Gendered Organizations: How Human Resource Management Practices Produce and Reproduce Administrative Man

REFERENCES

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (1992). Gendered institutions: From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569. doi:10.2307/2075528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2000). Revisiting class: Thinking from gender, race, and organizations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Acker, J. (2007). Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. In J. Z. Spade & C. G. Valentine (Eds.), The kaleidoscope of gender; Prisms, patterns, and possibilities (2nd ed., pp. 345–355). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J. N., Hannan, M. T., Hsu, G., & Kocak, O. (2007). In the company of women: Gender inequality and the logic of bureaucracy in start-up firms. Work and Occupations, 34(1), 35–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, J. (2011). Status of telework in the federal government: Report to congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Retrieved July 21, 2011 from https://www.telework.gov/reports-studies/reports-to-congress/2010-report-to-congress.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, J. S. (2010). The success of failure: The paradox of performance pay. Review of Public Personnel Management, 30(1), 70–88. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 09351824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannen, J., Dodd, K., Oakley, A., & Storey, P. (1994). Young People, Health, and Family Life. Birmingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, D. M. (2000). The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender & Society, 14(3), 418–434. doi:10.1177/089124300014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, W., & Reed, C. (1994). Preparing supervisors for the future work force: The dual-income couple and the work-family dichotomy. Public Administration Review, 54(1), 36–43. doi:10.2307/976496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, S. B., Gatrell, C. J., Cooper, S. L., & Sparrow, P. (2013). Fathers at work: A ghost in the organizational machine. Gender, Work & Organization, 20(6), 632–646. doi:10.1111/gwao.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. (2006). Masculine markets and feminine care: A gender analysis of the National performance review. Public Administration Review, 66(6), 861–872. doi:10.1111/j.1540–6210.2006.00654.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. L. (2003). Finding a voice: Gender and subjectivity in public administration research and writing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 25(1), 37–60. doi:10.1080/10841806.2003.11029390
   Google Scholar
• Burnier, D. L. (2005). Bringing gender into view. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 394–400.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Chen, Q. (2012). The mechanism of gender difference and representation role in negotiation. Public Personnel Management, 41(5), 91–103. doi:10.1177/009102601204100509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Can bureaucracy benefit organizational women? Administration & Society, 41(3), 340–363. doi:10.1177/0095399709334643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denhardt, R. B., & Perkins, J. (1976). The coming of death of administrative man. Public Administration Review, 36(4), 379–384. doi:10.2307/974841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, J. R. (2001). Referral hiring and ethnically homogenous jobs: How prevalent is the connection and for whom? Social Science Research, 30(3), 401–425. doi:10.1006/ssre.2001.0704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000a). Advancing gender equity in organizations; The importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization, 74, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000b). Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change. In Research in Organizational Behavior, Chapter 11. London, UK: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. E. (1983). Bureaucracy and public life: The femininization of the polity. Administration & Society, 15(3), 295–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, R. M., & Mors, M. L. (2008). Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Social Science Research, 37(4), 1061–1080. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin, C. (1985, February). Monitoring costs and occupational segregation by sex: An historical analysis (NBER Working Paper 1560). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w1560.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, E. H. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organization variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70(4), 702–728. doi:10.1177/000312240507000408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., & Fenley, V. M. (2014). Inch by inch: Gender equity since the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(1), 40–58. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 13510379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, M. E., & Spice, S. (2009). Gender and workplace issues. In S. W. Hays, R. C. Kearney, & J. D. Coggburn (Eds.), Public human resource management: Problems and prospects (5th ed.) (pp. 236–252). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, C. (2005). The rational feminist: Enhancing administrative theory through object models. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(2), 377–384.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyman, M., & Duer, H. (2004). A typology of workplace policies: Worker friendly versus family friendly? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24(2), 113–132. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 03260845
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C. W., & Winslow, W. (2006). Gender representation in the federal workforce. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26(3), 276–295. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 05281785
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. R., & Mann, H. S. (2004). Feminist praxis: Administering for a multicultural, multigendered public. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(1), 79–95. doi:10.1080/10841806.2004.11029429.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. R., & Mann, H. S. (2006). Gender anarchy and the future of feminisms in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28(3), 399–417. doi:10.1080/10841806.2006.11029536.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantari, B. (2012). The influence of social values and childhood socialization on occupational gender segregation and wage disparity. Public Personnel Management, 41(2), 241–255. doi:10.1177/009102601204100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M. (1977/2008). Men and women of the corporation (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kmec, J. A. (2005). Setting occupational sex segregation in motion demand-side explanations of sex traditional employment. Work and Occupations, 32(3), 332–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. 2010. Toward new conceptions of work-life balance: A session on recognizing the role of men in achieving work-life balance in a globalized world. Retrieved from Middlesex University (UK) Research Repository: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/4493.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, X. J., & Guy, M. E. (2014). How emotional labor and ethical leadership affect job engagement for Chinese public servants. Public Personnel Management, 43(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/0091026013512278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. Y. (2003). “Said and done” versus “saying and doing”: Gendering practices, practicing gender at work. Gender & Society, 17(3), 342–366. doi:10.1177/0891243203017003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S. H. (2013). Time use on care giving activities: Comparing federal government and private sector workers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(1), 3–27. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 12436982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S. H., & Bowman, L. (2015). Public agencies, gendered organizations: The future of gender studies in public management. Public Management Review, 17(6), 857–875. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.867067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastracci, S. H., Newman, M. A., & Guy, M. E. (2006). Appraising emotion work: Determining whether emotional labor is valued in government jobs. American Review of Public Administration, 36(2), 123–138. doi:10.1177/0275074005280642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos, K., & Galinsky, E. (2012). National study of employers. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute, Society for Human Resource Management. http://familiesandwork.org/downloads/2012NationalStudyofEmployers.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (1999). Crossing: A memoir. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCurdy, A. H., Newman, M. A., & Lovrich, N. P. (2002). Family-friendly workplace policy adoption in general and special purpose local governments. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22(1), 27–51. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 0202200102
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, P., Brown, K., & Bradley, L. (2005). Explanations for the provision-utilization gap in work/life policy. Women in Management Review, 20(1), 37–55. doi:10.1108/09649420510579568
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, B. D. (2008). A feminist post-structuralist analysis of HRD: Why bodies, power, and reflexivity matter. Human Resource Development International, 11(5), 447–463. doi:10.1080/13678860802417569
   Google Scholar
• Meyerson, D. E., & Kolb, D. M. (2000). Moving out of the “armchair”: Developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, 7(4), 553–571. doi:10.1177/135050840074003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgen, S. (1994). Personalizing personnel decisions in feminist organizational theory and practice. Human Relations, 47(6), 665–684. doi:10.1177/001872679404700605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naff, K. C. (1994). Through the glass ceiling: Prospects for the advancement of women in the federal civil service. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 507–514. doi:10.2307/976669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, M. A. (1995). The gendered nature of Lowi's typology; or, Who would guess you could find gender here? In G. Duerst-Lahti & R. M. Kelly (Eds.), Gender, power, leadership and governance (pp. 141–164). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. (2010). A strategic agenda for public human resource management research. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 20–43. doi:10.1177/0734371 × 09351821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, D. J. (2005). Organizational genealogies and the persistence of gender inequality: The case of Silicon Valley law firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 440–472. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., Sidanius, J., & Siers, B. (1997). The gender gap in occupational role attainment: A social dominance approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 37–53. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.72.1.37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccucci, N. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69(3), 373–382. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.01984.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1996). Gender and social interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(3), 173–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibl, F., & Dex, S. (1998). Should we have more family-friendly policies? European Management Review, 16(5), 586–599. doi:10.1016/s0263-2373(98)00035-8
   Google Scholar
• Skuratowicz, E., & Hunter, L. (2004). Where do women's jobs come from? Job re-segregation in an American bank. Work and Occupations, 31(1), 73–110. doi:10.1177/0730888403259779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson, J., & Stokoe, E. H. (2005). Discourses of work/life balance: Negotiating “gender blind” terms in organizations. Gender, Work, and Organizations, 12(2), 147–168. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2005.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2000). Bureau men, settlement women: Constructing public administration in the progressive era. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2002). Gender images in public administration (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, C. (2010). A tactless question: A rejoinder to the forum on “Bureau men, settlement women.” Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(2), 220–224. doi:10.2753/atp1084-1806320205
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C., & Dempsey, R. (2014). What Works for Women at Work: Four Patterns Working Women Need to Know. New York and London: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S. B., & Guy, M. E. (2015). Gender effects on emotional labor in Seoul metropolitan area. Public Personnel Management, 44(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/0091026014550491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar