204
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Risk assessment of occupational safety in construction projects using uncertain information

, &
Pages 1134-1151 | Received 29 Jan 2023, Accepted 23 Jul 2023, Published online: 26 Aug 2023

References

  • Baykasoğlu A , Kaplanoğlu V , Durmuşoğlu ZDU , Şahin C. 2013. Integrating fuzzy DEMATEL and fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS methods for truck selection. Expert Syst Appl. 40(3):899–907. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.046.
  • Boral S , Chaturvedi SK , Howard I , Naikan VNA , McKee K. 2021. An integrated interval type-2 fuzzy sets and multiplicative half quadratic programming-based MCDM framework for calculating aggregated risk ranking results of failure modes in FMECA. Process Saf Environ Protec. 150:194–222. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.04.006.
  • Chung J , Lee G , Kim J-H. 2021. Framework for technical specifications of 3D concrete printers. Autom Constr. 127:103732. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103732.
  • Cortés-Pérez JP , Cortés-Pérez A , Prieto-Muriel P. 2020. BIM-integrated management of occupational hazards in building construction and maintenance. Autom Constr. 113:103115. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103115.
  • Dabbagh R , Yousefi S. 2019. A hybrid decision-making approach based on FCM and MOORA for occupational health and safety risk analysis. J Safety Res. 71:111–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.09.021.
  • Debnath J , Biswas A , Sivan P , Sen KN , Sahu S. 2016. Fuzzy inference model for assessing occupational risks in construction sites. Int J Ind Ergon. 55:114–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.08.004.
  • Duryan M , Smyth H , Roberts A , Rowlinson S , Sherratt F. 2020. Knowledge transfer for occupational health and safety: cultivating health and safety learning culture in construction firms. Accid Anal Prev. 139:105496. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105496.
  • Grzegorzewski P. 2004. Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the Hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 148(2):319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2003.08.005.
  • Gul M. 2018. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 24(7):1723–1760. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531.
  • Gul M , Ak MF , Guneri AF. 2017. Occupational health and safety risk assessment in hospitals: a case study using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 23(2):187–202. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2016.1234363.
  • Gul M , Celik E. 2018. Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 24(7):1786–1812. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1422975.
  • Hoseini E , Hertogh M , Bosch-Rekveldt M. 2021. Developing a generic risk maturity model (GRMM) for evaluating risk management in construction projects. J Risk Res. 24(7):889–908. doi: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1646309.
  • Ilbahar E , Karaşan A , Cebi S , Kahraman C. 2018. A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Saf Sci. 103:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025.
  • Jahan A , Ismail MY , Shuib S , Norfazidah D , Edwards KL. 2011. An aggregation technique for optimal decision-making in materials selection. Mater Des. 32(10):4918–4924. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.050.
  • Karamoozian A , Wu D. 2022. A hybrid approach for the supply chain risk assessment of the construction industry during the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 1–16. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2022.3210083.
  • Karamoozian A , Wu D , Chen CLP , Luo C. 2019. An approach for risk prioritization in construction projects using analytic network process and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory. IEEE Access. 7:159842–159854. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939067.
  • Karamoozian A , Wu D. 2020. A hybrid risk prioritization approach in construction projects using failure mode and effective analysis. ECAM. 27(9):2661–2686. doi: 10.1108/ECAM-10-2019-0535.
  • Karamoozian A , Wu D , Lambert JH , Luo C. 2022. Risk assessment of renewable energy projects using uncertain information. Int J Energy Res. 46(13):18079–18099. doi: 10.1002/er.8428.
  • Karamoozian A , Wu D , Luo C. 2023. Risk assessment of renewable energy projects using a novel hybrid fuzzy approach. Int J Green Energy. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/15435075.2023.2166789.
  • Kembro J , Näslund D , Olhager J. 2017. Information sharing across multiple supply chain tiers: a Delphi study on antecedents. Int J Prod Econ. 193:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.032.
  • Li M , Wang H , Wang D , Shao Z , He S. 2020. Risk assessment of gas explosion in coal mines based on fuzzy AHP and Bayesian network. Process Saf Environ Protec. 135:207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.003.
  • Liu H-T , Tsai Y-L 2012. A fuzzy risk assessment approach for occupational hazards in the construction industry. Saf Sci. 50(4):1067–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.021.
  • Liu R , Hou L-X , Liu H-C , Lin W. 2020. Occupational health and safety risk assessment using an integrated SWARA-MABAC model under bipolar fuzzy environment. Comp Appl Math. 39(4):276. doi: 10.1007/s40314-020-01311-7.
  • Liu R , Liu Z , Liu H-C , Shi H. 2021. An improved alternative queuing method for occupational health and safety risk assessment and its application to construction excavation. Autom Constr. 126:103672. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103672.
  • Liu R , Zhu Y-J , Chen Y , Liu H-C. 2021. Occupational health and safety risk assessment using an integrated TODIM-PROMETHEE model under linguistic spherical fuzzy environment. Int J Intell Sys. 36(11):6814–6836. doi: 10.1002/int.22570.
  • Mattas K , Makridis M , Botzoris G , Kriston A , Minarini F , Papadopoulos B , Re F , Rognelund G , Ciuffo B. 2020. Fuzzy surrogate safety metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations. Accid Anal Prev. 148:105794. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105794.
  • Melnyk SA , Lummus RR , Vokurka RJ , Burns LJ , Sandor J. 2009. Mapping the future of supply chain management: a Delphi study. Int J Prod Res. 47(16):4629–4653. doi: 10.1080/00207540802014700.
  • Mete S. 2019. Assessing occupational risks in pipeline construction using FMEA-based AHP-MOORA integrated approach under Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 25(7):1645–1660. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1546115.
  • Moktadir MA , Ali SM , Paul SK , Shukla N. 2019. Barriers to big data analytics in manufacturing supply chains: a case study from Bangladesh. Comput Ind Eng. 128:1063–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.04.013.
  • Murry JW Jr. , Hammons JO. 1995. Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Rev High Educ. 18(4):423–436. doi: 10.1353/rhe.1995.0008.
  • Mutlu NG , Altuntas S. 2019. Risk analysis for occupational safety and health in the textile industry: integration of FMEA, FTA, and BIFPET methods. Int J Ind Ergon. 72:222–240. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2019.05.013.
  • Naghavi-Konjin Z , Mortazavi S-B , Asilian-Mahabadi H , Hajizadeh E. 2020. Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: a Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry. Process Saf Environ Protec. 137:352–357. doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038.
  • Okoli C , Pawlowski SD. 2004. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inform Manage. 42(1):15–29. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002.
  • Oliveira MD , Lopes DF , Bana e Costa CA. 2018. Improving occupational health and safety risk evaluation through decision analysis. Intl Trans in Op Res. 25(1):375–403. doi: 10.1111/itor.12339.
  • Oz NE , Mete S , Serin F , Gul M. 2019. Risk assessment for clearing and grading process of a natural gas pipeline project: an extended TOPSIS model with Pythagorean fuzzy sets for prioritizing hazards. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 25(6):1615–1632. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1495057.
  • Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 48(1):9–26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
  • Samaniego-Rascón D , Gameiro da Silva MC , Ferreira AD , Cabanillas-Lopez RE. 2019. Solar energy industry workers under climate change: a risk assessment of the level of heat stress experienced by a worker based on measured data. Saf Sci. 118:33–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.042.
  • Szmidt E , Kacprzyk J. 2000. Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(3):505–518. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00244-9.
  • Taylan O , Bafail AO , Abdulaal RMS , Kabli MR. 2014. Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl Soft Comput. 17:105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.003.
  • Tepe S , Kaya İ. 2020. A fuzzy-based risk assessment model for evaluations of hazards with a real-case study. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 26(2):512–537. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2018.1521262.
  • Wei C-P , Wang P , Zhang Y-Z. 2011. Entropy, similarity measure of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Inform Sci. 181(19):4273–4286. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2011.06.001.
  • Xu Z. 2007. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 15(6):1179–1187.
  • Yazdi M , Nedjati A , Abbassi R. 2019. Fuzzy dynamic risk-based maintenance investment optimization for offshore process facilities. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 57:194–207. doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.014.
  • Zhang L , Wu X , Zhu H , AbouRizk SM. 2017. Perceiving safety risk of buildings adjacent to tunneling excavation: an information fusion approach. Autom Constr. 73:88–101. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2016.09.003.
  • Zhang X , Mohandes SR. 2020. Occupational Health and Safety in green building construction projects: a holistic Z-numbers-based risk management framework. J Clean Prod. 275:122788. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122788.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.