Acoustic emission detection of crystallization in two forms: monohydrate and anhydrous citric acid

References

• Albion K, Briens L, Briens C, Berruti F, McDougall S. 2009. Detection of oversized material in a hydrotransport slurry pipe using a non-invasive acoustic method. Powder Technol. 190:361–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albion K, Briens L, Briens C, Berruti F. 2006. Detection of the breakage of pharmaceutical tablets in pneumatic transport. Int J Pharm. 322:119–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan P, Bellamy LJ, Nordon A, Littlejohn D. 2010. Non-invasive monitoring of the mixing of pharmaceutical powders by broadband acoustic emission. Analyst. 135:518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apelblat A, Manzurola E. 1987. Solubility of oxalic, malonic, succinic, adipic, maleic, malic, citric, and tartaric acids in water from 278.15 to 338.15 K. J Chem. Thermodyn. 19:317–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apelblat A. 2014. Citric Acid. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. p. 13–32.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett P, Smith B, Worlitschek J, Bracken V, O'Sullivan B, O'Grady D. 2005. A review of the use of process analytical technology for the understanding and optimization of production batch crystallization processes. Org Process Res Dev. 9:348–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briens L, Daniher D, Tallevi A. 2007. Monitoring high-shear granulations using sound and vibration measurements. Int J Pharm. 331:54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniher D, Briens L, Tallevi A. 2008. End-point detection in high-shear granulation using sound and vibration signal analysis. Powder Technol. 181:130–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersen A, Smith A, Chotard T. 2006. Effect of malic and citric acid on the crystallisation of gypsum investigated by coupled acoustic emission and electrical conductivity techniques. J Mater Sci. 41:7210–7217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Févotte G, Gherras N. 2012. Acoustic Emission: a new in-line and non-intrusive sensor for monitoring batch solution crystallization operations. IFAC Proceedings. 45:178–185.
   Google Scholar
• Fevotte G. 2002. New perspectives for the on-line monitoring of pharmaceutical crystallization processes using in situ infrared spectroscopy. Int J Pharm. 241:263–278.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Findlay WP, Peck GR, Morris KR. 2005. Determination of fluidized bed granulation end point using near-infrared spectroscopy and phenomenological analysis. J Pharm Sci. 94:604–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Dennis AB, Tobyn M. 2009. Monitoring and end-point prediction of a small scale wet granulation process using acoustic emission. Pharm Dev Technol. 14:299–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherras N, Fevotte G. 2012. On the use of process analytical technologies and population balance equations for the estimation of crystallization kinetics. A case study. AIChE J. 58:2650–2664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherras N, Serris E, Fevotte G. 2012. Monitoring industrial pharmaceutical crystallization processes using acoustic emission in pure and impure media. Int J Pharm. 439:109–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guyomar D, Lallart M, Monnier T, Wang XJ, Petit L. 2009. Passive impact location estimation using piezoelectric sensors. Structural Health Monitoring. 8:357–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyomar D, Lallart M, Petit L, Wang X-J. 2011. Impact localization and energy quantification based on the power flow: a low-power requirement approach. J Sound Vibration. 330:3270–3283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyomar D, Wang XJ, Petit L, Lallart M, Monnier T, Yuse K, Audigier D. 2011. Modeling of transient bending wave in an infinite plate and its coupling to arbitrary shaped piezoelements. Sens Actuator A-Phys. 171:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansuld EM, Briens L, McCann JAB, Sayani A. 2009. Audible acoustics in high-shear wet granulation: application of frequency filtering. Int J Pharm. 378:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich J, Ulrich J. 2012. Application of laser-backscattering instruments for in situ monitoring of crystallization processes – a review. Chem Eng Technol. 35:967–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu XH, Cunningham JC, Winstead D. 2008. Study growth kinetics in fluidized bed granulation with at-line FBRM. Int J Pharm. 347:54–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsler LE, Frey AR, Coppens AB, Sanders JV. 1999. Fundamentals of Acoustics. New York: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Laitinen N, Antikainen O, Rantanen J, Yliruusi J. 2004. New perspectives for visual characterization of pharmaceutical solids. J Pharm Sci. 93:165–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lube EL, Zlatkin AT. 1989. In-process monitoring of crystal perfection during melt growth. J Cryst Growth. 98:817–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matero S, Poutiainen S, Leskinen J, Järvinen K, Ketolainen J, Reinikainen SP, Hakulinen M, Lappalainen R, Poso A. 2009. The feasibility of using acoustic emissions for monitoring of fluidized bed granulation. Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 97:75–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Närvänen T, Lipsanen T, Antikainen O, Räikkonen H, Heinämäki J, Yliruusi J. 2009. Gaining fluid bed process understanding by in-line particle size analysis. J Pharm Sci. 98:1110–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordon A, Carella Y, Gachagan A, Littlejohn D, Hayward G. 2006. Factors affecting broadband acoustic emission measurements of a heterogeneous reaction. Analyst. 131:323–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordon A, Waddell RJH, Bellamy LJ, Gachagan A, McNab D, Littlejohn D, Hayward G. 2004. Monitoring of a heterogeneous reaction by acoustic emission. Analyst. 129:463–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poutiainen S, Matero S, Hämäläinen T, Leskinen J, Ketolainen J, Järvinen K. 2012. Predicting granule size distribution of a fluidized bed spray granulation process by regime based PLS modeling of acoustic emission data. Powder Technol. 228:149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rantanen J, Wikstrom H, Turner R, Taylor LS. 2005. Use of in-line near-infrared spectroscopy in combination with chemometrics for improved understanding of pharmaceutical processes. Anal Chem. 77:556–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawada T, Gohshi Y, Abe C, Furuya K. 1985. Acoutics emission from phase transition of some chemicals. Anal Chem. 57:1743–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervloet D, Nijenhuis J, van Ommen JR. 2010. Monitoring a lab-scale fluidized bed dryer: a comparison between pressure transducers, passive acoustic emissions and vibration measurements. Powder Technol. 197:36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade AP. 1990. Acoustic emission: is industry listening? Chemom Intell Lab Syst. 8:305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JD, Ren CJ, Yang YR. 2010. Characterization of flow regime transition and particle motion using acoustic emission measurement in a gas–solid fluidized bed. AIChE J. 56:1173–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Févotte G, Huang Y, Michelitsch T. 2016. Study of acoustic emission during the cooling crystallization of citric acid. Powder Technol. 301:70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Guyomar D, Yuse K, Lallart M, Petit L. 2010. Impact force detection using an energy flow estimator with piezoelectric sensors. Front Mech Eng China. 5:194–203.
   Google Scholar
• Wang XJ, Huang Y. 2017. An investigation of the acoustic emission generated during crystallization process of salicylic acid. Powder Technol. 311:350–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watano S. 2001. Direct control of wet granulation processes by image processing system. Powder Technol. 117:163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YF, Dong KZ, Zhengliang H, Wang JD, Yang YR. 2011. Fault detection based on acoustic emission-early agglomeration recognition system in fluidized bed reactor. Ind Eng Chem Res. 50:8476–8484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar