Quantitative structure retention relationship (QSRR) approach for assessment of chromatographic behavior of antiviral drugs in the development of liquid chromatographic method

References

• ICH Harmonized Guideline Q12. Technical and Regulatory Considerations for Pharmaceutical Product Lifecycle Management, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Food Drug Administration. Pharmaceutical Quality System (ICH 10) conference. Arlington, VA, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M.; Pohl, M.; Hanna-Brown, M.; Nethercote, P.; Borman, P.; Hansen, G.; Smith, K.; Larew, J. Implications and Opportunities of Applying QbD Principles to Analytical Measurements. Pharm. Tech. 2010, 34, 52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Peraman, R.; Bhadraya, K.; Padmanabha Reddy, Y. Analytical Quality by Design: A Tool for Regulatory Flexibility and Robust Analytics. Int. J Anal. Chem. 2015, 2015, 1–9. DOI: 10.1155/2015/868727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agatonovic Kustrin, S.; Zecevic, M.; Zivanovic, L.; Tucker, I. G. Application of Artificial Neural Networks in HPLC Method Development. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 1998, 17, 69–76. DOI: 10.1016/s0731-7085(97)00170-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, R.; Doble, P.; Dawson, M. Optimisation of HPLC Gradient Separations Using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs): Application to Benzodiazepines in Post-Mortem Samples. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2009, 77, 615–620. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2009.01.012.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, S. QbD Considerations for Analytical Methods—FDA Perspective. IFPAC Annual Meeting, CMC Lead for QbD ONDQA/CDER/FDA, Baltimore, MD, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, K. L.; Harrington, B.; Graul, T. W. QbD in Liquid Chromatographic Applications; Fanalis, S., Haddad, P. A., Poole, C. F., Eds.; Elsevier, 2013. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Kaliszan, R. Chapter 11, Recent Advances in Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships (QSRR). In Handbook of Analytical Separations, 2000. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/S1567-7192(00)80014-5.
   Google Scholar
• Karoly, H. Quantitative Structure (Chromatographic) Retention Relationships. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1158, 273–305. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruth, I. J.; Amos, P. R.; Haddad, S.,R.; John, W. D.; Christopher, A. P. Molecular Modeling and Prediction Accuracy in Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship Calculations for Chromatography. Trends. Anal. Chem. 2018, 105, 352–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristina, I. D. M.; David, A. S.; Stephen, W. D.; Melvin, R. E.; Nicholas Shaw, P.; David, A. B. Chromatographic Retention Behaviour of n-Alkylbenzenes and Pentylbenzene Structural Isomers on Porous Graphitic Carbon and Octadecyl-Bonded Silica Studied Using Molecular Modelling and QSRR. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 6987–6993. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.08.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasser, J. J.; Zeraatkar, E. Fuzzy Wavelet Network Based on Extended Kalman Filter Training Algorithm Combined with Least Square Weight Estimation: Efficient and Improved Chromatographic QSRR/QSPR Models. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2021, 208, 104191. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2020.104191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yabin, W.; Talebi, M.; Ruth, I. J.; Amos, R. S.; John, W. D.; Christopher, A. P.; Paul, R. H. Retention Prediction in Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography Using Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships Applied to the Hydrophobic Subtraction Model. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1541, 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.01.053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amir, M. R.; Yousefinejad, S.; Azin, S.; Afshan, M.; Ghodratollah, A. Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationship for Chromatographic Behaviour of Anthraquinone Derivatives through considering Organic Modifier Features in Micellar Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2019, 1599, 46–54. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.03.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciura, K.; Dziomba, S.; Nowakowska, J.; Markuszewski, M. J. Thin Layer Chromatography in Drug Discovery Process. J. Chromatogr. A 2017, 1520, 9–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2017.09.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klara, I. V. Chapter 13: Application of HPLC Measurements for the Determination of Physicochemical and Biomimetic Properties to Model In Vivo Drug Distribution in Support of Early Drug Discovery. Handbook of Analytical Separations, Elsevier Publishing: Amsterdam, 2020; Vol. 8, p 667. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64070-3.00013-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ciura, K.; Kawczak, P.; Greber, K. E.; Kapica, H.; Nowakowska, J.; Bączek, T. Application of Reversed-Phase Thin Layer Chromatography and QSRR Modelling for Prediction of Protein Binding of Selected β-Blockers. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2019, 176, 112767. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.07.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, B. C.; Catrow, J. L.; Maschek, J. A.; Cox, J. E. QSRR Automator: A Tool for Automating Retention Time Prediction in Lipidomics and Metabolomics. Metabolites 2020, 10, 237–245. DOI: 10.3390/metabo10060237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szultka Mlynska, M.; Boguslaw, B. Chromatographic Behavior of Selected Antibiotic Drugs Supported by Quantitative Structure-Retention Relationships. J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1478, 50–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2016.11.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghavami, R.; Rasouli, Z. Investigation of Retention Behavior of Anthraquinoids in rp-HPLC on 17 Different C18 Stationary Phases by Means of Quantitative Structure Retention Relationships. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 22, 2677–2691. DOI: 10.1007/s00044-012-0254-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczak-Skierska, J.; Szultka-Młyńska, M.; Pauter, K.; Buszewski, B. Study of Chromatographic Behavior of Antibiotic Drugs and Their Metabolites Based on Quantitative structure-retention relationships with the use of HPLC-DAD. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 184, 113187. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zisi, C.; Sampsonidis, I.; Fasoula, S.; Papachristos, K.; Witting, M.; Gika, H. G.; Nikitas, P.; Pappa-Louisi, A. QSRR Modeling for Metabolite Standards Analyzed by Two Different Chromatographic Columns Using Multiple Linear Regression. Metabolites 2017, 7, 7. DOI: 10.3390/metabo7010007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Q.; Gu, H.-W.; Yin, X.-L.; Zhou, H.-H.; Chang, H.-Y.; Shi, J.; Chen, Y.; Yan, X.-F.; Liu, Z. Development of an HPLC-DAD Method Combined with Chemometrics for Differentiating Geographical Origins of Chinese Red Wines on the Basis of Phenolic Compounds. Food Anal. Methods 2021, 14, 1895–1907. DOI: 10.1007/s12161-021-02032-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelena, G.; Ana, P.; Mira, Z.; Biljana, O.; Marija, M.; Ljiljana, Z. Quantitative Structure–Retention Relationships of Azole Antifungal Agents in Reversed-Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Talanta 2012, 100, 329–337. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.07.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Tripartite, Guidelines, ICH Q2: Validation of Analytical Procedures (R1), Toronto, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Giriraj, P.; Sivakkumar, T. A Rapid-Chemometrics Assisted RP-HPLC Method with PDA Detection for the Simultaneous Estimation of Ofloxacin and Nimorazole in Pharmaceutical Formulation. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2015, 38, 904–910. DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2014.991870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yangfei, W.; Qiong, A.; Jianyin, L.; Hai, S.; Xiangdong, J.; Yongjian, Y.; Guoren, Y. Fingerprint and Multicomponent Quantitative Analysis for the Quality Evaluation of Sibiraea angustata Leaves by HPLC-DAD and HPLC-ESI-MS/MS Combined with Chemometrics. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2017, 40, 449–458. DOI: 10.1080/10826076.2017.1320290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman, A. G.; IŞik, S.; Abba, S. I.; MerİÇlİ, F. Artificial Intelligence-Based Models for the Qualitative and Quantitative Prediction of a Phytochemical Compound using HPLC Method. Turk. J. Chem. 2020, 44, 1339–1351. DOI: 10.3906/kim-2003-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schefzick, S.; Kibbey, C.; Bradley, M. P. Prediction of HPLC Conditions Using QSPR Techniques: An Effective Tool to Improve Combinatorial Library Design. J. Comb. Chem. 2004, 6, 916–927. DOI: 10.1021/cc049914y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Usman, A. G.; Işik, S.; Abba, S. I. Hybrid Data-Intelligence Algorithms for the Simulation of Thymoquinone in HPLC Method Development. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2021, 18, 1537–1549. DOI: 10.1007/s13738-020-02124-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranušová, P.; Nemeček, P.; Lehotay, J.; Čižmárik, J. QSRR Modelling Aimed on the HPLC Retention Prediction of Dimethylamino- and Pyrrolidino-Substitued Esters of Alkoxyphenylcarbamic Acid. Chem. Pap. 2021, 75, 2525–2535. DOI: 10.1007/s11696-020-01470-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florin, S.; Mihaela, S.; Victor, D. Dependence of Reversed-Phase Liquid Chromatographic Retention for Aripiprazole and Some Related Chemical Impurities on the Main Elution Parameters. J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol. 2016, 39, 70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toma, G.; Andrei, M.; Victor, D. Hydrophobicity Parameter (Log Kow) Estimation for Some Phenolic Compounds of Pharmaceutical Interest from Retention Studies with Mobile Phase Composition in Reversed‐Phase Liquid Chromatography. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 147–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar