Use of polymeric membranes for purification of an E. coli expressed biotherapeutic protein

References

• Ishihara, T.; Yamamoto, S. Optimization of Monoclonal Antibody Purification by Ion-Exchange Chromatography. Application of Simple Methods With Linear Gradient Elution Experimental Data. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1069, 99–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P.; Bhattacharaya, P.; Pandey, G.; Mukherjee, K.J. Overexpression and Purification of Recombinant Human Interferon Alpha2b in Escherichia coli. Protein Express Purif. 2005, 41, 313–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambure, R.; Gupta, D.; Rathore, A.S. A Novel Multimodal Chromatography Based Single Step Purification Process for Efficient Manufacturing of an E. coli Based Biotherapeutic Protein Product. J. Chromatogr. A. 2013, 1314, 188–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatt, K.U.; Hanisch, F.; Dünnebier, G.; Engell, S. Model-Based Optimization and Control of Chromatographic Processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 1119–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallant, S.R.; Vunnum, S.; Cramer, S.M. Optimization of Preparative Ion-Exchange Chromatography of Proteins: Linear Gradient Separations. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 725, 295–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petsch, D.; Beeskow, T.C.; Anspach, F.B.; Deckwer, W.D. Membrane Adsorbers for Selective Removal of Bacterial Endotoxin. J. Chromatogr. B 1997, 693, 79–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, A.; Kiesewetter, A. Cation Exchange Chromatography in Antibody Purification: pH Screening for Optimised Binding and HCP Removal. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 848, 151–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore, A.S.; Shirke, A. Recent Developments in Membrane-Based Separations in Biotechnology Processes. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2011, 41, 398–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charcosset, C. Purification of Proteins by Membrane Chromatography. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1998, 71, 95–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, H.L.; Fahrner, R.L.; Xu, Y.; Norling, L.A.; Blank, G.S. Membrane Ion-Exchange Chromatography for Process-Scale Antibody Purification. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 907, 145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.S.; Suen, S.Y. Modification of Porous Alumina Membranes With n-Alkanoic Acids and Their Application in Protein Adsorption. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 275, 70–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulbricht, M. Membrane Separations Using Molecularly Imprinted Polymers. J. Chromatogr. B 2004, 804, 113–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zydney, A.L. Membrane Technology for Purification of Therapeutic Proteins. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103, 227–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, T. Ion Exchange Membranes: State of Their Development and Perspective. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 263, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.; Xu, T.; Gong, M.; Yang, W. Synthesis and Characterizations of New Negatively Charged Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Materials: Part II. Membrane Preparation and Characterizations. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 247, 111–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogle, J.; Mohan, N.; Cheung, E.; Persson, J. Effects of Resin Ligand Density on Yield and Impurity Clearance in Preparative Cation Exchange Chromatography. I. Mechanistic Evaluation. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1225, 62–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, A.; Forrer, N.; Butté, A.; Cvijetić, B.; Morbidelli, M.; Jöhnck, M.; Schulte, M. Role of the Ligand Density in Cation Exchange Materials for the Purification of Proteins. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217(15), 2216–2225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, A.M.; Harinarayan, C.; Malmquist, G.; Axén, A.; Vanreis, R. Ion Exchange Chromatography of Monoclonal Antibodies: Effect of Resin Ligand Density on Dynamic Binding Capacity. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216(20), 4366–4371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H.L.; Lin, D.Q.; Zhu, M.M.; Yao, S.J. Effects of Ligand Density and Pore Size on the Adsorption of Bovine IgG With DEAE Ion-Exchange Resins. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35(16), 2131–2137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. New Ion Exchangers for the Chromatography of Biopolymers. J. Chromatogr. A. 1990, 510, 133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrzosek, K.; Gramblička, M.; Polakovič, M. Influence of Ligand Density on Antibody Binding Capacity of Cation-Exchange Adsorbents. J. Chromatogr. A. 2009, 1216(25), 5039–5044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, D.S.; Harinarayan, C.; Malmquist, G.; Axén, A.; Sharma, M.; Vanreis, R. Surface Extenders and an Optimal Pore Size Promote High Dynamic Binding Capacities of Antibodies on Cation Exchange Resins. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1216(20), 4372–4376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, A.C.; Boone, T.C.; Lu, H.S. Characterization, Formulation and Stability of Neupogen (Filgrastim), a Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor. In Formulation, Characterization, and Stability of Protein Drugs: Case Histories; Pearlman, R. Wang, Y.J. Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, 2002; Vol. 9, 303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Bartkowski, R.; Kitchel, R.; Peckham, N.; Margulis, L. Aggregation of Recombinant Bovine Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in Solution. J. Protein Chem. 2002, 21, 138.
   Google Scholar
• Snee, R.D. Think Strategically for Design of Experiments Success. Bioprocess Int. 2011, 9, 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Bade, P.D.; Kotu, S.P.; Rathore, A.S. Optimization of a Refolding Step for a Therapeutic Fusion Protein in the Quality by Design (QbD) Paradigm. J. Sep. Sci. 2012, 35, 3160–3169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cygnus application notes. http://cygnustechnologies.com/product_detail/bacterial/e-coli461hcp-elisa-kit.html
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, V.; Shivach, T.; Kumar, V.; Yadav, N.; Rathore, A.S. Avoiding Antibody Aggregation During Processing: Establishing Hold Times. Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9, 1195–1205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhambure, R.; Sharma, I.; Pattanayek, S.K.; Rathore, A.S. Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of Non-Specific Protein Adsorption on Filter Membrane Disks of a Commercially Available High Throughput Chromatography Device. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 451, 312–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V.; Bhalla, A.; Rathore, A.S. Design of Experiments Applications in Bioprocessing: Concepts and Approach. Biotechnol. Prog. 2014, 30, 86–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, S.; Rathore, A.S. High Throughput Process Development (HTPD) Platform for Membrane Chromatography. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 442, 245–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar