192
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Middle School Description Survey: A Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Organizational Culture in Middle Schools

&
Pages 13-34 | Published online: 08 Jul 2016

  • Alexander, W. M. (1986, May). Middle schools as they should and could be. Schools in the Middle: A Report on Trends and Practices, 1–6.
  • Alexander, W. M. (1987). Toward progress in the middle: Progress and problems. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 2, 314–329.
  • Alexander, W. M., & George, P. S. (1981). The exemplary middle school. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
  • Carr, S.C. (1989, March). Effects of different data collection strategies on Q - technique factor analytic results. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
  • Connors, N. A., & Irvin, J. L. (1989). Is “middle-schoolness” an indicator of excellence? Middle School Journal, 20(5), 12–14.
  • Corbett, H. D., Firestone, W. A., & Rossman, G. B. (1987). Resistance to planned changes and the sacred in school cultures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 36–59.
  • Daniel, L.G. (1989, November). Stability of Q-factors across two data collection methods. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Little Rock, AR. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 439)
  • Daniel, L.G. (1990). Operationalization of a frame of reference for studying organizational culture in middle schools (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Orleans, 1989). Dissertation Abstracts International, 50, 2320A-2321A. (University Microfilms No. 90-02,883)
  • Daniel, L.G. (1991). Operationalization of a frame of reference for studying organizational culture in middle schools. In B. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in educational research: Substantive findings, methodological developments (pp. 1–24). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Deller, D.K. (1984). Achieving excellence in today's middle school—What is required? NASSP Bulletin, 68, 19–24.
  • Doda, N., George, P., & McEwin, K. (1987). Ten current truths about effective schools. Middle School Journal, 18(3), 3–5.
  • Erickson, F. (1987). Conceptions of school culture: An overview. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 11–24.
  • Ervay, S. B., & Wood, D. E. (1980). Middle school teacher certification and education: An update. Clearing House, 53, 143–144.
  • Garvin, J. P. (1986, March). Common denominators in effective middle schools. Schools in the Middle: A Report on Trends and Practices, 1–4.
  • Gatewood, T. E., & Dilg, C. A. (1975). The middle school we need: A report from the ASCD working group on the emerging adolescent learner. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • George, P. S. (1983). The theory Z school: Beyond effectiveness. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
  • George, P. S. (1988). Education 2000: Which way the middle school? Clearing House, 62, 14–17.
  • George, P.S., & Oldaker, L.L. (1985). A national study of middle school effectiveness. Educational Leadership, 43, 79–85.
  • Glatthorn, A. A., & Spencer, N. K. (1986). Middle school/junior high principal's handbook: A practical guide for developing better schools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Hornbeck, D. W., & Arth, A. A. (1991). 1990's: Challenge of the century for middle level educators. NASSP Bulletin, 75(536), 94–100.
  • Lake, S. (1991). Defining an effective climate for a middle level school: Practitioner's Monograph No. 11. Irvine, CA: California League of Middle Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 333 593)
  • Lipsitz, J. (1984). Successful schools for young adolescents. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
  • Moody, D. (Ed.). (1989). Patterson's American education (1990 ed.). Mount Prospect, IL: Educational Directories, Inc.
  • Morgan, G. (1986). Images of organization. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • McPherson, R.B., Crowson, R.L., & Pitner, N.J. (1986). The adaptation of the organization to its environment. In R.B. McPherson, R.L. Crowson, & N.J. Pitner (Eds.). Managing uncertainty: Administrative theory and practice in education, (pp. 165–211). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1985). An agenda for excellence at the middle level. Reston, VA: Author.
  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Owens, R. G. (1991). Organizational behavior in organizations (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Sarason, S. B. (1971). The culture of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership: A dynamic view. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Schmidt, D.J. (1982). Why a middle school? Streamlined Seminar, 1(2), 1–6.
  • Sergiovanni, T. J. (1984). Leadership as cultural expression. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 105–114). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Shockley, R., Holt, L., & Meichtry, Y. (1985, June). Leadership in the middle level school: An imperative for excellence. Schools in the Middle: A Report on Trends and Practices, 1–4.
  • Steinhoff, C. R., & Owens, R. G. (1988, April). The Organizational Culture Assessment Inventory: A metaphorical analysis of organizational culture in educational settings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
  • Thompson, B. (1981, November). Factor stability as a function of item variance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, Dallas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 205 553)
  • Valentine, J. W., & Kirkham, M. M. (1985). A national study of schools in the middle. Middle School Journal, 16(4), 12–17.
  • Weber, M. (1969). From: Objectivity in social science and social policy. In R. E. Rogers (Ed.), Max Weber's ideal type theory (pp. 12–33). New York: Philosophical Library.
  • Wiles, J. (1978). The emerging design of middle school evaluation. Middle School Journal, 9(1), 3, 18–19.
  • Wiles, J., & Bondi, J. (1981). The essential middle school. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Willower, D. J. (1984). School principals, school cultures, and school improvement. Educational Horizons, 27, 35–38.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.