Persuasive Effects of Linguistic Agency Assignment and Linguistic Markers of Argumentation in Health Messages about an Emerging Sexually Transmitted Disease

References

• Allen, M. (1994). The persuasive effects of one and two sidedmessages. In M. Allen & R. W. Preiss (Eds.), Prospects and precautions in the use of meta-analysis (pp. 101–125). Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombre, J. C., & Ducrot, O. (1989). Argumentativity and informativity. In M. Meyer (Ed.), From metaphysics to rhetoric (pp. 71–87). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombre, J. C., & Ducrot, O. (1983). L’argumentation dans la langue [The argumentation in the language]. Brussels, Belgium: Mardaga.
   Google Scholar
• Apotheloz, D., & Nowakowska, M. (2011). Déjà en emploi justificatif. [Already used as justification]. In G. Corminboeuf & M. J. Béguelin (Eds.), Du système linguistique aux actions langagières (pp. 249–261). Bruxelles, Belgium: De Boeck-Duculot.
   Google Scholar
• Babrow, A. S., & Mattson, M. (2003). Theorizing about health communication. In T. L. Thompson, A. Dorsey, K. Miller, & R. Parrott (Eds.), Handbook of health communication (pp. 35–61). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bassano, D. (1991). Opérateurs et connecteurs argumentatifs: Une approche psycholinguistique [Argumentative operators and connectors: A psycholinguistic approach]. Intellectica, 11, 149–191.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. A., McGlone, M. S., & Dragojevic, M. (2014a). Bacteria as bullies: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health message. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 340–358. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. A., McGlone, M. S., & Dragojevic, M. (2014b). Vicious viruses and vigilant vaccines: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health policy advocacy. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 1178–1195. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.811330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2017). Agents and patients in physical settings: Linguistic cues affect the assignment of causality in German and Tongan. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch, C., Ulshöfer, C., Renkewitz, F., & Betsch, T. (2011). The influence of narrative vs. statistical information on perceiving vaccination risks. Medical Decision Making, 31, 742–753. doi:10.1177/0272989X11400419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1997). Effects of self-efficacy and vividness on the persuasiveness of health communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 31–54. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp0601_02
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Crawford, P., & Carter, R. (2006). Evidence-based health communication. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Camenga, D. R., Hieftje, K. D., Fiellin, L. E., Edelman, E. J., Rosenthal, M. S., & Duncan, L. R. (2014). The use of message framing to promote sexual risk reduction in young adolescents: A pilot exploratory study. Health Education Research, 29, 360–366. doi:10.1093/her/cyt156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC fact sheet. (2017, September). Reported STDs in the United States, 2016. High burden of STDs threaten millions of americans. Retrieved from https://fr.scribd.com/document/361874803/CDC-Fact-Sheet-Reported-STDs-in-the-United-States-2016
   Google Scholar
• Charaudeau, P. (1992). Grammaire du sens et de l’expression [The grammar of sense and expression]. Paris, France: Hachette éducation.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, M., McGlone, M. S., & Bell, R. A. (2015). Persuasive effects of linguistic agency assignment and point of view in narrative health messages about colon cancer. Journal of Health Communication, 20, 977–988. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clerehan, R., Buchbinder, R., & Moodie, J. (2005). A linguistic framework for assessing the quality of written patient information: Its use in assessing methotrexate information for rheumatoid arthritis. Health Education Research, 20, 334–344. doi:10.1093/her/cyg123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelis, E., Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2013). Two-sided messages for health risk prevention: The role of argument type, refutation, and issue ambivalence. Substance Use & Misuse, 48, 719–730. doi:10.3109/10826084.2013.787093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelis, E., Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2014). The inoculating effect of message sidedness on adolescents’ binge drinking intentions. The moderating role of issue involvement. Journal of Drug Issues, 44, 254–268. doi:10.1177/0022042613500053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wit, J. B. F., Das, E., & Vet, R. (2008). What works best: Objective statistics or a personal testimonial? An assessment of the persuasive effects of different types of message evidence on risk perception. Health Psychology, 27, 110–115. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.1.110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, J. K., Guzman, S. J., Maryniuk, M. D., O’Brian, C., Kadohiro, J. K., Jackson, R. A., … Funnel, M. M. (2017). The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care, 40, 1790–1799. doi:10.2337/dci17-0041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144–168. doi:10.1080/03637750500111815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. (1982). More on the categorial analysis of grammatical relations. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 102–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547–619. doi:10.1353/lan.1991.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragojevic, M., Bell, R. A., & McGlone, M. S. (2014). Giving radon gas life through language: Effects of linguistic agency assignment in health messages about inanimate threats. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33, 89–98. doi:10.1177/0261927X13495738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ducrot, O. (1988). Topoi et formes topiques [Topoi and topic forms]. Bulletin d’Etudes De Linguistique Française, 22, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar, T., & Volkman, J. E. (2012). Using communication theory for health promotion: Practical guidance on message design and strategy. Health Promotion Practice, 13, 587–590. doi:10.1177/1524839912450879
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elder, C., Barber, M., Staples, M., Osborne, R. H., Clerehan, R., & Buchbinder, R. (2012). Assessing health literacy: A new domain for collaboration between language testers and health professionals. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 205–224. doi:10.1080/15434303.2011.627751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1988). Discourse representation in media discourse. Sociolinguistics, 17, 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In E. Bach & R. Harms (Eds.), Universals in linguistic theory (pp. 1–88). New York, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Foolen, A. (1996). Pragmatic particles. In J. Verschueren, J. O. Ostman, J. Blommaert, & C. Ulcaen (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1–24). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1994). Hysterical style in the press. In D. Graddol & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.), Media texts: Authors and readers (pp. 90–99). Bristol, UK: The Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, M. A. (2013). Message framing, it does a body good: Effects of message framing and motivational orientation on young women’s calcium consumption. Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 1296–1306. doi:10.1177/1359105312463587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowacki, E. M. (2016). Prompting participation in health: Fostering favorable attitudes toward personal health records through message design. Patient Education and Counseling, 99, 470–479. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glowacki, E. M., McGlone, M. S., & Bell, R. A. (2016). Targeting type 2: Linguistic agency assignment in diabetes prevention policy messaging. Journal of Health Communication, 21, 457–468. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1095821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., & Cappella, J. N. (2014). Understanding public resistance to messages about health disparities. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 493–510. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.821561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K., & Brinn, L. S. (2003). Messages influencing college women’s tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 443–461. doi:10.1080/713852118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, K. J. (2012). The use of metaphor in discourse about cancer: A review of the literature. Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing, 16, 408–412. doi:10.1188/12.CJON.408-412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrington, N. G. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: Message design in health communication research. Health Communication, 30, 103–105. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, K., & Koteyko, N. (2013). Exploring health communication. Language in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvella, R. J., & Mathieu, S. (2000). On judging quantities in text without expert knowledge. In R. Lundquist & R. J. Jarvella (Eds.), Language, text and knowledge (pp. 261–284). New York, NY: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Jayez, J., & Tovena, L. M. (2008). Presque and almost: How argumentation derives from comparative meanings. In O. Bonami & P. Cabredo Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics (Vol. 7, pp. 217–239). Paris, France: CNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Kay,J. (1990). Even. Linguistics and Philosophy, 13, 59–111. doi:10.1007/BF00630517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Peňa, J. (2017). Playing to beat the blues: Linguistic agency and message causality effects on use of mental health games application. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 436–443. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. J., & Jahnke, N. (2011). The meaning of utterance-final even. Journal of English Linguistic, 39, 36–64. doi:10.1177/0075424210390798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & McGill, A. L. (2011). Gaming with Mr. Slot or gaming the slot machine? Power, anthropomorphism, and risk perception. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 94–107. doi:10.1086/658148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, M. (1994). Metaphor and the discourse of virology: HIV as human being. The Journal of Medical Humanities, 15, 123–139. doi:10.1007/BF02276866
   Google Scholar
• Kools, M. (2012). Making written materials easy to understand. In C. Abraham & M. Kools (Eds.), Written health communication: An evidence-based guide (pp. 23–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy, G., Helmreich, S., & Cowie, J. R. (2010). The influence of text characteristics on perceived and actual difficulty of health information. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 438–449. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, L. (2007). The rhetorical “turn” in medical education: What have we learned and where are we going? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 12, 121–133. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9046-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, L., & Haber, R. J. (1999). Teaching and learning communication in medicine: A rhetorical approach. Academic Medicine, 74, 507–510. doi:10.1097/00001888-199905000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main, K. J., Argo, J. J., & Huhmann, B. A. (2004). Pharmaceutical advertising in the USA: Information or influence? International Journal of Advertising, 23, 119–142. doi:10.1080/02650487.2004.11072875
   Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer, R., & Waldmann, M. R. (2014). Indicators of causal agency in physical interactions: The role of the prior context. Cognition, 132, 485–490. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazor, K. M., Baril, J., Dugan, E., Spencer, F., Burgwinkle, P., & Gurwitz, J. H. (2007). Patient education about anticoagulant medication: Is narrative evidence or statistical evidence more effective. Patient Education and Counseling, 69, 145–157. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., Bell, R. A., Zaitchik, S. T., & McGlynn, J. (2012). Don’t let the flu catch you: Agency assignment in printed educational materials about the H1N1 influenza virus. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 740–756. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.727950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlone, M. S., Stephens, K. K., Rodriguez, S. A., & Fernandez, M. E. (2017). Persuasive texts for prompting action: Agency assignment in HPV vaccinations reminders. Vaccine, 35, 4295–4297. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, J. (2014). Don’t tell me who to blame: Persuasive effects of implicit arguments in obesity messages on attributions of responsibility and policy support ( Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, J., & McGlone, M. S. (2018). Desire or disease? Framing obesity to influence attributions of responsibility and policy support. Health Communication. doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1431025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, L. A. (1992). Aspect and the semantics-pragmatics interface: The case of already. Lingua, 87, 321–339. doi:10.1016/0024-3841(92)90015-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis, L. A. (1996). On the use and meaning of already. Linguistics and Philosophy, 19, 477–502. doi:10.1007/BF00632778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. H., Lane, L. T., Deatrick, L., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moirand, S. (2006). Responsabilité et énonciation dans la presse quotidienne: Questionnements sur les observables et les catégories d’analyse [Responsability and enunciation in the daily press: Questions into observables and categories of analysis]. Semen, 22, 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mollen, S., Engelen, S., Kessels, L. T. E., & van den Putte, B. (2017). Short and sweet: The persuasive effects of message framing and temporal context in antismoking warning labels. Journal of Health Communication, 22, 20–28. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1247484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, J. (2014). Stalking the “vividness effect” in the preventive health message: The moderating role of argument quality on the effectiveness of message vividness. Journal of Promotion Management, 20, 628–646. doi:10.1080/10496491.2014.946199
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D. (1991). AIDS and the news media. The Milbank Quarterly, 69, 293–307. doi:10.2307/3350206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L., Rowley, J., Vander Hoom, S., Wijesooriya, N. S., Unemo, M., Low, N., … Meng, Z. (2015). Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting. PLoS ONE, 10, 1–17. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2002). Persuasion: Theory and research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2012). From psychological theory to message design: Lessons from the story of gain-framed and loss-framed persuasive message. In H. Cho (Ed.), Health communication message design: Theory and practice (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 623–644. doi:10.1080/10810730701615198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oswald, S., Herman, T., & Jacquin, J. (2018). Introduction. In S. Oswald, T. Herman, & J. Jacquin (Eds.), Argumentation and language. Linguistic, cognitive and discursive explorations (pp. 1–22). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Parrott, R. L. (1995). Motivation to attend to health messages. Presentation of content and linguistic considerations. In E. Maibach & R. L. Parrott (Eds.), Designing health messages. Approaches from communication theory and public health practice (pp. 7–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Raccah, P. Y. (1995). Argumentation and natural language: Presentation and discussion of four foundational hypotheses. Journal of Pragmatics, 24, 1–15. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(95)00029-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raccah, P. Y. (2011). Les questions de rhétorique sont-elles des questions sémantiques? [Are questions of rhetoric semantic questions?]. Revue De Sémantique Et Pragmatique, 29, 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Rook, K. S. (1986). Encouraging preventive behavior for distant and proximal health threats: Effects of vivid versus abstract information. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 526–534. doi:10.1093/geronj/41.4.526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruben, B. D. (2016). Communication theory and health communication practice: The more things change, the more they stay the same. Health Communication, 31, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.923086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. (2014). Applied linguistics as a resource for understanding and advancing health literacy. In H. E. Hamilton & W. S. Chou (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and health communication (pp. 153–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rundblad, G., & Tang, C. (2013). Uncovering public perceptions of scary contaminants and how and how not to communicate about them: A mixed-methods approach incorporating cognitive semantics. The Lancet, 382, 11. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62436-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russel, J., Greenhalgh, T., Byrne, E., & McDonnell, J. (2008). Recognizing rhetoric in health care policy analysis. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 13, 40–46. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.006029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, A. M., Knaus, M., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Das, E., & Fargelin, A. (2017). Effects of influenza strain label on worry and behavioral intentions. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 23, 1425–1426. doi:10.3201/eid2308.170364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, C., McComas, K., Juanillo, N., & Pelstring, L. (1999). Promoting informed decision-making: The role of message structure. Risk: Health, Safety & Environment, 10, 209–220.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. B., & Meloncon, L. (2018). Manifesting methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine. In L. Meloncon & J. B. Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health and medicine (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Bigsby, E. (2013). The effects of message features: Content, structure, and style. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion. Developments in theory and practices (pp. 20–35). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Snoeck-Henkemans, F. (2010). “Anyway” and “even” as indicators of complex argumentation. Cogency. Journal of Reasoning and Argumentation, 2, 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P. (2015). Are anthropomorphic persuasive appeals effective? The role of the recipient’s motivations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54, 187–200. doi:10.1111/bjso.12076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L., & Kumar, A. (2011). Responses to health promotion campaigns: Resistance, denial and othering. Critical Public Health, 21, 105–117. doi:10.1080/09581591003797129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treichler, P. (1992). AIDS and HIV infection in the third world: A first world chronicle. In E. Fee & D. M. Fox (Eds.), AIDS: The making of a chronic disease (pp. 377–412). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unemo, M., & Jensen, J. S. (2017). Antimicrobial-resistant sexually transmitted infections: Gonorrhea and mycoplasma genitalium. Nature Reviews Urology, 14, 139–152. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2016.268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 352–371). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eemeren, F. H. (1995). A world of difference: The rich state of argumentation theory. Informal Logic, 17, 144–158. doi:10.22329/il.v17i2.2404
   Google Scholar
• Van Gerrevink, R., & de Hoop, H. (2007). On the optimal use of almost and barely in argumentation. In M. Aloni, P. Dekker, & F. Roelofsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium (pp. 229–235). ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2013). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7, 104–136. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.606782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M. R., & Mayrhofer, R. (2016). Hybrid causal representations. In B. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 85–127). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winterstein, G., & Schaden, G. (2011). Relevance and utility in an argumentative framework: An application to the accommodation of discourse topics. In A. Lecomte & S. Tronçon (Eds.), Ludics, dialogue and interactions (pp. 134–146). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zeevat, H. (2009). “Only” as a mirative particle. In A. Riester & E. Onea (Eds.), Focus at the syntax-semantics interface (pp. 121–141). Working papers of the SFB 732: Incremental specification in context, Volume 3. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Zethsen, K. K., & Askehave, I. (2010). PIL of the month: A study of best practice in UE patient information leaflets. Journal of Applied Linguistic & Professional Practice, 7, 97–120. doi:10.1558/japl.v7i1.97
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., & McGlone, M. S. (2018). Language matters: Effects of linguistic agency assignment on HPV prevention advocacy in Chinese public health education materials. Chinese Journal of Communication. doi:10.1080/17544750.2018.1513853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuniga Huertas, M. K., & Cortez Campomar, M. (2009). Rational and emotional appeals in advertising of prescription medicines: Study of a slimming drug in Brazil. Innovative Marketing, 5, 80–88.
   Google Scholar