Evaluation and prediction of powder flowability in pharmaceutical tableting

References

• Bauer-Brandl A, Ritschel WA. 2012. Die Tablette, Handbuch der Entwicklung, Herstellung und Qualitätssicherung. 3rd ed. Aulendorf: Cantor-Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Beverloo WA, Leniger HA, van de Velde J. 1961. The flow of granular solids through orifices. Chem Eng Sci. 15:260–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierwisch C, Kraft T, Riedel H, Moseler M. 2009a. Three-dimensional discrete element models for the granular statics and dynamics of powders in cavity filling. J Mech Phys Solids. 57:10–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierwisch C, Kraft T, Riedel H, Moseler M. 2009b. Die filling optimization using three-dimensional discrete element modeling. Powder Technol. 196:169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capece M, Raimundo H, Strong J, Goa P. 2015. Prediction of powder flow performance using a multi-component granular bond number. Powder Technol. 286:561–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capece M, Ruiz Silva K, Sunkara D, Strong J, Goa P. 2016. On the relationship of inter-particle cohesiveness and bulk powder behaviour: Flowability of pharmaceutical powders. Int J Pharm. 511:178–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FETTE Compacting GmbH, FE 75. 2016. [accessed 2016 December 6]. http://www.fette-compacting.com/fe75-productivity-redefined/
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick JJ, Barringer SA, Iqbal T. 2004. Flow property measurement of food powders and sensitivity of Jenike's hopper design methodology to the measured values. J Food Eng. 61:399–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa R, Shiosaka Y, Kadota K, Takagaki K, Noguchi T, Schimosaka A, Schirakawa Y. 2016. Size-induced segregation during pharmaceutical particle die filling assessed by response surface methodology using discrete element method. J Drug Deliv Sci Tec. 35:284–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garthwaite P. 1994. An interpretation of partial least squares. J Am Stat Assoc. 89:122–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzler M, Michaels JN, Tardos GI. 2015. Quantification of segregation potential for polydisperse, cohesive, multi-component powders and prediction of tablet die-filling performance – a methodology for practical testing, re-formulation and process design. Powder Technol. 285:96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopireddy SR, Hildebrandt C, Urbanetz NA. 2016. Numerical simulation of powder flow in a pharmaceutical tablet press lab-scale gravity feeder. Powder Technol. 302:309–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Kafui KD, Wu CY, Thornton C, Seville JPK. 2009. A coupled DEM/CFD analysis of the effect of air on powder flow during die filling. AIChE J. 55:49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Wu CY, Kafui KD, Thornton C. 2010. Numerical analysis of density-induced segregation during die filling. Powder Technol. 197:111–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Wu CY, Kafui KD, Thornton C. 2011. 3D DEM/CFD analysis of size-induced segregation during die filling. Powder Technol. 206:177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausner HH. 1972. Effect of quench sintering on the grain structure of sintered metals. Int J Powder Metall. 8:159–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiestand EN. 2002. Mechanics and physical principles for powders and compacts: Foundations of pharmaceutical sciences series. 1st ed. West Lafayette (IN): SSCI Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hou H, Sun CC. 2008. Quantifying effects of particulate properties on powder flow properties using a ring shear tester. J Pharm Sci. 97:4030–4039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson S, Sinka IC, Cocks ACF. 2007. The effect of suction during die fill on a rotary tablet press. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 65:253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager PD, Bramante T. 2015. Assessment of pharmaceutical powder flowability using shear cell-based methods and application of Jenike's Methodology. J Pharm Sci. 104:3804–3813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenike W. 1964. Storage and flow of solids. Bulletin of the Utah engineering experiment station (Issue 123). Salt Lake City (Utah): University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Jivraj M, Martini LG, Thomson CM. 2000. An overview of the different excipients useful for the direct compression of tablets. Pharm Sci Technol. Today. 3:58–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johanson K. 2009. Effect of particle shape on unconfined yield strength. Powder Technol. 194:246–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketterhagen WR. 2015. Simulation of powder flow in a lab-scale tablet press feed frame: effects of design and operating parameters on measures of tablet quality. Powder Technol. 275:361–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leturia M, Benali M, Lagarde S, Ronga I, Saleh K. 2014. Characterization of flow properties of cohesive powders: a comparative study of traditional and new testing methods. Powder Technol. 253:406–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leyva N, Mullarney MP. 2009. Modeling pharmaceutical powder-flow performance using particle-size distribution data. Pharm Technol. 33:126–134.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli J, Carson JW. 2002. Solve solids flow problems in bins, hoppers, and feeders. Chem Eng Prog. 98:24–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills LA, Sinka IC. 2013. Effect of particle size and density on the die fill of powders. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 84:642–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nwose EN, Pei C, Wu CY. 2012. Modelling die filling with charged particles using DEM/CFD. Particuology. 10:229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ph. Eur. 2016. European pharmacopoeia. 8th ed. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Mia Y. 1996. The influence of particle size and shape on the angle of internal friction and the flow factor of unlubricated and lubricated powders. Int J Pharm. 144:187–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prescott JK, Barnum RA. 2000. On powder flowability. Pharm Technol. 24:60–85.
   Google Scholar
• Razali NM, Wah YB. 2012. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J Stat Modeling Anal. 2:21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Rios M. 2006. Developments in powder flow testing. Pharm Technol. 30:38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider LCR, Cocks ACF, Apostolopoulos A. 2005. Ceramic comparison of filling behaviour of metallic, ceramic, hardmetal and magnetic powders. Powder Metall. 48:77–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider LCR, Sinka IC, Cocks ACF. 2007. Characterisation of the flow behaviour of pharmaceutical powders using a model die–shoe filling system. Powder Technol. 173:59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulze D. 2007. Powders and bulk solids. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schwedes J. 2005. Review on testers for measuring flow properties of bulk solids. Granul Matter. 5:1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinka IC, Schneider LCR, Cocks ACF. 2004. Measurement of the flow properties of powders with special reference to die fill. Int J Pharm. 280:27–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinka IC, Motazedian F, Cocks ACF, Pitt KG. 2009. The effect of processing parameters on pharmaceutical tablet properties. Powder Technol. 189:276–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun CC. 2010. Setting the bar for powder flow properties in successful high speed tableting. Powder Technol. 201:106–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svarovskly L. 1987. Powder testing guide, methods of measuring the physical properties of bulk powders. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• USP 29-NF 24, US Pharmacopeial Convention, “<1174> Powder Flow”, p. 3017.
   Google Scholar
• Wold S, Sjöström M, Eriksson L. 2001. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 58:109–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Dihoru L, Cocks ACF. 2003. The flow of powder into simple and stepped dies. Powder Technol. 134:24–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Cocks ACF. 2004. Flow behaviour of powders during die filling. Powder Metall. 47:127–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Cocks ACF. 2006. Numerical and experimental investigations of the flow of powder into a confined space. Mech Mater. 38:304–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY. 2008. DEM simulations of die filling during pharmaceutical tableting. Particuology. 6:412–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Armstrong B, Vlachos N. 2011. Characterization of powder flowability for die filling. Particul Sci Technol. 30:378–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CY, Guo Y. 2012. Numerical modelling of suction filling using DEM/CFD. Chem Eng Sci. 73:231–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaginuma Y, Ozeki Y, Kakizawa M, Gomi SJ, Watanabe Y. 2007. Effects of powder flowability on die-fill properties in rotary compression. J Drug Deliv Sci Tec. 17:205–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W, Muteki K. 2011. Prediction of bulk powder flow performance using comprehensive particle size and particle shape distributions. J Pharm Sci. 100:284–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zettler A, Hilden J, Koenig M, Breslin C, Aburub A, Allgeier M, Patel P, Mitra B. 2016. Evaluation of small-scale powder flow characterization tests in the prediction of large-scale process failures. J Pharm Innov. 11:189–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu HP, Zhou ZY, Yang RY, Yu AB. 2007. Discrete particle simulation of particulate systems: theoretical developments. Chem Eng Sci. 62:3378–3396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar