The Concrete-Representational-Abstract Integrated Sequence as Supplemental Instruction to Teach Addition

References

• Badinlou, F., Kormi-Nouri, R., Mousavi Nasab, S. M., & Knopf, M. (2017). Developmental differences in episodic memory across school ages: Evidence from enacted events performed by self and others. Memory (Hove, England), 25(1), 84–94. doi:10.1080/09658211.2015.1126607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2018). A systematic review of the literature on mathematics manipulatives to support students with disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 41(1), 65–106. doi:10.1353/etc.2018.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E. C., Satsangi, R., & Park, J. (2018). The concrete-representational-abstract approach for students with learning disabilities: An evidence-based practice synthesis. Remedial and Special Education, 39(4), 211–228. doi:10.1177/0741932517721712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouck, E., Park, J., & Nickell, B. (2017). Using the concrete-representational-abstract approach to support students with intellectual disability to solve change-making problems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60(1), 24–36. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2016.11.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bundock, K., Hawken, L. S., Kiuhara, S. A., O’Keeffe, B. V., O’Neill, R. E., & Cummings, M. B. (2021). Teaching rate of change and problem solving to high school students with high incidence disabilities at tier 3. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(1), 35–49. doi:10.1177/0731948719887341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbonneau, K., R., Marley, S., C., Selig,., & J., P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380–400. doi:10.1037/a0031084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, D. H. (1999). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(7), 400–405. doi:10.5951/TCM.5.7.0400
   Google Scholar
• Ching, B. H. (2016). The importance of additive reasoning in children’s mathematical achievement: A longitudinal study [Unpublished dissertation]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, D., D., Hughes, C., A., Farmer,., & T., W. (2008). Responsiveness to intervention: A review of field studies and implications for rural special education. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 3–9. doi:10.1177/875687050802700402
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, E., & Shepherd, K. (2013). Implementing multi-tiered systems of support in mathematics: Findings from two schools. Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 2(1), 1–15. http://www.josea.info
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M. V. (1999). Repeated measures design. The Counseling Psychologist, 27(4), 552–578. doi:10.1177/0011000099274004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M., & Hinton, V. M. (2022). The effects of a CRA-I intervention on students’ number sense and understanding of addition. Remedial and Special Education, 43(3), 183–194. doi:10.1177/07419325211038009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M., & Milton, J. H. (2020). Teaching the partial products algorithm using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence. Exceptionality, 28(2), 142–160. doi:10.1080/09362835.2020.1772070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M. (2010). The effects of strategic instruction and the concrete-representational-abstract sequence on students’ subtraction with regrouping. Remedial and Special Education, 31(3), 195–207. doi:10.1177/0741932508327467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flores, M. M. (2009). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach subtraction with regrouping to students with mathematics difficulties. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(3), 145–152. doi:10.3200/PSFL.53.5.145-152
   Google Scholar
• Fuson, K. C., Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2015). Making early math education work for all children. Phi Delta Kappan, 97(3), 63–68. doi:10.1177/0031721715614831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293–304. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A., Hinton, V. M., & Flores, M. M. (2018). A case study using CRA to teach students with disabilities to count using flexible numbers: Applying skip counting to multiplication. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 62(1), 49–57. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2017.1342218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. (2004). Reading statistics and research (4th ed.). Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, P., & Miller, S. P. (2006). Designing and implementing mathematics instruction for students with diverse learning needs. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Kashi, T., L. (2008). Response to intervention as a suggested generalized approach to improving minority ayp scores. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 37–44. doi:10.1177/875687050802700406
   Google Scholar
• Kot, M., Terzioğlu, N. K., Aktaş, B., & Yikmiş, A. (2018). Effectiveness of touch math technique: Meta-analysis study. European Journal of Special Education, 3(4), 100–110. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1326894
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, N., & J., Lucas, M., S. (2011). Exploring mathematics college readiness in the united states. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–27. https://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/680
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, K., & Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated multi-tiered systems of support: Blending RTI and PBIS. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, C., & Miller, S. P. (1992). Teaching students with learning problems in math to acquire, understand, and apply basic math facts. Remedial and Special Education, 13(3), 19–35. doi:10.1177/074193259201300303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J. H., Flores, M. M., Hinton, V. M., Dunn, C., & Darch, C. (2023). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach conceptual understanding of place value, rounding, and expanded notation. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 38(1), 15–25. doi:10.1111/ldrp.12299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milton, J. H., Flores, M. M., Moore, A. J., Taylor, J. J., & Burton, M. E. (2019). Using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence to teach conceptual understanding of basic multiplication and division. Learning Disability Quarterly, 42(1), 32–45. doi:10.1177/0731948718790089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morano, S., Flores, M. M., Hinton, V., & Meyer, J. (2020). A comparison of concrete-rep­resentational-abstract and concrete-representational-abstract-integrated fraction interventions for students with disabilities. Exceptionality, 28(2), 77–91. doi:10.1080/09362835.2020.1727328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Burman, D., Bell, D., Evans, D., & Hallett, D. (2009). Deaf children’s informal knowledge of multiplicative reasoning. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 260–277. doi:10.1093/deafed/enn040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit, D., & F., Beck, C., T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, G., G., Bursuck, W., & D., Sinclair. (2018). Implementing rti in two rural elementary schools: Encouraging beginnings and challenges for the future. The Rural Educator, 34(3), 1–9. http://www.nrea.net doi:10.35608/ruraled.v34i3.394
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2016). Assessment in special and inclusive education (13th ed.). Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Stelmach, B., L. (2018). A synthesis of international rural education issues and responses. The Rural Educator, 32(2), 32–42. http://www.nrea.net doi:10.35608/ruraled.v32i2.432
   Google Scholar
• Smit, R., & Humpert, W. (2012). Differentiated instruction in small schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(8), 1152–1162. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2012.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, T. K., & Maccini, P. (2012). The effects of the concrete-representational-abstract-integration strategy on the ability of students with learning disabilities to multiply linear expressions within area problems. Remedial and Special Education, 34(3), 142–153. doi:10.1177/0741932512441712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2019). https://data.census.gov/profile/Beulah_CCD,_Lee_County,_Alabama?g=060XX00US0108190288
   Google Scholar