6,054
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How Cannabis Users Obtain and Purchase Cannabis: A Comparison of Cannabis Users from European Countries with Different Cannabis Policies

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Aldridge, J., & Decary-Hétu, D. (2016). Cryptomarkets and the future of illicit drug markets. In J. Mounteney, A. Oteo, & P. Griffiths (Eds.), The internet and drug markets (EMCDDA: Insights 21) (pp. 23–32). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Barratt, M. J., Ferris, J. A., & Winstock, A. R. (2016). Safer scoring? Cryptomarkets, social supply and drug market violence. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 35, 24–31.
  • Belackova, V., Roubalova, M., & van de Ven, K. (2019). Overview of “home” cultivation policies and the case for community-based cannabis supply. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 71, 36–46.
  • Bennett, T., & Holloway, K. (2019). How do students source and supply drugs? Characteristics of the university illegal drug trade. Substance Use & Misuse, 54(9), 1530–1540. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2019.1590415
  • Broséus, J., Rhumorbarbe, D., Morelato, M., Staehli, L., & Rossy, Q. (2017). A geographical analysis of trafficking on a popular darknet market. Forensic Science International, 277, 88–102.
  • Caulkins, J. P., & Pacula, R. L. (2006). Marijuana markets: Inferences from reports by the household population. Journal of Drug Issues,36(1), 173–200.
  • Chatwin, C. (2011). Drug policy harmonization and the European Union. Springer. ISBN 978-1-349-32281-7
  • Chatwin, C., & Potter, G. (2014). Blurred boundaries: The artificial distinction between “use” and “supply” in the UK cannabis market. Contemporary Drug Problems,41(4), 536–550.
  • Coomber, R., & Moyle, L. (2014). Beyond drug dealing: Developing and extending the concept of social supply of illicit drugs to minimally commercial supply. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 21(2), 157–164.
  • Coomber, R., Moyle, L., & South, N. (2016). The normalisation of drug supply: The social supply of drugs as the “other side” of the history of normalisation. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 23(3), 255–263.
  • Coomber, R., Moyle, L., & South, N. (2016). Reflections on three decades of research on ‘social supply’in the UK. Friendly Business, 13-28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_2
  • Coomber, R., & Turnbull, P. (2007). Arenas of drug transactions: Adolescent cannabis transactions in England—Social supply. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 845–865.
  • Décary-Hétu, D., Mousseau, V., & Vidal, S. (2018). Six years later: Analyzing online black markets involved in herbal cannabis drug dealing in the United States. Contemporary Drug Problems, 45(4), 366–381.
  • Decorte, T., Lenton, S., & Wilkins, C. (Eds.). (2020). Legalizing cannabis. Experiences, lessons and scenarios. Routledge.
  • Decorte, T., Potter, G., & Bouchard, M. (2011). World wide weed: Global trends in cannabis cultivation and its control. Ashgate.
  • Demant, J., Munksgaard, R., & Houborg, E. (2018). Personal use, social supply or redistribution? Cryptomarket demand on Silk Road 2 and Agora. Trends in Organized Crime, 21(1), 42–61.
  • Demant, J. J., & Bakken, S. A. (2019). Technology-facilitated drug dealing via social media in the Nordic countries. Background paper commissioned by the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction for the EU Drug Markets Report 2019 (pp. 1–22). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Duffy, M., Schafer, N., Coomber, R., O’Connell, L., & Turnbull, P. (2008). Cannabis supply and young people: ‘It’s a social thing. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Edmunds, M., Hough, M., & Urquía, N. (1996). Tackling local drug markets (Vol. 80). Home Office Police Research Group.
  • EMCDDA. (2017). Drug trafficking penalties across the European Union – A survey of expert opinion. Technical report. EMCDDA. http://emcdda.europa.eu/publications/technical-reports/trafficking-penalties
  • EMCDDA. (2018). Cannabis legislation in Europe: An overview. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EMCDDA. (2019a). European Drug Report 2019: Trends and developments. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • EMCDDA. (2019b). Estimating the size of the main illicit retail drug markets in Europe: An update, Technical report. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • ESPAD Group. (2016). ESPAD Report 2015. Results from the European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drugs. Publication Office of the European Union.
  • Eurobarometer. (2014). Young people and drugs. Flash Eurobarometer 401. TNS Political & Social.
  • Grigg, J., Scott, J., Lenton, S., & Barratt, M. (2015). The social supply of cannabis in Australia. (National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, Monograph Series No. 59). Commonwealth of Australia.
  • Harocopos, A., & Hough, M. (2005). Drug dealing in open-air markets. Problem-Oriented Guides for Police. Problem Specific Guides Series No. 31. Department of Justice Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.
  • Harrison, L. D., Erickson, P. G., Korf, D. J., Brochu, S., & Benschop, A. (2007). How much for a dime bag? An exploration of youth drug markets. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, S27–S39.
  • Hathaway, A. D., Mostaghim, A., Erickson, P. G., Kolar, K., & Osborne, G. (2018). It’s really no big deal”: The role of social supply networks in normalizing use of Cannabis by students at Canadian universities. Deviant Behavior, 39(12), 1672–1680.
  • Hemsing, N., & Greaves, L. (2020). Gender norms, roles and relations and cannabis-use patterns: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 947.
  • Hough, M., Warburton, H., Few, B., May, T., Man, L.-H., Witton, J., & Turnbull, P. J. (2003). A growing market: The domestic cultivation of cannabis. Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  • Korf, D. J. (2020). Coffeeshops in the Netherlands: Regulating the front door and the back door. In T. Decorte, S. Lenton, & C. Wilkins (Eds.), Legalizing cannabis: Experiences, lessons and scenarios. Routledge.
  • Korf, D. J., Liebregts, N., & Nabben, T. (2016). Waterbed, drukte en overlast: Effecten sluitingsbeleid coffeeshops in Amsterdam-centrum. [Waterbed, crowds and nuisance: Effects of closing policy for coffee shops in the center of Amsterdam]. Rozenberg Publishers.
  • Kruithof, K., Aldridge, J., Décary-Hétu, D., Megan, S., Dujso, E., & Hoorens, S. (2016). Internet-facilitated drugs trade. RAND Europe Research Report.
  • Lenton, S., Grigg, J., Scott, J., Barratt, M., & Eleftheriadis, D. (2015). The social supply of cannabis among young people in Australia. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 503, 501–520.
  • Masson, K., & Bancroft, A. (2018). Nice people doing shady things’: Drugs and the morality of exchange in the cryptomarkets. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 58, 78–84.
  • May, T., & Hough, M. (2004). Drug markets and distribution systems. Addiction, Research, and Theory, 12, 549–563.
  • Mounteney, J., Oteo, A., & Griffiths, P. (2016). The internet and drug markets: Shining a light on these complex and dynamic systems. In J. Mounteney, A. Oteo, & P. Griffiths (Eds.), The internet and drug markets (EMCDDA: Insights 21) (pp. 127–133). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Moyle, L. (2013). An exploration of how the social supply and user dealer supply of illicit drugs differs to conventional notions of drug dealing and consideration of the consequences of this for sentencing policy [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Plymouth.
  • Moyle, L., & Coomber, R. (2019). Student transitions into drug supply: Exploring the university as a ‘risk environment. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(5), 642–657.
  • Nabben, T, Benschop, A, Korf, DJ (2016) Antenne 2015. Trends in alcohol, tabak, en drugs bij jonge Amsterdammers. Amsterdam: Rozenberg Publishers. ISBN 9789051708103/NUR740
  • Natarajan, M., & Hough, J. M. (2000). Illegal drug markets: From research to prevention policy (p. 11). Criminal Justice Press.
  • NDM. ( 2020). Nationale drugs monitor 2019. Trimbos-instituut.
  • Nicholas, R. (2008). The impact of social networks and not-for-profit illicit drug dealing on illicit drug markets in Australia: A discussion paper. National Drug Law Enforcement Fund (NDLERF).
  • Norbutas, L. (2018). Offline constraints in online drug marketplaces: An exploratory analysis of a cryptomarket trade network. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 56, 92–100.
  • Osborne, G. & Fogel, C., (2008). Understanding the motivations for recreational marijuana use among adult Canadians. Substance Use and Misuse, 43(3 –4), 539–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826080701884911
  • Parker, H., Williams, L., & Aldridge, J. (2002). The normalization of ‘sensible’ recreational drug use: Further evidence from the North West England longitudinal study. Sociology, 36(4), 941–964.
  • Pearson, G. (2007). Drug markets and dealing: From ‘street dealer’ to ‘Mr Big. In M. Simpson, T. Shildrick, & R. MacDonald (Eds.), Drugs in Britain: Supply, consumption and control (pp. 76–91). Palgrave.
  • Pearson, G., & Hobbs, R. (2001). Middle market drug distribution. Home Office.
  • Potter, G. (2009). Exploring retail level drug distribution: Social supply, ‘real’ dealers and the user/dealer interface. In T. Demetrovics, J. Fountain, & L. Kraus (Eds.), Old and new policies, theories, research methods and drug users across Europe (pp. 50–74). Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Potter, G. (2018). Introduction: Drugs, place, space and time. In G. Potter, J. Fountain, & D. J. Korf (Eds.), Place, space and time in European drug use, markets and policy (pp. 11–26). Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Potter, G., Bouchard, M., & Decorte, T. (2011). The globalization of cannabis cultivation. In G. Potter, M. Bouchard, & T. Decorte (Eds.), World wide weed (pp. 21–40). Routledge.
  • Reuter, P. (2009). Systemic violence in drug markets. Crime, Law and Social Change, 52(3), 275–284.
  • Rossi, M. (2020). The cannabis social market (No. 43). Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
  • Rotermann, M. (2020). What has changed since cannabis was legalized? Statistics Canada, Catalogue No. 82-003-X. Health Reports, 31(2), 11–20.
  • Sandberg, S. (2008). Black drug dealers in a white welfare state: Cannabis dealing and street capital in Norway. The British Journal of Criminology, 48(5), 604–619.
  • Scott, J. G., Grigg, J., Barrat, M., & Lenton, S. (2017). Social capital and cannabis supply. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 1–16.
  • Shiner, M. (2009). Drug use and social change. InM. Shiner (Ed.) Drug use and social change: The distortion of history(pp. 158–169). Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 0230222722, 9780230222724
  • Soska, K., & Christin, N. (2015). Measuring the longitudinal evolution of the online anonymous marketplace ecosystem. Proceedings of the 24th USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 33–48), Washington, D.C.
  • Taylor, M., & Potter, G. R. (2013). From “social supply” to “real dealing”: Drift, friendship, and trust in drug dealing careers. Journal of Drug Issues, 43, 392–406.
  • Thanki, D., & Frederick, B. J. (2016). Social media and drug markets. In J. Mounteney, A. Oteo, & P. Griffiths (Eds). The internet and drug markets (EMCDDA: Insights. 21) (pp. 115–123). Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Trautmann, F., Kilmer, B., & Turnbull, P. (2013). Further insights into aspects of the EU illicit drugs market. Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Tzanetakis, M. (2018). Social order of anonymous digital markets: Towards an economic sociology of cryptomarkets. In G. Potter, J. Fountain, & D. J. Korf (Eds.), Place, space and time in european drug use, markets and policy (pp. 61–80). Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Tzanetakis, M., Kamphausen, G., Werse, B., & von Laufenberg, R. (2016). The transparency paradox. Building trust, resolving disputes and optimising logistics on conventional and online drugs markets. The International Journal on Drug Policy, 35, 58–68.
  • Van Hout, M. C. ., & Bingham, T. (2014). Responsible vendors, intelligent consumers: Silk Road, the online revolution in drug trading. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25(2), 183–189.
  • Van Ooyen-Houben, M. & Kleemans, E. (2016). Drug policy: The ‘Dutch model’. Crime and Justice, 44(1):165–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/681551
  • Vlaemynck, M. (2013). Social supply: Methods of data collection. In J. Fountain, M. Wouters, & D. J. Korf (Eds.), Snapshots of social drug research in Europe (pp. 64–65). Pabst Science Publishers.
  • Werse, B. (2008). Retail markets for cannabis-users, sharers, go-betweens and stash dealers. In D. J. Korf, T. Decorte, J. Fountain, L. Kraus, & J. Moskalewicz (Eds.), Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in perception, policy and markets (pp. 106–123). Pabst Science Publisher.
  • Williams, L., & Askew, R. (2016). Maturing on a high: An analysis of trends, prevalence and patterns of recreational drug use in middle and older adulthood. The SAGE handbook of drug and alcohol studies, 447-468.
  • Werse, B., Benschop, A., Kamphausen, G., van Hout, M. C., Henriques, S., Silva, J. P., Dąbrowska, K., Wieczorek, L., Bujalski, M., Felvinczi, K., & Korf, D. J. (2019). Sharing, group-buying, social supply, offline and online dealers: How users in a sample from six European countries procure new psychoactive substances (NPS). International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17(5), 1237–1251.