“This Group of Difficult Kids”: The Discourse Preservice English Teachers Use to Label Students

References

• Allday, R. A., Duhon, G. J., Blackburn-Ellis, S., & Van Dycke, J. L. (2011). The biasing effects of labels on direct observation by preservice teachers. Teacher Education & Special Education, 34, 52–58. doi:10.1177/0888406410380422
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, M., Armstrong, S., Elish-Piper, L., Matthews, M., & Risko, V. (2009). Deconstructing the construct of ‘Struggling Reader’: Standing still or transforming expectations and instruction? American Reading Forum Annual Yearbook [Online], 29. Retrieved from http://americanreadingforum.org/yearbook/yearbooks/09_yearbook/Alvarez%20and%20Armstrong.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benesch, S. (2008). “Generation 1.5” and its discourses of partiality: A critical analysis. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 7, 294–311. doi:10.1080/15348450802237954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berard, T. J. (2005). On multiple identities and educational contexts: Remarks on the study of inequalities and discrimination. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4, 67–76. doi:10.1207/s15327701jlie0401_4
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, M. (2005). The effects of disability labels on special education and general education teachers' referrals for gifted programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 285–293. doi:10.2307/4126967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 97–116. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Madrid, S., Otto, S., Shuart-Faris, N., & Smith, M. (2008). On discourse analysis in classrooms: Approaches to language and literacy research, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloome, D., Carter, S. P., Christian, B. M., Otto, S., & Shuart-Faris, N. (2005). Discourse analysis and the study of classroom language and literacy events: A microethnographic approach, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, R. L. (2014). A cultural analysis of the achievement gap Discourse: Challenging the language and labels used in the work of school reform. Urban Education, 49, 440–468. doi:10.1177/0042085913507459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, M. (2003). ‘This mystery…’: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2, 313–326. doi:10.1016/S1475-1585(03)00048-1
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, R. (2008). The matter of whiteness. In P. S. Rothenberg (Ed.), White privilege: Essential readings on the other side of racism, pp. 9–14. New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, F. (2006). Studying side by side: Collaborative action ethnography in educational research. In G. Spindler & L. Hammond, (Eds.), Innovations in educational ethnography: Theories, methods, and results (pp. 235–258). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis, New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1987). Silencing in public schools. Language Arts, 64, 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, G., Algozzine, B., & Ysseldyke, J. (1980). Classroom teacher and teacher-in-training susceptibility to stereotypical bias. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 59, 27–30. doi:10.1002/j.2164-4918.1980.tb00478.x
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011a). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2011b). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit, New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1979). Footing. Semiotica, 25(1–2), 1–30. doi:10.1515/semi.1979.25.1-2.1
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, K., Gutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano-López, P., & Turner, M. G. (1997). Putting language back into language arts: When the radical middle meets the third space. Language Arts, 74, 368–378.
   Google Scholar
• Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 35–67. doi:10.2307/3588096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, S. B., & Street, B. V. (2008). On ethnography: Approaches to language and literacy research, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7, 173–192. doi:10.1177/1461445605050365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C. E. (2012). Students “at risk”: Stereotypes and the schooling of Black boys. Urban Education, 47, 464–494. doi:10.1177/0042085911429084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. P. (2009). Implicit and explicit attitudes of educators toward the emotional disturbance label (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ball State University, Muncie, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Josselson, R., & Harway, M. (2012). The challenges of multiple identities. In R. Josselson & M. Harway (Eds.), Navigating multiple identities (pp. 3–12). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., & Davis, J. H. (1997). The art and science of portraiture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, E. M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York. NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lubeck, S. (1996). Deconstructing “child development knowledge” and “teacher preparation.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11, 147–167. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(96)90003-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., Raley, J. D., & Seyer-Ochi, I. (2009). Race and class in a culture of risk. Review of Research in Education, 33, 101–116. doi:10.3102/0091732×08327163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, R., & Varenne, H. (1995). Culture “as” disability. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 26, 324–348. doi:10.2307/3195676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pica-Smith, C., & Veloria, C. (2012). “At risk means a minority kid:” Deconstructing deficit discourses in the study of risk in education and human services. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 2, 33–48.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Malancharuvil-Berkes, E., Mosley, M., Hui, D., & Joseph, G. O. (2005). Critical discourse analysis in education: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 75, 365–416. doi: 10.3102/00346543075003365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, A. S., & Heny, N. A. (2016). “It's just really not me”: How pre-service English teachers from a traditional teacher education program experience student-teaching in charter-school networks. Cogent Education, 3, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1142838
   Google Scholar
• Salerno, A. S., & Kibler, A. K. (2014). Understanding how pre-service English teachers adopt stance toward academic teaching inquiry tasks. Linguistics and Education, 28, 92–106. doi: 10.1016/j.linged.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, A. S., & Kibler, A. K. (2015). Questions they ask: Considering teacher-inquiry questions posed by pre-service English teachers. Educational Action Research, 23, 399–415. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2015.1012174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleeter, C. E., & Milner IV, H. R. (2011). Researching successful efforts in teacher education to diversify teachers. In A. F. Ball & C. A. Tyson (Eds.), Studying diversity in teacher education (pp. 81–103). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Swadener, B. B., & Lubeck, S. (1995). The social construction of children and families “at risk”: An introduction. In B. B. Swadener & S. Lubeck (Eds.), Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of risk (pp. 1–16). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, G., & Hunston, S. (2000). Evaluation: An introduction. In S. Hunston & G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse (pp. 1–27). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D. (2011). “Urban, but not too urban”: Unpacking teachers' desires to teach urban students. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 23–34. doi:10.1177/0022487110379216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. W. (2011). Resistance to classroom participation: Minority students, academic discourse, cultural conflicts, and issues of representation in whole class discussions. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 10, 250–265. doi:10.1080/15348458.2011.598128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar