Virtual reality in physical rehabilitation: a narrative review and critical reflection

References

• King DL, Herd MCE, Delfabbro PH. Tolerance in internet gaming disorder: a need for increasing gaming time or something else? J Behav Addict. 2017;6(4):525–533.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Pub.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen J, Verschuren O, Renger WJ, et al. Gamification in physical therapy: more than using games. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 2017;29(1):95–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsawaier RS. The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. IJILT. 2018;35(1):56–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajani NB, Weth D, Mastellos N, et al. Use of gamification strategies and tactics in mobile applications for smoking cessation: a review of the UK mobile app market. BMJ Open. 2019;9(6):e027883.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffman HG, Meyer WJ, Ramirez M, et al. Feasibility of articulated arm mounted oculus rift virtual reality goggles for adjunctive pain control during occupational therapy in pediatric burn patients. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2014;17(6):397–401. Available from: www.liebertpub.com.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarig Bahat H, Croft K, Carter C, et al. Remote kinematic training for patients with chronic neck pain: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(6):1309–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagheri R. Virtual reality: the real life consequences. UC Davis Bus Law J. 2017;17:102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Keshner EA, Weiss PT, Geifman D, et al. Tracking the evolution of virtual reality applications to rehabilitation as a field of study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2019;16(1):15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson PN, Foreman N, Stanton D. Virtual reality, disability and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 1997;19(6):213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milgram P, Kishino F. Taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans Inf Syst. 1994;E77-D:1321–1329. Available from: https://search.ieice.org/bin/summary.php?id=e77-d_12_1321.
   Google Scholar
• Walton DM. Physiotherapy’s place in a rapidly changing world: a pan-canadian perspective of threats facing practice from the physio moves Canada project, part 2. Physiother Can. 2020;72(1):34–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Google. Google Ngram Viewer “virtual reality”. 2019. Available from: https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=virtual+reality&year_start=1800&year_end=2000&corpus=15&smoothing=3&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cvirtualreality%3B%2Cc0.
   Google Scholar
• Bown J, White E, Boopalan A. Looking for the ultimate display: a brief history of virtual reality. In: Boundaries of self and reality online: Implications of digitally constructed realities. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Inc.; 2017. p. 239–259.
   Google Scholar
• Weinbaum SG. Pygmalion’s Spectacles. Novato, CA: Jeremy Norman & Co; 1935.
   Google Scholar
• Boas YAGV. Overview of virtual reality technologies. East Central Europe. 2015;42:48–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fluke CJ, Barnes DG. The ultimate display. Proceedings of the IFIP Congress; 2016. 2:p. 506–508.
   Google Scholar
• SUTHERLAND IE. Head-mounted three dimensional display. Proceedings of the December 9–11, 1968, Fall Joint Computer Conference, Part I on - AFIPS ’68 (Fall, part I). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 1968. p. 757–764.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger MW. Responsive environments. AFIPS Conference Proceedings - 1977 National Computer Conference, AFIPS 1977. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press; 1977. p. 423–434.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman WR, Craig AB. Understanding virtual reality: interface, application, and design. Understanding virtual reality: Interface, application, and design. 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder R. Virtual reality in the real world. History, applications and projections. Futures. 1993;25(9):963–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S. Brief introduction of virtual reality & its challenges. Int J Sci Eng Res. 2013;4:304–309.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Neira C, Sandin DJ, DeFanti TA. Surround-screen projection-based virtual reality: the design and implementation of the CAVE. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, SIGGRAPH 1993; 1993. p. 135–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz-Neira C, Sandin DJ, DeFanti TA, et al. The CAVE: audio visual experience automatic virtual environment. Commun. ACM. 1992;35(6):64–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachara M, Zagal JP. Challenges for success in stereo gaming: a virtual boy case study. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; 2009. p. 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman DA, McMahan RP. Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2007;40(7):36–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes CE, Stapleton CB, Hughes DE, et al. Mixed reality in education, entertainment, and training. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2005;25(6):24–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss PL, Rand D, Katz N, et al. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehab. 2004;1(1):12. Available from: http://www.eyetoy.com.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka K, Parker JR, Baradoy G, et al. A comparison of exergaming interfaces for use in rehabilitation programs and research. Loading. 2012;6:69–81. Available from: http://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/107.
   Google Scholar
• Parry I, Carbullido C, Kawada J, et al. Keeping up with video game technology: objective analysis of xbox KinectTM and PlayStation 3 MoveTM for use in burn rehabilitation. Burns. 2014;40(5):852–859. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2013.11.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Avila L, Bailey M. Virtual reality for the masses. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2014;34(5):103–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baldominos A, Saez Y, Del Pozo CG. An approach to physical rehabilitation using state-of-the-art virtual reality and motion tracking technologies. Procedia Comput Sci. 2015;64:10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Anthes C, García-Hernández RJ, Wiedemann M, et al. State of the art of virtual reality technology. IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings; 2016. p. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Heineman DS. Porting game studies research to virtual reality. New Media Soc. 2016;18(11):2793–2799.
   Google Scholar
• Rajesh Desai P, Nikhil Desai P, Deepak Ajmera K, DJSCOE, Vile - Parle (W), Mumbai, et al. A review paper on oculus Rift-A virtual reality headset. IJETT. 2014;13(4):175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Monica R, Aleotti J. Evaluation of the oculus rift S tracking system in room scale virtual reality. Virtual Reality. 2022;1:1–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-022-00637-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas AP. Review: The oculus quest is virtual reality’s best bet yet. Time. 2019. Available from: https://time.com/5584275/oculus-quest-review/.
   Google Scholar
• Ma F, Pan X. Visual fidelity effects on expressive self-avatar in virtual reality: First impressions matter. 2022 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR); 2022. 57–65. Available from: https://research.gold.ac.uk/id/eprint/31676/.
   Google Scholar
• Lai Z, Hu YC, Cui Y, et al. Furion: engineering high-qality immersive virtual reality on today’s mobile devices. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM; 2017. p. 409–421.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf WJ. Developing the tools for practical VR applications. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 1996;15(2):23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gobron SC, Zannini N, Wenk N, et al. Serious games for rehabilitation using head-mounted display and haptic devices. In: International Conference on Augmented and Virtual Reality. Springer, Cham; 2015. p. 199–219.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlen T, Dohle C. Virtual reality for physically disabled people. Comput Biol Med. 1995;25(2):205–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2005;8(3):187–211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albani G, Pignatti R, Bertella L, et al. Common daily activities in the virtual environment: a preliminary study in parkinsonian patients. Neurol Sci. 2002;23(0):s49–s50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang L, Abreu BC, Seale GS, et al. A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: reliability and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2003;84(8):1118–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshner EA. Virtual reality and physical rehabilitation: a new toy or a new research and rehabilitation tool? J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2004;1(1):1–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2004;1(1):10–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher BE, Morton SM, Lang CE. From motor learning to physical therapy and back again: the state of the art and science of motor learning rehabilitation research. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2014;38(3):149–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen M. Telerehabilitation. NRE. 1999;12(1):11–26.
   Google Scholar
• Feintuch U, Raz L, Hwang J, et al. Integrating haptic-tactile feedback into a video-capture-based virtual environment for rehabilitation. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2006;9(2):129–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rand D, Kizony R, Weiss P. T. L. The sony PlayStation II EyeToy: low-cost virtual reality for use in rehabilitation. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008;32(4):155–163. (
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JC. Hacking the nintendo wii remote. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2008;7(3):39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston HR, Greenlay S, Van Hoof J. Understanding the nintendo wii console in long-term care facilities understanding the nintendo wii and microsoft kinect consoles in long-term care facilities. TAD. 2013;25(2):77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Bateni H. Changes in balance in older adults based on use of physical therapy vs the wii fit gaming system: a preliminary study. Physiotherapy. 2012;98(3):211–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange B, Chang CY, Suma E, et al. Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the microsoft kinect sensor. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS. IEEE; 2011. p. 1831–1834.
   Google Scholar
• Guzsvinecz T, Szucs V, Sik-Lanyi C. Suitability of the kinect sensor and leap motion controller-a literature review. Sensors (Switzerland). 2019;19(5):1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang CY, Lange B, Zhang M, et al. Towards pervasive physical rehabilitation using microsoft kinect. 2012 6th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, Pervasive Health; 2012. p. 159–162.
   Google Scholar
• Chessa M, Maiello G, Borsari A, et al. The perceptual quality of the oculus rift for immersive virtual reality. Hum Comput Interact. 2019;34(1):51–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Lubetzky A, Gospodarek M, et al. Virtual environments for rehabilitation of postural control dysfunction. arXiv. 2019; 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill S, Nguyen A, Rodriguez ST, et al. Mobilization and calibration of the HTC VIVE for virtual reality physical therapy. Digit Health. 2020;6:2055207620950929.
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill S, Rodriguez S, Wang E, et al. Virtual reality augments movement during physical therapy: a pragmatic randomized trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;101(3):229–236. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33935153/.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levac D, Glegg S, Colquhoun H, et al. Virtual reality and active videogame-based practice, learning needs, and preferences: a cross-Canada survey of physical therapists and occupational therapists. Games Health J. 2017;6(4):217–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss P, Keshner E, Levin M. Virtual reality for physical and motor rehabilitation. Virtual Reality. New York, NY: Springer; 2014. pp. 144–161.
   Google Scholar
• Walton DM. Physiotherapists’ perspectives on the threats facing their profession in the areas of leadership, burnout, and branding: a pan-Canadian perspective from the physio moves Canada project, part 3. Physiother Can. 2020;72(1):43–51. Available from: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0061.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholls DA. The end of physiotherapy. The end of physiotherapy. London, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kenwright B. Virtual reality: Ethical challenges and dangers [opinion]. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 2018;37(4):20–25. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8558774/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorn SD. Digital health: hope, hype, and amara’s law. Gastroenterology. W.B. Saunders. 2015;149(3):516–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Levac DE. Barriers, facilitators and interventions to support virtual reality implementation in rehabilitation: a scoping review. Pm R. 2018;10(11):1237–1251.e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laver K, George S, Ratcliffe J, et al. Virtual reality stroke rehabilitation – hype or hope? Aust Occup Ther J. 2011;58(3):215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serino M, Cordrey K, McLaughlin L, et al. Pokémon go and augmented virtual reality games: a cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Curr Opin Pediatrs. 2016;28(5):673–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canning CG, Allen NE, Nackaerts E, et al. Virtual reality in research and rehabilitation of gait and balance in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2020;16(8):409–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiegel JS. The ethics of virtual reality technology: social hazards and public policy recommendations. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018;24(5):1537–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac DE, Galvin J. When is virtual reality “therapy”? Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94(4):795–798. WBSaunders;
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krasovsky T, Lubetzky A v, Archambault PS, et al. Will virtual rehabilitation replace clinicians: a contemporary debate about technological versus human obsolescence. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020;17(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuentes J, Armijo-Olivo S, Funabashi M, et al. Enhanced therapeutic alliance modulates pain intensity and muscle pain sensitivity in patients with chronic low back pain: an experimental controlled study. Phys Ther. 2014;94(4):477–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath AO, Luborsky L. The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61(4):561–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AC. COVID-19 and the advancement of digital physical therapist practice and telehealth. Phys Ther. 2020;100(7):1054–1057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottrell MA, Galea OA, O'Leary SP, et al. Clinical rehabilitation real-time telerehabilitation for the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions is effective and comparable to standard practice: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(5):625–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walton DM. Physiotherapists’ perspectives on the threats posed to their profession in the areas of training, education, and knowledge exchange: a pan-Canadian perspective from the physio moves Canada project, part 1. Physiother Can. 2020;72(1):26–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glegg SMN, Levac DE. Enhancing clinical implementation of virtual reality. International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR; 2017. p. 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon SA, Yeung E, Shaw JA, et al. Seven-Step framework for critical analysis and its application in the field of physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2017;97(2):249–257. Available from: 10.2522/ptj.20160149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin MF, Weiss PL, Keshner EA. Emergence of virtual reality as a tool for upper limb rehabilitation: incorporation of motor control and motor learning principles. Phys Ther. 2015;95(3):415–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig ST, Krch D, Lange BS, et al. Virtual reality and rehabilitation. Handbook of rehabilitation psychology. 3rd ed. Washington DC, USA: American Psychological Association; 2019. p. 521–539. Available from: /record/2019-25330-032.
   Google Scholar
• Rodeschini G. Gerotechnology: a new kind of care for aging? An analysis of the relationship between older people and technology. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(4):521–528. Available from: 10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00634.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar