Multivariate look at the TLC retention: A concise review

References

• Poole, C. F.; Poole, S. K. Multidimensionality in Planar Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 703, 573–612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Use of Multivariate Mathematical Methods for the Evaluation of Retention Data Matrices. Adv. Chromatogr. 1996, 36, 1–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, A. E.; Prazen, B. J.; Synovec, R. E. Trends in Chemometric Analysis of Comprehensive Two-dimensional Separations. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2004, 378, 1948–1951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T. Data Evaluation in Chromatography by Principal Component Analysis. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2010, 24, 20–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratchell, N. Cluster Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987, 6, 105–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, S.; Esbensen, K.; Geladi, P. Principal Component Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1987, 2, 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croux, C.; Filzmoser, P.; Oliveira, M. R. Algorithms for Projection-pursuit Robust Principal Component Analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2007, 87, 218–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, M.; Rousseeuw, P. J.; Verboven, S. A Fast Method for Robust Principal Components with Applications to Chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 60, 101–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daszykowski, M. From Projection Pursuit to Other Unsupervised Chemometric Techniques. J. Chemom. 2007, 21, 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Lathauwer, L.; De Moor, B.; Vandewalle, J. An Introduction to Independent Component Analysis. J. Chemom. 2000, 14, 123–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanimirova, I.; Daszykowski, M.; Walczak, B. Dealing with Missing Values and Outliers in Principal Component Analysis. Talanta 2007, 72, 172–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bro, R. PARAFAC. Tutorial and Applications. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38, 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrion, R. N-Way Principal Component Analysis Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 25, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumarra, G.; Scarlata, G.; Cirma, G.; Romano, G.; Palazzo, S.; Clementi, S.; Giulietti, G. Application of Principal Components Analysis to the Evaluation and Selection of Eluent Systems for the Thin-layer Chromatography of Basic and Neutral Drugs. J. Chromatogr. A 1984, 295, 31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musumarra, G.; Scarlata, G.; Romano, G.; Cappello, G.; Clementi, S.; Giulietti, G. Qualitative Organic Analysis. Part 2. Identification of Drugs by Principal Components Analysis of Standardized TLC Data in Four Eluent Systems and of Retention Indices on SE 30. J. Anal. Toxicol. 1987, 11, 154–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullner, G.; Cserhati, T.; Bordas, B.; Szogyi, M. Mixed Supports in the Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography of Amino Acids. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 1986, 9, 1919–1931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T. Dependence of the Silanophilic Effect on the Concentration of Preadsorbed Salts and on the Chemical Structure of Peptides in Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1991, 553, 467–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Illés, Z. Comparison of Two Principal Component Analysis Methods to Evaluate Reversed-phase Retention Data. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1991, 9, 685–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foti, S.; Musumarra, G.; Saletti, R.; Romano, G. Determination of the ‘Chromatographic Pattern’ for the Identification of Dipyrone Urinary Metabolites. Farmaco 1991, 46, 1081–1089.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Retention of 4-Cyanophenyl Herbicides on Water-insoluble β-cyclodextrin Support. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 685, 295–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgács, E. Use of Principal Component Analysis for the Evaluation of the Retention Behaviour of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Drugs on β-cyclodextrin Column. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1995, 13, 525–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Magyar, K. Use of TLC and Multivariate Mathematical Statistical Methods to Study the Interaction of Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Drugs with Amino Acids. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1992, 10, 1033–1039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserhati, T.; Hollo, J. Interaction of Amino Acids with a Non-homologous Series of Anticancer Drugs. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 1994, 32, 201–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forgács, E.; Cserháti, T. Effect of Various Organic Modifiers on the Determination of the Hydrophobicity Parameters of Non-homologous Series of Anticancer Drugs. J. Chromatogr. A 1995, 697, 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Thin Layer Chromatography and Principal Component Analysis for the Study of the Interaction of Amino Acids with Some Antisense Nucleosides. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 316, 105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Effect of pH and Salts on the Binding of Free Amino Acids to the Corn Protein Zein Studied by Thin-layer Chromatography. Amino Acids 2005, 28, 99–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Magyar, K. Relationship between the Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Molecular Parameters of Some Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitory Drugs, Determined by Means of Adsorptive and Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1994, 24, 249–264.
   Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T. Interaction of Carboxymethyl-γ-cyclodextrin with Anticancer Drugs Studied by Charge-transfer Thin-layer Chromatography. Biomed. Chromatogr. 1994, 8, 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgács, E.; Cserháti, T. Interaction of Some Steroid Drugs with β-cyclodextrin Polymer. J. Chromatogr. A 1999, 845, 447–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Use of Canonical Correlation Analysis for the Evaluation of Chromatographic Retention Data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 28, 305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazylak, G.; Aboul-Enein, H. Y. Chemometric Account for Retention of Lysosomotropic Alkanolamines in Planar Chromatography Systems. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1997, 20, 2327–2355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q.-S.; Zhang, L.; Yang, H.-Z.; Liu, H.-Y. Correlation between the Molecular Structures of Some Potential Photosystem II Inhibitors and Their Retention Data in HPTLC. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 1999, 12, 301–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoliński, A.; Djakovic-Sekulic, T. L. Chemometric Study of Retention Indices of Some Thiazolidinediones Derivatives in Two Low Polarity Stationary Phases. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2014, 17, 623–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briciu, R. D.; Sârbu, C. Comparative Evaluation of Vegetable Oils-impregnated Layers as Reversed-phases for Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2010, 87, 1091–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Szögyi, M. Determination of the Lipophilicity of Some Peptides. Effect of Surface pH of Silica. J. Chromatogr. A 1990, 520, 249–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Valko, K. Relationship between the Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Molecular Parameters of Some Synthetic Nucleosides, Determined by Means of Adsorptive and Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1990, 20, 81–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valkó, K.; Cserháti, T.; Fellegvári, I.; Sági, J.; Szemzö, A. Application of Chromatographic Retention Data in an Investigation of a Quantitative Structure-nucleotide Incorporation Rate Relationship. J. Chromatogr. A 1990, 506, 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Illés, Z. Effect of Nature of Support and Impregnating Agent on Lipophilicity Determination for Nonionic Surfactants by Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. Chromatographia 1991, 31, 152–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish, Y.; Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Reversed-phase Retention Characteristics of Some Bioactive Heterocyclic Compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 668, 485–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Relationship between the Hydrophobicity and Specific Hydrophobic Surface Area of Pesticides Determined by High-performance Liquid Chromatography Compared with Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 771, 105–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T. The Use of Principal Component Analysis for the Study of the Interaction of Anionic Surfactants with Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin. J. Inclusion Phenom. 1999, 33, 123–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Influence of Salt and pH on the Hydrophobicity Parameters of Antisense Nucleosides Studied by Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography and Multivariate Mathematical-statistical Methods. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1999, 41, 21–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Oros, G. Impact of Molecular Surface Characteristics on the Reversed-phase Retention Behaviour of Synthetic Dyes. Biomedical Chromatography 1999, 13, 525–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E.; Balogh, S. Relationship between the Reversed-phase Retention of Monotetrazolium and Ditetrazolium Salts and their Physicochemical Properties. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 1999, 12, 446–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros, G.; Cserháti, T. Reversed Phase Thin Layer Chromatographic Behavior of Some Acylanilide Fungicides. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2009, 32, 1317–1330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flieger, J.; Świeboda, R.; Tatarczak, M. Chemometric Analysis of Retention Data from Salting-out Thin-layer Chromatography in Relation to Structural Parameters and Biological Activity of Chosen Sulphonamides. J. Chromatogr. B 2007, 846, 334–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, L.; Skibiński, R.; Radoń, M. Chemometric Characterization of Model Compounds Retention in Salting-out Thin Layer Chromatography on Silica. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2011, 34, 776–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, L.; Skibiński, R.; Bojarczuk, A. Chemometric Characterization of Model Compounds Retention in Salting-out Thin Layer Chromatography on Cellulose. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2012, 35, 1298–1305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, Ł.; Skibiński, R.; Gowin, E.; Ma̧czka, P. Exploring Hidden Trends in Classic and Micellar Thin-layer Chromatographic Retention of Model Compounds by Chemometric Methods. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2013, 36, 2348–2362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, L.; Skibiński, R.; Gumieniczek, A.; Wojnar, A. Multi-way Analysis of Retention of Model Compounds in Thin-layer Chromatography. Acta Chromatogr. 2010, 22, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, Ł.; Radoń, M.; Radkiewicz, B.; Skibiński, R. Trilinear Multiplicative Modelling of Thin Layer Chromatography Retention as a Function of Solute, Organic Modifier and Its Concentration. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 59–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasal, A.; Siluk, D.; Kaliszan, R. Chromatographic Retention Parameters in Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology. Curr. Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 381–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannhold, R.; Cruciani, G.; Dross, K.; Rekker, R. Multivariate Analysis of Experimental and Computational Descriptors of Molecular Lipophilicity. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrić, F.; Héberger, K. Towards Better Understanding of Lipophilicity: Assessment of In Silico and Chromatographic logP Measures for Pharmaceutically Important Compounds by Nonparametric Rankings. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2015, 115, 183–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atrrog, A. A. B.; Natić, M.; Tosti, T.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Dordević, I.; Tešević, V.; Jadranin, M.; Milosavljević, S.; Lazić, M.; Radulović, S.; Tešić, Ž. Lipophilicity of Some Guaianolides Isolated from Two Endemic Subspecies of Amphoricarpos neumayeri (Asteraceae) from Montenegro. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2009, 23, 250–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalász, H.; Benko, B.; Gulyás, Z.; Tekes, K. Lipophilicity Determination Using Both TLC and Calculations. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2009, 32, 1342–1358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. Evaluation of the Lipophilicity of Fat-soluble Vitamins. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2009, 22, 211–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ucherek, M.; Komsta, Ł.; Skibiński, R.; Modzelewska-Banachiewicz, B.; Gumieniczek, A. Lipophilicity Evaluation of the Products Obtained in the Reaction of N3-substituted Amidrazones with cis-1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic Anhydride. Chromatographia 2009, 69, 1169–1174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janicka, M.; Stepnik, K.; Pachuta-Stec, A. A Comparative study of the Lipophilicity of 1,2,4-triazoles by Reversed-phase and Micellar TLC and OPLC. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2013, 26, 153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dołowy, M.; Pyka, A. Evaluation of Lipophilic Properties of Betamethasone and Related Compounds. Acta Pol. Pharm. Drug Res. 2015, 72, 671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Todor, S. Evaluation of Lipophilicity by Principal Components Analysis. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 1998, 11, 123–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Todor, S. Determination of Lipophilicity of Some Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents and Their Relationships by Using Principal Component Analysis Based on Thin-layer Chromatographic Retention Data. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 822, 263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusu, M.; Rusu, D.; Sârbu, C. Lipophilicity of Metallic Complexes of 4-Methoxyphenyl-4′-chlorobenzoylhydrazine as Estimated from Principal Component Analysis of Thin Layer Chromatographic Retention Data. Anal. Lett. 1999, 32, 2999–3011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Pop, L.; Todor, S. Estimarea Lipofilicitǎţii unei Serii de Feromoni eu Ajutorul Analizei Componentelor Principale. Rev. Chim. 1999, 50, 540–544.
   Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Malawska, B. Evaluation of Lipophilicity of Piperazine Derivatives by Thin Layer Chromatography and Principal Component Analysis. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2000, 23, 2143–2154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Kuhajda, K.; Kevresan, S. Evaluation of the Lipophilicity of Bile acids and Their Derivatives by Thin-layer Chromatography and Principal Component Analysis. J. Chromatogr. A 2001, 917, 361–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Demertzis, M. A.; Kovala-Demertzi, D. Chromatographic Behaviour and Lipophilicity of Pd(II) and Pt(II) Complexes of Py-2-carbaldehyde Tiosemicarbazone with Potential Biological Activity. Rev. Chim. 2003, 54, 799–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casoni, D.; Sârbu, C. The Lipophilicity of Parabens Estimated on Reverse Phases Chemically Bonded and Oil-impregnated Plates and Calculated Using Different Computation Methods. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 2377–2384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briciu, R. D.; Kot-Wasik, A.; Wasik, A.; Namieśnik, J.; Sârbu, C. The Lipophilicity of Artificial and Natural Sweeteners Estimated by Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography and Computed by Various Methods. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 3702–3706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Briciu, R. D. Lipophilicity of Natural Sweeteners Estimated on Various Oils and FATS Impregnated Thin-layer Chromatography Plates. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2010, 33, 903–921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briciu, R. D.; Sârbu, C. Lipophilicity of Flavonoids Estimated by Reversed-phase High Performance Thin-layer Chromatography: Chemically Bonded Plates vs. Impregnated Plates with Oils, Animal, and Human Fats. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2010, 45, 1275–1285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komsta, T.; Skibiński, R.; Berecka, A.; Gumieniczek, A.; Radkiewicz, B.; Radoń, M. Revisiting Thin-layer Chromatography as a Lipophilicity Determination Tool—A Comparative Study on Several Techniques with a Model Solute Set. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 53, 911–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowin, E.; Komsta, L. Revisiting Thin-layer Chromatography as a Lipophilicity Determination Tool. Part III—A Study on CN Adsorbent Layers. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2012, 25, 471–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglot, T.; Gumieniczek, A.; Komsta, Ł.; Kasińska, A. LC and Principal Component Analysis in the Lipophilicity Study of Seven Angiotensin II-AT1 Receptor Antagonists (sartans). Chromatographia 2008, 68, 977–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabić, D.; Natić, M.; Džambaski, Z.; Stojanović, M.; Marković, R.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Tešić, Z. Estimation of Lipophilicity of N-substituted 2-alkylidene-4-oxothiazolidines by Means of Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2011, 34, 791–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naşcu-Briciu, R. D.; Sârbu, C. Lipophilicity of Oils and Fats Estimated by TLC. J. Sep. Sci. 2013, 36, 1317–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobanska, A. W.; Wójcicka, K.; Brzezinska, E. Evaluation of the Lipophilicity of Selected Sunscreens—A chemometric Analysis of Thin-layer Chromatographic Retention Data. J. Sep. Sci. 2014, 37, 3074–3081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vastag, G. G.; Apostolov, S. L.; Matijević, B. M.; Marinković, A. D. Chemometric Approach in Studying of the Retention Behavior and Lipophilicity of Potentially Biologically active N-substituted-2-phenylacetamide Derivatives. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2014, 25, 1948–1955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vastag, G.; Apostolov, S.; Matijević, B.; Petrović, S. Establishing Dependences between Different Lipophilic Parameters of new Potentially Biologically Active N-substituted-2-phenylacetamide Derivatives by Applying Multivariate Methods. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2014, 53, 312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vastag, G.; Apostolov, S.; Nakomčić, J.; Matijević, B. Application of Chemometric Methods in Examining of the Retention Behavior and Lipophilicity of Newly Synthesized Cyanoacetamide Derivatives. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2014, 37, 2529–2545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciura, K.; Nowakowska, J.; Pikul, P.; Struck-Lewicka, W.; Markuszewski, M. J. A Comparative Quantitative Structure-retention Relationships Study for Lipophilicity Determination of Compounds with a Phenanthrene Skeleton on Cyano-, Reversed Phase-, and Normal Phase-Thin Layer Chromatography Stationary Phases. J. AOAC Int. 2015, 98, 345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimov, N.; Moskovkina, M. New Aspects of Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationships in Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1991, 552, 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. Topological Indexes and QSRR Methodology in Pharmaceutical and Chemical Analysis. J. AOAC Int. 2012, 95, 673–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. The Application of Topological Indexes in TLC. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2001, 14, 152–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q. S.; Zhang, L. Review of Research on Quantitative Structure-retention Relationships in Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 1999, 22, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogány, G.; Cserháti, T.; Oláh, J.; Valkó, K. Relationships between the Chromatographic Retention Data and the Effects of Nucleoside Derivatives in Highly Metastatic 3LL Cells. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1992, 10, 495–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwish, Y.; Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Use of Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis in Quantitative Structure-activity Relationships: A Comparative Study. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1994, 24, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, O.; Gere-Pászti, E.; Forgács, E. Study of the Interaction of Structurally Similar Bioactive Compounds by Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2003, 41, 169–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oros, G.; Cserháti, T. Relationship between the Calculated Physicochemical Parameters and Reversed Phase Thin-layer Chromatographic Retention Behavior of Carboxamide Fungicides and Related Compounds. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2010, 33, 880–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sârbu, C.; Casoni, D.; Darabantu, M.; Maiereanu, C. Quantitative Structure–Retention and Retention—Activity Relationships of Some 1,3-oxazolidine Systems by RP-HPTLC and PCA. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2004, 35, 213–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyka, A. Use of Structural Descriptors to QSRR Analysis of Selected Bile Acids Separated by NP-TLC. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2009, 32, 2739–2746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanojević, M.; Trifković, J.; Kostić-Rajačić, S.; Šoškić, V.; Tešić, Z.; Milojković-Opsenica, D. Assessment of Lipophilicity of Some Biologically Active Arylpiperazines by RPTLC and Multivariate analysis. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2014, 37, 2814–2828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifković, J.; Andrić, F.; Ristivojević, P.; Andrić, D.; Tešić, Ž. L.; Milojković-Opsenica, D. M. Structure-Retention Relationship Study of Arylpiperazines by Linear Multivariate Modeling. J. Sep. Sci. 2010, 33, 2619–2628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabić, D.; Natić, M.; Džambaski, Z.; Marković, R.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Tešić, Z. Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship of New N-substituted 2-alkylidene-4-oxothiazolidines. J. Sep. Sci. 2011, 34, 2397–2404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livaja-Popović, D. J.; Lončar, E. S.; Jevrić, L. R.; Malbaša, R. V. Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography Behavior of Aldopentose Derivatives. Hem. Ind. 2012, 66, 365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovačević, S. Z.; Jevrić, L.; Kuzmanović, S. P.; Lončar, E. Chemometric Estimation of the RP TLC Retention Behaviour of Some Estrane Derivatives by Using Multivariate Regression Methods. Cent. Eur. J. Chem. 2013, 11, 2031–2039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed Shenger, M. S.; Filipic, S.; Nikolic, K.; Agbaba, D. Estimation of Lipophilicity and Retention Behavior of Some Alpha Adrenergic and Imidazoline Receptor Ligands Using RP-TLC. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2014, 37, 2829–2845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipic, S.; Elek, M.; Nikolic, K.; Agbaba, D. Quantitative Structure-retention Relationship Modeling of the Retention Behavior of Guanidine and Imidazoline Derivatives in Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2015, 28, 119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perušković, D. S.; Stevanović, N. R.; Lolić, A. D.; Baošić, R. M. Correlation between Structure, Retention and Lipophilicity of Some Antidepressants: QSRR and QSAR Studies. Lett. Drug Des. Discovery 2014, 11, 162–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šegan, S.; Terzić-Jovanović, N.; Milojković-Opsenica, D.; Trifković, J.; Šolaja, B.; Opsenica, D. Correlation Study of Retention Data and Antimalarial Activity of 1,2,4,5-mixed Tetraoxanes with Their Molecular Structure Descriptors and LSER Parameters. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2014, 97, 178–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadžić, M. Z.; Jevrić, L. R.; Kovačević, S. Z.; Podunavac-Kuzmanović, S. O. Retention Data from Normal-phase Thin-layer Chromatography in Characterization of Some 1,6-anhydrohexose and D-aldopentose Derivatives by QSRR Method. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2015, 38, 1044–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karadžić, M. Ž.; Jevrić, L. R.; Podunavac Kuzmanović, S. O.; Lončar, E. S.; Kovačević, S. Z. Structure–retention Relationship Study of 2,4-dioxotetrahydro-1,3-thiazole Derivatives. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2015, 38, 1247–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovačević, S. Z.; Podunavac Kuzmanović, S. O.; Jevrić, L. R.; Lončar, E. S. Assessment of Chromatographic Lipophilicity of Some Anhydro-D-Aldose Derivatives on Different Stationary Phases by QSRR Approach. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2015, 38, 492–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djaković-Sekuli, T. L.; Smoliński, A. Chemometric Characterization of s-Triazine Derivatives in Relation to Structural Parameters and Biological Activity. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2010, 36, 954–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevrić, L. R.; Jovanović, B. Ž.; Velimirović, S. D.; Tepić, A. N.; Koprivica, G. B.; Mišljenović, N. M. Application of Lipophilicity Parameters in QSRR Analysis of Newly Synthesized s-Triazine Derivatives: Prediction of the Retention Behaviour. Hem. Ind. 2011, 65, 533–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevrić, L. R.; Koprivica, G. B.; Mišljenović, N. M.; Tepić, A. N.; Kuljanin, T. A.; Jovanović, B. Ž. Estimation of the Correlation between the Retention of s-Triazine Derivatives and Some Molecular Descriptors. Acta Period. Technol. 2011, 42, 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Siouffi, A.-M. Some Aspects of Optimization in Planar Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1991, 556, 81–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias, N. C.; Poole, C. F. Optimization of Ternary Mobile Phases in Reversed-phase Thin-layer Chromatography by Use of a Mixture-design Approach with the Solvation-parameter Model. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2000, 13, 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelander, A.; Summanen, J.; Yrjönen, T.; Haario, H.; Ojanperä, I.; Vuorela, H. Optimization of Separation in TLC by Use of Desirability Functions and Mixture Designs According to the ‘PRISMA’ Method. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 1999, 12, 365–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, C. F.; Dias, N. C. Practitioner's Guide to Method Development in Thin-layer Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 892, 123–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babić, S.; Horvat, A. J. M.; Kaštelan-Macan, M. Use of a Genetic Algorithm to Optimize TLC Separation. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2005, 18, 112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré, J. C.; Pothier, J.; Galand, N.; Viel, C. Optimisation of Experimental Conditions of Planar Chromatography with Multivariate Analysis. II. Optimisation of Separation of Quinolizidinic Alkaloids by Association Criteria between Sorbents and Eluents. Analusis 1995, 23, 342–351.
   Google Scholar
• Bota, A.; Sârbu, C.; Mǎrutoiu, C.; Coman, V. Application of Principal-components Analysis to the Choice of Optimum Solvent System for the Separation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, by TLC. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 1997, 10, 358–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medić-Šarić, M.; Stanić, G.; Bošnjak, I. The Use of Information Theory and Numerical Taxonomy Methods for Evaluating the Quality of Thin-layer Chromatographic Separations of Flavonoid Constituents of Matricariae flos. Pharmazie 2001, 56, 156–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkó, K.; Cserháti, T.; Forgács, E. Comparative Investigation of the Retention Behaviour of Nucleoside Derivatives on Alumina Stationary Phases in Thin-layer Chromatography and High-performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1991, 550, 667–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cserháti, T. Evaluation of HPLC Retention Data by Non-linear Mapping, Cluster Analysis and Varimax Rotation. A Comparative Study. J. Biochem. Biophys. Methods 1996, 32, 137–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Komsta, L.; Pietras̈, R.; Bartuzi, E.; Skibiński, R.; Gumieniczek, A. Chemometric Comparison of Thin-layer Chromatography, Gradient High-performance Liquid Chromatography, and Computational Methods for Lipophilicity Assessment of Model Compounds. J. Planar Chromatogr.—Mod. TLC 2015, 28, 115–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar