Resin screening and process optimization for erythritol mother liquor chromatographic separation

References

• Bernt, W. O.; Borzelleca, J. F.; Flamm, G.; Munro, I. C. Erythritol: A Review of Biological and Toxicological Studies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 1996, 24, S191–S197. DOI: 10.1006/rtph.1996.0098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awuchi, C. G.; Echeta, K. C. Current Developments in Sugar Alcohols: Chemistry, Nutrition, and Health Concerns of Sorbitol, Xylitol, Glycerol, Arabitol, Inositol, Maltitol, and Lactitol. Int. J. Adv. Acad. Res. 2019, 5, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bordier, V.; Teysseire, F.; Schlotterbeck, G.; Senner, F.; Beglinger, C.; Meyer-Gerspach, A. C.; Wölnerhanssen, B. K. Effect of a Chronic Intake of the Natural Sweeteners Xylitol and Erythritol on Glucose Absorption in Humans with Obesity. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3950. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Additives, E.; Food, N. Scientific Opinion on the Safety of the Proposed Extension of Use of Erythritol (E 968) as a Food Additive. EFSA J. 2015, 13, 4033.
   Google Scholar
• Kaulpiboon, J.; Haewpetch, P.; Rudeekulthamrong, P. Biosynthesis, Structural Characteristics and Anticariogenic Properties of Erythritol-Based Acceptor Products. J. Funct. Foods 2024, 112, 105934. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2023.105934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, Y.; Kasumi, T.; Ogihara, J.; Tamura, M.; Arai, T.; Tomishige, K. Erythritol: Another C4 Platform Chemical in Biomass Refinery. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 2520–2530. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b04046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzechonek, D. A.; Dobrowolski, A.; Rymowicz, W.; Mirończuk, A. M. Recent Advances in Biological Production of Erythritol. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 620–633. DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1380598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, J.; Yang, L.; Liu, J. The Recovery of Erythritol from the Waste Mother Liquor. Food and Fermentation Industries 2013, 39, 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. A Method of Reusing Mother Liquor of Erythritol Production to Prepare Mixed Sugar Alcohol Products, CN104086365B, 05-18, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z.; Liu, W.; Duan, X.; Ren, G.; Li, L.; Cao, W.; Guo, J.; Jiao, X.; Zhu, L.; Wei, X. Effects of Freezing and Drying Programs on IgY Aggregation and Activity during Microwave Freeze-Drying: Protective Effects and Interactions of Trehalose and Mannitol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 260, 129448. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X.-Y.; Zhang, L.-H.; Yang, L.-P.; Han, Y.-L.; Tian, Y.-J.; Zhang, J.-X.; Liu, J.-J. Identification of the Components in the Erythritol Mother Liquor. Food and Fermentation Industries 2014, 40, 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. Q.; Wang, H. W.; Lv, J. Y.; Deng, Z. X.; Cheng, H. R. Highly Efficient Erythritol Recovery from Waste Erythritol Mother Liquor by a Yeast-Mediated Biorefinery Process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 11020–11028. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b04112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broughton, D. B. Production-Scale Adsorptive Separations of Liquid Mixtures by Simulated Moving-Bed Technology. Sep. Sci. Technol. 1984, 19, 723–736. DOI: 10.1080/01496398408068590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, P. E.; Abusabah, E. K. E. The Separation of Synthetic Mixtures of Glucose and Fructose and Also Inverted Sucrose Feedstocks Using Countercurrent Chromatographic Techniques. Chromatographia 1985, 20, 9–12. DOI: 10.1007/BF02260479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramani, H. J.; Hidajat, K.; Ray, A. K. Optimization of Simulated Moving Bed and Varicol Processes for Glucose–Fructose Separation. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2003, 81, 549–567. DOI: 10.1205/026387603765444500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, N.; Håkansson, E.; Wahler, S.; Panke, S.; Bechtold, M. Multi-Objective Optimization for the Economic Production of D-Psicose Using Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1398, 47–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. V. D.; Le, T. H.; Kim, J. L.; Lee, J. W.; Koo, Y. M. Separation of D-Psicose and D-Fructose Using Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 1987–1995. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillarová, S.; Henke, S.; Svoboda, T.; Krčová, P.; Bubník, Z.; Kadlec, P.; Sluková, M. Possibilities of Optimizing the Purity of Mannose in Continuous Chromatographic Separation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2023, 46, 1298–1306. DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202200534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J. C.; Ban, X. F.; Gu, Z. B.; Li, C. M.; Hong, Y.; Cheng, L.; Li, Z. F. Preparation and Antibacterial Activity of a Novel Maltotetraose Product. Process Biochem. 2021, 108, 8–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2021.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, C. Y.; Zheng, Z. W.; Chen, K.; Wei, L. W.; Shen, L.; Lu, Y. H.; Fan, E. G. Using a Machine Learning Model for the Optimal Design of Simulated Moving Bed Processes and Its Application to Separate Rebaudioside a and Stevioside. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 96, 2558–2568. DOI: 10.1002/jctb.6798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W.; Kim, J. I.; Lee, C. H.; Kim, J. K.; Koo, Y. M. Design and Sensitivity Analysis of Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography to Separate Sugar Alcohols. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2007, 30, 1859–1877. DOI: 10.1080/10826070701386413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueki, Y.; Umemura, T.; Iwashita, Y.; Odake, T.; Haraguchi, H.; Tsunoda, K. Preparation of Low Flow-Resistant Methacrylate-Based Monolithic Stationary Phases of Different Hydrophobicity and the Application to Rapid Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Separation of Alkylbenzenes at High Flow Rate and Elevated Temperature. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1106, 106–111. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.08.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc, C.-L.; Theoleyre, M.-A.; Lutin, F.; Pareau, D.; Stambouli, M. Purification of Organic Acids by Chromatography: Adsorption Isotherms and Impact of Elution Flow Rate. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 105–112. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiochon, G.; Farkas, T.; Guan-Sajonz, H.; Koh, J.-H.; Sarker, M.; Stanley, B. J.; Yun, T. Consolidation of Particle Beds and Packing of Chromatographic Columns. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 762, 83–88. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(96)00642-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedruzzi, I.; Malvessi, E.; Mata, V. G.; Silva, E. A. B.; Silveira, M. M.; Rodrigues, A. E. Quantification of Lactobionic Acid and Sorbitol from Enzymatic Reaction of Fructose and Lactose by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1145, 128–132. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.01.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, X.; Zhang, M.; Wei, F.; Wang, S. Affinity Character Analysis of Magnolol and Honokiol Based on Stepwise Frontal Analysis Coupled with Cell Membrane Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2023, 1229, 123903. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2023.123903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, J.; Frenz, J.; Horváth, C. Measurement of Adsorption Isotherms by Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1984, 316, 53–68. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)96140-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, L.; Che, X.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, K.; Du, Y.; Gao, J.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, G. Regulation on Both Pore Structure and Pressure-Resistant Property of Uniform Agarose Microspheres for High-Resolution Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2022, 1681, 463461. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2022.463461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anoyal, S. J. Complexing of Polyols with Cations. Tetrahedron 1974, 30, 1695–1702. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4020(01)90691-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angyal, S. J. Complexes of Metal Cations with Carbohydrates in Solution. Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, 1989, 47, 1–43. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2318(08)60411-4.
   Google Scholar
• Vente, J. A.; Bosch, H.; de Haan, A. B.; Bussmann, P. J. T. Evaluation of Sugar Sorption Isotherm Measurement by Frontal Analysis under Industrial Processing Conditions. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1066, 71–79. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.12.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruthven, D. M.; Ching, C. Counter-Current and Simulated Counter-Current Adsorption Separation Processes. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1989, 44, 1011–1038. DOI: 10.1016/0009-2509(89)87002-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazario, C. E.; Silva, M. R.; Franco, M. S.; Lanças, F. Evolution in Miniaturized Column Liquid Chromatography Instrumentation and Applications: An Overview. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1421, 18–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.08.051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nizam, T.; Krishnan, K. A.; Joseph, A.; Krishnan, R. R. Isotherm, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Modelling of Liquid Phase Adsorption of the Heavy Metal Ions Zn(II), Pb(II) and Cr(VI) onto MgFe2O4 Nanoparticles. Groundwater Sustainable Dev. 2024, 25, 101120. DOI: 10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101120.
   Google Scholar
• Seidel-Morgenstern, A. Experimental Determination of Single Solute and Competitive Adsorption Isotherms. J. Chromatogr. A 2004, 1037, 255–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.11.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritti, F.; Guiochon, G. Systematic Errors in the Measurement of Adsorption Isotherms by Frontal Analysis: Impact of the Choice of Column Hold-up Volume, Range and Density of the Data Points. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1097, 98–115. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2005.08.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muther, T.; Kalantari Dahaghi, A. Calculation of Hydrogen Adsorption Isotherms and Henry Coefficients with Mixed CO2 and CH4 Gases on Hydroxylated Quartz Surface: Implications to Hydrogen Geo-Storage. J. Storage. Mater. 2024, 87, 111425. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2024.111425.
   Google Scholar
• Cavazzini, A.; Felinger, A.; Guiochon, G. Comparison between Adsorption Isotherm Determination Techniques and Overloaded Band Profiles on Four Batches of Monolithic Columns. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1012, 139–149. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(03)01185-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. P. W. The Role of Molecular Interactions in Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1976, 122, 35–53. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9673(00)82235-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L., Chromatographic Analysis; Tsinghua University Press: Beijing China, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rongère, P.; Morel-Desrosiers, N.; Morel, J.-P. Interactions between Cations and Sugars. Part 8. Gibbs Energies, Enthalpies and Entropies of Association of Divalent and Trivalent Metal Cations with Xylitol and Glucitol in Water at 298.15 K. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1995, 91, 2771–2777. DOI: 10.1039/FT9959102771.
   Google Scholar
• Verstraeten, M.; Pursch, M.; Eckerle, P.; Luong, J.; Desmet, G. Modelling the Thermal Behaviour of the Low-Thermal Mass Liquid Chromatography System. J. Chromatogr. A 2011, 1218, 2252–2263. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.02.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa, T.; Suzuki, S.; Kubo, H.; Ohtani, H. On-Column Isomerization of Sugars during High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Analysis of the Elution Profile. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 720, 167–172. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00280-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortner, F.; Wiemeyer, H.; Mazzotti, M. Interconversion and Chromatographic Separation of Carbohydrate Stereoisomers on Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Resins. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1517, 54–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.08.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R. Effect of Flow Rates and the Slope of the Linear Concentration Gradient on Peak Areas in High Pressure Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1971, 57, 383–390. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(71)80058-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich, S.; Arab, H.; Buchholz, M.; Engell, S. Experimental Application of Individual Column State and Parameter Estimation in SMB Processes to an Amino Acid Separation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 348–353. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.266.
   Google Scholar
• Hao, W.; Wang, J. Evaluation of Nonlinear Chromatographic Performance by Frontal Analysis Using a Simple Multi-Plate Mathematical Model. J. Chromatogr. A 2005, 1063, 47–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.11.065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, B.; Golshan-Shirazi, S.; Guiochon, G. Effect of Mass Transfer Coefficient on the Elution Profile in Nonlinear Chromatography. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 3363–3368. DOI: 10.1021/j100345a095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliorini, C.; Gentilini, A.; Mazzotti, M.; Morbidelli, M. Design of Simulated Moving Bed Units under Nonideal Conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 2400–2410. DOI: 10.1021/ie980262y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J.; Jiang, X.; Guo, J.; Chen, Y.; Yu, W. Competitive Adsorption Equilibrium Model with Continuous Temperature Dependent Parameters for Naringenin Enantiomers on Chiralpak AD Column. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1422, 163–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.10.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J.; Zhu, L.; Xu, G.; Yu, W.; Ray, A. K. Determination of Competitive Adsorption Isotherm of Enantiomers on Preparative Chromatographic Columns Using Inverse Method. J. Chromatogr. A 2013, 1273, 49–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar