Deciphering Discord: How Conflicting Information and Political Ideology Shape Public Attitude Toward PFAS Regulation

References

• Abhyankar, P., O’Connor, D. B., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500701235732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahn, J., & Kahlor, L. A. (2022). When experts offer conflicting information: A study of perceived ambiguity, information insufficiency, trustworthiness and risk information behaviors. Health Communication, 38(14), 3276–3286. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2146033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Theories of Cognitive Self-Regulation, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P., Ghosh, S., Hwang, J., Shah, D. V., & Brauer, M. (2023). Red media vs. blue media: Social distancing and partisan news media use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Communication, 39(2), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2167584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenan, M. (2023, October 12). Government agency ratings remain largely negative. Gallup. https://news.gallup.com/poll/512585/government-agency-ratings-remain-largely-negative.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, N. M., Evans, A. T., Fritz, M. K., Peak, S. A., & von Holst, H. E. (2021). Trends in the regulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(20), 10900. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182010900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., Geryk, L. L., Chen, A. T., Nagler, R. H., Dieckmann, N. F., & Han, P. K. J. (2016). Conflicting health information: A critical research need. Health Expectations, 19(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. M., & Han, P. K. J. (2020). Conflicting health Information. The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119057840.ch49
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. E., Weberling McKeever, B., Holton, A., & Dixon, G. N. (2015). The influence of weight-of-evidence messages on (vaccine) attitudes: A sequential mediation model. Journal of Health Communication, 20(11), 1302–1309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2015.1023959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, S. M. (2017). The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013a). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012458290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, G. N., & Clarke, C. E. (2013b). The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Education Research, 28(2), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cys110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, C., Kiley, J., & Asheer, N. (2019, October 1). Public Expresses Favorable Views of a Number of Federal Agencies. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/10/01/public-expresses-favorable-views-of-a-number-of-federal-agencies/
   Google Scholar
• Dong, X., & Yang, J. Z. (2023). PFAS contamination: Pathway from communication to behavioral outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 28(4), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2023.2193144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evich, M. G., Davis, M. J. B., McCord, J. P., Acrey, B., Awkerman, J. A., Knappe, D. R. U., Lindstrom, A. B., Speth, T. F., Tebes-Stevens, C., Strynar, M. J., Wang, Z., Weber, E. J., Henderson, W. M., & Washington, J. W. (2022). Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment. Science, 375(6580), eabg9065. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg9065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldscher, K. (2022, June 22). Stricter Federal Guidelines on “Forever chemicals” in Drinking Water Pose Challenges. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/features/stricter-federal-guidelines-on-forever-chemicals-in-drinking-water-pose-challenges/
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, S. E., Ducatman, A., Boobis, A., DeWitt, J. C., Lau, C., Ng, C., Smith, J. S., & Roberts, S. M. (2021). Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substance toxicity and human health review: Current state of knowledge and strategies for informing future research. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 40(3), 606–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680–701. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Barry, C. L., & Niederdeppe, J. (2017). Partisan responses to public health messages: Motivated reasoning and sugary drink taxes. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 42(6), 1005–1037. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-4193606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Fowler, E. F., & Nagler, R. H. (2023). Prevalence and potential consequences of exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from nationally-representative survey of U.S. adults. Health Communication, 38(2), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1951958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grandjean, P., Timmermann, C. A. G., Kruse, M., Nielsen, F., Vinholt, P. J., Boding, L., Heilmann, C., Mølbak, K., & Meliker, J. (2020). Severity of COVID-19 at elevated exposure to perfluorinated alkylates. Public Library of Science ONE, 15(12), e0244815. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244815
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. (2019, August 29). For Decades, Polluters Knew PFAS Chemicals Were Dangerous but Hid Risks from Public. Environmental Working Group. https://www.ewg.org/research/decades-polluters-knew-pfas-chemicals-were-dangerous-hid-risks-public
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., Janssen, I., & Jucks, R. (2023). Balance as credibility? How presenting one- vs. two-sided messages affects ratings of scientists’ and politicians’ trustworthiness. Health Communication, 38(12), 2757–2764. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2111638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. P., & Wald, D. M. (2020). The role of scientific source credibility and goodwill in public skepticism toward GM foods. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1725086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B., & Hefferon, M. (2019, March 28). What Americans Know About Science. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/03/28/what-americans-know-about-science/
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, B., Tyson, A., & Funk, C. (2022, February 15). Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Other Groups Declines. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2022/02/15/americans-trust-in-scientists-other-groups-declines/
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. H., & Comello, M. L. (2019). Stymied by a wealth of health information: How viewing conflicting information online diminishes efficacy. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 12(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2019.1580064
   Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H. (2014). Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.798384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Gollust, S. E., Yzer, M. C., Vogel, R. I., & Rothman, A. J. (2023). Sustaining positive perceptions of science in the face of conflicting health information: An experimental test of messages about the process of scientific discovery. Social Science & Medicine, 334, 116194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., & LoRusso, S. M. (2018). Conflicting information and message competition in health and risk messaging. In R. L. Parrott (Ed.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 353–372). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.292
   Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Vogel, R. I., Gollust, S. E., Yzer, M. C., & Rothman, A. J. (2022). Effects of prior exposure to conflicting health information on responses to subsequent unrelated health messages: Results from a population-based longitudinal experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 56(5), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Vogel, R. I., Rothman, A. J., Yzer, M. C., & Gollust, S. E. (2023). Vulnerability to the effects of conflicting health information: Testing the moderating roles of trust in news media and research literacy. Health Education & Behavior, 50(2), 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/10901981221110832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, R. H., Yzer, M. C., & Rothman, A. J. (2019). Effects of media exposure to conflicting information about mammography: Results from a population-based survey experiment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53(10), 896–908. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Wang, Y., & Thier, K. (2022). Why do people believe health misinformation and who is at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation. Social Science & Medicine, 314, 115398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramjee, D., Pollack, C. C., Charpignon, M.-L., Gupta, S., Rivera, J. M., El Hayek, G., Dunn, A. G., Desai, A. N., & Majumder, M. S. (2023). Evolving face mask guidance during a pandemic and potential harm to public perception: Infodemiology study of sentiment and emotion on twitter. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e40706. https://doi.org/10.2196/40706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddinger, J. L., Levine, D., & Charness, G. (2022). Can targeted messages reduce COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy? A randomized trial. Preventive Medicine Reports, 29, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101903
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Renfrew, D., & Pearson, T. W. (2021). The social life of the “forever chemical”: PFAS pollution legacies and toxic events. Environment and Society, 12(1), 146–163. https://doi.org/10.3167/ares.2021.120109
   Google Scholar
• Shi, W., Rothman, A. J., Yzer, M. C., & Nagler, R. H. (2022). Effects of exposure to conflicting information about mammography on cancer information overload, perceived scientists’ credibility, and perceived journalists’ credibility. Health Communication, 38(11), 2481–2490. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2077163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talpos, S. (2019). They persisted. Science, 364(6441), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.364.6441.622
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, A. S. L., Lee, C., Nagler, R. H., & Bigman, C. A. (2017). To vape or not to vape? Effects of exposure to conflicting news headlines on beliefs about harms and benefits of electronic cigarette use: Results from a randomized controlled experiment. Preventive Medicine, 105, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2023, August 8). Meaningful and Achievable Steps You Can Take to Reduce Your Risk. https://www.epa.gov/pfas/meaningful-and-achievable-steps-you-can-take-reduce-your-risk
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024a, May 22). Final PFAS National Primary Drinking Water Regulation. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2024b, May 16). Past PFOA and PFOS Health Effects Science Documents. https://www.epa.gov/sdwa/past-pfoa-and-pfos-health-effects-science-documents
   Google Scholar
• Vijaykumar, S., McNeill, A., & Simpson, J. (2021). Associations between conflicting nutrition information, nutrition confusion and backlash among consumers in the UK. Public Health Nutrition, 24(5), 914–923. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980021000124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, B. (2019, May 6). Mapping the PFAS Contamination Crisis: New Data Show 610 Sites in 43 States. Environmental Working Group. https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/mapping-pfas-contamination-crisis-new-data-show-610-sites-43-states
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Li, J., Mangmeechai, A., & Su, J. (2021). Linking perceived policy effectiveness and proenvironmental behavior: The influence of attitude, implementation intention, and knowledge. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 2910. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington State Department of Health. (2022, October 21). 2022 EPA Health Advisory Levels for Four PFAS. https://doh.wa.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/331-702.pdf
   Google Scholar
• White House. (2023, March 14). Fact Sheet: Biden-⁠Harris Administration Takes New Action to Protect Communities from PFAS Pollution. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/03/14/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-takes-new-action-to-protect-communities-from-pfas-pollution/
   Google Scholar
• Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q., Herbert, N., Yang, S., Alber, J., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2021). The role of information avoidance in managing uncertainty from conflicting recommendations about electronic cigarettes. Communication Monographs, 88(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1809685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar