Hydrophobin purification based on the theory of CO₂-nanobubbles

References

• Vailaya, A.; Horvath, C. Retention in Reversed-Phase Chromatography: Partition orAdsorption? J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 829, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, R. P. W. Principle and Practice of Chromatography, 2003. http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/Dr.almajed/Books/practical%20HPLC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Linder, M. B.; Szilvay, G. R.; Nakari-Setälä, T.; Pentilla, M. Hydrophobins: The Protein Amphiphiles of Filamentous Fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29, 977–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grünbacher, A.; Throm, T.; Seidel, C.; Gutt, B.; Röhrig, J.; Strunk, T.; Vincze, P.; Walheim, S.; Schimmel, T.; Wenzel, W.; Fischer, R. Six Hydrophobins are Involved in Hydrophobin Rodlet Formation in Aspergillus nidulans and Contribute to Hydrophobicity of the Spore Surface. PLoS One 2014, 9, 94546–94556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, A. R.; Cagnolm, F.; Russell, A. B.; Izzard, M. J. Surface Properties of Class II Hydrophobins from Trichoderma reesei and Influence on Bubble Stability. Langmuir 2007, 23, 7995–8002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Deckers, S.; Riveros-Galan, D.; Gebruers, K.; Derdelinckx, G. Upgraded Model of Primary Gushing: From the Nanobubble Formation till the Liquid Expulsion. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2015, 73, 343–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Deckers, S. M.; Gebreurs, K.; Vissers, L.; Verachtert, H.; Derdenlickx, G. Hydrophobins: Exceptional Proteins for Many Applications in Brewery Environment and Other Bio-Industries. Cerevisia 2012, 37, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Gebruers, K.; Derdelinckx, G. Recent Advances in Fungal Hydrophobin towards using in Industry. Protein. J. 2015, 34, 243–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokribousjein, Z.; Deckers, S. M.; Gebruers, K.; Lorgouilloux, Y.; Baggerman, G.; Verachtert, H.; Delcour, J. A.; Etienne, P.; Rock, J.-M.; Michiels, C.; Derdelinckx, G. Review Hydrophobins, Beer Foaming and Gushing. Cerevisia 2011, 35, 85–101.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, M.; Selber, K.; Nakari-Setälä, T.; Qiao, M.; Kula, M.-R.; Penttilä, M. The Hydrophobins HFBI and HFBII from Trichoderma reesei Showing Efficient Interactions with Non-Ionic Surfactants in Aqueous Two-Phase Systems. Biomacromolecules 2001, 2, 511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Zune, Q.; Telek, S.; Riveros-Galan, D.; Verachtert, H.; Toye, D.; Gebruers, K.; Derdelinckx, G.; Delvigne, F. Fungal Biofilm Reactor Improves the Productivity of Hydrophobin HFBII. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 88, 171–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winterburn, J. B.; Andrew, B.; Martin, P. J. Characterisation of HFBII Biosurfactant Production and Foam Fractionation with and without Antifoaming Agents. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 90, 911–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Venken, T.; Deckers, S.; Winterburn, J.; Shokribousjein, Z.; Gebruers, K.; Verachtert, H.; Delcour, J.; Martin, P.; Derdelinckx, G. A Novel Method for Hydrophobin Extraction using CO2 Foam Fractionation System. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2013, 43, 372–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers, S. M.; Venken, T.; Khalesi, M.; Gebruers, K.; Baggerman, G.; Lorgouilloux, Y.; Shokribousjein, Z.; Ilberg, V.; Schönberger, C.; Titze, J.; Verachtert, H.; Michiels, C.; Neven, H.; Delcour, J.; Martens, J.; Derdelinckx, G.; De Maeyer, M. Combined Modeling and Biophysical Characterisation of CO2 Interaction with Class II Hydrophobins: New Insight Into the Mechanism Underpinning Primary Gushing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2012, 70, 249–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers, S. M.; Lorgouilloux, Y.; Gebruers, K.; Baggerman, G.; Verachtert, H.; Neven, H.; Michiels, C.; Derdelinckx, G.; Delcour, J. A.; Martens, J. Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) as a Tool to Detect CO2-Hydrophobin Structures and Study the Primary Gushing Potentialof Beer. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2011, 69, 144–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, M. J.; Askolin, S.; Hörhammer, N.; Tenkanen, M.; Linder, M.; Penttilä, M.;Nakari-Setälä, T. Process Technological Effects of Deletion and Amplification of Hydrophobins I and II in Transformants of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2002, 58, 721–727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. A.; Lynch, H. C.; Varley, J. The Application of Foaming for the Recovery of Surfactin from B. subtilis ATCC 21332 Cultures. Enzyme. Microb. Technol. 2001, 28, 346–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Knegt, R. J.; Brink, H. V. D. Improvement of the Drying Oven Method for the Determination of the Moisture Content of Milk Powder. Int. Dairy. J. 1998, 8, 733–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers, S. M.; Gebruers, K.; Baggerman, G.; Lorgouilloux, Y.; Delcour, J. A.; Michiels, C.; Derdelinckx, G.; Martens, J.; Neven, H. CO2-Hydrophobin Structures Acting as Nanobombs in Beer. BrewingSci. Monatsschr. Brauwiss. 2010, 63, 54–61.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, M.; Titze, J.; Ilberg, V.; Jacob, F. Novel Perspectives in Gushing Analysis: A Review. J. I. Brewing 2011, 117, 295–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers, S. M.; Vissers, L.; Gebruers, K.; Shokribousjein, Z.; Khalesi, M.; Riveros-Galan, D.; Schönberger, C.; Verachtert, H.; Neven, H.; Delcour, J.; Michiels, C.; Ilberg, V.; Derdelinckx, G.; Titze, J.; Martens, J. Doubly Modified Carlsberg Test Combined with Dynamic Light Scattering Allows Prediction of the Primary Gushing Potential of Harvested Barley and Malt. Cerevisia 2012, 37, 77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, H.; Xu, J.; Yu, X. Isolation and Bioactivity of an Angiogenesis Inhibitor Extracted from the Cartilage of Dasyatis akajei. Asia. Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 16, 286–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokribousjein, Z.; Philippaerts, A.; Riveros, D.; Titze, J.; Ford, Y.; Deckers, S. M.; Khalesi, M.; Delcour, J. A.; Gebruers, K.; Verachtert, H.; Ilberg, V.; Derdelinckx, G.; Sels, B.; A Curative Method for Primary Gushing of Beer and Carbonated Beverages: Characterization and Application of Antifoam based on Hop Oils. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2014, 72, 12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. C.; Yu, R. C.; Chou, C. C. Viability of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria in Fermented Soymilk after Drying, Subsequent Rehydration and Storage. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 93, 209–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez, B. E.; Ledeboer, A. M.; Drying of Probiotics: Optimization of Formulation and Process to Enhance Storage Survival. Dry. Technol. 2007, 25, 1193–1201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollohub, K.; Cal, K. Spray Drying Technique: II. Current Applicationsin Pharmaceutical Technology. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 587–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshii, H.; Buche, F.; Takeuchi, N.; Terrol, C.; Ohgawara, M.; Furuta, T. Effects of Protein on Retention of ADH Enzyme Activity Encapsulated in Trehalose Matrices by Spray Drying. J. Food Eng. 2008, 87, 34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, M. T.; Tellington, A.; Trost, L.; Sokolov, A. Substantially Improved Stability of Biological Agents in Dried Form. BioProcess. Int. 2003, 1, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Hakanpää, J.; Paananen, A.; Askolin, S.; Nakari-Setälä, T.; Parkkinen, T.; Penttilä, M. E.; Linder, M. B.; Rouvinen, J. Atomic Resolution Structure of the HFBII Hydrophobin, a Self-Assembling Amphiphile. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 534–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio, J. M.; Linder, M. B.; Rouvinen, J. Crystal Structures of Hydrophobin HFBII in the Presence of Detergent Implicate the Formation of Fibrils and Monolayer Films. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 28733–28739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szilvay, G. R.; Paananen, A.; Laurikainen, K.; Vuorimaa, E.; Lemmetyinen, H.; Peltonen, J.; Linder, M. B. Self-Assembled Hydrophobin Protein Films at the Air-Water Interface: Structural Analysis and Molecular Engineering. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 2345–2354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joensuu, J. J.; Conley; A. J. Lienemann. M.; Brandle, J. E.; Linder, M. B.; Menassa, R. Hydrophobin Fusions for High-Level Transient Protein Expression and Purification in Nicotianabenthamiana. Plant. Physiol. 2010, 152, 622–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarparanta, M. P.; Bimbo, L. M..; Mäkilä, E. M..; Salonen, J. J.; Laaksonen, P. H.; Helariutta, A. M. K.; Linder, M. B.; Hirvonen, J. T.; Laaksonen, T. J.; Santos, H. A.; Airaksinen, A. J. The Mucoadhesive and Gastroretentive Properties of Hydrophobin-CoatedPorous Silicon Nanoparticle Oral Drug Delivery Systems. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3353–3362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deckers, S. M.; Vissers, L.; Khalesi, M.; Shokribousjein, Z.; Verachtert, H.; Gebruers, K.; Pirlot, X.; Ilberg, V.; Titze, J.; Neven, H.; Derdelinckx, G. Thermodynamic View of Primary Gushing. J. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. 2013, 71, 149–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Mandelings, N.; Herrera-Malaver, B.; Riverso-Galan, D.; Gebruers, K.; Derdelinckx, G. Improvement of the Retention of Ocimene in Water Phase using Class II Hydrophobin HFBII. Flavour. Frag. J. 2015, 30, 451–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalesi, M.; Mandelings, N.; Shokribousjein, Z.; Riveros-Galan, D.; Verachtert, H.; Gebruers, K.; Delvigne, F.; Vankelecom, I.; Derdelinckx, G. Biophysical Characterisation of Hydrophobin Enriched Foamate. Cerevisia 2014, 38, 129–134.
   Google Scholar