Anti-Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Messages Elicit Reactance: Effects on Attitudes and Policy Preferences

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, F. (2015). Toward a dose-response account of media priming. Communication Research, 42, 1089–1115. doi:10.1177/0093650213482970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkes, H. R., Boehm, L. E., & Xu, G. (1991). Determinants of judged validity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 576–605. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(91)90026-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M., Pandeya, N., Byrnes, G., Renehan, A. G., Stevens, G. A., Ezzati, M., & Forman, D. (2015). Global burden of cancer attributable to high body-mass index in 2012: A population-based study. The Lancet Oncology, 16, 36–46. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(14)71123-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backholer, K., Sarink, D., Beauchamp, A., Keating, C., Loh, V., Ball, K., & Peeters, A. (2016). The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages according to socioecomic position: A systematic review of the evidence. Public Health Nutrition, 19, 3070–3084. doi:10.1017/S136898001600104X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensley, L. S., & Wu, R. (1991). The role of psychological reactance in drinking following alcohol prevention messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1111–1124. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessarabova, E., Fink, E. L., & Turner, M. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39, 339–364. doi:10.1111/hcre.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., Hennessy, M., Glanz, K., Strasser, A., & Vaala, S. (2015). Do emotional appeals in public service advertisements influence adolescents’ intention to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages? Journal of Health Communication, 20, 938–948. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Science in the Public Interest. (2017). Local sugary drink taxes voted on 2014-2017. Washington, D. C.: Author. Retrieved from https://cspinet.org/resource/local-sugary-drink-taxes-voted-2014%E2%80%932017
   Google Scholar
• Danaei, G., Ding, E. L., Mozaffarian, D., Taylor, B., Rehm, J., Murray, C. J. L., & Ezzati, M. (2009). The preventable causes of death in the United States: Comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factor. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000058. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debnam, J. (2017). Selection effects and heterogeneous demand responses to the Berkeley Soda Tax vote. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 99(5), 1172–1187. doi:10.1093/ajae/aax056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, E. A., Cohen, J. E., Truant, P. L., Rutkow, L., Kanarek, N. F., & Barry, C. L. (2015). News framing of New York City’s sugar-sweetened beverage portion-size cap. American Journal of Public Health, 105, 2202–2209. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2015.302673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Barry, C. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2017). Partisan responses to public health messages: Motivated reasoning and sugary drink taxes. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42, 1005–1037. doi:10.1215/03616878-4193606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Niederdeppe, J., & Barry, C. L. (2013). Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention. American Journal of Public Health, 103, e96–e102. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gostin, L. (2017). 2016: The year of the soda tax. Milbank Quarterly, 95, 19–23. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grynbaum, M. M., & Connelly, M. (2012, August 22). 60% in city oppose Bloomberg’s soda, poll finds. New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes/2012/08/23/nyregion/most-new-yorkers-oppose-bloombergs-soda-ban.html
   Google Scholar
• Han, E., & Powell, L. M. (2013). Consumption patterns of sugar-sweetened beverages in the United States. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 113, 43–53. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, T., & Zerbach, T. (2013). Helpful or harmful? How frequent repetition affects perceived statement credibility. Journal of Communication, 63, 1010–2013. doi:10.1111/jcom.12063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., & Cameron, G. T. (2017). Utilizing audiovisual and gain-framed messages to attenuate psychological reactance toward weight management health messages. Health Communication, 32, 72–81. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1099506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Lane, L., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219–240. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00297.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G., Merlo, C., Demissie, Z., Sliwa, S., & Park, S. (2017). Trends in beverage consumption among high school students – United States, 2007-2015. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 66, 112–116. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6604a5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongeau, P. (2013). Fear appeals. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The persuasion handbook (2nd ed., pp. 184–199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S., Xu, F., Town, M., & Blanck, H. M. (2016). Prevalence of sugar-sweetened beverage intake among adults — 23 states and the District of Columbia, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65, 169–174. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6507a1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavey, L., Sparks, P., & Churchill, S. (2018). Proscriptive vs. prescriptive health recommendations to drink alcohol within recommended limits: Effects on moral norms, reactance, attitudes, intentions and behavior. Alcohol and Alcoholism. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agx123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2012). What is the best measure of psychological reactance? An empirical test of two measures. Health Communication, 27, 1–9. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.567446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quick, B. L. (2013). Perceived message sensation value and psychological reactance: A test of the dominant thought disruption hypothesis. Journal of Health Communication, 15, 603–628. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1099506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rains, S. A. (2013). The nature of psychological reactance revisited: A meta-analytic review. Human Communication Research, 39, 47–73. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01443.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard, M.-A., Schindler, S., Raabe, V., Stahlberg, D., & Messner, M. (2013). Less is sometimes more: How repetition of an antismoking advertisement affect attitudes toward smoking and source credibility. Social Influence, 9, 116–132. doi:10.1093/her/15.3.339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, A. S., Banas, J. A., & Magid, Y. (2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 32, 890–902. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1196410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. (2010). Justice: What’s the right thing to do? New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L. (2010). Mitigating psychological reactance: The role of message-induced empathy in persuasion. Human Communication Research, 36, 397–422. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Coles, V. (2015). Fear and psychological reactance: Between- versus within-individuals perspectives. Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie, 223, 225–235. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, L. D., Ng, S. W., Ryan-Ibarra, S., Taillie, L. S., Induni, M., Miles, D. R., & Popkin, B. M. (2017). Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study. PLoS Medicine, 14, e1002283. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, G. M., Micha, R., Khatibzadeh, S., Lim, S., Ezzati, M., & Mozaffarian, D. (2015). Estimated global, regional, and national disease burdens related to sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in 2010. Circulation, 132, 639–666. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, J., Kim, S., & Cohen, H. (2017). Message fatigue: Conceptual definition, operationalization, and correlates. Communication Monographs, 84, 5–29. doi:10.1080/03637751.2016.1250429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2012, May 31). Drink different. The Daily Show (clip). New York, NY: Comedy Central.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Runger, D. (2016). Psychology of habit. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 289–314. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Five faces of oppression. In Ann E. Cudd & R. O. Andreasen., Feminist theory: A philosophical anthology (pp. 91–104). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yzer, M. C., Siero, F. W., & Buunk, B. P. (2000). Can public campaigns effectively change psychological determinants of safer sex? An evaluation of three Dutch campaigns. Health Education Research, 15, 339–352. doi:10.1093/her/15.3.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar