Augmented reality learning environment for physiotherapy education

References

• Jones MA, Jensen G, Edwards I. Clinical reasoning in physiotherapy. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. p. 245–56.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs J. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Amsterdam: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• McMeeken J, Webb G, Krause K-L, Grant R, Garnett R. Learning outcomes and curriculum development in Australian physiotherapy education. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. Expertise and tacit knowledge in medicine. In: Sternberg RJ, Horvath JA, editors. Tacit knowledge in professional practice: researcher and practitioner perspectives. New Jersey: Psychology Press; 1999. p. 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Audétat M-C, Laurin S, Sanche G, Béïque C, Fon NC, Blais JG, et al. Clinical reasoning difficulties: a taxonomy for clinical teachers. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):984–9.10.3109/0142159X.2012.733041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2005;39(1):98–106.10.1111/med.2005.39.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3(2):83–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphuis C, Barsom E, Schijven M, Christoph N. Augmented reality in medical education? Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3(4):300–11.10.1007/s40037-013-0107-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Azuma RT. A survey of augmented reality. Presence Teleop Virtual Environ. 1997 Aug 1;6(4):355–85.10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kancherla AR, Rolland JP, Wright DL, Burdea G. A novel virtual reality tool for teaching dynamic 3D anatomy. In: Ayache N, editor. Computer vision, virtual reality and robotics in medicine. Lecture notes in Computer Science. Vol. 905. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 163–9.10.1007/978-3-540-49197-2
   Google Scholar
• Rolland J, Davis L, Hamza-Lup F, Daly J, Ha Y, Martin G, et al. Development of a training tool for endotracheal intubation: distributed augmented reality. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;288–94.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakellariou S, Ward BM, Charissis V, Chanock D, Anderson P. Design and implementation of augmented reality environment for complex anatomy training: inguinal canal case study. In: Shumaker R, editor. Virtual and mixed reality. VMR 2009. Lecture notes in Computer Science. Vol. 5622. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p. 605–14.
   Google Scholar
• Blum T, Kleeberger V, Bichlmeier C, Navab N. Mirracle: An augmented reality magic mirror system for anatomy education. In IEEE virtual reality workshops (VRW). Costa Mesa: IEEE; 2012. p. 115–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber O, Raskar R. Spatial augmented reality: merging real and virtual worlds. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2005.10.1201/b10624
   Google Scholar
• Johnson AS, Sun Y. Spatial augmented reality on person: exploring the most personal medium. In: Randall S, editor. Virtual augmented and mixed reality. Designing and developing augmented and virtual environments. VAMR 2013. Lecture notes in Computer Science. Vol. 8021. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 169–74.10.1007/978-3-642-39405-8
   Google Scholar
• Ni T, Karlson AK, Wigdor D. AnatOnMe: facilitating doctor-patient communication using a projection-based handheld device. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York City (NY): ACM; 2011. p. 3333–42.
   Google Scholar
• Soloway E, Jackson SL, Klein J, Quintana C, Reed J, Spitulnik J et al. Learning theory in practice: case studies of learner-centered design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York City (NY): ACM; 1996. p. 189–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hoang T, Reinoso M, Joukhadar Z, Vetere F, Kelly D. Augmented studio: projection mapping on moving body for physiotherapy education. In: Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Denver: ACM; 2017. p. 1419–30
   Google Scholar
• Maloney S, Storr M, Paynter S, Morgan P, Ilic D. Investigating the efficacy of practical skill teaching: a pilot-study comparing three educational methods. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2013;18(1):71–80.10.1007/s10459-012-9355-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salyers VL. Teaching psychomotor skills to beginning nursing students using a web-enhanced approach: a quasi-experimental study. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2007;4(1):1373.
   Google Scholar
• McMenamin PG. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1(4):139–44.10.1002/(ISSN)1935-9772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James DL, Twigg CD. Skinning mesh animations. ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Papers. Los Angeles (CA): ACM; 2005. p. 399–407.10.1145/1186822
   Google Scholar
• Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003;19(4):9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Wallace R, Soloway E, Krajcik J, Bos N, Hoffman J, Hunter HE et al. ARTEMIS: learner-centered design of an information seeking environment for K-12 education. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Los Angeles (CA): ACM Press/Addison-Wesley; 1998. p. 195–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson SL, Krajcik J, Soloway E. The design of guided learner-adaptable scaffolding in interactive learning environments. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Los Angeles (CA): ACM Press/Addison-Wesley; 1998:187–94.10.1145/274644
   Google Scholar
• Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett M, Proctor M. Three-dimensional display technologies for anatomical education: a literature review. J Sci Educ Technol. 2016;25(4):641–54.10.1007/s10956-016-9619-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-Torregrosa J, Torralba J, Jimenez M, García S, Barcia J. ARBOOK: development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. J Sci Educ Technol. 2015;24(1):119–24.10.1007/s10956-014-9526-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luchini K, Quintana C, Soloway E. Design guidelines for learner-centered handheld tools. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vienna: ACM; 2004. p. 135–42.
   Google Scholar