Perceived Active Control over Online Health Information: Underlying Mechanisms of Mode Tailoring Effects on Website Attitude and Information Recall

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 233–248. doi:10.1086/314322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, A. B. (1999). Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: Need for cognition determines the impact of message format. AIDS Education and Prevention, 11, 150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, N., Linn, A. J., Smets, E. M., Verdam, M. G., & Van Weert, J. C. (2020). Tailored communication for older patients with cancer: Using cluster analysis to identify patient profiles based on information needs. Journal of Geriatric Oncology. Ahead of print. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, N., Smets, E., Eddes, E., de Haes, J., Loos, E., & Van Weert, J. (2015). Illustrations enhance older colorectal cancer patients’ website satisfaction and recall of online cancer information. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24(2), 213–223. doi:10.1111/ecc.12283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bol, N., Van Weert, J., Loos, E., Romano Bergstrom, J., Bolle, S., & Smets, E. (2016). How are online health messages processed? using eye tracking to predict recall of information in younger and older adults. Journal of Health Communication, 21(4), 387–396. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1080327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992). Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 205–229. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, D. S., & Nah, S. (2009). The effects of interactive news presentation on perceived user satisfaction of online community newspapers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 855–874. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01473.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig Lefebvre, R., Tada, Y., Hilfiker, S. W., & Baur, C. (2010). The assessment of user engagement with eHealth content: The eHealth engagement scale. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15(4), 666–681. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01514.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, R., de Nooijer, J., Brouwer, W., Oenema, A., Brug, J., & de Vries, N. K. (2011). Strategies to facilitate exposure to internet-delivered health behavior change interventions aimed at adolescents or young adults: A systematic review. Health Education & Behavior, 38(1), 49–62. doi:10.1177/1090198110372878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaher, B. G., Boles, S. M., Akers, L., Gordon, J. S., & Severson, H. H. (2006). Defining participant exposure measures in web-based health behavior change programs. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(3), e15. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.3.e15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Melo Ghisi, G. L., Abdallah, F., Grace, S. L., Thomas, S., & Oh, P. (2014). A systematic review of patient education in cardiac patients: Do they increase knowledge and promote health behavior change? Patient Education and Counseling, 95(2), 160–174. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, A., & Jobst, J. (2005). Multimedia learning with hypermedia. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 569–588). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dutch Comprehensive Cancer Organisation. (2017, September 2). Cijfers over kanker. Updated. Retrieved from http://www.cijfersoverkanker.nl/selecties/dataset_2/img5a268d84bf985
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? learning from the web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48–78. doi:10.1177/009365001028001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerlin, A., Lakhani, I., Lantz, P. M., Janz, N. K., Morrow, M., Schwartz, K., … Katz, S. J. (2006). An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1–3), 303–312. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, J., & Cho, C. (2009). A new approach to target segmentation: Media-usage segmentation in the multi-media environment. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(3), 145–155. doi:10.1057/jt.2009.12
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, J., Van Weert, J., Van der Meulen, N., Van Dulmen, S., Heeren, T., & Bensing, J. (2008). Recall in older cancer patients: Measuring memory for medical information. The Gerontologist, 48(2), 149–157. doi:10.1093/geront/48.2.149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., Carcioppolo, N., & Davis, L. (2012). Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. Journal of Communication, 62(5), 851–868. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01668.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H., & Stout, P. A. (2010). The effects of interactivity on information processing and attitude change: Implications for mental health stigma. Health Communication, 25(2), 142–154. doi: 10.1080/10410230903544936
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W. (2000). Are tailored health education materials always more effective than non-tailored materials? Health Education Research, 15(3), 305–315. doi:10.1093/her/15.3.305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., & Wray, R. J. (2003). Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior, 27(1), 227–232. doi:10.5993/ajhb.27.1.s3.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lairson, D. R., DiCarlo, M., Myers, R. E., Wolf, T., Cocroft, J., Sifri, R., … Wender, R. (2008). Cost‐effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use. Cancer, 112(4), 779–788. doi:10.1002/cncr.23232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S57–S80. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, M., & Lomax, R. G. (2005). The effect of varying degrees of nonnormality in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(1), 1–27. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1201_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, A. J., Alblas, M., Van Weert, J. C. M., & Bol, N. (2015). Een kwestie van voorkeur? een experimentele studie naar het aanpassen van gezondheidsinstructies aan de voorkeur voor modaliteit van de ontvanger. Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap, 43(4), 362–377. doi:10.5553/TCW/138469302015043004004
   Google Scholar
• Linn, A. J., Van Dijk, L., Smit, E. G., Jansen, J., & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2013). May you never forget what is worth remembering: The relation between recall of medical information and medication adherence in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 7(11), e543–e550. doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2013.04.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu, Y. P., & Shrum, L. J. (2002). What is interactivity and is it always such a good thing? Implications of definition, person, and situation for the influence of interactivity on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 53–64. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A. (2007). Can interactivity make a difference? Effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 766–776. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A., Cortese, J., Gerend, M. A., Schmitt, K., Kung, Y. M., & McLaughlin, C. (2016). A model of tailoring effects: A randomized controlled trial examining the mechanisms of tailoring in a web-based STD screening intervention. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1214–1224. doi:10.1037/hea0000399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A., Noar, S. M., Cortese, J., Van Stee, S. K., Glueckauf, R. L., & Lee, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. Journal of Health Communication, 18(9), 1039–1069. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.768727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marathe, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011). What drives customization? Control or identity? Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, 781–790. doi:10.1145/1978942.1979056
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Massa, L. J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: Cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 833–846. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, S. J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2002). Measures of perceived interactivity: An exploration of the role of direction of communication, user control, and time in shaping perceptions of interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29–42. doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. H., Smets, E. M. A., Bol, N., Loos, E. F., Van Laarhoven, H. W. M., Geijsen, E. D., … Van Weert, J. C. M. (2019). Tailored Web-based information for younger and older patients with cancer: Randomized controlled trial of a preparatory educational intervention on patient outcomes. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e14407. doi:10.2196/14407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. H., Smets, E. M. A., Bol, N., Loos, E. F., & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2018). How tailoring the mode of information presentation influences younger and older adults’ satisfaction with health websites. Journal of Health Communication, 23(2), 170–180. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1421729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. H., Van Weert, J. C. M., Bol, N., Loos, E. F., Tytgat, K. M. A. J., Van de Ven, A. W. H., & Smets, E. M. A. (2017). Tailoring the mode of information presentation: Effects on younger and older adults’ attention and recall of online information. Human Communication Research, 43(1), 102–126. doi:10.1111/hcre.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673–693. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, J., & Sundar, S. S. (2015). How does interactivity persuade? An experimental test of interactivity on cognitive absorption, elaboration, and attitudes. Journal of Communication, 65(2), 213–236. doi: 10.1111/jcom.2015.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429–434. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R., Barden, J., & Wheeler, S. (2002). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion: Health promotions that yield sustained behavior change. In R. DiClemente, R. Crosby, & M. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research (pp. 71–99). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severson, H. H., Gordon, J. S., Danaher, B. G., & Akers, L. (2008). ChewFree.com: Evaluation of a web-based cessation program for smokeless tobacco users. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10(2), 381–391. doi:10.1080/14622200701824984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, M., Kelly, B., & Hornik, R. (2006). Cancer information scanning and seeking behavior is associated with knowledge, lifestyle choices, and screening. Journal of Health Communication, 11(sup001), 157–172. doi:10.1080/10810730600637475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit, E., Linn, A., & Weert, J. (2015). Taking online computer-tailoring forward: The potential of tailoring the message frame and delivery mode of online health behaviour change interventions. The European Health Psychologist, 17, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Smit, E. S., & Bol, N. (2019). From self-reliers to expert-dependents: Identifying classes based on health-related need for autonomy and need for external control among mobile users. Media Psychology, 1–24. Advanced online publication, doi:10.1080/15213269.2019.1604235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Society, A. C. (2017). Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2017-2019. Atlanta, Georgia: American Cancer Society.
   Google Scholar
• Stanczyk, N. E., Crutzen, R., Bolman, C., Muris, J., & de Vries, H. (2013). Influence of delivery strategy on message-processing mechanisms and future adherence to a Dutch computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(2), e28. doi:10.2196/jmir.2153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S., & Marathe, S. (2010). Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research, 36(3), 298–322. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., & Jia, H. (2012). Motivational technologies: A theoretical framework for designing preventive health applications. In M. Bang & E. L. Ragnemalm (Eds..), Persuasive technology. Design for health and safety (Persuasive 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 7284, pp. 112–122). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_10.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, L. M., Van der Wall, E., Albada, A., Spreeuwenberg, P. M., Verheul, W., & Bensing, J. M. (2012). The validity of using analogue patients in practitioner–patient communication research: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(11), 1528–1543. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2111-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Weert, J., Van Noort, G., Bol, N., Van Dijk, L., Tates, K., & Jansen, J. (2011). Tailored information for cancer patients on the internet: Effects of visual cues and language complexity on information recall and satisfaction. Patient Education and Counseling, 84(3), 368–378. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H., Neijens, P., & Smit, E. (2011). The relation between actual and perceived interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 40(2), 77–92. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367400206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar