Framing the Clinical Encounter: Shared Decision-Making, Mammography Screening, and Decision Satisfaction

References

• Baron, J. (1997). Confusion of relative and absolute risk in valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14(3), 301–309. doi:10.1023/A:1007796310463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCSC. (2018). Breast cancer surveillance consortium risk calculator. Retrieved from https://tools.bcsc-scc.org/BC5yearRisk/calculator.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J., Kupperman, E., Kandel, L. A., & Ahn, J. (2016). Shared decision making, fast and slow: Implications for informed consent, resource utilization, and patient satisfaction in orthopaedic surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 24(7), 495–502. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland, L., Kryworuchko, J., Saarimaki, A., & Lawson, M. L. (2017). Parental decision making involvement and decisional conflict: A descriptive study. BMC Pediatrics, 17(1), 146. doi:10.1186/s12887-017-0899-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonner, C., & Newell, B. R. (2008). How to make a risk seem riskier: The ratio bias versus construal level theory. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(5), 411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnside, E. S., Trentham-Dietz, A., Shafer, C. M., Hampton, J. M., Alagoz, O., Cox, J. R., … Wilke, L. G. (2019). Age-based versus risk-based mammography screening in women 40–49 years old: A cross-sectional study. Radiology, 292(2), 321–328. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019181651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, J., Chun, J. W., & Lee, M. J. (2018). Impacts of message framing and social distance in health campaign for promoting regular physical exercise. Journal of Health Communication, 23(9), 824–835. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1527872
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554. doi:10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey, J. (2011). The effects of absolute risks, relative risks, frequencies, and probabilities on decision quality. Journal of Health Communication, 16(7), 788–801. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.561916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eden, K. B., Scariati, P., Klein, K., Watson, L., Remiker, M., Hribar, M., & Nelson, H. D. (2015). Mammography decision aid reduces decisional conflict for women in their forties considering screening. Journal of Women’s Health, 24(12), 1013–1020. (Larchmt). doi:10.1089/jwh.2015.5256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwyn, G., Durand, M. A., Song, J., Aarts, J., Barr, P. J., Berger, Z., … Han, P. K. (2017). A three-talk model for shared decision making: Multistage consultation process. BMJ, 359. doi:10.1136/bmj.j4891
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., Joseph-Williams, N., Lloyd, A., Kinnersley, P., … Edwards, A. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1361–1367. doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernster, V. L. (1997). Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49–a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making. American Journal of Public Health, 87(7), 1103–1106. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goggins, K. M., Wallston, K. A., Nwosu, S., Schildcrout, J. S., Castel, L., & Kripalani, S.; for the Vanderbilt Inpatient Cohort Study (VICS). (2014). Health literacy, numeracy, and other characteristics associated with hospitalized patients’ preferences for involvement in decision making. Journal of Health Communication, 19(sup2), 29–43. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.938841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffey, R. T., & Shah, M. N. (2016). What we talk about when we talk about SDM. Academic Emergency Medicine, 23(4), 493–494. doi:10.1111/acem.12907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, R. G., & StataCorp, L. P. (2006, May). Linear mixed models in Stata. In German Stata Users’ Group Meetings 2006 (No. 05). Stata Users Group, Mannheim, Germany. Retrieved from https://www.stata.com/meeting/11uk/gutierrez.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hanoch, Y. (2004). Improving physician-patient understanding of probability in communicating cancer-screening test findings. Journal of Health Communication, 9(4), 327–335. doi:10.1080/10810730490468496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, J., Jansen, J., & McCaffery, K. (2018). Decision-making about mammographic screening: Pursuing informed choice. Climacteric, 21(3), 209–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Koo, K., Brackett, C. D., Eisenberg, E. H., Kieffer, K. A., & Hyams, E. S. (2017). Impact of numeracy on understanding of prostate cancer risk reduction in PSA screening. PloS One, 12(12), e0190357. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaVallie, D. L., Wolf, F. M., Jacobsen, C., Sprague, D., & Buchwald, D. S. (2012). Health numeracy and understanding of risk among older American Indians and Alaska Natives. Journal of Health Communication, 17(3), 294–302. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.626497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkus, I. M., Johnson, C., Amarasekara, S., Pan, W., & Updegraff, J. A. (2019). Predicting colorectal cancer screening among adults who have never been screened: Testing the interaction between message framing and tailored risk feedback. Journal of Health Communication, 24(3), 262–270. doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1597950
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lueck, J. A. (2017). Matching message design and depressed cognition: An exploration of attention patterns for gain-and loss-framed depression help-seeking messages. Journal of Health Communication, 22(7), 593–603. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1324538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelblatt, J., Kreling, B., Figeuriedo, M., & Feng, S. (2006). What is the impact of shared decision making on treatment and outcomes for older women with breast cancer? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(30), 4908–4913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, E., Barratt, A. L., McGeechan, K., Davey, H. M., Howard, K., & Houssami, N. (2010). Helping women make choices about mammography screening: An online randomized trial of a decision aid for 40-year-old women. Patient Education and Counseling, 81(1), 63–72. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2014). News frames and national security. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, R. E., Leader, A. E., Censits, J. H., Trabulsi, E. J., Keith, S. W., Petrich, A. M., … Hegarty, S. E. (2018). Decision support and shared decision making about active surveillance versus active treatment among men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer: A pilot study. Journal of Cancer Education, 33(1), 180–185. doi:10.1007/s13187-016-1073-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Daily, K., & Qin, Y. (2018). Relative persuasiveness of gain-vs. loss-framed messages: A review of theoretical perspectives and developing an integrative framework. Review of Communication, 18(4), 370–390. doi:10.1080/15358593.2018.1519845
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Kim, M. T., Han, H. R., & Chan, K. S. (2015). Modern measurement approaches to health literacy scale development and refinement: Overview, current uses, and next steps. Journal of Health Communication, 20(sup2), 112–115. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1073408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30. doi:10.1177/0272989X9501500105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Annals of the International Communication Association, 30(1), 1–43. doi:10.1080/23808985.2006.11679054
   Google Scholar
• Rimer, B. K., Halabi, S., Skinner, C. S., Kaplan, E. B., Crawford, Y., Samsa, G. P., … Lipkus, I. M. (2001). The short-term impact of tailored mammography decision-making interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(3), 271–287. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(00)00172-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, R., & Niederdeppe, J. (2019). Testing the role of narrative and gain-loss framing in messages to promote sleep hygiene among high school students. Journal of Health Communication, 24(1), 84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, V., Andrade, A. D., García-Retamero, R., Anam, R., Rodríguez, R., Lisigurski, M., … Ruiz, J. G. (2013). Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians. Journal of Health Communication, 18(sup1), 273–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(1), S202–S220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapira, M. M., Fletcher, K. E., Gilligan, M. A., King, T. K., Laud, P. W., Matthews, B. A., … Hayes, E. (2008). A framework for health numeracy: How patients use quantitative skills in health care. Journal of Health Communication, 13(5), 501–517. doi:10.1080/10810730802202169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrager, S., & Burnside, E. (2019). Breast cancer screening in primary care: A call for development and validation of patient-oriented shared decision-making tools. Journal of Women’s Health, 28(2), 114–116. doi:10.1089/jwh.2017.6775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J., & Johar, G. V. (2002). Effects of inconsistent attribute information on the predictive value of product attitudes: Toward a resolution of opposing perspectives. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(1), 39–56. doi:10.1086/339920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, S. L., Harris, R. P., & Woolf, S. H.; Shared Decision-Making Workgroup of the US Preventive Services Task Force. (2004). Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention: A suggested approach from the US Preventive Services Task Force. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26(1), 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2003.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk, K. J., & Parrott, R. L. (2014). Math anxiety and exposure to statistics in messages about genetically modified foods: Effects of numeracy, math self-efficacy, and form of presentation. Journal of Health Communication, 19(7), 838–852. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.837549
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, J. A., Fraenkel, L., Green, C., Alarcón, G. S., Barton, J. L., Saag, K. G., … Reyes, E. (2019). Individualized decision aid for diverse women with lupus nephritis (IDEA-WON): A randomized controlled trial. PLoS Medicine, 16(5), e1002800. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Wolf, M. S., & Wagner, C. V. (2010). Socioeconomic status, statistical confidence, and patient–provider communication: An analysis of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2007). Journal of Health Communication, 15(sup3), 169–185. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.522690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squiers, L. B., Holden, D. J., Dolina, S. E., Kim, A. E., Bann, C. M., & Renaud, J. M. (2011). The public’s response to the US Preventive Services Task Force’s 2009 recommendations on mammography screening. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(5), 497–504. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tice, J. A., Miglioretti, D. L., Li, C. S., Vachon, C. M., Gard, C. C., & Kerlikowske, K. (2015). Breast density and benign breast disease: Risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 33(28), 3137. doi:10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevena, L. J., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Edwards, A., Gaissmaier, W., Galesic, M., Han, P. K., … Ozanne, E. (2013). Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: A risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 13(2), S7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wan, H. H. (2008). Resonance as a mediating factor accounting for the message effect in tailored communication - Examining crisis communication in a tourism context. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 472–489. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00395.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita, T., Bardo, A. R., Cummins, P. A., Millar, R. J., Sahoo, S., & Liu, D. (2019). The roles of education, literacy, and numeracy in need for health information during the second half of adulthood: A moderated mediation analysis. Journal of Health Communication, 24(3), 271–283. doi:10.1080/10810730.2019.1601303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar