ScientificWorldJournal. 11:1630–1640. doi:10.1100/2011/493207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin L, Yu K, Lin S, Song X, Yu X. 2016. Associations of blood mercury, inorganic mercury, methyl mercury and bisphenol A with dental surface restorations in the U.S. population, NHANES 2003–2004 and 2010–2012. Ecotoxicol Environm Safety. 134:213–225. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin Y, Allen HE, Li Y, Sunders HPF. 1996. Adsorption of mercury (II) by soil: effect of pH, chloride, and organic metter. J Environ Qual. 25:837–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Chen LX, Liu DY. 2012. Characterization of a marine-isolated mercury-resistant Pseudomonas putida strain SP1 and its potential application in marine mercury reduction. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 93:1305–1314. doi:10.1007/s00253-011-3454-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar