An International Meta-Analysis of Reading Recovery

References

• *Burroughs-Lange, S. (2008). Comparison of literacy progress of young children in London Schools: A RR Follow-Up Study. London, UK: Institute of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ioe.ac.uk/Comparison_of_Literacy_Progress_of_Young_Children_in_London_Schools_-_A_Reading_Recovery_Follow_up_Study_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Burroughs-Lange, S., & Douëtil, J. (2007). Literacy progress of young children from poor urban settings: A Reading Recovery comparison study. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 12(1), 19–46. Retrieved from https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/LTL/LTL_Vol12_No1-2007/LTL_12.1-Burroughs-Lange-Douetil.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Center, Y., Wheldall, K., Freeman, L., Outhred, L., & McNaught, M. (1995). An evaluation of Reading Recovery. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 240–263. doi: 10.2307/748034
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children's literacy development. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann Educational.
   Google Scholar
• *Clay, M. M. (2009). The development project. In B. Watson & B. Askew (Eds.), Boundless Horizons. Rosedale, North Shore, NZ: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2013). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• *Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2013). Evaluation of the i3 scale up of Reading Recovery: Year One report 2011–2012. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/evaluation-i3-scale-reading-recovery-year-one-report-2011-12
   Google Scholar
• *Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2015a). Evaluation of the i3 scale up of Reading Recovery: Year Two report 2012–2013. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.cpre.org/rryr2
   Google Scholar
• *Consortium for Policy Research in Education. (2015b). Evaluation of the i3 scale up of Reading Recovery: Years Three and Four report 2013–2015. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Brownfield, K. (April, 2015). A closer look at what works: Theoretical and instructional perspectives behind beginning reading interventions. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Harmey, S. (2014). Reading Recovery and Descubriendo la Lectura National Report 2013–2014. Columbus, OH: International Data Evaluation Center. Retrieved from https://www.idecweb.us/Publications.aspx
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., & Murphy, J. A. (2004). A meta-analysis of Reading Recovery in United States schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(1), 23–38. doi: 10.3102/01623737026001023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *DeFord, D., Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., & Young, P. (1987). Reading Recovery program: Report of the follow-up studies (Vol. VII). Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science. (2005). DEIS: Delivering equality of opportunity in Schools. Dublin, Ireland: Department of Education and Science, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• *Department of Evaluation Services. (1995). Compensatory education (CE) product evaluation: Elementary and secondary programs 1994–95. Saginaw, MI: Saginaw Public Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED391853).
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. A. (2013). Marie M. Clay's theoretical perspective: A literacy processing theory. In D. E. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, sixth edition (pp. 636–656). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaum, B., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M., & Moody, S. (2000). How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk of reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 605–619. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Every Child a Chance Trust. (2009). The long term costs of literacy difficulties (2d ed.). Retrieved from https://www.kpmg.com/UK/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/PDF/What%20We%20Do/ecc-long_term_costs_of_literacy_report_2nd_edition.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Gardner, J., Sutherland, A., & Meenan-Strain, C. (1998) Reading Recovery in Northern Ireland: The first two years. Belfast, Ireland: Blackstaff.
   Google Scholar
• GL Assessment (2011). BAS II Word Reading Scale. London, UK: GL Education Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi: 10.2307/1164588
   Google Scholar
• Heinsman, D. T., & Shadish, W. R. (1996). Assignment methods in experimentation: When do nonrandomized experiments approximate answers from randomized experiments? Psychological Methods, 1, 154–169. doi: 10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., Colt, J. M., Catto, S. L., & Gury, E. C. (1992). Reading and writing of first-grade students in a restructured Chapter 1 program. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 545–572. doi: 10.3102/0002831202900354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. A., & Singer, H. (1961). The substrata-factor theory: Substrata factor differences underlying reading ability in known-groups at the high school level. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• *Huck, C. S., & Pinnell, G. S (1986). The Reading Recovery Project in Columbus, Ohio, Vol.1 Pilot year 1984–1985. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R. (1999). Longitudinal study of the Reading Recovery program: 1994–1998. Detroit, MI: Detroit Public Schools, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Assessment. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 430067).
   Google Scholar
• *Hurry, J. (2012). The impact of Reading Recovery five years after intervention. London, UK: University of London, Institute of Education. Retrieved from http://www.ioe.ac.uk/Research_Home/Hurry-London-Follow-Up-2012-Report-December.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Hurry, J., & Holliman, A. (2009). The impact of Reading Recovery three years after intervention. London, UK: University of London, Institute of Education. Retrieved from https://www.ioe.ac.uk/PHD_JH_Reading_Recovery_report_2009.pdf
   Google Scholar
• *Hurry, J., & Sylva, K. (2007). Long-term outcomes of early reading intervention. Journal of Reading Research, 30, 227–248. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00338.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–126. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Loeb, S. (1995). Where do Head Start attendees end up? One reason why preschool effects fade out. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 62–82. doi: 10.3102/01623737017001062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., … Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. (NCSER 2013–3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Literacy. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 184–202. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3
   Google Scholar
• *Pinnell, G. S., DeFord, D. E., & Lyons, C. A. (1988). Reading Recovery: Early intervention for at-risk first graders (Educational Research Service Monograph). Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED303790).
   Google Scholar
• *Pinnell, G. S., Lyons, C. A., Deford, D. E., Bryk, A. S., & Selzer, M. (1994). Comparing instructional models for the literacy education of high-risk first graders. Reading Research Quarterly, 29, 8–39. doi: 10.2307/747736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Quay, L. C., Steele, D. D., Johnson, C. I., & Hortman, W. (2001). Children's achievement and personal and social development in a first-year Reading Recovery program with teachers in training. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Reading and Writing, 5(2), 7–25. Retrieved from https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/LTL/LTL_Vol5_No2-2001/LTL_5.2-Quay-Steele-etal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, M., Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2010). Components of effective early reading interventions for young struggling readers. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 15, 171–192. doi: 10.1080/19404150903579055
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (2013). Toward an interactive model of reading. In D. E. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, sixth edition (pp. 636–656). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• *Schwartz, R. M. (2005). Literacy learning of at-risk first-grade students in the Reading Recovery Early Intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 257–267. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scull, J. A., & Lo Bianco, J. (2008). Successful engagement in an early literacy intervention. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 8, 123–150. doi: 10.1177/1468798408091852.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 1334–1356. doi:10.1198/016214508000000733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261–281). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Barr, R. (1995). Reading Recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 958–996. doi:10.2307/748206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. (2011). Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1–26. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407. doi: 10.1598/rrq.21.4.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R. (2010). “Learning to be learning disabled”: Marie Clay's seminal contribution to the response to intervention approach to identifying specific reading disability. Journal of Reading Recovery, 10(1), 5–23. Retrieved from https://readingrecovery.org/images/pdfs/Journals/JRR/Vol10_No1_Fall-2010/JRR_10.1_Vellutino.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., & Scanlon, D. (2003). Emergent literacy skills, early instruction, and individual differences as determinants of difficulties in learning to read: The case for early intervention. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson. (Eds.), The handbook of early literacy research (pp. 295–321). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (2013). Beginning reading intervention report: Reading Recovery. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=420
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance (2014). Procedures and standards handbook (version 3.0). Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/DocumentSum.aspx?sid=19
   Google Scholar