Nonionic surfactant structure on the drug release, formulation and physical properties of ethylcellulose microspheres

References

• Thakare M, Israel B, Garner ST, et al. Formulation parameters and release mechanism of theophylline loaded ethyl cellulose microspheres: effect of different dual surfactant ratios. Pharm Develop Technol 2013;18:1213–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. Key structure of Brij for overcoming multidrug resistance in cancer. Biomacromolecules 2013;14:424–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai V, Tan HS, Michniak-Kohm B. Effect of surfactants and pH on naltrexone (NTX) permeation across buccal mucosa. Int J Pharm 2011;411:92–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson F, Olbe M, Sommarin M, Larsson C. Brij 58, a polyoxuethylene acyl ether, creates membrane vesicles of uniform sidedness. A new tool to obtain inside-out (cytoplasmic side-out) plasma membrane vesicles. Plant J 1995;7:165–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pachuau L, Mazumder B. A study on the effects of different surfactants on ethylcellulose microspheres. Int J PharmTech Res 2009;1:966–971.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Lv G, Tang Y, et al. Preparation and properties of BSA-loaded microspheres based on multi-(amino acid) copolymer for protein delivery. Int J Nanomed 2014;9:1957–1965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie C, Stinga G, Iovescu A, et al. The influence of nonionic surfactants on the carbopol-PEG interpolymer complexes. Rev Roum Chim 2010;55:409–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivadasan K, Somasundaran P. Polymer-surfactant interactions and the association behavior of hydrophobically modified hydroxyethylcellulose. Colloids Surfaces 1990;49:229–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santo S, Medronho B, dos Santos T, Antunes FE. Drug delivery systems: advanced technologies potentially applicable in personalised treatment, advances in predictive, preventive and personalised medicine. In: Coehlo J, ed. Amphipilic molecules in drug delivery. Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg; 2013: 35–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sojaee S, Emami P, Mahmood A, et al. An investigation on the effect of polyethylene oxide concentration and particle size in modulating theophylline release from tablet matrices. AAPS PharmSciTech 2015;16:1281–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodmeir R, McGinty JW. The preparation and evaluation of drug-containing poly (dl-lactide) microspheres formed by the solvent evaporation method. Pharm Res 1987; 4:465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas S, Merkle H, Gander B. Microencapsulation by solvent extraction/evaporation: reviewing the state of the art of microsphere preparation process technology. J Control Release 2005;102:313–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki Y, Onuki Y, Yakou S, Takayama K. Effect of temperature-increase rate on drug release characteristics of dextran microspheres prepared by emulsion solvent evaporation process. Int J Pharm 2006;324:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang YY, Chia HH, Chung TS. Effect of preparation temperature on the characteristics and release profiles of PLGA micro spheres containing protein fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. J Control Release 2000;69:81–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla A, Price JC. Effect of drug loading and molecular weight of cellulose acetate propionate on the release characteristics of theophylline microspheres. Pharm Res 1991;8:1396–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amsden B. The production of uniformly sized polymer microspheres. Pharm Res 1999;16:1140–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freiberg S, Zhu XX. Polymer microspheres for controlled drug release. Int J Pharm 2004;282:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Rouaud D, Poncelet D. Microencapsulation by solvent evaporation: state of the art for process engineering approaches. Int J Pharm 2008;363:26–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada H. One and three month release injectable microspheres of the LH-RH superagonist leuprorelin acetate. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 1997;28:43–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin WC. Classification of surface-active agents. J Soc Cosmetic Chem 1949;1:311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan OI, Healy AM. Surfactants in pharmaceutical products and systems. In: James S, ed. Encyclopedia pharmaceutical technology. 3rd ed. Vol. 1. New York: Informa Healthcare; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Berthod A, Tomer S. Polyoxyethelene alkyl ether nonionic surfactants: physicochemical properties and use for cholesterol determination in food. Talanta 2001;55:69–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu YH, Fu X, Wang J, Xiaozhen GT. Morphology control between microspheres and nanofibers by solvent-induced approach based on crosslinked phosphazene-containing materials. Mater Sci Eng B 2008;153:62–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao S, Shi Y. Effects of process and formulation parameters on characteristics and internal morphology of poly(d, l-lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres formed by the solvent evaporation method. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2008;68:214–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeidat WM, Price JC. Preparation and evaluation of Eudragit S100 microspheres as pH sensitive release proparations for piroxicam and theophylline using the emulsion-solvent evaporation method. J Microencapsul 2006;23:195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeidat W, Price JC. Viscosity of polymer solution phase and other factors controlling the dissolution of theophylline microspheres prepared by the emulsion solvent evaporation method. J Microencapsul 2003;20:57–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar