Household and family during urbanization and industrialization: efforts to shed new light on an old debate

REFERENCES

• Anderson, M. (1971). Family structure in nineteenth century Lancashire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benigno, F. (1989). The Southern Italian family in the early modern period: A discussion of co-residential patterns. Continuity and Change, 4, 165–194.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, J., & Kesztenbaum, L. (2014). ‘The true social molecule’. Industrialization, paternalism and the family. Half a century in Le Creusot (1836–86). The History of the Family, 19, 53–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, E., & Locke, H. (1945). The family, from institution to companionship. New York: American Book Co.
   Google Scholar
• De Moor, T., & Jan Luiten van Zanden, L. (2010). Girl power: The European marriage pattern and labour markets in the north sea region in the late medieval and early modern period. The Economic History Review, 63, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desan, S. (1997). “War between brothers and sisters”: Inheritance law and gender politics in revolutionary France. French Historical Studies, 20, 597–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dribe, M., Manfredini, M., Oris, M., & Ritschard, G. (2010, October 6–9). Access to reproduction in pre-transtional Europe. A sequential approach. Paper presented at the international conference on Marriage patterns, household formation and economic development, Centre for Global Economic History at Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Eggerickx, T. (2001). The fertility decline in the industrial area of Charleroi during the second half of the 19th century: Did sedentaries and migrants have a different behaviour? BTNG, 3–4, 403–429.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, T., & Wolf, A. (Eds.). (2005). Marriage and family in Eurasia. Perspectives on the Hajnal hypothesis. Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Engelen, T., & Puschmann, P. (2011). How unique is the Western European marriage pattern? A comparison of nuptiality in historical Europe and the contemporary Arab world. The History of the Family, 16, 387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faragó, T. (1998). Different household formation systems in Hungary at the end of the eighteenth century: Variations on John Hajnal's thesis. Historical Social Research, 23, 83–111.
   Google Scholar
• Fauve-Chamoux, A. (1995). The stem family, demography and inheritance: The social frontiers of auto-regulation. In R. L.Rudolph (Ed.), The European peasant family and society. Historical studies (pp. 86–113). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauve-Chamoux, A., & Ochiai, E. (Eds.). (2009). The stem family in Eurasian perspective. Revisiting house societies, 17th-20th centuries. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Gehrmann, R. (2014). German towns at the eve of industrialization: household formation and the part of the elderly. The History of the Family, 19, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geschwind, A., & Fogelvik, S. (2000). The Stockholm Historical Database. In P.K. Hall, R.McCaa, & G.Thorvaldsen (Eds.), Handbook of international historical microdata for population research (pp. 207–230). Minnesota: The Minnesota Population Center.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, W. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, S. M. (1961). Industrialization and the family in sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 67, 312–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guinnane, T. (1991). Re-thinking the Western European marriage pattern: The decision to marry in Ireland at the turn of the twentieth century. Journal of Family History, 16, 47–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D.Glass & D.Eversley (Eds.), Population in history: Essays in historical demography. London: Aldine Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review, 8, 449–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hareven, T. (1982). Family time & industrial time. The relationship between the family and work in a New England industrial community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, M. (2004). The household and the making of history: A subversive view of the Western past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L. (1967). Manuel de démographie historique [Manual of historical demography]. Geneva: Droz.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. (1997). Migration and urbanization in the Ruhr Valley. Boston: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, A. (1993). Family and social change. The household as process in an industrializing community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaser, K. (2001). Serfdom in Eastern Europe. In D.Kertzer & M.Barbagli (Eds.), The history of the European family: Family Life in the long nineteenth century (1789–1913) (pp. 25–62). New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kertzer, D., & Hogan, D. (1989). Family, political economy, and demographic change. The transformation of life in Casalecchio, Italy, 1861-1921. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klep, P. (2005). An adult life before marriage: Children and the Hajnal hypothesis. In T.Engelen & A.Wolf (Eds.), Marriage and Family in Eurasia. Perspectives on the Hajnal hypothesis. Amsterdam: Aksant.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, J., Mandemakers, K., & Wals, H. (2005). City nomads: Changing residence as a coping strategy, Amsterdam, 1890–1940. Social Science History, 29, 15–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kok, J. (2007). Principles and prospects of the life course paradigm. Annales de Démographie Historique [Annals of Historical Demography], 113, 203–230.
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, P. (1972). Household and family in past time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laslett, P. (1983). Family and households as work group and kin group: Areas of traditional Europe compared. In R.Wall (Ed.), Family forms in historical Europe (pp. 513–563). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Play, F. (1855). Les ouvriers Européens: L'organisation des familles [European laborers: The organization of families]. Paris: Imprimerie impériale.
   Google Scholar
• Le Play, F. (1872). The organization of labor. Philadelphia: Claxton, Remsen & Haffelfinger.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, Z. (2008). The Sociology of migration. In C.Bryant & D.Peck (Eds.), 21st Century Sociology. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, L. (2004). De selectiviteit van blijvers. Een reconstructie van de sociale positie van Duitse migranten in Rotterdam (1870–1885) [The selectivity of stayers: a reconstruction of the social position of German migrants in Rotterdam (1870–1885)]. Tijdschrift voor sociale en economische geschiedenis 1, 92–115.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, J., & Lucassen, L. (2009). The mobility transition revisited, 1500–1900: What the case of Europe can offer to global history. Journal of Global History, 4, 347–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, K. (1991). The European marriage pattern in the cities. Variations on a theme by Hajnal. Journal of Family History, 16, 79–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, A. (1986). Marriage and love in England: Modes of reproduction 1300-1840. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Macfarlane, A. (1987). The culture of capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Matthijs, K. (2002). Mimetic appetite for marriage in nineteenth-century Flanders: Gender disadvantage as an incentive for social change. Journal of Family History, 27, 101–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthijs, K., & Moreels, S. (2010). The Antwerp cor*-database: A unique Flemish source for historical-demographic research. The History of the Family, 15, 109–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterauer, M. (2003). European kinship systems and household structures: Medieval origins. In P.Heady & H.Grandits (Eds.), Distinct inheritances. Property, family and community in a changing Europe (pp. 35–52). Münster: Lit.
   Google Scholar
• Mogey, J. M. (1955). The contribution of Frederic Le Play to family research. Marriage and Family Living, 17, 310–315.
   Google Scholar
• Moreels, S., Vandezande, M., & Matthijs, K. (2010). Fertility in the port city of Antwerp (1846-1920). A detailed analysis of immigrants' spacing behaviour in an urbanizing context. Working paper of the Scientific Research Community Historical Demography, WOG/HD/2010-14. Leuven: Centre for Sociological Research.
   Google Scholar
• Moreels, S., & Matthijs, K. (2011). Marrying in the city in times of rapid urbanization. Journal of Family History, 36, 72–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreels, S., & Vandezande, M. (2012). Migration and reproduction in transitional times. Stopping behaviour of immigrants and natives in the Belgian city of Antwerp (1810-1925). Historical Social Research, 37, 321–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oris, M. (1996). Fertility and migration in the heart of the industrial revolution. The History of the Family, 1, 169–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oris, M. (2000). The age at marriage of migrants during the industrial revolution in the region of Liège. The History of the Family, 5, 391–413.
   Google Scholar
• Ortmayr, N. (1995). Late marriage: Causes and consequences of the Austrian Alpine marriage pattern. In R. L.Rudolph (Ed.), The European peasant family and society. Historical studies (pp. 49–63). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puschmann, P., Grönberg, P-O., Schumacher, R., & Matthijs, K. (2014). Access to marriage and reproduction among migrants in Antwerp and Stockholm. A longitudinal approach to processes of social inclusion and exclusion, 1846–1926. The History of the Family, 19, 29–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R. E. (1928). Human migration and the marginal man. American Journal of Sociology, 33, 881–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, R., & Burgess, E. (1925). The city. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1963). The social system. Glencoe: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S. (1987). Prolonged connections. The rise of the extended family in nineteenth- century England and America. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggles, S. (2012). The future of historical family demography. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 423–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, W. (1985). Structure and mobility. The men and women of Marseille, 1820–1870. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. (2013). Careers of men and women in the 19th and 20th centuries. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R., Matthijs, K., & Moreels, S. (2013). Migration and reproduction in an urbanizing context. Family life courses in 19th century Antwerp and Geneva. Revue Quetelet, 1, 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M. (2007). Central European household and family systems, and the Hajnal-Mitterauer' line: The parish of Bujakow (18th-19th centuries). The History of the Family, 12, 19–42.
   Google Scholar
• Szołtysek, M., Gruber, S., Zuber-Goldstein, B., & Scholz, R. (2011). Living arrangements and household formation in an industrializing urban setting: Rostock 1867-1900. Annales de Démographie Historique [Annals of Historical Demography], 2011, 233–269.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W., Park, R., & Miller, H. (1971 [1921]). Old World Traits Transplanted. Montclair, N.J: Patterson Smith.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (2005a). Frederick Le Play, the developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family myths. Working paper of the Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. (2005b). Reading history sideways. The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm of family life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todd, E. (1990). L'invention de l'Europe [The invention of Europe]. Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen, M. H., & Maas, I. (2010). Historical studies of social mobility and stratification. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 429–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, R. (1983). Introduction. In R.Wall (Ed.), Family forms in historic Europe (pp. 1–64). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, R. (2009). Ideology and reality of the stem family in the writings of Frédérick Le Play. In A.Fauve-Chamoux & E.Ochiai (Eds.), The stem family in Eurasian perspective. Revisiting house societies, 17th-20th centuries (pp. 53–80). Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Wirth, L. (1928). The ghetto. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zijdeman, R. (2010). Status attainment in the Netherlands, 1811-1941. Spatial and temporal variation before and during industrialization. Ede: Ponsen & Looijen.
   Google Scholar