Scaling and Sustaining an Intervention: The Case of Reading Recovery

References

• Bates, C. C., D'Agostino, J. V., Gambrell, L., & Xu, M. (2016). Reading Recovery: Exploring the effects on first-graders' reading motivation and achievement. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 21, 47–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A. S., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. Elementary School Journal, 111, 7–34. doi: 10.1086/653468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. J., Morris, D., & Fields, M. (2005). Intervention after grade 1: Serving increased numbers of struggling readers effectively. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 61–94. doi: 10.1207/s15548430jlr3701_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1994). The wider implications of an educational innovation. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 1, 121–141.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2000). Running records for classroom teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2013). An observation survey of early literacy achievement (3rd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 3–12. doi:10.3102/0013189×032006003
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, C., & Ball, D. (2007). Educational innovation and the problem of scale. In B. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle (Vol. 1; pp. 19–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., Peurach, D. J., Glazer, J. L., Gates, K. E., & Goldin, S. (2013). Improvement by design: The promise of better schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2007). Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading research. Educational Researcher, 36, 564–572. doi: 10.3102/0013189×07313156
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V. (2012). Technical review committee confirms highest NCRTI ratings for Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Journal of Reading Recovery, 1 (2), 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Harmey, S. (2015). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura National Report 2013–2014 (IDEC Rep. No. 2015–01). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, International Data Evaluation Center.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Harmey, S. J. (2016). An international meta-analysis of Reading Recovery. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 21, 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 23–38. doi: 10.3102/01623737026001023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Rodgers, E. (2013, July). Scaling-up Reading Recovery. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Reading Recovery Institute, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Rodgers, E. (2014a, June). Integrating English learners in Reading Recovery. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the i3 Project Director's Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Rodgers, E. (2014b, April). Using multiple-cohort data to construct a nationally representative literacy profile of early readers. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Rodgers, E. (2015, June). Affordances and challenges of providing high quality professional development to teachers in rural areas. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the i3 Project Director's Meeting, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Stringfield, S. (2000). Working together for reliable school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 5, 183–204. doi:10.1080/10824669.2000.9671386
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 201–211. doi: 10.1111/1540-5826.00075
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26. doi:10.17763/haer.66.1.g73266758j348t33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. doi:10.1598/rrq.41.1.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depth of educational reform. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 445–57. doi: 10.1177/002221940003300505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer, J. L., & Peurach, D. J. (2013). School improvement networks as a strategy for large-scale education reform: The role of educational environments. Educational Policy, 27, 676–710. doi:10.1177/0895904811429283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Bellengé, F. X., Rodgers, E., & Schulz, M. (2004). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura National Report, 2003–2004. Columbus, OH: National Data Evaluation Center.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5–12. doi:10.3102/0013189×015005005
   Google Scholar
• Hough, H. J., Kerbow, D., Bryk, A., Pinnell, G. S., Rodgers, E., Dexter, E., … Fountas, I. (2013). Assessing teacher practice and development: The case of comprehensive literacy instruction. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 452–485. doi: 10.1080/09243453.2012.731004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Data Evaluation Center. (2015). 2014–2015 National Summary Report for the United States. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University. Retrieved from https://www.idecweb.us/publications.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Lemons, C. J., Fuchs, D., Gilbert, J. K., & Fuchs, L. S. (2014). Evidence-based practices in a changing world: Reconsidering the counterfactual in education research. Educational Researcher, 43, 242–252. doi: 10.3102/0013189×14539189
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Goldsworthy, H., Armijo, M., Gray, A., Sirinides, P., Blalock, T. J., … Sam, C. (2014). Evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery (Research Report No. RR-79). Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/2036_rryear2report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Gray, A., Gillespie, J. N., Sirinides, P., Sam, C., Goldsworthy, H., … Tognatta, N. (2013). Evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery Year One Report, 2011–12. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Gray, A., Sirinides, P., Goldsworthy, H., Armijo, M., Sam, C., … Tognatta, N. (2015). Year one results from the multisite randomized evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 547–581. doi: 10.3102/0002831214565788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2015, March). Local education agency universe survey, 2002–03 through 2012–13 [Data tables]. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/tables/dt14_204.20.asp
   Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention. (2014). Screening charts. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/resources/tools-charts/screening-tools-chart
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Inspector General. (2006). The Reading First program's grant application process. Final inspection report (Report No. EDOIG/ I13-F0017). Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Petroski, H. (2001). Success and failure in engineering. National Forum, Winter, 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Petroski, H. (2006). Success through failure: The paradox of design. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., DeFord, D. E., & Lyons, C. A. (1988). Reading Recovery: Early intervention for at-risk first graders (Educational Research Service monograph). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., DeFord, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Seltzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8–39. doi: 10.2307/747736
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., Short, K., Lyons, C. A., & Young, P. (1986). The Reading Recovery project in Columbus Ohio, year 1. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ransford-Kaldon, C., Flynt, E. S., & Ross, C. (2011, March). A randomized controlled trial of a response-to-intervention (RTI) tier 2 literacy program: Leveled Literacy Intervention (LLI). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Reading Recovery Council of North America. (2014). Standards and guidelines of Reading Recovery in the United States, 2012. Retrieved from http://readingrecovery.org/reading-recovery/implementation/standards-a-guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, E. (2002). Lessons from a successful reform initiative. In E. Rodgers & G. Pinnell (Eds.), Learning from teaching in literacy education: New perspectives on professional development (pp. 158–172). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, E. (2012, November). The role of design in scaling up an educational innovation. In J. V. D'Agostino (Chair), Scaling up an educational innovation: Analyzing the case of Reading Recovery. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Literacy Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, E., & D'Agostino, J. (2011). Scaling up Reading Recovery: Poised to start year 2. Journal of Reading Recovery, 11(1), 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., & McDonald, S.-K. (2007). Scale-up in practice: An introduction. In B. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in principle (Vol. 1; pp. 1–14). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the Reading Recovery early intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 257–267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., & Madden, N. (2007). Scaling up Success for All: The first sixteen years. In B. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Ideas in practice (Vol. II; pp. 201–228). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Stringfield, S., & Datnow, A. (1998). Scaling up school restructuring designs in urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 30, 269–76. doi:10.1177/0013124598030003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, What Works Clearinghouse. (2013, July). Beginning Reading intervention report: Reading Recovery®. Retrieved from http://whatworks.ed.gov
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R. (2010). “Learning to be learning disabled”: Marie Clay's seminal contribution to the response to intervention approach to identifying specific reading disability. Journal of Reading Recovery, 10(1), 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. G., & Daviss, B. (1994). Redesigning education. New York, NY: H. Holt.
   Google Scholar