533
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The Effects of Vaccine Efficacy Information on Vaccination Intentions Through Perceived Response Efficacy and Hope

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &

References

  • AstraZeneca. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine AstraZeneca Confirms 100% protection against severe disease, hospitalisation and death in the primary analysis of phase III trials. AstraZeneca. https://www.astrazeneca.com/media-centre/press-releases/2021/covid-19-vaccine-astrazeneca-confirms-protection-against-severe-disease-hospitalisation-and-death-in-the-primary-analysis-of-phase-iii-trials.html
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass Communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0303_03
  • Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Gibbons, F. X., Gerrard, M., McCaul, K. D., & Weinstein, N. D. (2007). Meta-analysis of the relationship between risk perception and health behavior: The example of vaccination. Health Psychology, 26(2), 136–145. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.136
  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
  • Cohen, J. (2020). ‘Absolutely remarkable’: No one who got Moderna’s vaccine in trial developed severe COVID-19. Science. https://www.science.org/content/article/absolutely-remarkable-no-one-who-got-modernas-vaccine-trial-developed-severe-covid-19
  • Fagerlin, A., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Ubel, P. A. (2011). Helping patients decide: Ten steps to better risk communication. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 103(19), 1436–1443. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr318
  • Ferrer, R., & Klein, W. M. (2015). Risk perceptions and health behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 5, 85–89. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.012
  • Floyd, D. L., Prentice‐dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta‐analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407–429. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.x
  • Head, K. J., Kasting, M. L., Sturm, L. A., Hartsock, J. A., & Zimet, G. D. (2020). A national survey assessing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions: Implications for future public health communication efforts. Science Communication, 42(5), 698–723. doi:10.1177/1075547020960463
  • Hotez, P., Batista, C., Ergonul, O., Figueroa, J. P., Gilbert, S., Gursel, M. … Bottazzi, M. E. (2021). Correcting COVID-19 vaccine misinformation: Lancet commission on COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics task force members. EClinicalMedicine, 33. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100780
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185
  • Katalla, K. (2022). Comparing the COVID-19 vaccines: How are they different? Yale Medicine. https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison#:~:text=How%20well%20it%20works%3A%20AstraZeneca,and%20100%25%20against%20severe%20disease
  • Katz, M. L., Kam, J. A., Krieger, J. L., & Roberto, A. J. (2012). Predicting human papillomavirus vaccine intentions of college-aged males: An examination of parents’ and son’s perceptions. Journal of American College Health, 60(6), 449–459. doi:10.1080/07448481.2012.673523
  • Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press.
  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  • Lee, B., Liu, J., Choung, H., & McLeod, D. M. (2021). Exploring numerical framing effects: The interaction effects of gain/loss frames and numerical presentation formats on message comprehension, emotion, and perceived issue seriousness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(2), 387–406. doi:10.1177/1077699020934195
  • Liu, J., Lee, B., McLeod, D. M., & Choung, H. (2019). Framing obesity: Effects of obesity labeling and prevalence statistics on public perceptions. Health Education & Behavior, 46(2), 322–328. doi:10.1177/1090198118788907
  • Liu, J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2022). Effects of communicating prevalence information about two common health conditions. Health Communication, 37(11), 1401–1412. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1895417
  • Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9(3), 275–300. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.9.3.275
  • McLeod, D. M., Choung, H., Su, M. H., Kim, S. J., Tao, R., Liu, J., & Lee, B. (2022). Navigating a diverse paradigm: A conceptual framework for experimental framing effects research. Review of Communication Research, 10. doi:10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.033
  • Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR). (2022). COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness and safety. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/covid19_vaccine_safety.html
  • Nabi, R. L. (2015). Emotional flow in persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30(2), 114–124. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974129
  • Nabi, R. L., Gustafson, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). Framing climate change: Exploring the role of emotion in generating advocacy behavior. Science Communication, 40(4), 442–468. doi:10.1177/1075547018776019
  • Nabi, R. L., & Myrick, J. G. (2019). Uplifting fear appeals: Considering the role of hope in fear-based persuasive messages. Health Communication, 34(4), 463–474. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1422847
  • Nabi, R. L., & Prestin, A. (2016). Unrealistic hope and unnecessary fear: Exploring how sensationalistic news stories influence health behavior motivation. Health Communication, 31(9), 1115–1126. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1045237
  • Nan, X., Iles, I. A., Yang, B., & Ma, Z. (2022). Public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: Lessons from communication science. Health Communication, 37(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10410236.2021.1994910
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. doi:10.1080/10810730701615198
  • O’Keefe, D. J., & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain-and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication, 27(8), 776–783. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.640974
  • Pfizer. (2021). Pfizer and BioNTech confirm high efficacy and no serious safety concerns through up to six months following second dose in updated topline analysis of landmark COVID-19 vaccine study. Pfizer. https://www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-confirm-high-efficacy-and-no-serious
  • Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473. doi:10.1177/1090198111418108
  • Roseman, I. J. (2001). A model of appraisal in the emotion system: Integrating research, theory, and applications. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 68–91). Oxford University Press.
  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  • Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain-and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(suppl_1), S202–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
  • Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408–433. doi:10.1006/jesp.1993.1019
  • Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
  • Slovic, P. (2016). Do adolescent smokers know the risk? In P. Slovic (Ed.), The perception of risk (pp. 364–371). Routledge.
  • Smith, C., & Ellsworth, P. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813
  • Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracin, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. doi:10.1037/a0039729
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458. doi:10.1126/science.7455683
  • Visschers, V. H., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W., & De Vries, N. N. (2009). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(2), 267–287. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
  • Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Correction as a solution for health misinformation on social media. American Journal of Public Health, 110(S3), S278–280. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2020.305916
  • Wilson, T. D., Houston, C. E., Etling, K. M., & Brekke, N. (1996). A new look at anchoring effects: Basic anchoring and its antecedents. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 125(4), 387–402. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.125.4.387
  • Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
  • Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
  • Witte, K., Cameron, A., McKeon, J., & Berkowitz, J. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–341. doi:10.1080/108107396127988
  • World Health Organization. (2020). Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviors and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news/item/23-09-2020-managing-the-covid-19-infodemic-promoting-healthy-behaviours-and-mitigating-the-harm-from-misinformation-and-disinformation
  • World Health Organization. (2021). Vaccine efficacy, effectiveness and protection. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/vaccine-efficacy-effectiveness-and-protection
  • Wu, N., Joyal-Desmarais, K., Ribeiro, P. A. B., Vieira, A. M., Stojanovic, J., Sanuade, C., Bacon, S. L. … Bacon, S. L. (2023). Long-term effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against infections, hospitalisations, and mortality in adults: Findings from a rapid living systematic evidence synthesis and meta-analysis up to December, 2022. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00015-2
  • Yale Institute for Global Health. (2020). Vaccine messaging guide. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund. https://www.unicef.org/media/93661/file/Vaccine%20messaging%20guide.pdf
  • Zillmann, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behavior. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Basic social psychophysiological research (pp. 215–240). Guilford Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.